Quantcast
Channel: Double Portion Inheritance
Viewing all 108 articles
Browse latest View live

Pilgrims Banned Christmas & Easter, Kept Biblical Feasts, and Thanksgiving

$
0
0
By Maria Merola

Over the years I have read historical accounts about the Early American Settlers who came over on the Mayflower from England to America. Some historical accounts have tried to make the Pilgrims appear to be brutal, merciless killers of the Native American Indians. But other historical accounts reveal that while they were not perfect people, for the most part, they were people who revered the Holy Scriptures and obeyed the Torah (Mosaic Law).

Ever since I was a child in the Catholic School, I can remember being told that the Pilgrims were “witch-hunters” who performed ruthless executions of those found to be practicing divination. While I don’t doubt that some of these accounts could be true, I have also been aware of the fact that the Jesuit order of Catholic Priests in the Vatican have been notorious for trying to discredit the Protestant Reformation ever since the 1500’s. The Jesuits aka “the Illuminati” have re-written our Public School history books to make the Pilgrims appear to be savages. They want to discredit the Protestant Reformation and the early Reformers for their stand against the Roman Catholic Church. The Jesuits want to make it appear that the Pilgrims were not obedient to the Scriptures and that they were wrong to rebel against the authority of the Pope. And so there is a hidden agenda I believe to discredit the Pilgrims who came over on the Mayflower.

I honestly believe that both sides (Pilgrims and Native Americans) were not 100% innocent and both sides were partially wrong in many instances. There were Pilgrims who probably unjustly killed the Indians, but there were probably an equal amount of killers in the camp of the Native Americans as well. The Native Americans have been proven in recent years to be “lost tribes of Yisra’el” and yet many of them engaged in pagan idolatry, and sun-god worship. I would venture to say that the Pilgrims had what they would call “biblical” reasons for exterminating some of the Native Americans, as they probably saw themselves like the Ancient Yisra’elites coming into the “Promised Land” and they probably viewed the Native American Indians as “idolaters” who bowed to graven images and smoked peace pipes in an act of worship to their pagan sun-gods. According to Exodus 22:18, it is written “thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” Based on this commandment, the Pilgrims thought that they were obeying the commandments of YaHuwaH when they exterminated any Native American Indian who worshiped a graven image or smoked peace pipes to their deities. The Pilgrims probably thought of themselves as the chosen Covenant people who followed the scriptures, while the Native American Indians were viewed to be like the Canaanites who were occupying the land that was rightfully promised to them.

In reality, many of the Native American Indians as well as the Puritans were both descendants of the Lost Sheep of the House of Yisra’el.  If only they could have recognized one another as such, perhaps there would have been more unity between them and less fighting. Regardless of “who is right and who is wrong,” I will not try to decipher. I tend to believe that there was probably sin on both sides (Native Americans & Pilgrims).

Thanksgiving Holiday: Pagan or Biblical?

There are some people who want to purport that Thanksgiving Day is another pagan holiday meant to commemorate Nimrod. They say that it is the same day that the witches celebrate on September 21st called “Mabon” but this is not even close to the truth. First of all, we are shown in scripture that there is no “bad time of year” to give thanks to YaHuWaH for the things he has given us throughout the year. To those who would say “where is the word Thanksgiving found in scripture?”  There are several places in scripture where we are commanded to give thanks:

Wayyikra (Leviticus) 7:12 If he offer it for a thanksgiving, then he shall offer with the sacrifice of thanksgiving unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers anointed with oil, and cakes mingled with oil, of fine flour, fried.

Wayyikra (Leviticus) 7:13 Besides the cakes, he shall offer for his offering leavened bread with the sacrifice of thanksgiving of his peace offerings.

Wayyikra (Leviticus) 7:15 And the flesh of the sacrifice of his peace offerings for thanksgiving shall be eaten the same day that it is offered; he shall not leave any of it until the morning.

Wayyikra (Leviticus) 22:29 And when ye will offer a sacrifice of thanksgiving unto YHWH, offer it at your own will.

NehemYah (Nehemiah) 11:17 And Mattaniah the son of Micha, the son of Zabdi, the son of Asaph, was the principal to begin the thanksgiving in prayer: and Bakbukiah the second among his brethren, and Abda the son of Shammua, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun.

NehemYah (Nehemiah) 12:8 Moreover the Levites: Jeshua, Binnui, Kadmiel, Sherebiah, Judah, and Mattaniah, which was over the thanksgiving, he and his brethren.

NehemYah (Nehemiah) 12:27 And at the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem they sought the Levites out of all their places, to bring them to Jerusalem, to keep the dedication with gladness, both with thanksgivings, and with singing, with cymbals, psalteries, and with harps.

NehemYah (Nehemiah) 12:46 For in the days of David and Asaph of old there were chief of the singers, and songs of praise and thanksgiving unto Elohiym (God).

Tehillim (Psalm) 26:7 That I may publish with the voice of thanksgiving, and tell of all your wondrous works.

Tehillim (Psalm) 50:14 Offer unto Elohiym (God) thanksgiving; and pay your vows unto the most High:

To those who want to associate Thanksgiving with Mabon, let’s see what YaHuWaH says about celebrating The Feast of Tabernacles  or “Ingathering” at the Harvest Time:

Shemoth (Exodus) 23:16 And the feast of harvest, the firstfruits of your labours, which you have sown in the field: and the feast of ingathering, which is in the end of the year, when you have gathered in your labours out of the field.

Shemoth (Exodus) 34:22 And you shall observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year’s end.

Now just because Satan is a copycat and a counterfeiter, whose form of Harvest should we celebrate in the Fall? Satan’s Mabon or the Feast of Tabernacles? Just because they happen to fall around the same time of year, are we supposed to no longer celebrate the Feast of Ingathering or Harvest unto YaHuWaH?

Now, I celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles each year according to the Biblical Calendar, but so what if we celebrate an American Tradition that is meant to honor YaHuWaH and give thanks to him? Are all traditions against Torah? Does Thanksgiving violate the word of Yah?

I cannot find one thing pagan about Thanksgiving.

Mabon is celebrated in September not November, so there is no connection here. The first thing I want to do is illustrate that the Pilgrims were very conscientious about not violating Yah’s word, and they would NEVER have celebrated a pagan holiday known as “Mabon” but instead, they were careful to keep all of the Holy Feasts of YaHuWaH. This is why this argument does not hold water, and it is apparent that our history books have been re-written to discredit the Pilgrims because of their stand for the truth of scripture.

The Origins of Thanksgiving


The “Thanksgiving” we now celebrate (a feast of togetherness between the Native Americans--was not the original gathering). It is true that Squanto and his fellow Native Americans helped the Pilgrims to grow crops and get sap from trees and survive the harsh winters of what would become New England. But the very first harvest feast that these two peoples enjoyed was not called Thanksgiving. Rather it was a celebration of the fall harvest, when vegetables were pulled from the ground and off stalks and made ready for a big meal.

Pilgrims and Native Americans dined together at the same tables, yes, and they played games together and demonstrated their bow-and-arrow and musket-shooting skills to each other. But they didn't call it Thanksgiving until 1624.

That year William Bradford, the governor of the Plymouth Colony, proclaimed a day of thanksgiving that was really a day of fasting and prayer. (Remember, fasting is when you don’t eat. So, Thanksgiving started out as a day of not eating.) And the day the members of the Plymouth Colony celebrated this day of fasting and prayer in thanksgiving was November 29th.

So we have two ideas coming together: a day of thanksgiving for the fall harvest, on which people fasted and prayed, and a great feast to celebrate the bounty of the fall harvest. Since both activities celebrated the same thing--the fall harvest—it’s only natural that they eventually merged (like so many other American holidays).

This merged celebration continued informally through the years, until 1863, when President Abraham Lincoln declared the fourth Thursday of November a national holiday called Thanksgiving.

The Early Settlers and Pilgrims were Torah Observant followers of Messiah

In the 1600’s it was against the law in America to celebrate the pagan holidays instituted by the Papacy (i.e. Christmas, Easter etc.). These were handed down from the Tower of Babel and made to look “Christian” by Constantine in the 3rd Century, but they never were meant to honor the true God of Yisra’el. They were always meant to commemorate the pagan sun gods who were always reincarnated each December 25th. YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) was then “lumped in” with all of those false Messiah’s, even though he was born on the Feast of Tabernacles in the fall.

It was not until the Papacy began to take on a stronghold in American life, that the “falling away” began in America, and gradually since the 1900’s, Protestant Churches began to adopt the customs of the Papacy (Beast of Revelation 17). Prior to the 1900’s, most Protestant Churches did not keep Christmas or Easter.

Hence, today, we have deviated greatly from what the Protestant Reformers fought so hard against in order to gain freedom from the Papacy and all of it’s Babylonian customs.

Another “Reformation” is in order again today, and I believe it will begin when those who are part of Yah’s Remnant will “come out of her” (Revelation 18:4) pertaining to the Mother of Harlots, and her false Baal worship religion that she has masked to look “Christian.” Let’s give thanks to the Creator of Yisra’el, YaHuWaH, who came in the flesh as YaHuW’shuwa our Messiah!

At this website, evidence is provided about the Early American Settlers who came over from England on the Mayflower. These Pilgrims were Torah Observant and would have nothing to do with the Papacy or the customs of Rome.

Early Settlers Kept the Seventh Day Sabbath


It has been reported that the first Sabbath-keeper in America was Stephen Mumford who came as a missionary from London in 1664, and brought the opinion with him that the whole of the ten commandments, as they were delivered from Mount Sinai, were moral and immutable; and that it was the anti-Christian power which thought to change times and laws, that changed the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day of the week (Andrews, pp. 498-499).

Although it is not commonly taught, some of the Puritans kept the Sabbath.

In a book by Dr. Samuel Kohn, chief Rabbi of Budapest, Hungary, in the late 1800s provided this information:

Already around the year 1530 Sabbatarians emerged in Bohemia Sabbatarians (Subbotniki), or Judaizers also arose soon thereafter in Silesia, Poland and Russia; in the latter, where they were frequently confused with the Jews in the second half of this century, remain until today. We meet similar sects around 1545 among the Quakers in England. Several leaders and preacher of the Puritans, imbued with the Old Testament spirit, likewise raised the issue of reinstating the day of rest from Sunday to Saturday (Kohn S. Translated by T. McElwain and B. Rook. Sabbatarians in Transylvania. Christian Churches of God, Wooden (Australia), 1998, p.10-11).

Here is another report which also reports that once in America, there were Sabbatarians among the Puritans (as well as the position against Christmas, which is also a Church of God position):

Strange as it may seem, in the early history of America there was an attempt at suppression of Christmas spirit. The stern Puritans at Plymouth, imbued with the rigorous fervor of the Old Testament, abhorred the celebration of the orthodox holidays. Their worship was on the Sabbath (Saturday), rather than Sunday, and Christmas in particular they considered a pagan celebration. Later immigrants attempted to observe Christmas as a time of joy, but were suppressed. Governor Bradford, Elder Brewster, Miles Standish and other leaders were firm against the yuletide spirit as we know it today (Sprague H. Letter from the editor. St. Joseph, Mo., Daily Gazette, December 1934 as cited in Dugger AN, Dodd CO. A History of True Religion, 3rd ed. Jerusalem, 1972 (Church of God, 7th Day). 1990 reprint, p. 265).

In addition, those Puritans even had the Native Americans observe the Sabbath as well:

... Adopt the Puritan pace and mode of work, which meant long days of agricultural labor. Insisting upon the gendered division of labor favored by the English, the missionaries urged the Indian men to forsake hunting and fishing in favor of farming. The Indian women were supposed to withdraw ... had to rest and worship on the seventh day, the Sabbath. Praying towns did not appeal to those Indians who belonged to the largest and most autonomous bands, principally the Narragansett (Taylor A. American Colonies : The Settling of North America; The Penguin History of the United States, Volume1, Hist of the USA. (Paperback) Penguin, New York; Reprint edition, July 30, 2002).

That some of the Puritans kept the seventh-day Sabbath should not be a surprised as the Church of God includes in its ancestry (see articles The Churches of Revelation 2 & 3 and The Pergamos Church Era), people who were called the Cathari (from the Greek word, katharoi, meaning pure).

Michael Scheifler provides insight into historic facts about the Early Settlers in America




Christmas Banned by Protestants after the Reformation

On this website we see that the Reformers and the Pilgrims fought to keep these pagan holidays of Christmas and Easter out of the church, yet these pagan customs in our Apostate American Churches have prevailed:

The Pagan History of Christmas
by Dr. Joel Ehrlich of Hebraic Renewal

“…We find in the Catholic encyclopedia that Christmas was not even among the earliest church festivals. It was not until the latter part of the fourth century that the Roman Church began observing December 25th as Jesus’ birthday. By the fifth century A.D., the Roman Church ordered the birth of Messiah to be forever observed on December 25th. At the time of this decree, the Roman Church knew full well that the pagan religious cults throughout the Roman and Greek worlds celebrated the pagan sun god, Mithra, on this self-same day. This winter festival was known as the Nativity of the Sun. It was also known in the Roman Empire as Saturnalia [another name for sun worship].

*Note: In 46 BC, when the Roman “Julian Calendar” was adopted, December 24th was the shortest day of the year. Therefore, December 25th was the first annual day that daylight began to increase. Thus, the origin of the REBIRTH or Annual Birthday of the Invincible SUN.

In accordance with the Roman “Julian calendar,” the “Saturnalia” festival appears to have taken place on December 17th; it was preceded by the “Consualia” near December 15th, and followed by the “Opalia” on December 19th. These pagan celebrations typically lasted for a week, ending just before the late Roman Imperial Festival for “Sol Invictus”(Invincible Sun) on December 25th.

In 1582 A.D., Roman Catholic Pope Gregory the XIII caused the current “Gregorian Calendar” to be adopted, in order to eliminate the solar time shift error introduced by the “Julian Calendar.”

By December 1582 A.D. the shortest day of the year had shifted 12 days on the Roman “Julian Calendar” to Wednesday, December 12, 1582. However, the Original December 25th ‘Birth Date’ was retained for all pagan Sun gods by the Roman “Saturnalia” and “Sol Invictus” traditions; which were now called the “Twelve Days of Christ Mass.”

On the new Roman Catholic Gregorian calendar the shortest annual day was numerically shifted back 10 days to the 22nd of December, where it remains to this day; while the original order of the days of the week remained unchanged. Therefore, Wednesday, December 12th, 1582 A.D., became Wednesday, December 22nd, 1582 AD, and the True Sabbath Day remained unchanged. YHWH, the Only True YHWH, would never have allowed The True Messiah to be born on or near the December 25th birthday period of the pagan sun gods; during the time in which virgins were sacrificed, murder was commonplace, and orgies the norm. This would be an entirely unacceptable association.

The winter festival was very popular in ancient times, and marked a time of rejoicing and festivity. Much of our present day customs involved in the Christmas season are a direct inheritance of the Roman winter festival of Saturnalia. These days involved gift giving, colored lights to ward off evil spirits, festive meals, and of course, decorated trees.

The present day Christmas tree also goes back to the worship of sacred trees in the ancient Babylonian system. The green evergreen symbolized the incarnate Baal coming to life through the incarnate baby Tammuz. The custom of decorating and worshiping trees spread throughout the known world, with the variety of tree used selected according to the natural growth of each area of the world. The Druids worshiped the oak tree; the Egyptians worshiped the palm tree, while in Rome it was the fir tree.

There are at least ten references in the Bible warning that these green trees were associated with idolatry and pagan worship. Jeremiah 10:1-4 details the Yisra’elites following the very pagan customs practiced today with the Christmas Tree…

…The reason Yah warns against the worship of the signs of heaven in association with this custom is that it was associated with the worship of the sun. The very term, Christmas, comes from the sacred Christ-mass, where the Pope in the role of the High Priest of the mystery Babylon religion introduces the people to the concept of trans-substantiation. Using the wine and round wafers to reflect the life of Baal, the sun god, the name of Jesus replaces the ancient pagan custom. The wine and wafers are now said to be the transformation of the actual blood and body of Messiah within the person who ingests them. People, thereby, relive again and again the death and resurrection of the incarnate god…It would surprise most Christians to learn that the history of the church is filled with historic battles over these very doctrinal issues. Many of the reformation movements in the church made drastic attempts to get away from these pagan holidays.

Calvin, in 1550, instigated an edict concerning church holidays. A ban was passed against observing various church festivals, which included Christmas. In a tract on the necessity of reforming the church, Calvin exclaimed: “I know how difficult it is to persuade the world that YHWH disapproves of all modes of worship not expressly sanctioned by His Word.”

John Knox, in the Scottish reformation, repeatedly confronted the Catholic Church, contending that true worship must be instituted by Yah, not derived from the traditions of men. At the heart of his argument was an appeal to Torah, especially, references to Deuteronomy 4 and 12, which state that one must not add to nor subtract from Yah’s word.

John Knox, History of the Reformation in Scotland, 1950, Vol. 1, page 91 states the following: “That YHWH’s word damns your ceremonies it is evident; for the plain and straight has not commanded your ceremonies… “Not that thing which appears good in your eyes, shall you do to YHWH your Elohiym, but what YHWH your Elohiym has commanded thee that do you; add nothing to it; diminish nothing from it.”

Christmas and Easter Banned from the Church of Scotland

David Calderwood [1511-1651], representing the Scottish ministries, asserted in reference to Christmas and Easter: “The Judaical days had once that honor, as to be appointed by YHWH Himself; but the anniversary days appointed by men have not like honor. This opinion of Christ’s nativity on the 25th day of December was bred at Rome.”

David Calderwood then exposed the Roman claims made for the 25th of December as the day of Messiah’s birth. He argues that the Apostles never ordained it. He said the following: “Nay, let us utter the truth, December-Christmas is a just imitation of the December-Saturnalia of the ethnic [heathen] Romans, and so used as if Bacchus [another name for the sun god], and not Messiah, were the Yahweh of Christians.”

George Gillespie [1613-1649], a premier Scottish theologian, wrote in a book published in 1637 called A Dispute Against the English Popish Ceremonies Obtruded Upon the Church of Scotland. “The holidays [reference to Christmas and Easter] take a severe beating on a number of accounts. Sacred significant ceremonies devised by man are to be reckoned among images forbidden in the second commandment in regards to worshiping idols.”

The English Puritans fought to ban the worship of Christmas and Easter. They resorted to Galatians 4:8-11, which many Christians have used to say that it is referring to Yah not wanting believers to worship Jewish holidays. However, this is wrong on several accounts:

1. These scriptures are specifically referring to a people brought near to Yah through Messiah, who were former pagans.

2. Apostle Paul himself, as detailed throughout the book of Acts, worshiped YHWH ordained feasts.

3. If we were taking these scriptures as an argument for Messiah doing away with Torah, then this would put it in direct conflict with YaHuW’shuwa’s statement in Matthew 5:17, where he stated he did not come to do away with Torah, nor the prophets. In Galatians 4:8-11 Paul speaking by the Holy Spirit wrote to the Galatians that they were still observing pagan feasts which kept them in bondage:

Galatians 4:

8 Howbeit then, when ye knew not Elohiym, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. (Obviously referring to pagan holidays)

9 But now, after that ye have known Elohiym, or rather are known of Elohiym, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?

10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. (Pagan feasts)

11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.

History records that when the Puritans came to power in England, Parliament, in June, 1647, passed legislation abolishing Christmas and other holidays. In this legislation, they wrote the following: “For as much as the feast of the nativity of Christ, Easter, and other festivals, commonly called holy days, have been here-to-fore superstitiously used and observed; be it ordained that the said feasts, and all other festivals, commonly called holy days, be no longer observed as festivals.”

The American Puritan movement took an even stronger stand against these pagan holidays. Samuel Miller, a Puritan and professor of history and church government at Princeton Seminary, stated in 1896 in his book, why Presbyterians reject the holy days of Christmas and Easter. He stated that “the Scriptures were the only infallible rule of faith and practice, and that no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of YHWH, which is not warranted in Scripture. Not only does the celebration of non-biblical holidays lack a scriptural foundation, but the scriptures positively discount it.” [Miller, pgs. 65, 74]Presbyterians were not the only ones who maintained a strong stand against Christmas, as there were many other Christians who held to similar convictions. As a matter of fact, the famous preacher, Charles Spurgeon, stated in a sermon given on Christmas Eve, December 24th 1871, the following:

“We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas: first, because we do not believe in the mass at all, but abhor it, whether it be said or sung in Latin or English; and secondly, because we find no scriptural warrant whatever for observing any day as the birthday of the Savior; and, consequently, it’s observance is a superstition, because not of divine authority.” [C. H. Spurgeon, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, 1971, pg. 697]

Opposition to these church holidays remained in American Presbyterianism through the latter half of the 19th century. Speaking following the Civil War, historian Ernest Trice Thompson wrote the following:

“There was no recognition of either Christmas or Easter in any of the Protestant churches, except the Episcopal and Lutheran. For a full generation after the Civil War, the religious journals of the South mentioned Christmas only to observe that there was no reason to believe that Jesus was actually born on December 25th; it was not recognized as a day of any religious significance in the Presbyterian Church” [Ernest Trice Thompson, Presbyterians In the South, 1973, Vol. 2, pg. 434.] FSCG Note: Alabama was the USA State to recognize Christmas, and did not do so until 1836. [“Tidbits,” Cheyenne, Wy. 82007, Burchett Publishing, Issue #271]

It was not until the turn of the 19th century that various Christmas customs began appearing in Presbyterian churches. There began to be reports of: 1) Frivolities like Saint Nicholas in children’s Sunday schools. 2) Use of Christmas trees and other festivities.

The appearance of Easter and Christmas in the official calendar of the Southern Presbyterian church did not actually occur until the late 1940s and 1950s, as a work of growing apostasy in the church. Even so, as late as 1962, the Synod of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland stated that they rejected the celebrations of Christmas and Easter [History of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland, 1893-1970, pg. 383].Christmas has clearly brought an infusion of paganism into the church that was initially prohibited among all of Yah’s people…..”

Below, you will find a teaching from my Messianic Rabbi friend Adam J. Bernay. Adam shares how the Pilgrims who came over on the Mayflower kept all of Yah’s Holy Feast days (Leviticus 23) to include the Feast of Tabernacles (which later on became Thanksgiving). The Pilgrims kept “the Feast of Ingathering” and proclaimed a “thanksgiving” according to the Calendar of YHWH on the 15th day of the 7th Hebrew month (generally around September/October depending on the moons). Later on, Abraham Lincoln changed the date to the last Thursday in November and made it an official American Holiday. More than likely Abraham Lincoln was not even aware that the Pilgrims were celebrating the Feast of Tabernacles in the Hebrew month of Tishri (in Autumn), and so he simply chose a random date whereby we would “give thanks” as a nation to YaHuWaH.

The Hebraic Origins of Thanksgiving
By Adam J. Bernay


This was my opening segment on Saturday’s BEYOND SALVATION RADIO SHOW and also one of my THREE teachings at Sabbath services (a triple blessing this week):

This coming week, families and friends all across America will sit down to enjoy Thanksgiving Dinner, with only the faintest idea why they’re doing it. In most schools, the history told is a very simple one: the Pilgrims, having survived their first winter in the New World, held a feast to celebrate their first harvest, and invited the local Natives to join them. Which is true, as far as that story goes. But, as is the case with history, the full story is actually a lot more interesting…

We should begin by asking ourselves, who were the Pilgrims? The standard answer – that they were people who fled England so that they may live and worship as they pleased – is also true, as far as it goes. But what was the problem with living and worshiping as they pleased? What shocking breach of English Christian society did they commit on a regular basis?

The answer – the full answer – is that these Anabaptists were what I call on my show Torah Observant. They kept the “Law of Moses,” as their Anglican cousins said. They worshiped not on the first day of the week but the seventh. They didn’t eat pork, shellfish, blood, or anything else forbidden in the first five books of the Bible. They didn’t keep Christmas or Easter, and they did keep Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the Day of the First Fruits, Pentecost, the Day of Blowing the Trumpets, the Day of Atonement… and, most importantly for today’s discussion, they kept the Feast of Tabernacles, called in Hebrew Sukkot.

How do we know this? Well, there are many historical proofs one may offer. First off, you might not know that America was not their first destination when they left England. No, first they went to Holland, where there was full and complete religious freedom. In Holland were not only Jews – including a large group of Sephardic Jews, Jews from the Spanish-speaking countries, in this case specifically from Spain, from where they’d been forced to leave during the Spanish Inquisition – and beyond Jews, there were other Torah Observant Christians! They stayed in Holland for some years, and then came to the New World, where they set up a government and society based on not English common law, but on the Laws of the Bible. Here is a quote from “THE JOURNAL OF THE PILGRIMS AT PLYMOUTH, IN NEW ENGLAND, IN 1620” as edited by Dr. George B. Cheever, Doctorate of Divinity, a famous Christian pastor during the early 1800s, and prolific Christian author:

Now it is remarkable that in the first great instance of capital legislation in this country, our Pilgrim Fathers went not to the laws of England for their guidance, but to those of YHWH. On this point Dr. Bacon of New Haven has written admirably. “What system of legislation should the colonists take in founding a New World? They could not instantly frame a new system; it must be the work of time and experience. Should they take the laws of England? Those were the very laws from which they fled. Those laws would subject them at once to the king, to the parliament, and to the prelates, in their several jurisdictions. The adoption of the laws of England would have been fatal to the object of their emigration.”

They could not take the Roman civil law; but they had a code of laws in every man's hand in the Bible, laws given to a community emigrating, like themselves, from their native country, for the great purpose of maintaining in simplicity and purity the worship of the one true Creator YHWH.

Like the Yisra’elites of old, they were to be a people surrounded by the heathen, and intermingled among them, and needing the influence of laws framed with a special reference to such a corrupting neighborhood and intercourse. Like the Hebrews also they were a free republican people, and needed laws for a community where there was no absolute power, where there were no privileged classes; laws, whose aim should be that equal and exact justice which is the only freedom. …

Dr. Bacon well remarks that “the greatest and boldest improvement which has been made in criminal jurisprudence by any one act since the dark ages, was that which was made by our fathers, when they determined that the judicial laws of YHWH as they were delivered by Moses, should be accounted of moral equity, and generally bind all offenders, and be a rule to all the courts.”

So, we see, that they lived by “the laws of YHWH as they were delivered by Moses,” which would include the keeping of a particular harvest festival known in English as the Feast of Tabernacles – or Feast of Booths, depending on your translation. We know they had three days of actual celebrating, which are the same as the three days during the Feast when all work is stopped and the focus is fully on celebrating YHWH’s Bounty.

And finally, on last bit of historic proof, one based on a bit of language. You may have had the dish they created, a mixture of harvest vegetables called Succotash. Well, knowing that Succotash is a compound word, and knowing that Englishmen have a tendency to drop the H’s at the beginnings of words, we can see that this fall delicacy began life as the Pilgrims’s “Sukkot Hash.” Cool… huh?


What Real Witches Practice After Halloween

$
0
0
http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/ghostbuster-wicca.htm

All Hallow’s Eve Is More than Candy and Playtime for Some Members of Society.

Halloween comes and goes for most of us. But for members of Wicca--one of the fastest growing religions in the world--the season of Samhain is a magic time.

The Halloween Sabbat (celebration) concludes for Wiccans on November 1st with the final turn of the year-wheel. Mother Earth nods a sad farewell to the god who will be reborn at Yule (December 20), and the life cycle begins anew. This is a time to honor the Earth Mother, remember the Ancients, and revere the horned-god of the Hunt.

According to the Celtic Almanac, the Wiccan year begins following Halloween. The seasonal scenario that follows is reminiscent of the earth goddess and dying-god cults of ancient civilizations.

* Yule is on December 20 and celebrates the goddess giving birth to the Sun god.

* The next season is Imbolc and marks the recovery of the goddess after giving birth to the god.

* The Spring Equinox (Ostara) marks the first day of Spring. The goddess awakes as the days grow longer and the light overtakes the darkness. The goddess fills the earth with fertility.

* Beltane celebrates the transformation of the boy god into manhood. He is filled with lust for the goddess and lies with her in the grass. The earth becomes pregnant with her vitality. Crops begin to grow. Flowers bloom.

* Litha (midsummer) arrives as the powers of nature escalate. The Earth Mother is filled with fertility. Wiccans practice numerous kinds of magic during this season.

* The next season is Lughnasadh, the time of the first harvest. The Wiccan god begins to lose his strength as the Sun rises higher each day. The nights grow longer. The god begins to die.

* Mabon is the completion of the harvest. The Wiccan god suffers death, draws back into darkness, and waits to be reborn at Yule.
The Wicca year-cycle described above is similar to concepts held by early pagans who viewed the natural world with awe and superstition. Ancients watched the changing of the seasons and wondered about the life and death of crops. They perceived such natural processes as mystic, and developed fertility cults with gods and goddesses who died and were reborn. The worship of the earth’s “spirit” as a mother, and the incarnation of the earth’s fertility forces within dying gods and goddesses, developed into one of the most widespread forms of paganism in antiquity.
                                                               
Eight Pagan Sabbaths Celebrated by Witches Made to Appear “Christians.”

1.) Imbolc (Saint Valentine’s Day): February 2nd -February 15th

2.) Ostara (Easter) Rome changed it to Passover week to identify her with Messiah’s Resurrection: March 21st -March 25th (Pope changed to Passover week to confuse with Christ)

3.) Beltane (Mayfest) (goddess of fertility/Mary) May 1st

4.) Midsummer Solstice (First Day of Summer) June 21st (Catholics call it St. John’s Day)

5.) Lugnasad (Catholic Mary’s Ascension) August 1st -August 15th

6.) Mabon (First Day of Autumn) September 21st

7.) Samhain (Halloween) Catholic “All-Saints Day” and “All-Souls Day” October 31st

8.) Yule (Christmas) birthday of false Christ: December 21st -December 25th

The “Yule” Wheel is a pagan representation of all the annual celebrations offered up to the pagan sun god and moon goddess in their many different “reincarnated” forms. The wheel has eight segments signifying “eight pagan Sabbaths” each year. Notice the five pointed star of witchcraft also called the “Eastern Star.” The star is within a circle representing the sun god, Baal.

This is the Pagan Yule Wheel used by witches and Wiccans. You will notice that all of these pagan feasts are on important “Christian” holidays. Yule is Christmas; Ostara is Easter; Beltane is Mayfest; Imbolic is Saint Valentine’s Day; Lughnasadh is the “Assumption of Mary” in the Catholic Church; Samhain is “All-Saints” Day or Halloween.


Whether it was Inanna of the Sumerians, Ishtar of the Babylonians, or Fortuna of the Romans, every civilization had a sect of religion based on the embodiment of the earth’s spirit as a caring mother-goddess. The Egyptians worshipped Hathor in this way, as did the Chinese, Shingmoo. The Germans worshipped Hertha as the great Mother Earth, and the apostate Jews idolized “the queen of heaven.” In Greece, the queen of the Olympian goddesses and Mother Earth was Hera. Before her was Gaia (Gaea), the creator-mother earth, and beneath her were many other earth goddesses including Demeter, Artemis, Aphrodite, and Hecate.

MOTHER EARTH TODAY . . . AND IN ANTIQUITY

The principal idea was, and evidently still is among Wiccans, that the Earth is a sentient being. The ancient and universally accepted idea that the “living Earth” was also a fertile mother was conceptualized in different ways and in various goddess myths and images throughout the ancient world. In The Golden Asse, by second century Roman philosopher Lucius Apuleius, the spirit of the earth was perceived as a feminine force that could express itself at various times and to different people within the goddess mothers. Note how Lucius prays to the earth spirit:

O blessed Queene of Heaven, whether thou be the Dame Ceres [Demeter] which art the original and motherly source of all fruitful things in earth, who after the finding of thy daughter Proserpina [Persephone], through thy great joy which thou diddest presently conceive, madest barraine and unfruitful ground to be plowed and sowne, and now thou inhabitest in the land of Eleusie [Eleusis]; or whether thou be the celestiall Venus [or] horrible Proserpina, thou hast the power to stoppe and put away the invasion of the hags and ghoasts which appeare unto men, and to keep them downe in the closures [womb] of the earth; thou which nourishest all the fruits of the world by thy vigor and force; with whatsoever name is or fashion it is lawful to call upon thee, I pray thee, to end my great travaile.

The earth spirit responds to Lucius:

Behold Lucius I am come, thy weeping and prayers hath moved me to succor thee. I am she that is the natural mother of all things, mistress and governess of all the elements, the initial progeny of worlds, chief of powers divine, Queene of heaven, the principal of the Gods celestial, the light of the goddesses: at my will the planets of the ayre [air], the wholesome winds of the Seas, and the silence of hell be disposed; my name, my divinity is adored throughout all the world in divers manners, in variable customs and in many names, for the Phrygians call me the mother of the Gods: the Athenians, Minerva: the Cyprians, Venus: the Canadians, Diana: the Sicilians, Proserpina: the Eleusians, Ceres: some Juno, other Bellona, other Hecate: and principally the aethiopians, Queene Isis.

One could assume, based on such texts, that a single spiritual source (or realm) energized the many goddess myths. Likewise, in the ancient Hymn, To Earth, The Mother Of All, Homer illustrates how the earth-spirit was universally involved in the affairs and lives of nations. Through Homer’s dedication to the earth we discover how far-reaching and omnipresent the mother-earth spirit was thought to be:

I will sing of well-founded Earth, mother of all, eldest of all beings. She feeds all creatures that are in the world, all that go upon the goodly land, and all that are in the paths of the seas, and all that fly: all these are fed by her store. Through you, O queen, men are blessed in their children and blessed in their harvests, and to you it belongs to give means of life to mortal men and to take it away. Happy is the man whom you delight to honour! He hath all things abundantly: his fruitful land is laden with corn, his pastures are covered with cattle, and his house is filled with good things. Such men rule orderly in their cities of fair women: great riches and wealth follow them: their sons exult with ever-fresh delight, and their daughters in flower-laden bands play and skip merrily over the soft flowers of the field. Thus it is with those whom you honour O holy goddess, bountiful spirit. Hail, mother of the gods, wife of starry Heaven; freely bestow upon me for this my song substance that cheers the heart! And now I will remember you and another song also.

From these and other ancient records, it is obvious that the earth was more than an agricultural or herbaceous facility to the pagans. She was the personable and “eldest of all beings,” the “holy goddess,” the “bountiful spirit,” the all-nourishing mother of men who manifested herself within the popular idols and mother goddesses.

Modern Wiccans and neo-pagans perceive the earth similarly, often referring to the earth as Gaia--a living, caring entity. We are told that people are just one of Mother Earth’s species, not her dominators. She provides the living biosphere -- the region on, above, and below her surface where created things, both physical and spiritual, live. During the Samhain sabbot (Halloween), pagans celebrate the time when the veil between the living and the dead is at its thinnest, a period when those spirits beneath Gaia’s surface can more easily communicate with the living.

SOMETHING WICCA THIS WAY COMES

Wiccans might find it interesting that many Christian theologians agree with the idea that the physical earth contains spiritual forces. For instance, in the Book of Revelation, chapter nine and verse fourteen, we read of “the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.” Likewise, in Job 26:5, we find “Dead things are formed from under the waters.” The literal Hebrew translation says, “The Rafa (fallen angels) are made to writhe from beneath the waters.” Additional biblical references indicate that the earth is a kind of holding tank, or prison, where Elohiym has bound certain fallen entities. (2nd Peter 2:4; Jude 6) That such fallen spirits seek to communicate with, or participate in the affairs of humanity, is defined in Scripture. The Hebrew people were warned that earth spirits pretending to be gods might seek communion with men, and, when the witch of Endor communicated with the same, they ascended up from “out of the earth” (1st Samuel 28:13). It would seem therefore, based on such Scriptures, that the dynamic or energy behind the earth-goddess-spirits of Halloween is indeed real, and, according to Christian doctrine, identical with the legions of fallen spiritual forces bound within the earth.

As in antiquity, those who practice modern paganism are guilty of worshipping “devils” (Revelation 9:20). The dogma once embraced and that continues through such earth-centric paganism as Wicca is defined in scriptures as the “doctrines of devils.” The Apostle Paul said, “the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils” (1st Corinthians 10:20). 

In Acts 7:41-42 (Jerusalem Bible), it describes those who worship idols as joining themselves to the “army of heaven” [stratos, the “fallen angel army”], and Psalm 96:5 concludes, “all the gods of the nations are idols” (elilim, LXX daimonia [demons]). Thus, pagan images, such as those that represented the ancient gods and goddesses were “elilim” (empty, nothing, vanity), but behind the empty idols were the living dynamics of idolatry and spiritual objects of pagan adoration: demons.

Because the Bible clearly defines such goddess worship as the homage of demons, and since demons are eternal personalities that desire the worship of humans, it is fair to characterize Wiccan deities, including the god, goddess, and horned-god of the Hunt, as neo-pagan titles attributed to demon spirits.

WITCHES ARE PEOPLE FOR WHOM MESSIAH DIED

The New Testament tells the story of presenting the Gospel to pagans. It records conversions to Messiah and the abandonment of earth-centered goddess cults. So powerful was the spread of the early faith of the YaHuWdiy (Jewish) Apostles that pagan religions that had dominated the Middle East for thousands of years, crumbled. The cold embrace of Mother Earth could not match the magnetic warmth of the love of YaHuWaH. In fact, the last recorded utterance of the oracle at Delphi seems to indicate the spirit of the Olympians understood he was no match for Jesus. From Man, Myth & Magic, we read:

“Apollo delivered his last oracle in the year 362 AD, to the physician of the Emperor Julian, the Byzantine ruler who tried to restore paganism after Christianity had become the official religion of the Byzantine Empire. ‘Tell the King, ‘said the oracle, ‘that the curiously built temple has fallen to the ground, that bright Apollo no longer has a roof over his head, or prophetic laurel, or babbling spring. Yes, even the murmuring water has dried up.’”

The worship of Diana in Ephesus was another stronghold of earth-centered goddess cults. Dianic witchcraft was the greatest unifying religion among all pagan people up to that time. It took 220 years to build the massive temple to Diana in Ephesus. Yet when Paul preached the Gospel of YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) to the Ephesians:“Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together, and burned them before all men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver. So mightily grew the word of YaHuWaH Elohiym and prevailed” (Acts 19:17-20).

May we with joy declare such a life-changing Gospel and not be ashamed“of the gospel of Messiah: for it is the power of Elohiym unto salvation to everyone that believes; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek” (Romans 1:16).

To help pastors, Christian education directors, Sunday School teachers and ministry leaders address such topics this Halloween, a 270 page teachers guide and two books on the subject in pdf format can be downloaded at no cost on the God’s Ghostbusters page at http://survivormall.com/thedeparture-3-4.aspx by simply right clicking the link and “saving as” to one’s computer. 

The new bestselling book Gods Ghostbusters is also available on the site.

Santa Claus or Satan Claws?

$
0
0
Edited and re-formatted by Maria Merola from Brian Newman’s Notes:  



Other Excerpts of this article taken from the book:

“Another Jesus & Another Gospel” 
By Maria Merola

© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2002

Pictured to the left and below are Christmas Cards from Germany. This is a demon spirit known in Germany as “Krampus.” This demon (according to folklore), is supposed to be the evil side-kick of Santa Claus himself or his “alter ego.” Krampus’ role is to scare children into being good. All year long children are taught that if they are “naughty” Krampus would come on Christmas with a switch and beat their bottoms. But if they were “nice” then Santa Clause would come and give them toys and treats. The invention of this creature comes from the popular medieval Christmas plays of the tenth through the sixteenth century. These miracle, moral, mystery and passion dramas acted out scenes from the scriptures and the liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church. Combining humor and religion, they flourished during the fifteenth century. It is significant that St. Nicholas was a dominant theme among these plays. Much of the myth and outlandish miracles of St. Nicholas originated from these dramas. And much of the bizarre characteristics of Santa were planted in these Christmas plays.---Siefker, Phyllis. Santa Claus, Last of the Wild Men: The Origins and Evolution of Saint Nicholas. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1997, p. 69

One of the bizarre jobs of St. Nick’s devilish helper was to “gleefully drag sinners to Hell”!  On the eve of December 6th, the myth told that this bearded, white-haired old “saint,” clad in a wide mantel, rode through the skies on a white horse (the rider on a white horse in Revelation 6), together with his slave, the swarthy Dark Helper. This reluctant helper had to disperse gifts to good people, but much preferred to threaten them with his broom-like scourge, and, at a sign of his master, would gleefully drag sinners away to a place of eternal suffering---Renterghem, Tony van. When Santa Was a Shaman. St. Paul: Llewellyn Publications, 1995, p. 111 

It is also alarming that Santa’s popular title, “Nick,” is also a common name for “the Devil.” “Old Nick” is a well-known British name for the Devil“It seems probable that this name is derived from the Dutch Nikken, the devil.”----Shepard, Leslie A. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology. New York: Gale Research Inc. 1991, p. 650 Nick, the devil---Skeat, Walter W. Concise Dictionary of English Etymology. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Ltd, 1993, p. 304

The Devil has other names besides the name Satan. He is also called Beelzebub or Lucifer. And in popular or rustic speech by many familiar terms as Old Nick---(Oxford English Dictionary). Nicholas is one of the most common devil’s names in German, a name that remains today when Satan is referred as Old Nick---Siefker, Phyllis. Santa Claus, Last of the Wild Men: The Origins and Evolution of Saint Nicholas. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1997, p. 69

Pictured is another Christmas card from Austria, just before World War II. The Big Black Horned thing you see is “Krampus,” once again the demon that comes with Santa bringing a “bag of Switches” for boys and girls that don’t behave. He would also kidnap and eat them. This is the origin of “Santa’s Little Helper” which later became the Elves at the North Pole. Every year in Austria they have a big party for him in December. Notice the children in the bag that he is kidnapping, and the pine branch from the x-mas tree he is about to beat that couple with, oh, and the goat horns and hooves, just like Baphomet, the goat demon worshiped in Freemasonry.

The German god “Ruebezahl” is a mixture of “Krampus” (the devil) and Santa. In Austria the strange and frightening creature, Krampus, is usually with St. Nicholas and often in chains, is dressed in fur with a scary mask and a long red tongue. Krampus carries a wooden stick or switches to threaten children who misbehave or do not know their lessons. Pictured to the right and below are more Christmas cards from Austria & Germany. The Little girl below is praying to the devil and asking for mercy. The creature is the “alter ego” of Santa Claus who would come to punish if the child has not been good all year long, but he comes as a benevolent jolly old fat man known as “Santa Clause” with toys and presents if the child has been good. Our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) taught us not to fear evil, nor to fear the devil. We are only to fear YaHuWaH who has the power to determine our eternal destiny:


Luke 12:

4 And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.

5 But I will forewarn you whom you shall fear: Fear him, which after he has killed has power to cast into Hell (Gehenna); yes, I say unto you, Fear him.

Satan has successfully caused little children to fear him instead of our Creator YaHuWaH:

Come, you children. . . I will teach you the fear of. . . Santa Claus? (Psalm 34:11)

“...You’d better watch out, You’d better not cry You’d better not pout, I’m telling you why Santa Claus is comin’ to town He’s making a list, He’s checking it twice He’s gonna find out Who’s naughty or nice...”

Children the world over are taught to FEAR Santa. “You’d better go to bed little boy,…..Santa is watching.”

Millions of fearful children are told, “You’d better behave, Santa is watching….. You might not get anything for Christmas.”

It is purely evil for parents to teach their children to fear the devil or Santa Clause. We are told that YaHuWaH has not given us the spirit of fear:

2nd Timothy 1:7 For Elohiym (God) has not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.  

Romans 8:15 For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but you have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.

We are commanded instead to fear YaHuWaH the Creator of the Universe:

Proverbs 1:7 The fear of YHWH is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction. 

Psalm 111:10 The fear of YHWH is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endures forever.


More Disgusting X-mas Cards with Krampus aka Satan Claws!


Who wants that thing playing with their kid? Oh wait--- we dress them up like that on Halloween! And then we put it all over our house, so these kind of things will feel right at home!

A black goat demon----how cute for the kids to play with on a Christmas card! *sarcasm*

You will notice that in each of these cards below, Santa Claus looks a lot like the Pope carrying his Papal Staff, and his “Dagon” pagan fish-god hat/miter; and he is with his alter ego, Satan----how telling!

Dagon, Nimrod & the Papacy 


The great apostate church of the Gospel Age, true to its Babylonian origin, has actually adopted this fish god in its ritual; for the pope on certain occasion’s manifests by his head gear that he is the direct representative of Dagon. As it was an indispensable rule in all idolatrous religions that the high priest should wear the insignia of the god that he worshipped, so the sculptures discovered by Layard show that the priests of Dagon were arrayed in clothing resembling fish. This is probably the ‘strange apparel’ referred to in Zephaniah 1:8. Berosus tells us that in the image of Dagon the head of the man appeared under the head of the fish, while Layard points out that in the case of the priests “the head of the fish formed a mitre above that of the man, while its scaly, fan-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human limbs and feet exposed.”---(Babylon and Nineveh, p. 343)
“In the ancient legends of the Babylonians there was “Oannes” called “Lord of the Waves.” He was amphibious, having the torso and head of a man but upon his head was the head of a fish with gaping mouth and draping downward were the back of the fish, complete with scales and tail. The Sumerians called him “EA” and like Oannes - he was half fish and half man. He was called the great Fish of heaven. The Philistines called him “DAGON”, the fish god that is also mentioned in the Bible.”---OANNES; part II, Vladimir Pakhomov taken from a history of Mesopotamia Written in the 3rd Century B.C. by Berossus; A Babylonian Priest
Dagon Fish Mitre Hat Worn by Babylonian Priests

The priests of Dagon wore the same mitre hat that was worn by “Cybele.” It looked like the open mouth of a fish propped upon the priest’s head.

“He was half fish and half man. He was called the great Fish of heaven. The Philistines called him ‘DAGON’, the fish god that is also mentioned in the Bible.”----OANNES; part II Vladimir Pakhomov taken from a history of Mesopotamia Written in the 3rd Century BC by Berossus; A Babylonian Priest

DAGON is mentioned in the Bible in at least 8 places:

Joshua 19:27
Judges 16:23
1st Samuel 5:2,3,4,5,7
1st Chronicles 10:10

“The two-horned mitre, which the Pope wears, when he sits on the high altar at Rome and receives the adoration of the Cardinals, is the very mitre worn by the priests of Dagon, the fish-god of the Philistines and Babylonians.”--- The Two Babylons ; Alexander Hislop; p. 215
Why do the Popes wear a “Mitre” hat? The fact is that the origin of the hat can be traced to an ancient Babylonian fish-god named Dagon.

“...there are strong evidences that Dagon was Nimrod.... All scholars agree that the name and worship of Dagon were imported from Babylonia.”---- The Two Babylons, Hislop, p. 215


“In their veneration and worship of Dagon, the high priest of paganism would actually put on a garment that had been created from a huge fish! The head of the fish formed a mitre above that of the old man, while its scaly, fan-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human limbs and feet exposed.”---- Babylon and Nineveh, Austen Henry Layard, p. 343


“The most prominent form of worship in Babylon was dedicated to Dagon, later known as Ichthys, or the fish. In Chaldean times, the head of the church was the representative of Dagon, he was considered to be infallible, and was addressed as ‘Your Holiness’. Nations subdued by Babylon had to kiss the ring and slipper of the Babylonian god-king. The same powers and the same titles are claimed to this day by the Dalai Lama of Buddhism, and the Pope. Moreover, the vestments of paganism, the fish mitre and robes of the priests of Dagon are worn by the Catholic bishops, cardinals and popes.”----The Wine of Babylon; Pg 9


“One need only look at Christianity to see...the Fish tradition! It’s under everyone’s nose. The real Priests of Dagon of old wore a mitre head dress and the Catholic religion uses this same design on their papal headdress!”----SIRIUS THE FISH TRADITION


According to Egyptian mythology, when the judges found Osiris [Nimrod] guilty of corrupting the religion of Adam and cut up his body, they threw the parts into the Nile. It was said that a fish ate one of these chunks and became transformed. Later, Isis [Semiramis] was fishing along the river bank when she fished up a half-man, half-fish. This sea creature was Dagon, the reincarnated Nimrod. And Dagon is the representation of Nimrod (of ancient Babylon) resurrecting out of the ocean depths as a half-man, half-fish. “Dagon is the diminutive of dag, and signifies... fish...The Babylonians believed that a being, part man and part fish, emerged from the Erythraean Sea, and appeared in Babylonia in the early days of its history Representations of this fish-god have been found among the sculptures of Nineveh. The Philistine Dagon was of a similar character.---- Manners and Customs of the Bible; by James Freeman


And this also explains the symbol for Christianity, the fish - the “Ichthys” which is Dagon.

Definition – “Ichthyic”– “of, pertaining to, or characteristic of fishes; the fish world in all its orders.”---- Oxford English Dictionary (C. E.)



Fish On Fridays?

The worship of Dagon also affected people’s eating habits. This may explain the mystery of why the Catholics abstain from eating fish on all days except Fridays. Whether they realize it or not, they are practicing the ancient pagan rite of worshipping Dagon. According to The Catholic Encyclopedia:

“As to the ritual of his worship...we only know from ancient writers that, for religious reasons, most of the Syrian peoples abstained from eating fish, a practice that one is naturally inclined to connect with the worship of a fish-god.”---- The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913, Encyclopedia Press, Inc.

The Doctrine of the Nicolaitanes

In his Revelation to the Seven Assemblies in Asia Minor, our Messiah specifically,” which is something he hates:

Revelation 2:6 But this you have, that you hate the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate.

Revelation 2:15 So have you also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which thing I hate.

What exactly is this doctrine that our Messiah hates? Well the root words come from two words:

Nicos = to dominate the people
Laity = the lay people who are not in leadership in the church

Hence this doctrine places other humans in the place of Messiah or Elohiym (God) in the life of the believer. What this means is that Popes, Bishops, Pastors, and Priests are put on a pedestal where they do not belong and the people are taught to put their trust in them for their salvation instead of Messiah himself. This doctrine teaches that people should not attempt to interpret scripture with the help of the Holy Spirit, but instead they should rely on “Church Fathers” and leaders to interpret scripture and to aid them in their path to salvation and eternal life. But our Messiah warned us not to call any church leader on earth “father”:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

Our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) taught us that the Holy Spirit is assigned to teach us and that we have no need to be taught any false doctrine that originates from humans:

1st YaHuW’chanon (John) 2:27 But the anointing which you have received of him abides in you, and you need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teaches you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it has taught you, you shall abide in him. 

The Role of the Papacy is to “dominate” the people with fear and to make them rely solely on him as the “visible image of Jesus Christ on earth,” as thus says Rome!

In all of the above images, Santa (which means holy in Latin) is actually the Pope or Bishop of Rome who is called “Holy Father” as he is dressed very similar to Santa Claus and standing with his true “alter ego” Satan or Krampus the horned god or “Nimrod.” Santa Claus is also called “Father Christmas” and the Latin word for Father is “Pappas” where we get the word “Pope”!

Pope = Father Christ Mass who performs the Catholic Mass!
The shocking truth is Santa Claus originated from a character identified as the devil or Satan.

In certain German children’s games, the Saint Nicholas figure itself is the Dark Helper, a devil who wants to punish children, but is stopped from doing so by Christ---Renterghem, Tony van. When Santa Was a Shaman. St. Paul: Llewellyn Publications, 1995, p. 105

This is a photo of St. Nicholas from whom we get “Santa Claus.” The name Nicholas, in Greek is “Niko-Laus” which means “one who RULES over the people.”  The word “Santa” means “Holy” in Latin and hence we have a name that means “The Holy One Who Rules Over the People.” Instead of the coming Messiah who reigns, this guy’s name says that he wants to rule over the people instead. It is interesting to note also that the Latin language is what is commonly used in Witchcraft, incantations, spells and in Satanic rituals. It is because Latin is a language that has its roots in paganism from the start. It is no wonder that Latin is a language that uses the same letters for Satan in the word “Holy” (Santa). But in Hebrew (the original language of scripture), the word for “holy” is “Kodesh” which has no resemblance to “Santa.” 
The bizarre and mutual attributes of Thor and Santa are no accident. Author Tony Renterghem, concludes his extensive research into the origin of Santa with the following statement:

“I can only conclude that the original ancestor of our modern Santa Claus is none other than the mythological Dark Helper-a faint memory of Herne/Pan, the ancient shamanic nature spirit of the Olde Religion.”---(Renterghem, Tony “When Santa Was a Shaman.” St. Paul: Llewellyn Publications, 1995, p. 93).

Note: Herne or Pan is the horned god. It is common knowledge that Pan and Herne are popular names for Satan. The Satanic Bible lists Pan as one of the Infernal Names of Satan---(LaVey, Anton Szandor. The Satanic Bible. New York: Avon Books, Inc., 1969 p. 144).

After researching scores of books and material on the origin of Santa Claus, by far, the best book on this subject is “Santa Claus, Last of the Wild Men.”--- The Origins and Evolution of Saint Nicholas, authored by the late University of Kansas associate, Phyllis Siefker.”

This is no child’s book, but a scholarly exploration into the origin of Santa Claus. It is published by the prestigious McFarland Publishers, a leading publisher of reference and academic books. This book carries no Christian bias, but is simply a secular, non-Christian scholastic study. With that in mind, the following analysis by Siefkler is even more alarming:

“The fact is that Santa and Satan are alter egos, brothers; they have the same origin. . . On the surface, the two figures are polar opposites, but underneath they share the same parent, and both retain many of the old symbols associated with their ‘father’ . . . From these two paths, he arrived at both the warmth of our fireplace and in the flames of hell.”----(Siefker, Phyllis. Santa Claus, Last of the Wild Men: The Origins and Evolution of Saint Nicholas. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1997, p. 6)

Christian Mythology says that Santa keeps lists of good and bad children. If you are good you get a visit from Santa and he leaves toys. However, in turn-of-the-century Europe, if you were bad you got a visit from KRAMPUS! It was Krampus who gave coal and rocks to the naughty children. Sometimes, Krampus would beat the bad with switches, and if a child was especially naughty, he would shackle them in chains, stuff them in a bucket and throw them into the fiery pits of Hell!

Does anyone find it strange that children will go to bed every night talking to an invisible man that they believe will swoop down from the sky on a certain holiday and bring them rewards? But we are told in scripture that the Messiah will hand out rewards at his second coming:

1st Corinthians 13:

13 Every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is.

14 If any man’s work abide which he has built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.

15 If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

Krampus, the original version of Santa’s Elf in Austria, would punish wrongdoers instead of Elohiym. He would bring the children a “bag of switches/branches” to beat them with. In Yehezqel (Ezekiel) 8:17 we learn more about this particular branch. This branch is a reference to the misltoe and also to the “abominable branch” in YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 14 known as “The King of Babylon” (Nimrod) because he was “cut down” like a tree as his limbs were severed by Noah’s son Shem and they were sent to all the provinces in the land of Shinar---The book of Jasher; The Two Babylons, by Alexander Hislop; The Antiquities, Josephus.

Considering Santa you cannot miss his “alter ego,” who has followed him like a dark shadow since ancient times. There is a devil, called Percht, Bartl, “KRAMPUS” (the Devil), Knecht Ruprecht, or Rotsohler, accompanying Santa Claus in the European Alps. He shows the pre-Christian origin of this custom as a daemon trabant. We should mention here also another figure: Ruebezahl, who is a German mythical, giant-like person, who is a mixture of Krampus (the Devil) and Santa.”----Santa’s Origin; by Sepp Rothwangl

“In Austria a strange and frightening creature, known as Krampus, is usually with St. Nicholas. This devil figure, often in chains, is dressed in fur with a scary mask and a long red tongue. Krampus carries a wooden stick or switches to threaten children who misbehave or do not know their lessons.”----Saint Nicholas Center; Discovering the Truth About Santa Claus.
We often repeat the famous quote of Santa Clause in Christmas songs such as “Ho, Ho, Ho, who wouldn’t go, Ho, Ho, Ho, who wouldn’t go….” But do we realize what we are teaching our children to say?

“Ho, Ho, Ho” comes from a Roman Requirement that during Saturnalia citizens had to appear before the temple of Saturn (Baal) and yell, “Lo, Lo, Lo, Saturn” three times translated as, “Praise, Praise, Praise Saturn as god!”----From: The Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic, an Introduction to the Study of the Religion of the Romans, W. Warde Fowler [1847 - 1921], Macmillan, 1899.

“There are several well-attested features of the Saturnalia as it was in historical times. On Dec. 17th there was a public sacrifice at the temple (formerly the era) of Saturn by the Forum, followed by a public feast, in breaking up from which the feasters shouted ‘Io Saturnalia!’”

In “The Drama Before Shakespeare - A Sketch”, author Frank Ireson, describes the popular Miracle Play. Notice the description of the devil as “shaggy, hairy,” etc. (as Santa), and notice the devil’s trademark “exclamation on entering was ho, ho, ho!”

Besides allegorical personages, there were two standing characters very prominent in Moral Plays—the Devil and Vice. The Devil was, no doubt, introduced from the Miracle Plays, where he had figured so amusingly; he was made as hideous as possible by his mask and dress, the latter being generally of a shaggy and hairy character, and he was duly provided with a tail: his ordinary exclamation on entering was, “Ho, ho, ho! what a fellow am I”---Ireson, Frank. “The Drama Before Shakespeare - A Sketch,” 1920 Siefker also collaborates the devil’s trademark “ho, ho, ho.”

In these plays, the devil’s common entry line, known as “the devil’s bluster,” was “Ho! Ho! Ho!”----Siefker, Phyllis. “Santa Claus, Last of the Wild Men”----The Origins and Evolution of Saint Nicholas. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1997, p. 69

The devil’s trademark “ho, ho, ho” was carried over from the early medieval Miracle Plays to the popular old English play “Bomelio,” as the following lines from the play verify:

“…. I conjure thee, foul spirit, down to hell! Ho, ho, ho! The devil, the devil! A-comes, a-comes, a-comes upon me…..” Dodsley, Robert. A Select Collection of Old English Plays, Vol. VI. The Project Gutenberg Ebook.


How St. Nicholas became Santa Claus

Nicholas was born in Parara, Turkey in 270 C.E. and later became Bishop of Myra. He died in 345 C.E. on December 6th. He was not canonized as a saint by the Roman Catholic Church until the 1800’s.

Nicholas was among the most senior bishops who convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 C.E. and created the New Testament. The text they produced portrayed Jews as “the children of the devil” who sentenced Jesus to death.

In 1087, a group of sailors who idolized Nicholas moved his bones from Turkey to a sanctuary in Bari, Italy. There Nicholas supplanted a female boon-giving deity called The Grandmother, or Pasqua Epiphania, who used to fill the children’s stockings with her gifts. The Grandmother was ousted from her shrine at Bari, which became the center of the Nicholas cult. Members of this group gave each other gifts during a pageant they conducted annually on the anniversary of Nicholas’ death, December 6.

The Nicholas cult spread north until it was adopted by German and Celtic pagans. These groups worshipped a pantheon led by Woden –their chief god and the father of Thor, Balder, and Tiw. Woden had a long, white beard and rode a horse through the heavens one evening each Autumn. When Nicholas merged with Woden, he shed his Mediterranean appearance, grew a beard, mounted a flying horse, rescheduled his flight for December, and donned heavy winter clothing.

In a bid for pagan adherents in Northern Europe, the Catholic Church adopted the Nicholas cult and taught that he did (and they should) distribute gifts on December 25th instead of December 6th
Pictured here is Santa Claus shaking hands with the Pope or Bishop of Rome. These two characters have “merged” into one and the same persona! 

Saint Nicholas, a fourth century Catholic Bishop of Myra in Asia Minor, who gave treats to children; was canonized by the Roman Catholic Church, as patron saint to sailors, pawnbrokers and children. Santa Claus or “Father Christmas” is a corruption of the Dutch “Sant Nikolaas.” The red suit comes from the fact that Catholic bishops and cardinals in Italy wear red. Also, according to tradition, a poor widower of Myra had three daughters, for whom she could not provide a dowry. On Xmas-Eve, “Saint Nicholas” threw three bags of gold down the chimney, thereby saving the daughters from having to enter into prostitution. One bag rolled into a shoe, and the others fell into some stockings that had been hung to dry by the fire, hence, the beginning of the tradition of the “Christmas stocking.”

But the Santa Claus concept originally came from ancient Egypt. The pagan Egyptian god, Bes, was a rounded, gnome-like personage who was the patron of little children. Bes was said to live at the North Pole, working all year-round to produce toys for children who had been good and obedient to their parents. In Dutch, he was called “Sinter Klaas.” The custom was brought to America by Dutch settlers. In European countries, Santa Claus was originally a grim personage who traversed the countryside, determined to find out who had been “naughty or nice.” Those who had been naughty were quickly switched.

Santa Claus is usually associated with snow, reindeer, and the North Pole, which suggests Scandinavian or Norse traditions of the Yuletide season. In Babylonia, the stag (reindeer) was a symbol of Nimrod, the mighty hunter. Antlers worn on the head of a noble leader symbolized his prowess as a hunter, and thereby, influence people to follow him. Santa is often looked upon as a jolly old man giving gifts to children and keeping the “magic” of Christmas alive, but, the Christmas spirit, is the spirit of lies, the spirit of deception, the season when the lonely are made to feel unwanted, when people get more depressed and suicidal, and when the hypocrites are generous for a season, celebrating their perpetual lie.

Prophecies About Our Messiah Satan Wants to Counterfeit 

Who is this that comes. . . red in your apparel  (Isaiah 63:2)
Who wears boots and a suit of red? Santa wears boots and a suit of red!

“Cap on head, suit that’s red,
Special night, beard that’s white,
Must be Santa, Must be Santa,
Must be Santa, Santa Clause”

Satan wants to be the Messiah!
The Master YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus)

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 63:1-2:

1 Who is this that comes from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save.

2 Wherefore are you red in your apparel, and your garments like him that treads in the winefat?

Revelation 19:

11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he does judge and make war.

12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.

13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of Elohiym (God).

Do you get the strangest feeling that someone is trying to “be like someone else”?

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 14:14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

Once again, we see the “signature” Papal staff in his hand. Is this supposed to be the Resurrected Christ come to reign? St. Nicholas, the Pope, or “Santa Claus”? Who can tell? Or maybe that’s the point! Notice that the colors he is wearing are “scarlet & purple” just like the woman who is reading a Beast in Revelation 17.

The Historical “St. Nicholas” who hated Jews wouldn’t get along with the biblical Jewish Messiah known as YaHuW’shuwa (Joshua aka Jesus), who kept the Sabbath, Holy Days, and Levitical diet. Our Messiah would never want a day in his honor on which Jews were ritually killed every Dec. 25th, but Saint Nicholas didn’t mind.

The 151st attendee listed in an A.D. 510 manuscript of attendees of the Council of Niceae was “Nicolas of Myra of Lycia.” Amazingly, December 25th was established as a supposedly “Christian” holiday at the Council of Nicea, and so was Easter, and Sunday. If anyone kept the Holy Days instead, Constantine had them put to death. St. Nicholas was all in favor of this, and mysteriously, X-mas later honored him. Imagine that. And that the same time the Roman Saturnalia was on December 25th, and was celebrated often by the ritual sacrifice of a Jew.

Saint Nicholas, was a Senior Bishop at the Council of Nicea. He wrote that Jews were “children of the devil that killed our Lord Jesus.”

At the Council of Nicea – “Those who openly or secretly keep the Sabbath and follow other practices in the manner of the Jews are not to be received into communion, nor into prayer, nor into the church....”

The Council of Laodicea – “It is not permitted to receive festivals which are by Jews, nor to hold a festival together with them. Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day...but if any be found to be Judaizers let them be anathema from Christ.”

Constantine wrote: “Let us have nothing in common with the Jews, who are our adversaries. This irregularity of observing Passover must be corrected, in order that we may no more have anything in common with the parricides and murderers of our Lord.”

Nimrod the Abominable Branch

“The Branch” was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah foretold of our Messiah, as THE RIGHTEOUS BRANCH:

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 11:1 And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots:

This prophecy above is about YaHuW’shuwa the Messiah (Jesus)--the righteous BRANCH. Ezekiel spoke of this very same BRANCH:

ZekarYaH (Zechariah) 3:8 Hear now, O YaHuW’shuwa (Joshua) the high priest, you, and your fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH.

You will notice that the Temple Menorah has 7 Branches. The Menorah is deliberately meant to resemble the Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden. The Middle Branch is the main trunk of the tree represented as our Messiah (the Servant Candle who lights the others). And the other 6 branches represent mankind for on the 6th day YaHuWaH created man.

It is for this reason, that our Messiah said these words: 

YaHuW’chanon (John) 15:5 I am the vine, you are the branches:

But Nimrod was the UNRIGHTEOUS BRANCH:

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 14:19 But you are cast out of your grave like, an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under feet. 

Yehezqel (Ezekiel) 8:17 ....they commit the abominations.....to provoke me to anger: and, lo they put the branch to their nose.

Why was Nimrod & Tammuz symbolized by an “Abominable Branch”?  


In the history of the Babylonian Empire, Shem (Noah’s son) had Nimrod killed because he and his mother/wife, Semiramis were offering up babies to Molech on December 25th during the winter solstice and also in Easter Sunrise services for the “spring equinox” on March 25th.

When Shem and his men found Nimrod, they chopped off his body parts just like limbs to a tree, and his limbs were sent to various provinces within the land of Shinar. From then on, Semiramis, (his wife and mother) commanded the Babylonians to memorialize Nimrod by going into the Forrest to cut down a tree to remember Nimrod who was “cut down like a tree.”

This is why YaHuWaH forbids us to erect a “Christmas Tree” even if it is supposedly in the honor of “Jesus”:

YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) 10:

2 Thus says YHWH, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

For the customs of the people are vain: for one cuts a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.

From the ancient days of Nimrod, (when his body parts were chopped off and scattered throughout the Provinces of Shinar), from that point on, Nimrod or Ba’al was known as “the god of the tree.”  

The Druids and the Celts continued to worship this pagan deity now called “The Green Man” through orgies in the forest under trees and erecting Christmas Trees.

Has anything changed today in America? Are we not just as adulterous as backsliding Yisra’el who played the harlot under every green tree?

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 57:5 Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clifts of the rocks?

YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) 3:6 YHWH said also unto me in the days of Yohshi’Yah (Josiah) the king, Have you seen that which backsliding Yisra’el has done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there has played the harlot.

Debarim (Deuteronomy) 12:2 You shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which you shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree:


1st Melakim (Kings) 14:23 For they also built them high places, and images, and groves (asherah), on every high hill, and under every green tree.

2nd Melakim (Kings) 17:10 And they set them up images and groves (asherah) in every high hill, and under every green tree:

YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) 3:13 Only acknowledge your iniquity, that you have transgressed against YHWH your Elohiym (God), and have scattered your ways to the strangers under every green tree, and you have not obeyed my voice, says YHWH.

Notice Nimrod in the illustration with a Pine Tree and Reindeer, and then Santa on the right! The Nimrod photo to the left is from a 4,000 year old Babylonian woodcut made by a Babylonian.

And so our Christmas tree and our Yule log have tremendous meaning, but not a biblical meaning. The Yule log is the dead Nimrod’s penis, human ruler of ancient Babylon, who was eventually deified as the sun incarnate, and hence a god.

The Christmas tree is mystical Tammuz, the slain god come to life again----After Armageddon, Chapter 4,Where do we get our ideas? by John A. Sarkett

Why Are Red & Green Official Christmas Colors?

Santa’s Suite was originally Green before the Coca-Cola Company came along. The suite is based on the Celtic god/demon called the “Green Man of the Woods” whose colors were Red and Green, their version of Attis (Tammuz in the Bible). They got the idea from the Babylonian Tammuz who was an “evergreen tree” the god who was worshiped on December 25th, hence the “branches” placed to the nose in Ezekiel 8:17.

“Pope Gregory...advised Saint Augustine to allow his converts certain festivals as formerly they had done this in honor of the devil. Therefore, St. Augustine permitted their usual December celebration under the new name. From these early pagan ceremonies are derived many of the English holiday customs that have survived to our day.”----The Evolution of Christmas; Published in 1909

Didn’t the Apostle Shaul (Paul) warn the Galatians to NOT GO BACK to Superstitions and Holidays they kept “BEFORE they knew Elohiym (God)?”As you can see below, there is a chart showing what these ELEMENTS are that are used in the worship of nature, and the 5-pointed star of witchcraft is in the center. This is the essence of paganism and the basis for pagan holidays. Now we know what the Apostle Paul meant here in Galatians when he spoke of weak and beggarly elements!


Galatians 4:

8 Howbeit then, when you knew not Elohiym, you did service unto them which by nature are no gods.

9 But now, after that you have known Elohiym, or rather are known of Elohiym,  how turn you again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto you desire again to be in bondage?

10 You observe days, and months, and times, and years (astrology).

11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.

The name “Santa Claus” & Anagrams

Have you ever noticed how easy it is to transform “Satan” from “Santa”? Just move the letter “N” to the end. And presto! “Satan” appears. . .

An internet Google search on “Satan Claus” [not Santa Claus – but SATAN Claus] found over 1,700 hits! Obviously, there are many that tie the two together.

The rearranging of letters (called anagrams) to hide secret names or words has long been practiced in the occult. The Jewish Encyclopedia writes of the Jewish occult book called the Kabbalah:

The golden age for anagrams began with the Kabbalah. The Platonists had strange notions as to the influence of anagrammatic virtues, particularly of anagrams evolved from names of persons. It is not surprising, therefore, that the Kabbalists, like all the Neoplatonists, pretended to discover occult qualities in proper names and in their anagrams.


Another name for Satan is Sanat. He also likes to be called “Natas” which is a root word for the name “Natasha” in Russian this is a word that means “Christmas.”

He simply rearranges the letters in his name at will. Who wears a red suit and claims to be “omnipresent” (everywhere at once) and “omniscient” (all-knowing) like Elohiym?

The song “Santa Claus is Coming to Town” says: “…he sees you when you’re sleeping; he knows when you’re awake.”

But this is blasphemy against the one true Elohiym of Yisra’el YaHuWaH. Who comes out of a “fire” place? Who takes the attention away from our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus Christ)? Who entices children with materialism? Santa is often referred to as “Father Christmas.” The word “mas” pertains to the Catholic mass wherein our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) is crucified over and over again. The Roman Catholic Church took the pagan holiday called “Saturnalia” for “Sat” or “Satan” and changed it into the birthday of our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus)----another identity switch of YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) for Satan.

Saturn is “STUR” in Chaldean for Nimrod.

One of the most well-known anagrams in the occult world is the name of Sanat KumaraSanat is better known as Satan. Constance Cumbey, writes in her best-selling, New-Age expose, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow. . . they [New Agers] freely call Sanat Kumara (Satan) ‘God’. And their doctrinal reference books by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky and Alice Ann Bailey freely cross-reference Sanat Kumara with Venus. In occult writings, Lucifer and Venus are one and the same.”----(Constance Cumbey, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, p. 138).........Texe Marrs writes of ‘Sanat’ in Dark Secrets of the New Age:

“. . . the New Age offers a being called Sanat Kumara. ‘Sanat’ is obviously a thinly veiled reference to Satan; nevertheless, New Age teachers evidently believe that the new spelling will alleviate the concerns of those not yet ready to confess Satan as their Lord and Messiah.”------Texe Marrs, Dark Secrets of the New Age, pp. 79-80 

Interesting.......Where does that put Lord S-A-N-T-A?

H.P. Blavatsky, the Satanist and New Age teacher writes in The Secret Doctrine:

“…Many a mysterious sacred name. . . conveys to the profane ear no more than some ordinary, and often vulgar [common] word, because it is concealed anagrammatically or otherwise. ”-----H.P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, Vol II, p. 78

Like S-A-N-T-A?

Blavatsky also writes, “…the name is not important – but the letters.”

“The name isn’t important. It is the letters….”---- H.P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, Vol II, p. 350  Blavatasky’s anagrams were used to disguise who her true god was. Blavatasky openly taught Satan is mankind’s true redeemer, creator and Saviour.

And now it stands proven that Satan, or the Red Fiery Dragon, the ‘Lord of Phosphorus’ and Lucifer, or ‘Light Bearer’, is in us; it is our Mind — our tempter and Redeemer, our intelligent liberator and Saviour----HP Blavatasky, The Secret Doctrine p. 513

Satan, the Serpent of Genesis is the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he . . . who opened the eyes of the automaton (Adam) created by Jehovah. . . he still remains in Esoteric Truth the ever loving messenger----H.P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, Vol 3, p. 243 

Gail Riplinger writes in her excellent book, “New Age Bible Versions” on the use of anagrams in the occult world:

“Lucifer’s True Identity as Satan is Revealed as the Anagram, a Transposition of Letters, To Obscure It. “Blinds,” as esoterics call them, include scrambling the letters of a name to hide the true meaning of a word from the uninitiated.”--- Gail Riplinger, New Age Bible Versions, p. 52

It is interesting Mrs. Riplinger also raises a red flag about the anagram Santa:

“Gods of the New Age include Sanatan and Sanatsiyata, . . . New Agers say each name is ‘concealed anagrammatically’ ‘and are aliases,’ and are ’an anagram used for Occult purposes. Is Santa, the great usurper of Christ's attention at Christmas, an anagram? “Ole Nick” is listed among the fallen angels or devils in the Dictionary of Fallen Angels. Scholars concur that Christ was born in the fall on the 4th day of the feast of tabernacles. December 25th is actually “the feast in honor of the birth of the son of the Babylonian queen of heaven, later called Saturnalia by the heathen Romans….”---Gail Riplinger, New Age Versions, p. 52

It is also worth noting, Santa is Spanish for holy. Santa is also from the Latin word Sanctus which means also saintly, holy. Our English words “saint, sanctify, et al” comes from Santa. Sounds like Satan’s “I will be like the most High” plan is in action.

Is “Claus” another anagram for “Lucas”?

It’s no secret Lucas and Lucis are new-age “code words” for Lucifer. The Alice Bailey founded new age, occult publishing company was originally named Lucifer Publishing Company but in 1924 the name was cleverly changed to Lucis Trust. By the way, the Lucifer worshiping Lucis Trust is a major player in the works of the United Nations formerly located in the United Nations building but now located on prime-time 1200 Wall Street.

It’s no coincidence that Santa Claus sounds like “Satan’s Claws” for he is described as one who comes like a roaring lion to devour:

1st Kefa (Peter) 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour:

Well Guess What? …..The Name “Santa Claus” Literally Means Satan Claws!

Where did the “Klaus” in “Santa Claus” come from?? Santa “CLAWS” (Claus) literally comes from the meaning behind the “Claws” of Krampus, the Devil!

The name Krampus originates from the Old High German word for claw (Krampen).

As time passed Krampus’ feet were replaced with “CLAWS” or sometimes with hooves and (sometimes one of each) and his body itself became covered in fur and he wore little or no clothing. 

Sometimes a common “devil” type tail is also added. Eventually his tongue became obscenely long as did his horns.
Since the demon Krampus comes from the word for claw, we can soundly suggest that Santa Claus and Satan Claws come from the same Evil Root.

Krampus – “The word Krampus originates from the Old High German word for CLAW (Krampen).”-----Paganism in the Eastern Alps Article; “Krampus.” 


“Krampus is the survivor of a pagan tradition that preceded Christianity and the word Krampus originates from the Old High German word for CLAW (Krampen).”-----Christmas in Salzburg and Linz 2005, Austria Travelers, Special Interest Tours in Austria

Satanist Anton LaVey, author of the Satanic Bible and founder of “The First Church of Satan,” has written that “fantasy plays an important role in any religious curriculum. The subjective mind is less discriminating about the quality of its food than it is about the taste. Thus, fantasy is utilized as a magic weapon in Satanism.”----Anton LaVey, The Satanic Rituals, p. 15

LaVey is an American Satanist; other Satanists actually worship Baal/Satan, who is called the “god of light” or “the sun-god” in most cultures.

Fantasies such as Santa Claus the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny are lies that we tell our children and we think it’s all “fun and games” but we are actually putting our children under a Satanic spell when we bewitch them with lies!

Interestingly enough, December 25th ranks high on the Satanist’s Calendar, just like Halloween and Birthdays. The birthday celebrates the Self, which is the true “god” of Satanism, according to LaVey.

Meet “Father X-mas” Everyone!

Do you remember Pan’s Labyrinth? Ba’al? Bacchus? This is also, Santa’s Precious, Sweet, little helper, that your kids are hoping will show up to bring them some toys. In the Satanic, Bible, Pan is one of the top names of Satan himself.

Jolly Old St. Nick is Satan himself! While Santa and Claus may be disguising their real meaning – there is no disguising St. Nick. He is a well-known character.

Old Nick is a well-known British name of the Devil. It seems probable that this name is derived from the Dutch Nikken, the devil----Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, p.650   

Nick, the devil----Walter W. Sleay, Concise Dictionary of English Etymology, p. 304 

The Devil is his name besides the name Satan, he is also called Beelzebub, Lucifer . . . and in popular or rustic speech by many familiar terms as Old Nick ----Oxford English Dictionary Vol III D-E 

Actor Adam Sandler and “New Line Studios” are obviously aware that “Nick” is an alias for Satan. Their movie Little Nicky” is about the son of Satan named Little Nicky. A teaser for the film says, “If your mother was an angel and your father was the devil you’d be messed up too.”

In the popular Cloud Ten Pictures “Apocalypse” film series Revelation, Tribulation, & Judgment, the Antichrist just so happens to be played by none other than the actor “Nick” Mancuso…..Hmmm…

The Cloud Ten Pictures are based on Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkin’s popular “Left Behind Series” Apocalypse book series. What is the name of the Antichrist in the Left Behind Series? Nicolae “Nick” Carpathia, of course! In fact, one of the books is titled, Nicolae, The Rise of the Antichrist.”  It is also interesting, the book American Slang defines the slang word nick: to rob or steal. (Robert L. Chapman, American Slang, p. 297) This is how our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) characterizes the devil:

YaHuW’chanon (John) 10:1-10

“...Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that enters not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbs up some other way [say a chimney?], the same is a thief and a robber…I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. The thief comes not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”


In Austria, the Santa Claus equivalent is St. Nicholas who always comes with Krampus, his darker side. He is always a large, demon goat, black-clad with antlers on his head. There are at least 60 Krampus figures who will roam the streets of Götzens as of 7:30 p.m. on Christmas Eve. On December 05, 2003, Devilish Creatures will gather on the Götzens Church Square for the annual Krampus Run Spectacle.

Watch Video Here:


This is a Christmas party in Austria! The Big Black Horned thing you see is “Krampus” a demon that comes with Santa bringing a bag of Switches for boys and girls that don’t behave. He would also kidnap and eat them. This is the origin of “Santa’s Little Helper” which later became the Elves at the North Pole. Every year in Austria they have a big party for him in December.
This is what sitting on Santa’s Lap in Austria looks like. This is Black Pete, another name for Santa in Dutch Colonies. These are the same people who made X-mas legal again in America. It had been outlawed up until the 1800’s by not only the states, but also by the Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians and several other Protestant denominations.

1st Corinthians 10:20 But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to Elohiym: and I would not that you should have fellowship with devils.

Santa Claus is “Another YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus)”

Do we realize as believers where the legend of Santa Clause comes from? Here on this web site, I found out something which I have always suspected about the myth known as “Santa Claus”:

Kris Kringle means “Christ child” in German. Santa Claus is also known as “Kriss Kringle” in Scandinavian countries, which is a corruption of the German “Christ Kindl”, meaning Christ Child.

Comparison Between YaHuW’shuwa Messiah & Santa Claus 

YaHuW’shuwa Messiah: Our Master & Savior According to Scripture
Santa Claus: The Counterfeit According to Myth & Imagination of Men
1. Has white hair like wool (Revelation 1:14)
1. Has white hair like wool
2. Has a beard (Isaiah 50:6)
2. Has a beard
3. Comes in red apparel (Isaiah 63:2)
Messiah will appear in red clothes at his second coming. (Revelation 19:13)
3. Comes in red apparel
4. Hour of His coming is a mystery (Luke 12:40; Mark 13:33)
4. Hour of his coming is a mystery
5. Comes from the North where He lives (Ezekiel 1:4; Psalm 48:2), and where Satan wants to reside (read Isaiah 14:13)
5. Comes from the North where he lives: North Pole
6. Is a carpenter (Mark 6:3)
6. Is a toy carpenter
7. Comes as a thief in the night (Matthew 24:43-44)
7. Comes as a thief in the night. Even gains entrance to homes as a thief.
8. Omnipotent (all powerful) (Matthew 28:18; Revelation 19:6)
8. Omnipotent - can carry and deliver all the toys of the world in one night
9. Omniscient (knows all) (Psalm 139:1-4; Hebrews 4:13; 1 John 3:20) The eyes of YHWH are in every place, beholding the evil and the good. (Proverbs 15:3)
9. Omniscient - knows if you have been good or bad, for the entire year
10. Omnipresent (Everywhere at one time) (Psalm 139:7-10; Ephesians 4:6; Matthew 18:20; John 3:13)
10. Omnipresent - sees when you’re awake or asleep. Has to be everywhere at once to be able to deliver all the toys in one short night. Is at all the superstores.
11. YaHuW’shuwa can come in though the doors are shut. (John 20:19; John 20:26)
11. Santa can come in though the doors are shut.
12. Ageless, eternal (Revelation 1:8; 21:6)
12. Lives forever
13. Lives in men (1st Corinthians 3:16; 2nd Corinthians 6:16-17)
13. Lives in the hearts of children, and the hearts of men. (Jeremiah 17:9)
14. Giver of Gifts (Ephesians 4:8)
14. Giver of Gifts
15. YaHuW’shuwa ascends on high and gives gifts, especially the Gift of Eternal life. (Ephesians 4:7-8; Romans 6:23)
15. Santa goes into the air and gives gifts.
16. YaHuW’shuwa gives his gifts according to whether you are good or bad. (Revelation 2:23)
16. Santa gives his gifts according to whether you are good or bad.
17. Absolute Truth (John 14:6)
17. Absolute Fable - a lie (1st Timothy 1:4; 4:7; 2 Timothy 4:4)
18. Sits on a throne (Revelation 5:1; Hebrews1:8)
18. Sits on a throne
19. We are told to boldly go to the throne of Grace for our needs (Hebrews 4:16)
19. Children are bidden to approach his throne to ask for anything they want
20. Commands children to obey parents (Ephesians 6:1)
20. Tells children to obey parents
21. Wants little children to come to Him (Mark.10:14)
21. Bids children to come unto him
22. Judges (Romans14:10; Revelation 20:2)
22. Judges whether or not you were good or bad
23. Everlasting Father (Isaiah 9:6; Hebrews 12:2)
23. Father Christmas (Christ’s mass = Christ’s sacrifice)
24. Christ Child (Matthew 1:23; Luke 2:11-12)
24. Kris Kringle (means Christ child)
Santa Claus is also known as “Kriss Kringle”, (In Scandinavian countries etc), which is a corruption of the German “Christ Kindl”, meaning Christ Child.
25. Worthy of Prayers and Worship (Revelation 5:14 Hebrews 1:6)
25. Prayers and worship to “St. Nick” by children (“Nick” means devil)
26. Lord of Hosts (Malachi 3:5; Isaiah 8:13; Psalms 24:10)
26. Lord over a host of elves - (In Druidic religion, elves are demons or tree spirits)
27. YaHuWaH says, “Ho, ho ...” (Zechariah 2:6)
27. Santa says, “Ho, ho, ho ...”
28. Prince of Peace, the Image of Elohiym (Isaiah 9:6; Hebrews 1:3)
28. Symbol of World Peace, the image of the Christmas Season

Every year, SATAN has his place of being glorified as the Son of God (Kris Kringle), from the North (Ezekiel 1:4; Psalm 48:2, read Isaiah14:13). As Santa Claus, he sits on his throne (Isaiah 14) in all the department stores, where children queue up to ask him for the things they want. By focusing their attention on this fat man in a red suit with god-like qualities, children are taught to believe that, just like Santa, YaHuWaH can be pleased with “good works,” done in order to earn His favor. They are also taught that, no matter how bad they have been, they will still be rewarded by Elohiym (God), just as Santa never failed to reward them with gifts.

From an early age children are taught to love material possessions more than YaHuWaH and with the love of trying to get as many presents as possible comes selfishness and love of oneself. They are taught to go to the wrong source for their wants and needs, and are encouraged to behave rightly throughout the year for the wrong reasons. This is all as a result of loving and believing this pagan myth of Santa Claus. YaHuWaH tells us in his word that these symptoms will become evident as we approach the last days:

2nd Timothy 3:1-4 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of Elohiym.

We cannot lie to our children about the myth of Santa Claus and then expect them to want to serve the Messiah of Yisra’el, YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus Christ). Our Messiah made it clear that we cannot serve him and material things:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve Elohiym and mammon (money, materialism).
If we lie to our children about Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth fairy, we do the following:

1.) By lying to them about these myths, we set an example to them that “lying is okay” as long as it is in fun and thus we teach our children to tell lies.

2.) We destroy their trust when they find out they have been lied to.

3.) They will question whether or not we lied to them about the reality of our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus Christ), and they will always have some level of doubt.

4.) We endanger our own souls by telling lies.

2nd Corinthians 4:4 tells us that Satan is “the god of this world”, so it should not come as a surprise that he is popular all over the world as the personage of “Santa Claus.”

The pagan world celebrates “Santa Claus”, (a friend of the world), yet YaHuWaH tells us this: 

Ya’aqob (James) 4:4 …You adulterers and adulteresses, know you not that the friendship of the world is enmity with Elohiym? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of Elohiym.”

No matter how inferior we may feel if we tell our children the truth about Santa Claus, we must realize that YaHuWaH does not want us to go along with the rest of the world:

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be you transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of Elohiym.

*SOURCES*

[1] Addison G. Wright, Roland E. Murphy, Joseph A. Fitzmyer, “A History of Yisra’el” in The Jerome Biblical Commentary, (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990), p. 1247.

[3] Increase Mather, A Testimony against Several Prophane and Superstitious Customs, Now Practiced by Some in New England (London, 1687), p. 35. See also Stephen Nissenbaum, The Battle for Christmas: A Cultural History of America’s Most Cherished Holiday, New York: Vintage Books, 1997, p. 4.

[4] Nissenbaum, p. 3.

[5] David I. Kertzer, The Popes Against the Jews: The Vatican’s Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001, p. 74.

[6] Kertzer, p. 33, 74-5.

[7] Clement Miles, Christmas Customs and Traditions: Their History and Significance, New York: Dover Publications, 1976, pp. 178, 263-271.



Grace Establishes the Law

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל 
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, May 2009

Romiym (Romans) 3:31 Do we then make void the Towrah (law) through faith? Elohiym forbid: yes, we establish the Towrah (law).

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) illustrated here in his letter to the Romans that our faith in Mashiyach Yahuwshuwa, does not make void or cancel out the Mosaic Law (Towrah) or the first five books of the Bible. He also emphasized that our faith in Messiah all the more “establishes the Towrah” (law) in our lives! This is contrary to what many in today’s Christian Church have taught us to believe.

The majority within Christianity have grossly misinterpreted Paul’s Epistles and they are used out of context in order to try and convince us that we no longer have to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah). But the same Paul whom these Christians love to quote warned us about the last days when many would “fall away from the truth” and they would give heed to “the man of sin.” This is none other than what many have called “the Anti-Messiah” or “the son of perdition.” His false religion is called “Mystery Babylon the Great the Mother of Harlots” which is completely opposed to the Mosaic Law (Towrah) of our Creator. In 2nd Thessalonians 2, Sha’uwl (Paul) refers to this as “the MYSTERY OF INIQUITY,” and in his day, this religion of lawlessness was already “at work.” So what is this “Mystery of Iniquity?”

In the Strong’s Greek Concordance, the word Iniquity is defined as follows:

#458. anomia an-om-ee’-ah from 459; illegality, i.e. violation of law or (genitive case) wickedness:--iniquity, transgress(-ion of) the law, unrighteousness.

#459. anomos an’-om-os from 1 (as a negative particle) and 3551; lawless, i.e. (negatively) not subject to (the Jewish) law; (by implication, a Gentile), or (positively) wicked:--without law, lawless, transgressor, unlawful, wicked.

Did you get that?

INIQUITY = NOT SUBJECT TO JEWISH LAW!

*Note: this is not referring to any man-made additions or subtractions to the Mosaic Law found in the “Oral Towrah” (Talmud). The term “Jewish Law” here refers to the Towrah of YHWH (not Rabbinic Judaism).

In all of Paul’s Epistles, he was not preaching lawlessness, contrary to what most people in today’s Church have come to believe. He was actually making a distinction between the DOCTRINES AND COMMANDMENTS OF MEN, versus the Laws of YaHuWaH, which are now WRITTEN IN OUR HEARTS AND MINDS UNDER THE NEW COVENANT!

The Prophet Daniel was shown in his vision that the Anti-Messiah would be against the Holy Covenant of our Creator---in other words the Mosaic Law or the Towrah! You see the Towrah was written with the finger of Elohiym when Mosheh went up to Mount Sinai and when he came down and presented those tablets to Yisra’el, that was our Marriage Covenant!

The Anti-Messiah will be against this holy covenant (the Towrah):

Daniyel (Daniel) 11:28 Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land.

Daniyel (Daniel) 11:30 For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.

Daniyel (Daniel) 11:32 And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: but the people that do know their Elohiym shall be strong, and do exploits.

In 2nd Thessalonians 2, Paul wrote that the Anti-Messiah would “sit in the temple of Elohiym declaring that he is Elohiym.” When this 3rd Jewish Temple is built in Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), the animal sacrifices will once again be resumed. Most Christians assume that because our Messiah paid the price once and for all with his sacrifice on the two sticks את(taw or cross), that there will never again be anymore animal sacrifices. But that is completely false. What they do not understand is that animal sacrifices never took away sins in the first place---not even under the “Old Covenant!”

You see our Messiah was ALWAYS in eternity that LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD! His sacrifice was already completed in eternity past before he came in the flesh and died for us:

Ibriym (Hebrews) 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 9:26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world has he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

1st Keefa (Peter) 1:19-20 But with the precious blood of Mashiyach (Messiah), as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,

Chazown (Revelation) 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

What does this all mean? It means that animal sacrifices were always meant to show us a “prophetic shadow picture” of our Messiah---not take our sins away! And so when the animal sacrifices are resumed during the Millennium (Ezekiel 40-48), they will not be for the purpose of taking sins away, “for it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins” (Hebrews 10:4). You see most Christians have been erroneously taught to believe that under the “Old Covenant” animal blood took away sins (which it never did). And they are taught to believe that under the “New Covenant” it is the blood of Mashiyach (Messiah) Yahuwshuwa that takes away our sins. But his blood alone is what has ALWAYS taken sins away even under Abrahamic & Mosaic Covenant:

Ibriym (Hebrews) 10:11 And every priest stands daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:

Animal sacrifices will be resumed again in the 3rd Jewish Temple in order to show the Jewish people a prophetic shadow picture of their Messiah who was “slain from the foundation of the world.” And when the Anti-Messiah “takes away the daily sacrifices” that is when their eyes will be opened and they will realize that he is the false Messiah who promotes “The Mystery of Lawlessness.” The Anti-Messiah will “take away the daily sacrifices” which is what the Apostle Sha’uwl was talking about in 2nd Thessalonians 2 when he described the “Mystery of Lawlessness.”  

Daniyel (Daniel) 8:11 Yes, he magnified himself even to the princes of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of the sanctuary was cast down.

Daniyel (Daniel) 11:31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that makes desolate.

Daniyel (Daniel) 12:11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that makes desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.

In Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 40-48 we find out that when Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashiyach (Messiah) returns he will be “the prince” who shall offer animal sacrifices during the “one thousand year reign.” Some of you may be asking yourselves “why in the world would he do animal sacrifices when he already provided the ultimate sacrifice of himself on the tree?” The answer is quite simple. Since he was ALWAYS that lamb slain from the foundation of the world in eternity past, his purpose for doing them during the Millennium will be for illustration purposes or object lessons, to teach us what he did for us and also as a memorial that we should always remember what he has done to purchase our salvation! In other words, he will not be doing these animal sacrifices to take away sins because animal blood NEVER did take away sins in the first place! He will be doing them as a reminder to us that he alone is that Lamb slain for all eternity!

Now we understand what the “Mystery of Lawlessness” will be all about in the 3rd Jewish Temple! The majority of Christians will be deceived into believing that the Anti-Messiah is the genuine Messiah because he will “take away the daily sacrifices!”

The only reason why YaHuWaH allowed the 2nd Jewish Temple to be destroyed in 70 A.D. is because the majority of the inhabitants of Jerusalem at that time had still not accepted YaHuW-ShuWA as their Messiah and so “the shadow pictures” of the animal sacrifices were not getting through to them. YaHuWaH saw that they were not seeing a picture of their Messiah in these animal sacrifices, and so he temporarily set aside the animal sacrifices through an Anti-Messiah leader named Nero Caesar. In other words the “Antichrist” of that time “took away the daily sacrifices” according to Daniel’s prophecy. But YaHuWaH allowed it in order to punish Yisra’el for their rejection of Messiah’s blood atonement. And these prophecies from Daniel will be repeated again in the end times.

In Matthew 5:17-19, our Messiah already told us that “one jot or tittle shall in no wise pass from the Towrah (law) until all be fulfilled.”

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

*Note: the word “fulfill” here in Greek is pleroo which means “to carry through to the end.” In other words until the end of the Millennium he will carry the Mosaic Law all the way to completion!

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

And when will “heaven and earth pass away?” It will be after the Millennium:

Chazown (Revelation) 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

All during the Millennium our Messiah Yahuwshuwa will be implementing the Towrah (Mosaic Law) and putting it into 100% full effect----including animal sacrifices!

Here we see prophecies about the Millennium where the Towrah will go out to all nations from Jerusalem:

Yeshayahuw (Isaiah) 2:3 And many people shall go and say, Come you, and let us go up to the mountain of YHWH, to the house of the Elohiym of Ya’aqob (Jacob); and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his pathsfor out of Tziyown (Zion) shall go forth the Towrah (law), and the word of YHWH from Yerushalayim (Jerusalem).

Miykayahuw (Micah) 4:2 And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of YHWH, and to the house of the Elohiym of Ya’aqob (Jacob); and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the Towrah (law) shall go forth of Tziyown (Zion), and the word of YHWH from Yerushalayim (Jerusalem).

The Galatian Controversy

One of the most misunderstood books in the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) is the book of Galatians. In the book of Galatians, the Apostle Paul was addressing this problem that existed with a sect of Judaism who were Gnostics called “The Essenes.” This sect gave themselves the title “Works of the Law” and they were trying to force outward circumcision upon Gentiles as a means to salvation or justification when it never was even under the Abrahamic & Mosaic Covenants. In the Towrah, it is written that if a stranger wants to sojourn with Yisra’el and he wants to keep the Passover Feast with an Yisra’elite, he must first become circumcised in his flesh (Exodus 12:48). And so this is where the contention started in the book of Galatians.

Circumcision in the flesh and in the heart was required in order to participate in animal sacrifices in the sanctuary, but not as a means to salvation (see Ezekiel 44:7-9). These Essenes in the book of Galatians, however, were making circumcision the pre-requisite to salvation when it never was. No place in the Towrah (5 books of Mosheh) does it say that one must be circumcised in order to be saved! YaHuWaH always intended circumcision to be an outward sign of circumcision of the heart:

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 10:16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked.

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 30:6 And YHWH your Elohiym will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your seed, to love YHWH your Elohiym with all your heart, and with all your soul, that you may live.

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 4:4 Circumcise yourselves to YHWH, and take away the foreskins of your heart, you men of Yahuwdah (Judah) and inhabitants of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem): lest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings.

And so under the Renewed Covenant, we have circumcision of the heart as the “sign” that we now belong to the Tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah) through Yahuwshuwa’s blood covenant:

Romiym (Romans) 2:

25 For circumcision is indeed profitable if you keep the Towrah (law); but if you are a breaker of the Towrah (law), your circumcision has become uncircumcision.

26 Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the Towrah (law), will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

27 And will not the physically uncircumcised, if he fulfills the Towrah (law), judge you who, even with your written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the Towrah (law)?

28 For he is not a Yahuwdiy (Jew) who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh;

29 but he is a Yahuwdiy (Jew) who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not from men but from Elohiym.

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) was telling those who were circumcised outwardly that it does not profit them if they are outwardly circumcised if they fail to keep the Towrah. Likewise he said that if an uncircumcised Gentile does obey the Law of YaHuWaH, his “uncircumcision” is then counted as “circumcision” because he obeys the commandments of YaHuWaH. And so in this way, Sha’uwl (Paul) was teaching that we are truly Yahuwdiy or “Jewish” if we are circumcised inwardly by the Holy Spirit, who removes the foreskin of our hearts and then writes his Towrah (Laws) in our hearts and in our minds.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Yisra’el after those days, says YHWH; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them an Elohiym, and they shall be to me a people:

Ibriym (Hebrews) 10:16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says YHWH, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

But you may be asking yourself “wait a minute---I thought that we are justified by grace through faith in Messiah---not by keeping works of the law!”

Yes! Indeed, we are “justified by grace through faith”, but then grace not only JUSTIFIES us, but grace also SANCTIFIES us and writes the law in our hearts and minds. This is the sign of the “Renewed Covenant” that we have YaHuWaH’s laws in our hearts and minds. Many Christians make the classic mistake of confusing JUSTIFICATION with SANCTIFICATION. But they are quite different.

When YaHuWaH brought the Yisra’elites out of Mitzrayim (Egypt), this is a picture of salvation (justification). But when he took them into the wilderness and taught them his statutes and precepts (Towrah or Instructions) this is a picture of sanctification (being set-apart and called to holiness). We must not confuse these two works of grace and treat them as the same thing.

YaHuWaH did not deliver Yisra’el out of Mitzrayim (Egypt) only to leave them in the wilderness without his instructions on how to live. He taught them his laws so that they would not find themselves back in Egyptian bondage again. You see they ended up becoming slaves in Egypt in the first place because they began to worship the same pagan gods of the Egyptians.  He did not just bail them out of slavery, but he taught them how to stay out of slavery and how to live holy!

The first set of laws came to us in stone tablets (which were corruptible or breakable). But now under the Renewed Covenant on Pentecost (Shabuoth) YaHuWaH presented those same laws to us, only now in “fleshy tables of the heart” (2nd Corinthians 3:3). The Holy Spirit gave us the very same laws but now in an incorruptible form which is a new nature. We now possess the nature of Messiah himself which is the LAW OF THE SPIRIT OF LIFE. These are the very same laws given to Yisra’el only now in an incorruptible form. Messiah is the “Living Towrah” or the “Living Word of Yah.” The corruptible form of the law (the word) was crucified but now the same law (the word) has been resurrected into an incorruptible form, which is called the “law of the spirit of life.”

Notice 3 types of law below:

1.) Law of the Spirit of Life
2.) Law of Sin & Death
3.) Law of YaHuWaH in Stone

Romans 8:

2 For the Towrah (law) of the Spirit of life in Mashiyach (Messiah)Yahuwshuwa has made me free from the law of sin and death.

3 For what the Towrah (law in stone) could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, Elohiym sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

4 That the righteousness of the Towrah (law) might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

Many Christians love to quote Romans 8:1 but they only quote half of the verse and leave the latter part of the verse out. I often hear them say:

“There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus…”

And then they stop there! But there is a condition that makes us no longer  under condemnation! What is that condition?

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Mashiyach (Messiah) Yahuwshuwa, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

The condition is this: They walk not after the flesh but in the power of the Holy Spirit! And what does the Holy Spirit do? He frees us from our inability to keep the law! The Law of the Spirit of Life (the Holy Spirit’s power in us to keep the law) has freed us from our inability to keep the law (the law of sin and death). YaHuWaH’s laws (in stone tablets) were only weak because of the fact that they were INCOMPATIBLE with our corrupted human nature.

But now that the Holy Spirit has given us the law in an INCORRUPTIBLE FORM, which is a NEW NATURE---THE NATURE OF MESSIAH HIMSELF, we are now able to FULFILL THE LAW just as Messiah completely fulfilled the law! This means we have been given power from the Holy Spirit to live exactly as Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashiyach lived!

The law in stone was weak because of our sinful nature, but “the law of the spirit of life” (the law of YHWH written in our hearts) has now freed us from this other law that works in our members that makes us want to break YaHuWaH’s laws. And so by the power of the Holy Spirit, we are now able to FULFILL THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE LAW!

There is a common mistake that many in the church make because they are viewing Paul’s writings with a Greco-Roman mindset instead of a Hebraic mindset.

When I ask most Christians how they would define sin, they don’t have a well-defined answer. They usually say something like “well, ummm, uhh, it means to disobey God....”

While this is a true statement, how do we know when we are disobeying the Heavenly Father? How do we know which laws apply now and which laws applied under the Mosaic & Abrahamic Covenants? Well the Apostle Yahuwchanon (John) knew exactly how to define what it means to “disobey” our Heavenly Father:

1st Yahuwchanon (John) 3:4 Whosoever commits sin transgresses also the Towrah (law): for sin is the transgression of the Towrah (law).

And what is the penalty for breaking the Laws of YaHuWaH?

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 18:20 The soul that sins, it shall die.

Romiym (Romans) 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of Elohiym is eternal life through Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach (Messiah) our YHWH.

Now we get a better understanding of what Shauwl (Paul) meant when he rebuked the Galatians for adhering to another gospel.”  He was rebuking those who would follow the doctrines and commandments of men---not the laws of YaHuWaH!

Galatiym (Galatians) 1:6-7 I marvel that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Mashiyach (Messiah) unto another besowrah (gospel): Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the besowrah (gospel) of Mashiyach (Messiah).

The Essene Jews (Gnostics) in Galatia were making outward circumcision the PRE-REQUISITE TO SALVATION, but it NEVER WAS EVEN UNDER THE FIRST COVENANT!

But now many Christians want to misinterpret Paul’s rebuke to the Galatians as if he was telling them not to keep the Mosaic Law---but this, my friends is completely false! Paul was not preaching against circumcision or the Mosiac Law at all. He was preaching against the idea of “putting the cart before the horse.”

Cart = Works
Horse = Faith

If faith can be likened unto a horse, then we know that the horse is what pulls the cart, hence it is faith that causes us to want to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah)—not the other way around! The foolish Galatians were trying to do “works” first (outward circumcision) as if the cart can pull the horse! In other words, they thought that by doing outward “works” of the Mosaic Law that they could earn salvation. Paul was telling them that you cannot earn salvation and that “doing outward works” does not make you righteous by itself. It is only when we have faith first, followed by works done out of faith, that we are made righteous!

The Apostle Ya’aqob (James or Jacob) illustrated this concept very well:

Ya’aqob (James) 2:

14 What does it profit, my brethren, though a man say he has faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,

16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be you warmed and filled; notwithstanding you give them not those things which are needful to the body; what does it profit?

17 Even so faith, if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

18 Yes, a man may say, You have faith, and I have works: show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.

19 You believe that there is one Elohiym; you do well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

20 But will you know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Yitzchaq (Isaac) his son upon the altar?

22 You see how faith combined with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?

23 And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed Elohiym, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of Elohiym.

24 You see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

Contrary to popular belief, Sha’uwl (Paul) was not preaching against circumcision and neither was he preaching against the Mosaic Law. How do we know? In the book of Acts we discover that some of the Yahuwdiy (Jews) were falsely accusing Sha’uwl (Paul) of teaching the Jews to no longer keep the Law of Mosheh and to stop circumcising their baby boys. But he quickly put an end to those false rumors by demonstrating that he was still very much a Towrah observant Yahuwdiy (Jew):

Maaseh Shlichiym (Acts) 21:

21 And they are informed of you, that you teach all the Yahuwdiy (Jews) which are among the Gentiles to forsake Mosheh, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.

23 Do therefore this that we say to you: We have four men which have a vow on them;

24 Them take, and purify yourself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning you, are nothing; but that you yourself also walk orderly, and keep the Towrah (law).

26 Then Sha’uwl took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

Sha’uwl was not teaching Yahuwdiy (Jews) to stop circumcising their baby boys as we see from this account. He was merely preaching that adult male Gentiles did not need to get circumcised in order to enter into covenant with YaHuWaH Elohiym. These Gentiles would later on decide to get circumcised “after” they had already entered into covenant when they were ready to do so. Nobody was supposed to force them to do this before they were ready.

Many Christians are taught to believe, that one has “fallen from grace” if they get circumcised in their flesh or if they obey the Towrah (Mosaic Law) because of what Sha’uwl wrote in Galatians 5:3-4: “For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Messiah is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; you are fallen from grace.”

In his letter to the Galatians, Sha’uwl was specifically addressing those from the sect called “Works of the Law” who were forcing circumcision as a means to justification. He was not preaching that circumcision or obedience to the Towrah of YaHuWaH caused one to fall from grace. Sha’uwl demonstrated by his actions in Acts 21 that he was not suddenly calling circumcision a sin for Jews or Gentiles under the Renewed Covenant. As a matter of fact, it is still recommended to circumcise baby boys on the 8th day for health reasons.

What Sha’uwl (Paul) did in Acts 21 clearly demonstrated to the Yahuwdiy (Jews) that these rumors that were being circulated about him were false, and he was obviously not preaching against the Mosaic Law nor circumcision. In order to make an open display of his faithfulness to the Towrah, he shaved his head and did a purification ritual according to the Mosaic Law. The Yahuwdiy (Jews) wanted him to prove that these rumors about him were false and so he did as they asked him to do. 

Now we can clearly see from the account in Acts 21, that Sha’uwl (Paul) was not preaching against circumcision at all to the Galatians nor did he ever contradict what was written in the the Mosaic Law. Sha’uwl remained a fully Towrah observant Yahuwdiy (Jew) even after his conversion to Messiah. His message was no different than what our Messiah taught. He was always making a distinction between YaHuWaH’s laws and the man-made laws of the Rabbi’s. What most Christ-ians are unaware of is that the Rabbi’s made up 613 of their own man-made interpretations of the Towrah, and they called their own traditions “The Towrah.”

Now we understand why our Mashiyach (Messiah) rebuked them so harshly! Listen to what he said to them:

Marqos (Mark) 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well you reject the commandment of Elohiym, that you may keep your own tradition.

Marqos (Mark) 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of Elohiym, you hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things you do.

And so you see there are the instructions of our Heavenly Father called “Towrah” and then there is the man-made Towrah” of the Pharisees called the Talmud. Now, I believe that we can use the Talmud as a valuable source for historic reference, but many Jews elevate the Talmud and they treat it as being equal to or above the inspired scriptures. The Talmud is a book of Rabbinical commentaries, but it is not to be treated as scripture. The reason why so many Christians get confused about the Mosaic Law of our Heavenly Father versus the man-made laws of the Phari-sees is because the English translators of the Bible only used one word for “law” to describe seventeen different applications of the word “law” in the Greek New Testament!

There are many different types of “law” that Sha’uwl (Paul) was talking about in his epistles, but you will never know which kind of “law” he was talking about unless you look up the original words in the Concordance. You must also go back and read the Law & Prophets before you can understand the context of Paul’s letters because scripture interprets scripture.

Here are a few examples of how the word “law” is used in Paul’s Epistles:

Mosaic Law: (5 Books of Moses) called Pentateuch in Greek or Towrah in Hebrew. This is the written marriage agreement between YaHuWaH and his beloved bride Yisrael. This can never be done away with because all of his covenants are “everlasting covenants.”If his written marriage agreement (Towrah) is done away with that means that there is no such thing as a New Covenant!

Pharisaic Law: Talmud or Oral Traditions. This is also called “dogma” in Greek. These are additional laws made by humans that are not  found in the scriptures. These are the laws that were “against us” that were nailed to the cross and taken out of the way!

The Laws of the Land: Basically these are the Civil Laws. Paul told us in Romans 13 to obey the civil laws of the land where we reside.

The Law of the Spirit of Life: The Mosaic Law written in our hearts by the Holy Spirit as a sign of the New Covenant.

The Law of Divorce: This law is found in Deuteronomy 24, and it states that if a man finds any “uncleanness” in his wife, he may write her a certificate of divorce, and then he must send her out of his house. She may then go and become another mans wife, but she may never return to her first husband for this is an abomination. YaHuWaH divorced the nation of Yisrael in Jeremiah 3:8 and then he sent them away to the nations. Yisrael then became joined to her false pagan deities, and this meant that she could never return to YaHuWaH her first husband, for this is an abomination. And because of this law, Yisrael remained bound to the “law of her husband” called “the law of divorce.” But once her husband (her Messiah) came in the likeness of sinful flesh, he then died making her “free from the law of her husband!” This is the law that we have been “freed from” as Paul explained in Romans 7. Yisra’el is now free to marry her Creator, her first husband, her Messiah! So you see, we are not free from the Towrah (the written marriage contract), but we are free from the divorce decree that prevented us from returning to him! 

The Law of Sin & Death: This is a natural law that wars within our members making us want to disobey the Mosiac Law. This is essentially the “sinful nature” or the evil inclination that is within fallen man.

The Law of Jealousy: This is described in Numbers 5 as a law that was done for a woman suspected of committing adultery on her husband but there was no proof or eye witness. The priest would perform this law and then he would “blot out the curses” written in a book that was against the woman if she had in fact committed adultery behind her husband’s back. This is the “handwriting of ordinances” that was “blotted out” which was against the adulterous wife (Yisra’el) that Paul spoke about in Colossians 2:16 & Ephesians 2:14. The law of jealousy caused the Ten Northern Tribes to be ostracized by the Two Southern Tribes of Judah. And so the House of Judah thought they had to create ordinances which kept the Gentiles (divorced tribes) out of the Temple. But YaHuWaH did not want the Jews to do this. He wanted them to bring the lost tribes back into covenant. And so these man-made ordinances were “against us!” 

So you see, when the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) spoke of the “law” in  scripture, he was not always speaking of the Mosaic Law. You must look up the original Greek word to determine if the word is “dogma” (man-made traditions) or if it is “Pentateuch” (the 5 books of Moses). Even in Greek the word “nomos” is a very ambiguous word for “law.” It can mean the Mosaic Law or it can also mean the Laws of the Pharisees. And so we have to fully understand the “context” of what Paul is writing about and then we can ascertain “which law” is being spoken of. The only way to know the difference between man-made laws of the Pharisees versus the Mosaic Law given to us as our Marriage Covenant is to study the Towrah! If you do not study the Towrah, do not attempt to understand Sha’uwl’s letters! Many have inaccurately stated that the laws of YaHuWaH put us into bondage, but that is not what puts us into bondage! What puts us in bondage is THE LAW OF SIN & DEATH! Messiah has redeemed us from the CURSE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO KEEP THE LAW!

YaHuWaH’s laws have now been transferred from STONE INTO FLESHY TABLES OF THE HEART, and his laws bring us LIBERTY!

Ya’aqob (James) 1:25 But whoso looks into the perfect Towrah (law) of liberty, and continues therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

Ya’aqob (James) 2:12 So speak you, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the Towrah (law) of liberty.

Our Mashiyach (Messiah) taught us that we must keep the commandments if we want to enter into eternal life!

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 19:17 “.....but if you will enter into life, keep the commandments.”

Obeying the Towrah is not the PREREQUISITE TO SALVATION, but obeying his laws are ESTABLISHED ALL THE MORE, in our hearts as a result of faith! The Apostle Keefa (Peter) prophesied about this end-time Apostasy where many would twist Paul’s words to their own DESTRUCTION:

2nd Keefa (Peter) 3:

15 And account that the longsuffering of our Master is salvation; even as our beloved brother Sha’uwl (Paul) also according to the wisdom given unto him has written unto you;

16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest (twist), as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

The Laws of YaHuWaH are all the more established now under the Renewed Covenant because of our faith in Messiah. They are not abolished nor have they been “nailed to the cross.”

Qolasiym (Colossians) 2:

13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, has he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross. 

The first and last letter of the Ancient Paleo Hebrew Alphabet is called Alef & Taw אתand it is seen as the Red Heifer being nailed to two crossed sticks for Two Houses of Yisrael! And so we must ask ourselves, “what kept the Two Houses of Yisrael separated? What was actually “nailed to the cross”? 

It was the “handwriting contained in ordinances!” But what does the word “ordinance” mean? In the Strong’s Greek Concordance we find that it is a civil decree, in other words a MAN-MADE LAW:

#378. dogma dog’-mah from the base of 1380; a law (civil, ceremonial or ecclesiastical):--decree, ordinance.

So you see Sha’uwl was not telling us that YaHuWaH’s laws were nailed to the cross! And so what exactly was nailed to the cross? There was a man-made decree invented by the Rabbis which commanded that a “wall” should be built up around the outer court of the Temple to keep the Gentiles out. This was a law that was “against us” and our Messiah “took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross!” In doing this, he fulfilled the prophecy in Ezekiel 37:16-17 by taking “two sticks” for Ephrayim &Judah and making them as “one stick in his hand!”

If Sha’uwl was teaching us that YaHuWaH nailed his own commandments to the cross, he would be in direct contradiction to our Mashiyach (Messiah) Yahuwshuwa’s words in Matthew 5:17-19 and this would make Shauwl (Paul) a false prophet! And even if Sha’uwl was preaching lawlessness (which he was not), then why would Christians choose to elevate Pauls words above our Messiah’s words?

In many of Shauwl’s letters, he was addressing this problem with people being “under rabbinic law” instead of under the leading of the Holy Spirit (who is our teacher). If we are UNDER THE SPIRIT we are not under RABBINIC LAW. That is what Paul meant when he said “you are not under the law.” He meant that we are not under Rabbinic or Pharisaic Law but we are under the Holy Spirit’s guidance who will always teach us to obey the laws of our Creator—not man-made laws.

Yahuwshuwa has given us the resources whereby we are able to be PERFECT AS OUR FATHER IN HEAVEN IS PERFECT:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5:48 Be you therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

But some will say “but nobody is perfect....” Yes, this is true when we are walking in the flesh, but through the power of the Holy Spirit we are able to be PERFECT. Messiah would not command this of us if he had not already given us the resources to accomplish it!

What is Grace?

The word “grace” in the Greek Concordance is “charis” which means the divine influence upon the heart.”  But what does this divine influence do to the heart?

Titus 2:

11 For the grace of Elohiym that brings salvation has appeared to all men,

12 Teaching us that, denying unrighteousness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and set-apart, in this present world;

So you see “grace” is not only what justifies us, but grace is also our teacher!  Grace not only brings us salvation, but grace teaches us to “deny unrighteousness” and LAWLESSNESS! Grace teaches us to live RIGHTEOUSLY and to obey the Towrah!

The Renewed Covenant Is Stricter than the Old Covenant

Under the Mosaic Covenant we were given the “bare minimum” requirements to follow, but under the Renewed Covenant, we are required to give 100% of our lives to Yahuwshuwa!

Luqas (Luke) 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 10:37 He that loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 10:38 And he that takes not his cross (two sticks), and follows after me, is not worthy of me.

The Apostle Sha’uwl tells us in Romans 12:1 that we are to present our bodies as a “living sacrifice!”

Why is the New Covenant stricter? Because Yahuwshuwa has given us all of the resources we need by offering up his life for us. We now have two things which enables us to keep the marriage covenant:

1.) The blood atonement of Messiah which cleanses us when we slip and fall.

2.) The gift of the Holy Spirit who deposits the Towrah (Mosaic Law) into our hearts and minds, thereby enabling us to obey the written marriage agreement (commandments).

Now, with the resources that we have been given, we are without excuse. Under the First Covenant, if someone broke the Law of Mosheh, they died at the testimony of two or three witnesses. But under the Renewed Covenant of Grace, Hebrews 10:29 says: HOW MUCH GREATER PUNISHMENT SHALL WE RECEIVE IF WE DO DESPITE TO THE SPIRIT OF GRACE?

Ibriym (Hebrews) 10:

26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sins,

27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

28 He that despised Mosheh’s Towrah (law) died without mercy under two or three witnesses:

29 Of how much worse punishment, suppose you, shall he be thought worthy, who has trodden underfoot the Son of Elohiym, and has counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and has done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

And so this begs the question: If you claim that you are “under grace” yet you are still not obeying the commandments of YaHuWaH, can it be that what you thought was “grace” is actually LICENTIOUSNESS & LASCIVIOUSNESS?

“You Should be Preaching the Gospel Instead of the Law!”

$
0
0
By Maria Merola
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, November 2007

As a writer and a public speaker, I often receive emails, ques-tions and comments from people of every walk of life. In my experience, the majority of people who I encounter do hunger and thirst for righteousness, and their questions are based on an honest and sincere desire to know the truth. But then there are those few who write to me raising objections that are not rooted in the truth from scripture. They always seem to come up with the same worn-out and often-times misquoted Bible passages taken completely out of context in order to defend their so-called “freedom in Christ.By their arguments and their reason-ing, it is obvious that they have been indoctrinated by many of these racketeering preachers in the pulpits who preach lawless-ness for the sake of financial prosperity and popularity. One of these patented responses that I often hear from them is: “Why don’t you focus on preaching the gospel instead of debating about the Law?”

People who say such things are merely trying to deflect from the spirit behind my message to the church which is: “Come out of idolatry.”  They use these types of responses as a smoke-screen but when you think about the logic behind what they are really saying, it goes something like this:

“Why not win souls instead of calling the church out of idolatry”?

This sounds like an oxymoron---doesn’t it?

Over and over again in the TaNaKh (Law, Prophets & Writings), we see that our creator, YaHuWaH was always dealing with Yisra’el  his covenant people---not unbelievers. Why? Because if Yisra’el  walked uprightly and she would forsake her idols, then the heathen nations would look to her as a light and they would repent.

But if the Christian Church is in idolatry herself she is powerless to win the lost. The Christian Church today must see that the blood of Messiah has grafted them into the same olive tree with Yisra’el. The Christian Church has not replaced Yisra’el. And so YaHuWaH deals with the Christian Church today no differently than he did with the nation of Yisra’el in the TaNaKh (Old Testament).

YaHuWaH says that judgment must begin within his house:

1st Keefa (Peter) 4:17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of  Elohiym (God): and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of Elohiym?

You see, if repentance begins with those who claim to be in blood covenant with our Messiah first, then the end result shall be that those who don’t obey the gospel at all will be won over also! 

Yahuwshuwa (Jesus) came to earth first for the “lost sheep of the House of Yisra’el,” and then he sent his disciples to reach out to the Gentiles.

In other words we have to first bring back those within the Christian Church who are “the lost sheep” because of pagan influences and then we can win the rest of the heathen world. Otherwise, it is like the pagans trying to win the pagans. Or in other words, the proverbial “blind leading the blind.”

What happened to the House of Judah in the days of the prophet Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah)? The nation of Judah became infected with the same religion of Babylon just like today’s Christian Church. And so YaHuWaH had to pluck them up, break down their idols, images, and throw down their false pagan altars.”  He had to afflict them, and destroy every vestige of paganism in their culture before he could allow them to come back to Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) to rebuild. It does not sound very gentle or loving does it? But indeed YaHuWaH’s ways are higher than our ways and his thoughts are higher than our thoughts!

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah ) 31:28 And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, says YHWH.

You see, YaHuWaH has called me to do the same thing today! He has called me to pluck up false religious lies that have infected Christianity, and to break down idolatrous ways of thinking, and then we can begin to rebuild a new foundation on the true Rock which is the Yahuwdiyth (Jewish) Messiah named Yahuw-shuwa---not on a false pagan “Jesus” that the church is worshiping today.

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah ) 16:19 O YHWH, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto you from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.

Many in the Church think that they are worshiping the real Messiah but it is “Another Jesus” not patterned after scripture (2nd Corinthians 11:4). Most of Christianity has been conditioned to believe that our Messiah came to do away with the Mosaic Law (Towrah) and thus the majority of the Christian Church teaches a “Lawless Jesus” who extends “cheap grace” without any self-sacrifice, without any repentance or “dying to the old sinful nature.”

We cannot save one single soul until we get them back to the REAL Messiah Yahuwshuwa!

We can preach the gospel all day long and then win them to a false pagan Jesus who is embedded in all of these pagan myths but they will not grow in the faith at all.

The rationale behind saying that we can use paganism to preach the gospel goes something like this:

“Why not tolerate idolatry and the sin of breaking the 1st Commandment in order to preach the good news that Jesus died so that we don't have to keep the commandments anymore?”

This, my friends is a false gospel!

To those who would say that our primary job is to go and preach the gospel, I could not agree with you more!

That is the primary reason why YaHuWaH has called me to educate the church, because we are not reaching the Jews with this pagan version of the gospel!

And please don’t give me that same old anti-Semitic attitude that I hear all the time where Christians rationalize it is pointless to preach the gospel to the Jews. They say things like “The Jews rejected Christ because their hearts were hard.” When I hear Christians saying this, I become furious inside, because they presume that “hard-heartedness” is exclusive to the Jewish people rather than a condition of the human heart! Jeremiah 17:9 declares that the heart of mankind is deceitful and desperately wicked! Christians who say these types of things are displaying that they have hearts that are even more hardened than the Jewish people because they won’t even try to reach the Jews for Messiah! Not only that, but since most Christians reject the Towrah (instructions) of our Heavenly Father, they are no different than Korah in the rebellion against Moses!

We will never reach the Jewish people with a Greco-Roman paganized Jesus. Yahuwshuwa said to the Samaritan woman at the well “You don’t know what you worship but we do for salvation is of the Yahuwdiy (Jews)” ----Yahuwchanon (John) 4:22. 

He was telling her that if you don’t worship him the same way that the tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah) does by keeping the Feasts and the Sabbaths, then YOU DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU WORSHIP! 

You see, the Tribe of Yahuwdah has been given the role of the “kinsmen redeemer” for the other eleven Tribes of Yisrael. We see this illustrated in the story of Judah and his daughter-in-law Tamar in Genesis 38. Judah had promised to send her his youngest son Shelah as a “kinsmen redeemer” after his first-born son Er and the middle son Onan had already died. But instead, Judah himself ended up as her kinsmen redeemer! What this means is that the tribe of YaHuWDaH (Judah) is the tribe that reveals the Father & the Son as the “kinsmen redeemer!” See my other article entitled: The Father & the Son Seen in Judah, the Kinsmen Redeemer.

In Genesis 49:8-12 the patriarch Yaaqob (Jacob) spoke a prophecy over his son Yahuwdah (Judah) from where we derive the term “Jew.” Ya’aqob (Jacob), whose name was changed to Yisra’el said concerning his son Judah: “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah nor a lawgiver from between his feet until Shiloh come.” What does this prophecy mean?It means that the Tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah) or the Jewish people are the tribe that was commissioned to uphold the standard of the Towrah (Mosaic Law) for the other eleven tribes (of which Christians are grafted into). In Romans 3:1-2, the Apostle Shauwl (Paul) wrote: “What advantage then has the Jew? Or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of Elohiym.” What are these oracles? The Greek Strong’s Concordance defines this word “oracles” as “logion” which means “the contents of the Mosaic Law.” So you see, the House of Yahuwdah (Jews) were entrusted with the mandate to preach the Towrah to the nations!

So you see, before we can have world revival on a global scale, we must first preach the true besowrah (gospel) of the true Yahuwdiyth (Jewish) Messiah!

To the Jew First

Why are we commanded to preach the besowrah (gospel) to the Yahuwdiy (Jew) first? Because the scriptures say so:

Romiym (Romans) 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Mashiyach (Messiah): for it is the power of Elohiym unto salvation to everyone that believes; to the Yahuwdiy (Jew) first, and also to the Greek.

Romiym (Romans) 2:9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that does evil, of the Yahuwdiy (Jew) first, and also of the Gentile;

Romiym (Romans) 2:10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that works good, to the Yahuwdiy (Jew) first, and also to the Gentile:

I am the oldest of four children in my family. And so when I was a child, and all of us kids were being scolded for being rowdy, my father would always look at me and say: “Maria, you are the oldest, so you should know better.”

Elohiym in his wisdom has chosen “the weak things to put down the mighty and the foolish things to confound the wise” (1st  Corinthians 1). And so he uses the Gentiles (the younger brother) to make the Jews (the older brother) come back up to the standard that he was chosen for in the first place. And so he has allowed Ephrayim (the younger) in the story of the prodigal to become as the first-born (Jeremiah 31:9) because he wants to provoke the biological first-born son (Judah) to jealousy. Why? Because the first-born son became complacent and he began to keep the commandments out of habit and he lost his first love. He was no longer doing it out of love for the Heavenly Father but out of duty. But when the prodigal son came home, he desired to obey the commandments because of the Father’s great love and compassion for him. This what the Father wants from Judah, the first-born as well. He wants Judah (Jews) to obey him out of love rather than out of duty. And he wants Ephrayim to come back home to the Towrah (instructions) of the Father so that he can provoke big brother to jealousy!

This is the wisdom of Elohiym!

If we attempt to use lies about Christ-Mass & Easter thinking that we can win people to Messiah this way, then we will later on have to undo all of the lies we taught them. This rationale sounds something like this: “I have to lie to you first so that I can preach the truth to you. Now, do you see that we cannot use pagan holidays under the guise of getting people saved? 

This kind of logic reminds me of what Yahuwshuwa said to the religious leaders of his day:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, you make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

In Yahuwshuwa’s day, the religious leaders were going all over the world to win converts (proselytes) but once they did, they were making them twice the child of Hell (Gehenna) because they were teaching them false man-made traditions. These “traditions of men 
only made the word of our Creator of “none effect (Matthew 5:16). 

In other words, we can preach a false gospel by using lies, about Christ-Mass and Easter, but then what are we really winning them to? There is no power to come out of Babylon and the world in that kind of “watered down gospel.”

We must preach the message of the cross (self-denial) which says: “deny yourself, be willing to die for him and give up everything… forsake all idols and false pagan systems.”

That is the true gospel of which the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) spoke:

“.......for the preaching of the cross is foolishness to them that perish…”----1st Corinthians 1:18.

This means that we must preach an uncompromising message of dying to the old sinful nature, and the traditions of men.

In the past, I have had an affinity for finding old pieces of furniture in people’s trash, redeeming it, stripping off the old paint and uncovering the beauty of the real wood underneath. Once that was done, I could then apply the new finish.

You cannot apply new finish to old paint. You must strip away the old stuff so that the wood will become porous and receive the stain and the new finish.

The same thing holds true with preaching the gospel. We must first strip away the layers of old ways of thinking from people and then we can preach the real Yahuwshuwa--- the true Yahuwdiyth (Jewish) Messiah!

Then we can build on that foundation which is him!

If we are not preaching both elements of Law & Prophets, Spirit & Truth, Wisdom & Revelation,” then we are not preaching the true Message of the Kingdom. 

The Law of YaHuWaH (Towrah) gives us “wisdom” but the Ruwach Ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit) brings “revelation.” But we need both operating in our lives!

There are those within the Christian Church who have been given some revelation but they are lacking in wisdom because they think that the Towrah (Mosaic Law) is done away with.

Then there are the Jews who have wisdom from the Towrah, but many of them reject the Messiah, (who gives us anointing of the Holy Spirit).

So you see, both camps are missing something!

Christians need to come back to Towrah and Jews need to accept the Messiah Yahuwshuwa and receive his spirit inside of them!

The Jewish people have rejected him because of the false way that Christianity has presented a false, lawless, pagan Jesus Christ. Not only has Christianity rejected the Towrah (Mosaic Law) which the Messiah of Yisrael always upheld and obeyed, but they have  persecuted the Jews for centuries, and this is what has caused the Jewish people to reject him.

Why does the Bible teach us to preach the gospel to the Jew first? Because as the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) explained in Romans 11:

“....if the falling away of them is riches to the world, how much more their fullness?”

In other words, we will win the rest of the world to Messiah when we first reach the Jews! They are the key to world revival! And how do we win the Jews to Messiah? When the Christian Church at large comes out of Mystery Babylon Religion, and they begin to obey the Towrah, then the Jewish people (symbolized by the older brother in the story of the prodigal son) will then be provoked to Jealousy! And this is how we truly preach the besowrah (gospel)! We do it by obeying Towrah and then we can “provoke Judah to jealousy!”

Ephrayim the Prodigal Son

Can you imagine the prodigal son writing and sending letters to his older brother while he is still in the pig-pen and trying to provoke his older brother to obey their father? The older brother would just laugh at him and say to him: “look at you hypocrite!...you don’t obey our father’s instructions and you are trying to win me over to live as you do?”

In the parable of the prodigal son, Ephrayim (Yisra’el ) represents the younger brother who was “afar off” in the land of Egypt (symbolizing bondage to sin). Judah on the other hand, represents the older brother who never left home but he continued to obey the father’s instructions (the Feasts and Sabbaths).

The prophet Ezekiel was given a commandment in Ezekiel 37:16-18 to take “two sticks” and to write upon one stick for Ephrayim and upon the other stick for Yahuwdah (Judah). YaHuWaH told Ezekiel that “the two sticks shall become one stick in my hand.”

The Hebrew word for “stick” is ets which means “tree.” In other words these two olive trees (Ephrayim & Judah) are the Gentiles and the Jews! When these two come together as ONE NEW MAN (Ephesians 2:15), then “the fullness of the Gentiles” will be accomplished (Romans 11:25). And this is when the natural branches will desire to be grafted back into their own olive tree!

This is when the “Two Witnesses” in Revelation 11:4 (the two candlesticks & the two olive trees) will preach an uncompromising message to the world that will cause the biggest revival in history! This revival will unify the Jewish and the Gentile followers of  Messiah against the Anti-Messiah and his followers!

Ephrayim (Yisra’el ) will never win Judah (Jews) to the Messiah until Ephrayim comes back home to the commandments of the Heavenly Father just like the prodigal son.

When the prodigal son came back home, the father cleansed him by killing the “fatted calf” (blood atonement). And then the older brother Judah became jealous and said: ”Father, I never left home and rebelled against your commandments (Towrah) and yet you never killed a fatted calf for me.”

Ephrayim (the prodigal son) only received the fatted calf (blood atonement) when he came home to his father’s instructions (Towrah) and then he made his older brother Judah jealous! And after Ephrayim received the fatted calf (blood atonement) he also received a signet “ring on his finger” (authority in the Father’s name) and he also received the white “robe of righteousness” or the wedding garment that qualifies him to get into the wedding!

That is the true gospel message to the Jew first and also to the Gentile!

The Eight-Day Miracle of the Oil on Chanukkah: Truth or Tradition?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola

I for one, had previously been taught by others within the Hebraic Roots Movement that the “Eight-Day Miracle of the Oil” was simply a myth and that it could not be substantiated in the book of Maccabees. Although many have previously thought that this 8-day miracle of the oil is just a man-made Jewish Tradition, historically, I believe we can find sufficient evidence to conclude that it actually did occur. While I do not view the Talmud (Oral Traditions) equal in inspiration to the written Torah, we can certainly refer to the Talmud as historical record which I will be using as part of my research to show that this eight day miracle did happen.

As I began to research this further, I discovered several proofs from the scriptures that a temple rededication always lasts for seven days and it is considered rededicated on the eighth day. This is the standard because prophetically the number eight points to the 8th Millennium from creation in the future when the New Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) comes down out of heaven in Revelation 21. In 2nd Peter 3:8 we find out that “one day is like a thousand years with YHWH” and so we can look to the future “eighth millennium” from creation as “the eighth day” when our Creator YaHuWaH will cause the “first heaven and the first earth to pass away” and then “the new heaven and the new earth, and the new Jerusalem” will then come down to earth out of heaven. This will happen as an “initiation” into eternity on the 8th day or the 8th Millennium. The number “8” in scripture always represents new beginnings and initiation because a baby boy is circumcised and dedicated to YaHuWaH Elohiym on the 8th day from his birth.

Correlating to the idea of “new beginnings” is the very meaning of the word “Chanukkah” which literally means “rededication & initiation:” 

#2597 chanukka’ chan-ook-kaw’ (Aramaic) corresponding to 2598; consecration:--dedication.

#2598 chanukkah khan-ook-kaw’ from 2596; initiation, i.e. consecration:--dedicating(-tion).

Even the name Enoch in Hebrew comes from the same root word and means the same thing:

#2585 Chanowk khan-oke’ from 2596; initiated; Chanok, an antediluvian patriarch:--Enoch.

The 8th Millennium (after the 1,000 year reign of Messiah on earth) will then be the initiation of the New Heaven & the New Earth which will come down from heaven and the New Yerushalayim.  

YaHuWShuWA ha’MaShiYacH’s body will then be the temple on the 8th day (8th Millennium), and so it is significant that we see prophetically why this 8-day miracle is embedded into the celebration.

We can also see the number eight representing “salvation” because on Noah’s Ark, only eight people were saved:

1st Kefa (Peter) 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of Elohiym waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

2nd Kefa (Peter) 2:5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

Why did Kefa (Peter) called Noah the “eighth person?” Because Noah went into the ark last as he allowed his family to go in first, and then he being the “eighth person” symbolically means that YaHuWaH was putting an end to the defiled population of the earth and then he was “rededicating” the earth with water baptism by cleansing it.

We find in the Torah that whenever the altar became defiled, in order to “rededicate” the temple altar, it must remain unclean for seven days before it could be cleansed and rededicated:

The Standard for the Rededication of the Altar is Seven Days & on the 8th Day it is cleansed according to the Torah:

Shemoth (Exodus) 29:

35 And thus shall you do unto Aaron, and to his sons, according to all things which I have commanded you: seven days shall you consecrate them.

36 And you shall offer every day a bullock for a sin offering for atonement: and you shall cleanse the altarwhen you have made an atonement for it, and you shall anoint it, to sanctify it.

37 Seven days you shall make an atonement for the altarand sanctify it; and it shall be an altar most holy: whatsoever touches the altar shall be holy.

Yehezqel (Ezekiel) 43:

22 And on the second day you shall offer a kid of the goats without blemish for a sin offering; and they shall cleanse the altar, as they did cleanse it with the bullock.

23 When you have made an end of cleansing it, you shall offer a young bullock without blemish, and a ram out of the flock without blemish.

24 And you shall offer them before YHWH, and the priests shall cast salt upon them, and they shall offer them up for a burnt offering unto YHWH.

25 Seven days shalt you prepare every day a goat for a sin offering: they shall also prepare a young bullock, and a ram out of the flock, without blemish.

26 Seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it; and they shall consecrate themselves.

27 And when these days are expired, it shall be, that upon the eighth day, and so forward, the priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace offerings; and I will accept you, saith YHWH Elohiym.

2nd Chronicles 7:9 And in the eighth day they made a solemn assembly: for they kept the dedication of the altar seven days, and the feast seven days.

The Law of the Leper takes Seven Days and on the 8th Day he is cleansed:

Wayyikra (Leviticus) 22

2 This shall be the law of the leper in the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought unto the priest:

6 And YHWH spoke unto Mosheh, saying,

27 When a bullock, or a sheep, or a goat, is brought forth, then it shall be seven days under the dam; and from the eighth day and thenceforth it shall be accepted for an offering made by fire unto YHWH.

In 2nd Kings 5:10-14 the prophet Elisha told the Syrian Naaman to wash himself seven times in the Jordan River and his leprosy would be healed. We see the same pattern here because Elisha obviously knew what the Torah said about the Law of the Leper and that he would be unclean for seven days and on the eighth day he was cleansed. Naaman dipped himself seven times (once for each day of uncleanness in the Torah ritual) and then he was cleansed! The number eight represents salvation and newness of life! 

The Talmud Reveals Historically the Eight Day Miracle of the Oil

*Disclaimer: I, Maria Merola do not hold the Talmud as being inspired like the scriptures, but I do believe we can glean historic facts from the Talmud. Concerning this historical fact about the 8-day miracle of the oil found in the Talmud, I believe we can find enough evidence in Torah to validate that this miracle did indeed take place, even though it is not recorded in the book of Maccabees.

The Chanukah miracle: A flask with one night’s oil burned for 8 nights. But being that there was oil for one night, the miracle actually lasted only 7 nights. So why does Chanukah last for 8 nights?

Here are 8 approaches to answer this question:

They divided one night’s oil into eight portions. Miraculously, each portion lasted an entire night. ---Beit Yosef, Orach Chaim 670

The Greeks ransacked the Temple many days in search of oil to defile. Despite their strength and numbers, they overlooked one flask. A few weak, battle-weary Jews found it immediately. ---HaMeiri in Lehodos U’lehallel; Sefer HaEshkol, Chanukah 6:13

Wanting the oil to last, they made the wicks one-eighth of the normal thickness. Nevertheless, the flames burned just as brightly as if the wicks had been the normal thickness. ---Chidushei HaRim

The golden Menorah was ritually impure. So were all the Jewish soldiers, having come in contact with death on the battlefield. Therefore, they were forced to make a temporary earthenware Menorah, because earthenware is more resistant to impurity. But earthenware is porous, and when it’s new it absorbs a small but significant part of any oil put in it. Therefore, one night’s oil for a gold Menorah was not sufficient for an earthenware menorah because some of the oil is lost to absorption. ---Bava Metzia 40a & Maharsha Chullin 55

In one account, the text reads “and there wasn’t enough (oil) it to burn even one day...” ---Sheiltos DeRav Achai Gaon, Parshas Vayishlach found in footnote to Megillas Antiochucus in Siddur Otzar Hatefilos

Seven days commemorate the miracle of the oil, and one day commemorates the miracle that a few weak Jewish soldiers defeated the mighty Greek legions.--Kedushas Levi

Chanukah occurred in the year 3622 (139 BCE). Calendar calculations and other historical sources indicate that the 25th of Kislev, the first day of Chanukah, fell on Shabbat that year. Therefore, they needed to light the menorah before sunset Friday night, and consequently needed a little more than a night’s-worth of oil.---Atzei Zayis

The commandment to light the Menorah with pure oil is written in the Torah (Leviticus, chapters 23 and 24) immediately after the commandment to observe the Succoth festival for 8 days (7 days of Succoth followed by Shemini Atzeres). The Sages saw this as a Divine hint that Chanukah should be for 8 days. ----Bnei Yisaschar in the name of the Rokeach

Research based on Sefer Ner Lemeah, Rabbi Yerachmiel Zeltzer

Apparently the historical record shows that the House of Judah were unable to keep the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkoth) in the 7th month that year when Judah Maccabees took back the temple for YaHuWaH because the temple had been defiled by Antiochus. When the temple was rededicated two months later, the House of Judah kept a belated Feast of Tabernacles. I don’t believe that this was accidental. I believe that YaHuWaH allowed this to happen to signify that the 8th Millennium will begin another Tabernacle in the New Jerusalem. All throughout the 7th Millennium during the earthly reign of Messiah, this will take place during the “seventh millennium” or “the seventh day” as a thousand years of Sabbath Rest. It is no small coincidence that the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkoth) takes place in the “seventh month” correlating the “7th Millennium.” But since the House of Judah had to wait until the 9th month to celebrate Sukkoth that year, then the 9th month will correlate to the 9th Millennium (after the 8th Millennium) which will go on into infinity or eternity. 


When the Second Temple in Jerusalem was looted and services stopped, Judaism was outlawed. In 167 BCE Antiochus ordered an altar to Zeus erected in the Temple. He banned circumcision and ordered pigs to be sacrificed at the altar of the temple. [14]Antiochus’s actions provoked a large-scale revolt. Mattityahu, a Jewish priest, and his five sons Jochanan, Simeon, Eleazar, Jonathan, and Judah led a rebellion against Antiochus. Judah became known as Yehuda HaMakabi (“Judah the Hammer”). By 166 BCE Mattathias had died, and Judah took his place as leader. By 165 BCE the Jewish revolt against the Seleucid monarchy was successful. The Temple was liberated and rededicated. The festival of Hanukkah was instituted to celebrate this event. [15] Judah ordered the Temple to be cleansed, a new altar to be built in place of the polluted one and new holy vessels to be made. According to the Talmud, olive oil was needed for the menorah in the Temple, which was required to burn throughout the night every night. The story goes that there was only enough oil to burn for one day, yet it burned for eight days, the time needed to prepare a fresh supply of oil for the menorah. An eight day festival was declared by the Jewish sages to commemorate this miracle.

The version of the story in 1st Maccabees states that an eight-day celebration of songs and sacrifices was proclaimed upon re-dedication of the altar, and makes no mention of the miracle of the oil. [16] A number of historians believe that the reason for the eight day celebration was that the first Hanukkah was a belated celebration of Sukkot and Shemini Atzeret.[17] During the war the Jews were not able to celebrate the these festivals, when lamps were lit in the Temple (Suk.v. 2–4).

The Miracle of the Oil and the Remnant
By James Scott Trimm
From the book: Channukah and the Last Days

A major part of the Channukah story is the miracle of the oil. In fact, when the Hasmonian dynasty fell out of favor, celebration of Channukah shifted in theme from the military victory itself, to the miracle of the oil. The miracle of the oil is not actually mentioned in the books of the Maccabees however the Talmud does recount it:

Talmud: b. Shabbat 21b

What is the reason for Channukah? For our Rabbis taught: On
the 25th of Kislev begin the days of Channukah, which are
eight, during which lamentation for the dead and fasting are
forbidden. For when the Greeks entered the Temple, they
defiled all the oils in it, and when the Hasmonean dynasty
prevailed against and defeated them, they [the Maccabees]
searched and found only one cruse of oil which possessed the
seal of the High Priest, but which contained sufficient oil for
only one day’s lighting; yet a miracle occurred there and they
lit [the lamp] for eight days. The following year these days
were appointed a Festival with the recitation of Hallel and
thanksgiving.

It was also recounted in the Megillat Antiochus (c. 200 CE):

Megillat Antiochus

The Hasmoneans entered the Sanctuary, rebuilt the gates,
closed the breaches, and cleansed the Temple court from the
slain and the impurities. They looked for pure olive oil to light
the Menorah, and found only one bottle with the seal of the
Kohen Gadol so that they were sure of its purity. Though its
quantity seemed sufficient only for one day’s lighting, it lasted
for eight days owing to the blessing of the Elohim of heaven
who had established His Name there. Hence, the Hasmoneans
and all the Jews alike instituted these eight days as a time of
feasting and rejoicing, like any festival prescribed in the Torah,
and of kindling lights to commemorate the victories Elohim
had given them.

There has been some controversy concerning the miracle of the oil. Some say that it was a later innovation, since it is not mentioned in either 1st of 2nd Maccabees. I am convinced that the miracle of the oil did take place for three reasons:

1. It is implied in 2nd Maccabees (we will cover this below)

2. It is recorded in other early sources, such as the Megillat Antiochus.

3. It fits the Last Days prophetic imagery too well for that relationship to be coincidental.

While none of the books of the Maccabees mention this miracle, there are hints of it found in 2nd Maccabees (which is written on the REMEZ level). 2nd Maccabees opens with two letters. The first is a letter to the Jews in Egypt (2nd Maccabees 1:1-9) and the second is more specifically to Aristobulus and to the Jews in Egypt (2nd Maccabees 1:10-2:18). The purpose of these letters, is to explain to the Jews in Egypt why they should keep the eight-day Channukah Festival, despite the fact that it is not one of the feasts prescribed in the Torah. The letter begins with events concerning Nehemiah and works it’s way backwards to the time of Moses.

The letter encourages the Egyptians to “celebrate the feast of tabernacles and the feast of fire” which he says “was given when Nehemiah, who built the Temple and the altar, offered sacrifices.” (2nd Maccabees 1:18)

What is “the feast of fire”? Is it a reference to the original feast of Tabernacles or to Channukah which originated as a belated feast of Tabernacles. The text is unclear.

The Letter goes on to explain the original “miracle of the oil” which took place in association with the dedication of the Second Temple built by Nehemiah:

2nd Maccabees. 1:19-36

19: For when our fathers were led into Persia, the priests that
were then devout took the fire of the altar privily, and hid it in
an hollow place of a pit without water, where they kept it sure,
so that the place was unknown to all men.

20: Now after many years, when it pleased God, Nehemiah,
being sent from the king of Persia, did send of the posterity of
those priests that had hid it to the fire: but when they told us
they found no fire, but thick water;

21: Then commanded he them to draw it up, and to bring it;
and when the sacrifices were laid on, Nehemiah commanded
the priests to sprinkle the wood and the things laid thereupon
with the water.

22: When this was done, and the time came that the sun shone,
which afore was hid in the cloud, there was a great fire kindled,
so that every man marvelled.

23: And the priests made a prayer whilst the sacrifice was
consuming, I say, both the priests, and all the rest, Jonathan
beginning, and the rest answering thereunto, as Nehemiah did.

24: And the prayer was after this manner; O Lord, Lord God,
Creator of all things, who art fearful and strong, and righteous,
and merciful, and the only and gracious King,

25: The only giver of all things, the only just, almighty, and
everlasting, thou that deliverest Israel from all trouble, and
didst choose the fathers, and sanctify them:

26: Receive the sacrifice for thy whole people Israel, and
preserve thine own portion, and sanctify it.

27: Gather those together that are scattered from us, deliver
them that serve among the heathen, look upon them that are
despised and abhorred, and let the heathen know that thou art
our God.

28: Punish them that oppress us, and with pride do us wrong.

29: Plant thy people again in thy holy place, as Moses hath
spoken.

30: And the priests sung psalms of thanksgiving.

31: Now when the sacrifice was consumed, Nehemiah
commanded the water that was left to be poured on the great
stones.

32: When this was done, there was kindled a flame: but it was
consumed by the light that shined from the altar.

33: So when this matter was known, it was told the king of
Persia, that in the place, where the priests that were led away
had hid the fire, there appeared water, and that Nehemiah had
purified the sacrifices therewith.

34: Then the king, inclosing the place, made it holy, after he
had tried the matter.

35: And the king took many gifts, and bestowed thereof on
those whom he would gratify.

36: And Nehemiah called this thing Naphthar, which is as
much as to say, a cleansing: but many men call it Naphta

The account is unclear as to whether these events took place at a Sukkot (Tabernacles) or on the 25th of Chislev. The author probably assumes that his audience is familiar with this account and knows which was the case.

If it took place on a Sukkot, it might explain how Sukkot has become the original “festival of lights” a characteristic that transferred to Channukah. Sukkot was known as the “Festival of Light” and at this feast the entire city of Jerusalem was filled with light from giant 75 feet tall menorahs. (m.Sukkah 5:2–4; b.Sukkah 52b).

This author’s intent was to justify the observance of Channukah through this account, which certainly implies that Channukah also involved a similar “miracle of the oil.” The letter goes on to recount another apocryphal event, in which Jeremiah also took some of this “fire” (which by implication, would also have taken the form of the miraculous thick liquid (oil) “nephthar” along with certain Temple artifacts including the Ark of the Covenant, hiding them up in a cave in Mount Moab:

2nd Maccabees 2:1-8a

1: It is also found in the records, that Jeremy the prophet
commanded them that were carried away to take of the fire, as
it hath been signified:

2: And how that the prophet, having given them the law,
charged them not to forget the commandments of the Lord, and
that they should not err in their minds, when they see images of
silver and gold, with their ornaments.

3: And with other such speeches exhorted he them, that the law
should not depart from their hearts.

4: It was also contained in the same writing, that the prophet,
being warned of God, commanded the tabernacle and the ark to
go with him, as he went forth into the mountain, where Moses
climbed up, and saw the heritage of God.

5: And when Jeremiah came thither, he found an hollow cave,
wherein he laid the tabernacle, and the ark, and the altar of
incense, and so stopped the door.

6: And some of those that followed him came to mark the way,
but they could not find it.

7: Which when Jeremiah perceived, he blamed them, saying,
As for that place, it shall be unknown until the time that God
gather his people again together, and receive them unto mercy.


8: Then shall the Lord shew them these things, and the glory of
the Lord shall appear, and the cloud also, as it was shewed
under Moses,…

The Author of 2nd Maccabees is telling us that on the last day when Messiah returns there will be a great miracle, the pillar of cloud will return and indicate the hidden position of the Ark of the Covenant, Temple artifacts and the “Naphthar” the oil that will miraculously restore the fire of the altar for the Millennial Temple. The letter goes on to recount Solomon’s dedication of the First Temple, and how the original fire of the altar of the First Temple was also a great miracle:

2nd Maccabees 2:8 b-12

8b …and as when Solomon desired that the place might be
honourably sanctified.

9: It was also declared, that he being wise offered the sacrifice
of dedication, and of the finishing of the temple.

10: And as when Moses prayed unto the Lord, the fire came
down from heaven, and consumed the sacrifices: even so
prayed Solomon also, and the fire came down from heaven,
and consumed the burnt offerings.

11: And Moses said, Because the sin offering was not to be
eaten, it was consumed.

12: So Solomon kept those eight days.

This refers back to the events recorded in 2nd Chronicles :

2nd Chronicles 7:1 HRV Now when Solomon (Shlomo) had made an end of praying, the fire came down from heaven, and consumed the burnt-offering and the sacrifices, and the glory of YHWH filled the house.

This was part of the dedication of Solomon’s Temple, which took place at Sukkot (2nd Chronicles. 7:8-10; 1st Kings 8:2).

Thus 2nd Maccabees makes the case that each Temple dedication was tied to a “miracle of fire” and to the eight day Sukkot celebration. It was manifest by the miracle of fire that came down from heaven at the dedication of the First Temple during Sukkot. It was manifest at the dedication of the Second Temple and the miracle of the fire from the Naphthar. Finally it was manifest at the re-dedication of the Second Temple with the miracle of the oil.

The miracle of the oil points to the last days in two important ways. To begin with, the finding of the oil in the Temple as the re-dedication prefigures the finding of the Naphthar as well as the Ark of the Covenant and other Temple artifacts which will bring about another “miracle of fire” at the dedication of the Millennial Temple.

There is another important way in which the miracle of the oil prefigures the Last Days. At the end of the three and one half years of the Great Tribulation, when Messiah shall cleanse His Sanctuary, he will find a remnant. Just as the oil had the seal of the Cohen HaGadol, the remnant shall also be sealed:

Revelation 7:2- 4 HRV

2 And I saw another angel who ascended from the rising of the
sun, and he had the seal of the Living Eloah. And he cried
aloud with a loud voice to the four angels--those to whom it
was given to harm the earth and the sea.

3 And he said, Do not harm the earth nor the sea, not even the
trees, until we seal the servants of Eloah between their eyes.

4 And I heard the number of those sealed, one hundred and
forty-four thousand from all the tribes of Yisra’el.

This seal is the seal of the Ruach HaKodesh:
Ephesians. 1:13 HRV

11 And we were chosen in Him, even as He marked us out
beforehand, and He desired: He who performs everything
according to the purpose of His will,

12 That we, those who first hoped in the Messiah, should be to
the esteem of His glory.

13 In Him also, you heard the Word of Truth, which is the
Good News of your life, and in Him, you believed and were
sealed with the Ruach HaKodesh which was promised,

14 Which is the token of our inheritance, unto the redemption
of those who have Life, and unto the glory of His honor.

In the Tanak, the olive oil of the menorah is identified as symbolic of the Ruach HaKodesh:

Zechariah 4:

1 And the angel that spoke with me returned and waked me, as
a man that is wakened out of his sleep.

2 And he said unto me: What see you? And I said, I have seen,
and behold a candlestick all of gold, with a bowl upon the top
of it, and its seven lamps thereon; there are seven pipes: yes
seven, to the lamps, which are upon the top thereof.

3 And two olive trees by it: one upon the right side of the bowl,
and the other upon the left side thereof.

4 And I answered and spoke to the angel that spoke with me,
saying, What are these, my master?

5 Then the angel that spoke with me answered and said unto
me: Know you not what these are? And I said, No, my master.

6 Then he answered and spoke unto me, saying: This is the
word of YHWH unto Z’rubavel, saying: Not by might, nor by
power: but by My spirit! says YHWH Tzva’ot.

7 Who are you, O great mountain before Z’rubavel? You shall
become a plain. And he shall bring forth the top stone with
shoutings of Grace! Grace! unto it.

8 Moreover the word of YHWH came unto me, saying:

9 The hands of Z’rubavel have laid the foundation of this
house; his hands shall also finish it: and you shall know that
YHWH Tzva’ot has sent me unto you.

10 For who has despised the day of small things? Even they,
shall see with joy the plummet in the hand of Z’rubavel--even
these seven, which are the eyes of YHWH, that run to and fro
through the whole earth.

11 Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these two
olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick, and upon the
left side thereof?

12 And I answered the second time, and said unto him, What
are these two olive branches, which are beside the two golden
spouts, that empty the golden oil out of themselves?

13 And he answered me and said: Know you not what these
are? And I said, No, my master.

14 Then said he: These are the two anointed ones, that stand by
the Adon of the whole earth.

Note the parallel here between these two “olive trees” and the two “olive tree” witnesses who witness during the forty-two months of the Great Tribulation:

Revelation 11:1-4 HRV

1 And a reed was given to me like a rod, and the angel stood
and said, Arise and measure the Temple of Eloah, and the altar,
and those who worship in it:

2 Yet the court within the Temple, leave out, and do not
measure it, because it is given to the Goyim, and they will
trample down the Set-Apart city, forty-two months.

3 And I will give my two witnesses [authority] to prophesy,
one thousand two hundred sixty days, being clothed with
sackcloth.

4 These are two olive trees and two lampstands, that stand
before the Adon of the whole earth.

Yeshua illustrates the “oil” which the remnant will have upon their return:

Matthew 25:1-12 HRV

1 Then will the Kingdom of Heaven be comparable to ten
virgins, which took their torches, and went out to meet the
bridegroom.

2 Five of them were foolish, and five of them were prudent.

3 The five foolish, when they took the torches, took no oil with
them:

4 But the prudent took the oil in their vessels, with the torches.

5 And while the bridegroom was delayed, they all slumbered
and slept.

6 And at midnight there was a cry, Behold! The bridegroom
has come: go out now to meet Him!

7 Then all those virgins arose, and made ready their torches.

8 And the foolish said to the prudent, Give us now of your oil,
for our torches are extinguished.

9 But the prudent answered and said to them, We may not give
you, lest there suffice not for us and you. But go now therefore
to them that sell, and buy for yourselves:

10 And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came. And
they that were ready, went in with Him to the marriage, and the
door was shut.

11 And after that, came the rest of the virgins, saying, My
Master, My Master: open to us!

12 But He answered, saying: Amen, I say to you, I know you
not.

Just as Judas Maccabee found a single jar of set-apart oil sealed with the seal of the Cohen HaGadol, when Messiah returns, he will find a remnant sealed with the seal of the Ruach HaKodesh, filled with the Ruach HaKodesh.

*James Trimm’s article ends here and Maria’s article continues*

Nine Branches or Seven Branches?

The temple menorah has only 7 branches, not 9 branches according to Numbers 8:2. I believe in celebrating Chanukkah by reading the story of the Maccabees to our children and remembering the YaHuW’diy (Jewish) people who died because they loved the commandments of YaHuWaH and refused to bow to a pagan idol. But I believe in using the 7-branch Temple Menorah and not the 9-branch one invented by traditions of men. Our Messiah was conceived on the 9th month in the Hebrew year called Kislev (Chanukkah), and born 9 months later in September on the Feast of Trumpets. There are 9 gifts of the Holy Spirit (1st Corinthians 12:8-11) & 9 fruits of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). There were also 9 months of pregnancy for the Temple (the body) of Messiah to be completely formed in the womb. Hence, while I personally do not use the 9-branch Menorah, I can see some prophetic meaning behind the number 9 in scripture and prophecy. The number 8 is the number of “new beginnings,” and it will be in the 8th Millennium from creation that the New Heaven & the New Earth will come down (Revelation 21). It will be at this point in time that the Messiah himself will be the Temple! (Revelation 21:22). Is there a numerical pattern here with the 8-day miracle and the 9-branch Menorah? It would seem that “the 8th day” following the Millennium and going into eternity is pointing to something prophetically. Will this be the final culmination of when the Temple will be permanently re-dedicated as the Lamb himself? Even though I can see some prophetic meaning behind the numbers 8 & 9, there is no scriptural support to use a 9-branch Menorah, and so I will use the 7-branch Temple Menorah as set forth by the Torah when celebrating Chanukkah.

What is the Catholic Mass?

$
0
0
The Dictionary definition for the word “mass” tells us what the word actually means in Catholicism:

http://www.Dictionary.com (Unabridged) Mass: noun The celebration of the Eucharist. Compare High Mass, Low Mass   ( sometimes lowercase) a musical setting of certain parts of this service, as the Kyrie eleison, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Benedictus, and Agnus Dei.

Origin: before 900; Middle English masse, Old English mæsse; Vulgar Latin *messa, Late Latin missa, formally feminine of Latin missus, past participle of mittere to send, dismiss; perhaps extracted from a phrase in the service with missa est and a feminine subject.

There you have it! The Dictionary shows the definition of the Mass as a celebration of the Eucharist. What is the Eucharist? It is a pagan idol! The Egyptian pagan priests placed these initials I H S of the pagan trinity (Isis, Horus & Seb) on a round wafer to commemorate the sun-god and they ate it each year on December 25th believing that the sun-god was being reincarnated in them as they ate this wafer-god. They re-enacted the death of Nimrod on a “tree” on March 25th (Easter) and believed he would be reincarnated on December 25th. This re-enactment was called a “Mass” or Massacre.

Today, these same initials of I H S appear on the Catholic Eucharist Wafer. The Catholic Catechism teaches that the priest has the power to pull “Christ” down from his throne and crucify him again and again at each Mass. The Catechism states the following concerning our Messiah:

“At each mass, he performs the function of the victim anew...” See my other article entitled“What is Christ Mass & Should You Be Merry About It?”
Pictured here to the right is the blasphemous idol called a “Crucifix” which keeps our Messiah perpetually dead on the cross! This crucifix pictures the pagan trinity of supposedly “Mary Queen of Heaven” (recycled from Semiramis, the wife of Nimrod); And on the left side a picture of Joseph the husband of Mary which supposedly makes up “The Holy Family” or pagan trinity of Isis, Horus & Seb. Joseph is said to be the earthly representation of the Heavenly Father, but this Catholic Trinity secretly disguises a false pagan Trinity! 

The Catholic Trinity secretly disguises a different trinity than what most Christians believe in:

The Pope as “the Holy Father,” Jesus as the pagan sun-god (reincarnation of Tammuz), and Mary as the Holy Spirit. Hence, Isis (Mary), Horus (Jesus), Seb (Pope/Father).

Pictured above is the original “Trinity” of the Father (Nimrod), the Mother (Semiramis), and the Son (Tammuz). The Roman Emperor Constantine borrowed this pagan myth and assimilated it to our Messiah. He renamed Nimrod “the Holy Father”(every Pope is supposedly a reincarnation of Nimrod the sun-god). The title “Pope” in Latin is Pappasmeaning “Father” (Pater in Greek). Constantine also renamed Semiramis “Mary” or the Holy Spirit and he renamed Tammuz “J’Zeus.” Our Messiah YaHuWShuWA (Jesus) does not live inside of a round wafer nor does he dwell in a golden sun-burst called “the Monstrance.” The Monstrance pictured to the right is a golden sun-burst that is used to store the Eucharist wafer. Roman Catholicism inaccurately refers to this symbol of Baal worship as “the Ark of the Covenant.” Inside of this “Monstrance” is a glass window with the pagan sun-god wafer inside where the Vatican claims that it contains “J’Zeus” (Jesus). The Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) explained to us that the Creator cannot live in objects made with human hands!  
Acts 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwells not temples made with hands; as says the prophet. 

Acts 17:24 Elohiym that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Master of heaven and earth, dwells not in temples made with hands;

Even the gilded clip that holds the wafer is called “a lunette” because the Latin word for moon is luna, and it is shaped like a crescent moon like in the religion of Islam! Pictured is the flag of Islam which shows us that Roman Catholicism is another stream of Mystery Babylon Religion right along with Islam. In the ancient Mystery Religion of Semiramis & Nimrod, she called herself “the goddess of the moon” and Nimrod is called “the god of the sun” as well as “the god of the tree.” As you can see the flag of Islam pictures the symbolism for the Mystery Religion of Babylon featuring the moon and “the falling star” called Lucifer or the pagan sun-god. At this youtube video, you can view the history of Islam and you will see that Islam was created by the Vatican in the 6th Century as a clever decoy for the end-time Beast! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDBRPF9uCYk

Understanding Roman Catholicism by Rick Jones is a book that you can read entirely online as it compares what is written in the scriptures to the Catholic Catechism and it shows us that the Catholic Catechism is indeed the religion of Jezebel that our Messiah warned us about in Revelation 2:20-23: 
“....Notwithstanding I have a few things against you, because you suffer (allow) that woman Yeze’Baal (Jezebel), which calls herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idolsAnd I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searches the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.


Transubstantiation


During the mass, priests allegedly have the power to supernaturally turn the bread and wine into the actual and literal body and blood of YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach (Jesus Christ):

“The Council of Trent summarizes the Catholic faith by declaring: “Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly his body that he was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God, and this holy Council now declares again, that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation.” Pg. 347, #1376.

This Catechism quote reveals that the Catholic Church still adheres to this doctrine which was defined at the Council of Trent:

“At the heart of the Eucharistic celebration are the bread and wine that, by the words of Christ and the invocation of the Holy Spirit, become Christ’s Body and Blood.” Pg. 336 # 1333

The Catechism even specifies when Messiah (Christ) comes into the Eucharist and how long He stays:

“The Eucharistic presence of Christ begins at the moment of the consecration and endures as long as the Eucharistic species subsist. Christ is present whole and entire in each of the species and whole and entire in each of their parts, in such a way that the breaking of the bread does not divide Christ.” Pg. 347 #1377

Since Catholicism is teaching members to partake in literal cannibalism, this doctrine requires serious examination. To begin with, we must determine this doctrine’s origin. Is it from Elohiym, or is it a tradition of men? Catholicism insists it is scriptural, citing the words of YaHuW’shuwa  in YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:

“Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoso eats my flesh, and drinks my blood, has eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:53-54

Though this one verse does appear to teach cannibalism, if you read the entire passage in context, the meaning becomes clear. Right before making that statement, YaHuW’shuwa said:

“... For the bread of Elohiym is he which comes down from heaven, and gives life unto the world. Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. And YaHuW’shuwa said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that comes to me shall never hunger; and he that believes on me shall never thirst.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:33-35

This teaching is consistent with the rest of Scripture. Eternal life comes through believing in YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach, not eating His body. The Lord goes on to further clarify:

“And this is the will of him that sent me, that everyone which seeth the Son, and believes on him, may have everlasting life...” YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:40

Again, YaHuW’shuwa points out that eternal life comes through believing in Him. When the Messiah’s disciples murmured at His words, YaHuW’shuwa explained:

“It is the spirit that quickens; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:63

YaHuW’shuwa was talking spiritually, not physically. He was explaining that spiritually, all life comes through faith in Him, not eating His body.
Nowhere else in the Bible does Elohiym endorse cannibalism. In fact, Elohiym forbids the practice:

“But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall you not eat.” Bereshiyth (Genesis) 9:4

“... No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourns among you eat blood.” Wayyikra (Leviticus) 17:12

YaHuWaH Elohiym would never command His children to do something He had already forbidden.

The Biblical purpose

Shaul’s instructions in 1st Corinthians 11 shed even more light on this matter:

“For I have received of the Master that which also I delivered unto you, That the Master YaHuW’shuwa the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.” 1st Corinthians 11:23-24

When YaHuW’shuwa said, “Take, eat: this is my body,” He was not suggesting that they reach out and begin eating His literal body. To even suggest such is ridiculous. He was speaking spiritually about what He was about to accomplish on the cross.

Notice how that verse ends: “...this do in remembrance of me.” Observing the Master’s Supper is a remembrance of Messiaht’s work at Calvary, not a reenactment. The same is true of Messiah’s blood:

“After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do you, as oft as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 1st Corinthians 11:25

YaHuW’shuwa Himself taught the same lesson to his disciples at the Last Supper:

“And he (YaHuW’shuwa) took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.” Luke 22:19

The Cup Full of Abominations & Filthiness

Revelation 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication.


Since transubstantiation is another unscriptural Catholic tradition of men, several more intriguing questions await an answer: Why does the Catholic Church deliberately take one verse of Scripture out of context and build a doctrine the Scriptures obviously does not teach? Why would the Catholic Church rather have you eating Elohiym than placing your faith in Him? Most importantly, can you knowingly partake in this practice now that you know the truth?

“Therefore to him that knows to do good, and does it not, to him it is sin.” Ya’aqob (James) 4:17

Eucharist: Preserves from Sin


Does partaking of the Eucharist have power to cleanse Catholics from past sins and preserve them from future sins?

“For this reason the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins:” Pg. 351, #1393

“By the same charity that it enkindles in us, the Eucharist preserves us from future mortal sins.” Pg. 352, #1395

Once again, Elohiym’s Word and Catholic tradition couldn’t be farther apart. Regarding cleansing from past sins, the Bible declares that all sins are washed away through the blood of YaHuW’shuwa Messiah:

“...the blood of YaHuW’shuwa Mashiyach his Son cleanses us from all sin.” 1st YaHuW’chanon (John) 1:7

“And from YaHuW’chanon Mashiyach, who is the faithful witness...Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,” Revelation 1:5

The Catechism strips away from Mashiyach the credit He alone deserves for cleansing people from their sins, and credits instead a wafer with accomplishing that task. Why is YaHuW’shuwa demoted again?

“And such were some of you: but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of the Master YaHuW’shuwa, and by the Spirit of our Elohiym.” 1st Corinthians 6:11

Preserving from future sins

There is no scriptural evidence that eating a piece of bread will preserve anyone from future sins. This doctrine’s only practical function is to keep members returning to the Catholic Church to receive the Eucharist, in hopes that it will help preserve them from sin.

Aside from holding people in bondage to the church, there is little else such a practice can accomplish.

Though Elohiym’s Word does not endorse this practice, it does suggest a way you can protect yourself from sin:

“Your word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against you.” Tehillim (Psalm) 119:11

“Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto according to your word.” Tehillim (Psalm) 119:9

To preserve yourself from sin, Elohiym suggests that you read, memorize and obey the Scriptures. Curiously, the Catholic Church disagrees. It seems that the Catholic leadership would rather have you looking to the church for help than to Elohiym’s Word.

You must decide why:

“YHWH shall preserve you from all evil...” Tehillim (Psalm) 121:7

“You art my hiding place; You shalt preserve me from trouble; You shalt compass me about with songs of deliverance. Selah.” Tehillim (Psalm) 32:7

“And YHWH shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.” 2nd Timothy 4:18

Conclusion

To cleanse you from past sins and protect you from future sins, Catholicism demands that you look to a piece of bread.

It is imperative that you understand that this tradition of men directly contradicts Elohiym’s Word. To obey this Catholic doctrine, you must reject Holy Scriptures.

Do you really want to do this?

“Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, To the only wise Elohiym our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Awmane.“ YaHuW’dah (Jude) 1:24-25

Eucharist: Helps the Dead


Partaking of the Eucharist purportedly gives Catholics who are still alive an opportunity to help the dead:

“The Eucharistic sacrifice is also offered for the faithful departed who ‘have died in Christ but are not yet wholly purified, so that they may be able to enter into the light and peace of Christ.” Pg. 345, #1371

“In the Eucharist, the Church expresses her efficacious communion with the departed...” Pg. 420 #1689

This heart-tugging doctrine indoctrinates Roman Catholics with the belief that regularly receiving the Eucharist will help their departed loved ones reach heaven faster.

If this doctrine is of Elohiym, then you should obey it. But if it’s a tradition devised by men to keep people in bondage to a church, then it is a cruel and heartless method of controlling people. Let’s see what Elohiym says about it.

Never mentioned

You can search the Scriptures from beginning to end, but you will not find the Eucharist helping a single dead person. And not one Bible character ever received the Eucharist on behalf of a departed loved one.

As you may suspect, this Catholic tradition is not only absent from Elohiym’s Word, it directly violates it as well. The Scriptures teaches that we will each give account for our own life:

“So then every one of us shall give account of himself to Elohiym.” Romans 14:12

YaHuWShuWA did all the work

People enter heaven solely because of the good work YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach did on the cross. Salvation is a gift from Elohiym, not an item earned by our righteousness or the righteousness of friends and loved ones.

Death, then judgment

The Scriptures declares that after death, everyone faces Elohiym for judgment. There are no more chances:

“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment” Ibriym (Hebrews) 9:27

Those who do not put their faith in Mashiyach (Messiah) while they are alive are already condemned to hell:

“He that believes on him (YaHuW’shuwa) is not condemned: but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of Elohiym.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 3:18

The wrath of Elohiym abides on those who die without Elohiym:

“He that believes on the Son has everlasting life: and he that believes not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of Elohiym abides on him.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 3:36

The Scriptures say nothing about Elohiym’s wrath being pacified because someone received the Eucharist on behalf of departed loved ones. The only way to avoid the condemnation of Elohiym is by placing your faith in YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach while you are alive. YaHuW’shuwa  declared:

“... He that hears my word, and believes on him that sent me, has everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.” YaHuW’chanon (John) 3:36

Conclusion

Once again, you are left with several questions which must be answered:

Why is this tradition of the Catholic Church so diametrically opposed to Elohiym’s Holy Word? Why does the Catholic Church want members performing rituals for the dead, when Elohiym’s Word says such practices are useless? Is this but another method of keeping people in bondage to the Catholic Church? Most importantly, you need to understand that to continue practicing this man-made tradition, you must reject the very words of YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach. Are you sure you want to do this?

“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Mashiyach.” Colossians 2:8

*Disclaimer: In all of my writings I no longer use the Greco-Roman transliterated name of our Messiah which is “Jesus.” I use his original Hebrew name which is Joshua or YaHuW’shuwa in ancient Hebrew as seen in the Strong’s Hebrew Concordance #3091. Instead of the title “Christ” which is what the Greeks called all of their pagan deities, I use the title Messiah or ha’Mashiyach which is more specific to the prophesied one in the Hebrew Scriptures. I no longer use the term “God” when referring to our Creator because there is pagan deity of fortune named “Baal Gawd” (#1171 in the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance) and so to avoid the association, I use the Hebrew title for “God” which is Elohiym (plural) or Eloah (singular). I only use the word “god” when referring to the pagan deities (not in association with our Creator). In Zephaniah 3:9 we are given an end-time prophecy that says we will be restored to a pure language that we may all call upon the name of our Creator YaHuWaH with “one consent.” In our English Bibles the word “LORD” has been used as a replacement 7,000 times for the proper name of our Creator which is 4 letters: YHWH pronounced as YaHuWaH. I have restored his name back to the text as it was removed by the Masorites in the 10th Century (based on a ban of the sacred name in the Jewish Talmud). Instead of the proper name of our Creator, they used Adonai (Master) and then the English translators used “the LORD” in all capital letters. There is no letter “J” in the Hebrew Language and so I use the corrected form of all of the names where the Heavenly Father’s name appears embedded (YaHuW) within the names of prophets and patriarchs.  Also, I use the King James Version of the Bible for all scripture references with the archaic words updated and the sacred names updated.


Valentine’s Day & Nimrod: The Original Cupid

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, February 2007 
http://www.DoublePortionInheritance.com/

Pictured to the left is an artist’s depiction of the original “Saint Valentine” of “Saturnia, which was later on renamed as the city of Rome.” According to Babylonian history, Nimrod was being pursued by a bounty hunt of men who were commissioned by Shem (the son of Noah) to find him and kill him for his many crimes against children. According to the book of Yasher (Jasher), it was Esau (the twin brother of Jacob) who ultimately killed Nimrod.

Nimrod’s demise is accurately described in Isaiah 14:12 where he is said to be “cut down to the ground,” just like a tree. Nimrod’s other alias is “Ba’al,” the god of the sun and the tree. This proph-ecy is about Satan himself who was once a “covering cherub” at the throne in heaven (see Ezekiel 28). After his rebellion towards the Most High, he was cast out of heaven and he masqueraded as the serpent in the Garden of Eden. But he also masqueraded as the “King of Tryus.”  Tyrus was an ancient Phonecian city on the Eastern Coast of the Mediterranean Sea which today is called Lebanon.

Nimrod’s crimes were many, but the most heinous of his crimes was the sacrificing of infants on the altar to Moloch (aka Satan). When Nimrod fled from his pursuers, he hid himself in the Mountains of Nembrod also called the Mountains of Nimrod. Today, these very same mountains are called the “Apennine Mountains” and they are located in Rome, Italy. These are the same mountains which surround the Vatican, otherwise known as  “The Seven Hills of Rome.” 

In the book of Jasher (Joshua 10:13, 2nd Samuel 1:18), we find out that Nimrod was advised by the priests of Ba’al that he would be given “esoteric knowledge” (hidden or secret wisdom) or what is called “the third eye” or “the all-seeing eye” of Lucifer (Horus). He was told that if he committed acts of incest with his mother, Semiramis and bestiality (sex with animals) he would gain this secret wisdom from the “gods” (fallen angels). Nimrod was also told that he could become immortal if he would sacrifice babies and drink the blood of these infants. This is why the scriptures call him “the mighty hunter.” He was not a hunter of animals only, but of the souls of humans.

Pictured here is the “all-seeing eye” seen over the Pyramid on the back of the U.S. one dollar bill and in other occult symbolism. It represents Lucifer (Satan) who has tried to deceive the world into believing that he is the one who is “all-knowing” and “all-wise” instead of our Creator, YaHuWaH. When people in the occult claim to have received “the third eye” it is what is also called “psychic power” or “extra-sensory perception.” This is a counterfeit to the true gifts of the Holy Spirit (1st Corinthians 12:1-11).

Nimrod, is also said to have “mingled his seed” with the seed of fallen angels as he had committed acts of bestiality (sexual relations with a goat) in order to gain supernatural demonic power (Daniel 2:43). In Daniel 2:32-45, Daniel interpreted a very important dream given to King Nebuchadnezzar. This dream shows us how all of the empires throughout history form an “image of a man,” and the final destruc-tion of this “image” ends with a “stone cut without hands” (symbolic of the Messiah) who comes at the 7th millennium to destroy all of the kingdoms of this world (inspired by Satan) represented by this image of a man. 

This image of a man is none other than an image of “Nimrod” whose body parts were cut off like limbs to a tree and delivered to each of the ten prov-inces within the land of Shinar.  In Genesis 10:9-19, we see that Nimrod’s kingdom consisted of ten provinces. After his kingdom was broken up by the confusing of the languages and by the splitting of the continents (Genesis 10:32, 11:7-8), his Mystery Religion continued under different names. All ten of these provinces in the latter days will come back together again as “ten horns” on the Beast or “ten toes” (Daniel 2:42; 7:24, Revelation 12:3).

The four body parts to this image of a man are accurately seen in Zechariah 1 as being “four horns” (political powers) who have scattered Judah, Yisra’el, and Jerusalem. The four body parts (head of gold, chest of silver, hips of brass, two iron legs) represent four empires: Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome. But in the end of days, out of these two iron legs (Rome) will come “ten toes” or “ten horns” which will be a revival of Nimrod’s king-dom which consisted of these very same “ten provinces” in the land of Shinar (Genesis 10:9-19). These ten provinces used to be concentrated in one area, but after the biblical Pangaea, where the earth was divided (Genesis 10:32), these ten provinces later on were divided into “seven continents” of the world: Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. In the end of days however, there will be “ten kings” that will arise to control these seven continents of the world. The ten horns on the beast correspond to “ten toes” in Daniel 2:43. The iron symbolizes “fallen angels” (not human) and the clay symbolizes human “seed” because Yah created Adam from the dust of the earth (clay). When the seed of Satan is mingled with the seed of humans (Nephilim) that is when the ten toes or ten horns will rule for one hour with the beast:

Chazown (Revelation) 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

In the Apostle John’s revelation, the angel told John that the “seven heads” represent “seven mountains” on which the woman sits:

Chazown (Revelation) 17:9 And here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sits.

Dave Hunt who authored the Book “A Woman Rides the Beast” gives an accurate description of these seven mountains:

Here is no mystical or allegorical language but an unambiguous statement in plain words:

The woman ... is that great city. There is no justification for seeking some other hidden meaning. Yet books have been written and sermons preached insisting that Mystery Babylon is the United States. That is clearly not the case, for the United States is a country, not a city. One might justifiably refer to the United States as Sodom, considering the honor now given to homosexuals, but it is definitely not the Babylon that John sees in this vision. The woman is a city....

Furthermore, she is a city built on seven hills. That specification eliminates ancient Babylon. Only one city has for more than 2000 years been known as the city on seven hills. That city is Rome. The Catholic Encyclopedia states: 

‘It is within the city of Rome, called the city of seven hills, that the entire area of Vatican State proper is now confined.’”

When Nimrod was killed and his body parts were delivered to each of the ten provinces of the land of Shinar, we can see that each province received one of his body parts. The four main body parts (head, chest, hips, two legs) end up in the last days branching off into ten body parts (ten toes or ten horns) as there will be ten political or global powers on the earth. The “seven hills” of Rome where Nimrod was killed and his body parts were severed, will come back together again as the beast “ascends out of the bottomless pit.” The “image of a man” (revived Nimrod) will be given life and made to speak, as he will be worshiped again as the Anti-Messiah:

Chazown (Revelation) 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

Nimrod’s image seen in the “image of a man” in Daniel 2:31-45 will be given life by Satan himself and he will be revived in the last days and worshiped. It should come as no surprise that since Nimrod’s body parts were severed in the ancient city of Saturnia (Rome) that is where the “seven hills” of Rome are now situated. But when Nimrod’s ten body parts (provinces) come back together again to form an image of a man, those “seven hills” that today surround Rome will have distributed it’s power to the “seven continents” of the world.

Now we can see why Satan has transformed into this creature which is pictured above as half-goat and half-man. Nimrod is according to the Babylonian Mystery Religion none other than a reincarnation of Satan himself.

2nd Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

Satan has transformed himself throughout history in many different mythological characters in order to receive worship from mortal humans. Satan has presented himself in the scriptures as the King of Tyrus (Ezekiel 28:2), the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:22) the King of Assyria (Isaiah 14:25, Micah 5:5-6). All throughout history, Satan has transformed himself into various creatures and he has possessed earthly kings.

Pictured here is Nimrod, Ba’al, Valentine, the Mighty Hunter, Faunus, Lupercus. He is the same BAPHOMET or the Goat of Mendez worshiped by Freemasons at the 30th, 31st, 32nd & 33rd degrees. Satan has many aliases.

Who Was Nimrod?

Nimrod, the mulatto son of Cush the Ethiopian, was later a source of embarrassment to the pagans of Europe. They didn’t want an African to worship. Consequently, they substituted a supposed son of Nimrod, a white child named Horus, born after the death of Nimrod. This white child then became the “fair cupid” of European tradition.

Nimrod was the great grandson of Noah, and he was said to be a “mighty hunter” before YaHuWaH:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:9 He was a mighty hunter before YHWH: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before YHWH.

Some people think that this is a positive connotation of being a hunter “before YaHuWaH” but if you look up the Hebrew word for “before” in Genesis 10, it reveals that he did these rebellious child sacrifices in front of YaHuWaH’s face! This means that he had no shame for his abominations. He hunted people down and used them for sacrifices.  This word “before” in Genesis 10:9 is #H6440. paniym:

Face, presence, person, surface (of ground), before and behind, toward, in front of, forward, formerly, from before-time, before, in the presence ofin the face of, at the face or front of, from the presence of, from before, from before the face of.

Nimrod did these evil things right in the face of YaHuWaH which is a way of saying that he was arrogant and had no shame for his atrocities!

We can read about this in the Antiquities of Josephus, in the book of Jasher and also in “The Two Babylons” by Alexander Hislop.

Executed at Rome

Nimrod -- THE ORIGINAL ST. VALENTINE -- was also known as Saturn, the Roman-Babylonian god who HID from his pursuers in a secret place. The Latin word Saturn is derived from the Semitic-speaking Babylonians. It means “to be hid, hide self, secret, conceal.”  The original Semitic (Hebrew) word, from which the Latin Saturn is derived, is used 83 times in the Old Testament (see Young’s Concordance) under “Sathar,” also “sether.”

According to ancient tradition, Saturn (Nimrod) fled from his pursuers to Italy. The Apennine Mountains of Italy were anciently named the mountains of Nembrod or Nimrod. Nimrod briefly hid out at the site where Rome was later built. The ancient name of Rome, before it was rebuilt in 753 B.C., was Saturnia -- the site of Saturn’s (Nimrod’s) hiding. There he was found and slain for his crimes. Later, professing Christians in Constantine’s day made Nimrod -- the St. Valentine of the heathen -- a SAINT of the Church and continued to honor him under the name of a Christian martyr.

Nimrod Was Killed at the Seven Hills of Rome

You may be wondering to yourself “how could Nimrod be killed in Rome, when the Land of Shinar existed about 1,200 years before Rome?”

The Land of Shinar where Nimrod’s Kingdom once existed is in Modern-day Iraq. And so the question arises, “how could he travel to Rome to run away from his pursuers who were trying to kill him?”

We can easily see how this happened by understanding that Rome used to be where Iraq is today!

See my other article entitled: “Nimrod, the Papacy & Pangaea:”

Pangaea, according to modern science took place 240 million years ago. But according to scripture, it happened after the flood in the days of Noah:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:

25 And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.

32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.

This event was not the same event mentioned in Genesis 11, where YaHuWaH confounded the languages at Babel! This was a literal “splitting” of the earth’s seven continents!

Let’s see what the Hebrew word here is for “divided:”

Strong’s #H6385. palag: to divide, split, (Niphal) to be splitbe divided, to split, cleave, to divide.

In Genesis 11, when YaHuWaH confounded the languages of the people at Babel, the word for confound is as follows:

Strong’s #H1101. balal: to mix, mingle, confuse, confound, to give provender, feed (animals), to mix oneself (among others), to fade away

As you can see, the first event where the “earth was divided” was a literal splitting of the earth’s continents! But the second event is where YaHuWaH actually “confounded their languages.” I suspect that these two events happened either simultaneously or very close together. Right about the time when Nimrod’s kingdom was taken over by his widow Semiramis, this is when YaHuWaH sent mass- confusion to this Anti-Messiah Empire which then caused people to migrate to different parts of the earth. The earth’s crust was also splitting and causing the continents to shift, and so the people groups were literally split away from Babel and their languages were confused as well. As you can see from the illustration above, all seven of the continents were connected before the flood.

Nimrod Built the Tower of Babel

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:

8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

9 He was a mighty hunter before YHWH: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before YHWH.

10 the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

11 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,

12 And Resen between Nineveh andCalah: the same is a great city.

Asshur or Assyria was the exact location where the Vatican is now located in Rome before the earth was divided in Pangaea after the flood!

In Rome at one time “Valentine” was called “Baalentine” to commemorate “Ba’al” the god of sexual desire. Now we can see the connection between Valentine’s Day, the Papacy, and Mystery Babylon. Valentine’s Day is another custom birthed at the Tower of Babel, which is why the Roman Papacy has made “Saint Valentine’s Day” an official Roman Catholic holiday.

According to ancient tradition, Saturn (Nimrod) fled from his pursuers to Italy. The Apennine Mountains of Italy were anciently named the “The Mountains of Nembrod or Nimrod.”

In the 3rd Century during the reign of the Roman Emperor Constantine, Gnostic Christians believed that Nimrod was “reincarnated” as the Messiah of Yisra’el, Yahuwshuwa (Jesus), hence they made “Saint Valentine” or “Saint Ba’alentine” of the heathen (a so-called “Saint” of the Church), and continued to honor him under the name of a Christian martyr. As you can see, Roman Catholicism secretly teaches “Another Yahuwshuwa” (Another Jesus) which is not the same Messiah of the Bible. Their Messiah is actually a reincarnation of Nimrod or Lucifer as the “New Age Christ” for all religions.

The official title for the Vatican today is called “The Seven Hills of Rome.” These seven hills are accurately translated in the Strong’s Greek Concordance as “mountains:”

#3735. oros: or’-os probably from an obsolete oro (to rise or “rear,” perhaps akin to 142; compare 3733); a mountain (as lifting itself above the plain): hill, mountain.

Chazown (Revelation) 17:9 And here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sits.

The Catholic Encyclopedia states the following concerning the Vatican: It is within the city of Rome, called the city of seven hills, that the entire area of Vatican State proper is now confined. 

Rome Exchanged the Set-Apart Holy Days of YaHuWaH with Days that Commemorate Nimrod 

The “Yule Wheel” is a pagan representation of all the annual celebrations offered up to the pagan sun-gods and moon goddesses in their many different “reincarnated” forms. 

The wheel has eight segments signifying “eight pagan Sabbaths” each year. Notice the five-pointed star of witch-craft, also called the “Eastern Star.”  The star is within a circle representing the sun-god, Ba’al.

Eight Feasts for the Beast

In many of my other writings I often show the same pagan Sabbath wheel detailing the eight pagan Sabbaths of the Antichrist annually. If I seem redundant and repetitive concerning this, it is because I want to emphasize that all eight of these pagan feasts are meant to prepare the entire world for worshiping the Beast (Satan) and his image of a man (the revived Nimrod). Each of these pagan holidays commemorate Nimrod but they have been cleverly disguised to appear “Christian.”

The Catholic Church gave these pagan holidays a so-called “Christian” identity. Lets see what they are:

1.) Imbolc February 2nd-February 15th later became “Saint Valentine’s Day.” February 14th is the “Ides of the month,which was supposedly the luckiest time for omens and spells to be done by the occultists.

2.) Ostara (Easter) March 21st– March 25th (The Vernal Equinox). Rome assimilated this pagan goddess to Passover in order to confuse the true biblical Passover with this fertility goddess. They even changed the Catholic Calendar to make Easter fall closer to Passover week in order to confuse Messiah’s Resurrection with hers.

3.) Beltane (Mayfest) May 1st - May 5th in honor of “the goddess of fertility” or what many call “Mother Earth” the “Queen of Heaven.” The Catholic Church has attached the mother of our Messiah, Miryam(Mary) to this pagan goddess, also celebrated as “Cinco de Mayo.” 

4.) Midsummer Solstice June 21st, the first day of Summer, Catholics call it St. John’s Day.

5.) Lugnasad August 1st– August 15th is also known as the alleged “Ascension day” of the Catholic Mary or the ancient mother goddess, Semiramis.

6.) Mabon September 21st, the first day of Autumn, September 21st.

7.) Samhain (Halloween) October 31st - November 1st, the Catholic “All-Saints Day” or “All-Souls Day.”

8.) Yule (Christmas) December 21st– December 25th, the Winter Solstice; the birthday of all false Messiahs.

The Ides of the Month in Paganism: Why February 14th?

Why should the Romans have chosen February 15th and the evening of February 14th to honor Lupercus -- the Nimrod of the Bible? Well, first of all, it is important to understand that since the creation, a new calendar date changed at sunset, the evening before. 

Nimrod (the Baal or sun-god of the ancient pagans) was said to have been born at the winter solstice. In ancient times the solstice occurred on January 6th and his birthday therefore was celebrated on January 6th. Later, as the solstice changed, it was celebrated on December 25th and is now called Christmas. It was the custom of antiquity for the mother of a male child to present herself for purification on the fortieth day after the day of birth (Leviticus 12:2-5). The fortieth day after January 6th (Nimrod’s original birth-date) takes us to February 15th, the celebration of which began on the evening of February 14th the Lupercalia or St. Valentine’s Day.

On this day in February, Semiramis, the mother of Nimrod, was said to have been PURIFIED and to have appeared for the first time in public with her son as the original “mother & child.” The Roman month February, in fact, derives its name from the “februa” which the Roman priests used in the rites celebrated on St. Valentine’s Day. The “februa” were thongs from the skins of sacrificial animals used in rites of purification on the evening of February 14th.

Cupid Makes His Appearance

Another name for the child Nimrod was “Cupid” which means “desire”-----Encyclopedia Britannica, article, Cupid. It is said that when Nimrod’s mother saw him, she LUSTED after him -- she DESIRED him. Nimrod became her Cupid -- her desired one -- and later her Valentine! So evil was Nimrod’s mother Semiramis that she married her own son! Inscribed on the monuments of ancient Egypt are inscriptions that Nimrod (the Egyptians called him Osiris) was “the husband of his mother.”

As Nimrod grew up, he became the child-hero of MANY women who DESIRED him. He was their Cupid! In Daniel 11:37, he is called the “desire of women.”

He provoked so many women to JEALOUSY that an idol of him was often called the “image of jealousy” (Ezekiel 8:5). It is said that when Noah’s son Shem had Nimrod killed all of his body parts were chopped off like limbs to a tree, hence, the reason he is the god of the Christmas tree. But the only body part of his that was never found was his penis! Nimrod’s penis was then memorialized as the Egyptian Obelisk seen here as the Washington Monument---a powerful occult talisman used to draw satanic power in rituals. In the last days, all “ten horns” (political powers) of the earth will be ruled by only “one horn” called “the little horn” (Daniel 7:8, 8:9).

This means that all of the seven continents of the world will be ruled by “ten horns” but these ten horns will rule for “one hour with the beast” (Revelation 17:12), as they will come under the authority of this “one horn” (One World Government). This horn is none other than Satan’s political power that will be seen in the Phallic Symbol of Nimrod (the Obelisk). Pictured above is a white horse with one single horn on his head (a unicorn). This is a mystical creature of mythology mentioned in Revelation 6. 

This is not to be confused with the word “unicorn” mentioned in the King James Bible which is actually a “rhinoceros.” We are shown in Revelation 6 that the Anti-Messiah will conquer the world while riding a white horse as he tries to mimic the true Messiah in Revelation 19 who also returns on a white horse.

Every Pope is secretly meant to be a “reincarnation of Nimrod,” the original false Christ. That is why every Pope wears the Mitre of Dagon the Fish on his head. It is said that when Nimrod’s body parts were cut off and distributed that he was reincarnated as a fish and he lived in the Mediterranean Sea. Thus we can see why the “King of Tyrus” in Ezekiel 28 is an allusion to the serpent in the Garden of Eden and also a reincarnation of Nimrod as Dagon the god of the sea. This website gives more insight about now Nimrod became known in the occult pagan world as the god of the fish:


The gods of the Tyrians are interesting insofar as they represent a stage in the evolution between what had come before and what eventually came after. On the one hand they were patterned after far more ancient deified kings; on the other hand, they obviously served as the prototypes for the deities of later cultures such as the Greeks and Romans. For instance, Melqart, patterned upon Marduk, was known as the Tyrian Hercules, and later became synchronized with Hercules. The father of Hercules was Zeus, that of Marduk, Dagon. It follows then that Zeus and Dagon represent different incarnations (or representations) of the same figure. This premise seems to be substantiated by the fact that Zeus was also known as Dyaus, and Dagon was also known as Daonos, two names so similar as to imply a common origin for the two. Dagon was likewise known as Daos, from which we probably derive the word Deus, or God. Furthermore, Zeus was at times referred to as Diu-Pater, which served as the basis for the Roman Jupiter. Diu-Pater translates simply as “God the Father.” Though a title such as God the Father isn’t paid too much serious attention in modern times, it could well indicate an important aspect of how the ancients viewed the notion of deity. This is to say, perhaps they viewed God, not as any sort of supernatural being, but rather as an ancestor…. King Hiram (2nd Samuel 5:11 & 1st Kings 5:1) seems to have made a conscious effort to manipulate the archetype embodied in the Phoenician gods, so that he himself appeared to be a flesh and blood incarnation or extension of them. His throne sat before large windows opening upon the sea and crashing waves. Visitors to his palace may well have thought they’d entered the domain of Poseidon himself. 

As we can see from the above article, Nimrod has become the “Universal god” of the pagans and just as his body parts were scattered throughout the ten provinces of Shinar, so his Mystery Religion has been scattered to the nations (ten horns on the beast).

The Connection Between The Book of Esther & Valentine’s Day: A “Lucky Day” to Kill Jews?

In 1582, the Roman Julian Calendar was updated and changed to the Gregorian Calendar decreed by Pope Gregory XIII. It was at this point, that Pope Gregory caused a new calendar date to change at midnight, instead of at sundown, and thus changing Yah’s rendering of times and seasons. He also changed the “New Year” back to January 1st which was first done by Julius Caesar. But as Christianity began to spread throughout Europe, many Christians began to celebrate the New Year on March 25th (the original date of Easter), because they thought that Messiah was born on December 25th. Nine months backwards would make his conception date fall on March 25th. Little did they realize that this was the conception date of Nimrod and his reincarnated son Tammuz (Ezekiel 8:14). 

In order to manipulate the calendar so that Easter would fall closer to YaHuWaH’s Passover, Pope Gregory then changed the New Year to fall on January 1st (in honor of the pagan god Janus) and thus the Catholic Church would be able to assimilate the pagan celebration of Easter to Messiah’s resurrection.

Before Pope Gregory changed the New Year to January, the 12th month of the year was February. The Romans and all other pagan cultures who worshiped Ba’al in his many different forms believed that the 13th day of the 12th month was a “lucky day” to call on the pagan gods.

The Wicked Haman Plotted to Kill Yahuwdah (the House of Judah) on the 13th day of the 12th Month

On the Hebrew Calendar, the 12th month is called “Adar” and so it is no coincidence that the wicked Haman had cast lots to see what day would be the“luckiest” day of the year to annihilate the Yahuwdiy (Jewish) people. The lots were cast and the demons gave the answer to Haman through the soothsayers as seen in the book of Esther. The day that was selected was the 13th day of the 12th month of Adar (Esther 3:13).

The ancient Romans believed that every month had a spirit that gained in strength and reached its peak or apex of power in the middle or ides of the month. This was usually the 15th day, and it was a day when witches and augurs, or soothsayers worked their magic. An augur was a person filled with a spirit of divination, and from the root-word augur we also get the word “inaugurate,” which means to “take omens.” 

Since February had been robbed by the Caesars and had only 28 days (29 in leap years), the “Ides of February” became the 14th day of that month. Since the Ides of a month was celebrated on the preceding eve, the month of February was unique, because it was the 13th day that became the eve of the Ides that month, and it became a very important pagan holiday in the Empire of Rome.

Wow! Now we know why the wicked Haman wanted to destroy the Yahuwdiy (Jewish) people on the 13th day of the 12th month! The Hebrew month called Adar used to be in February before Pope Gregory changed the Calendar around, and the 13th day of the month was their luckiest day when they could beckon the gods to do their bidding!

And so if you are a Yahuwdiy (Jew), or Messianic or a Christian, keep in mind that Valentine’s Day is also the same day that Haman wanted to annihilate the Yahuwdiyth (Jewish) people and thus wipe out the tribe of Judah through which our Messiah would later on be born into! This is one more reason for us to have nothing to do with this evil celebration of Baal!

*Last Trumpet Ministries Website commentaries:

In the days of the Roman Empire, the month of February was the last and shortest month of the year. February originally had 30 days, but when Julius Caesar named the month of July after himself, he decided to make that month longer and shortened February to 29 days while making July a month of 31 days. Later when Octavius Caesar, also known as Augustus, came to power, he named the month of August after himself, and not to be outdone he also subtracted a day from February and gave the month of August 31 days. To this very day it remains that way.

This was a day that was sacred to the sexual frenzy of the goddess Juno. This day also honored the Roman gods, Lupercus and Faunus, as well as the legendary twin brothers, who supposedly founded Rome, Remus and Romulus. These two are said to have been suckled by wolves in a cave on Palatine Hill in Rome. The cave was called Lupercal and was the center of the celebrating on the eve of Lupercalia or February 14th. On this day, Lupercalia, which was later named Valentine’s Day, the Luperci or priests of Lupercus dressed in goatskins for a bloody ceremony. The priests of Lupercus, the wolf-god, would sacrifice goats and a dog and then smear themselves with blood. These priests, made red with sacrificial blood, would run around Palatine Hill in a wild frenzy while carving a goatskin thong called a “februa.” Women would sit all around the hill, as the bloody priests would strike them with the goatskin thongs to make them fertile. The young women would then gather in the city and their names were put in boxes. These “love notes” were called “billets.” The men of Rome would draw a billet, and the woman whose name was on it became his sexual lust partner with whom he would fornicate until the next Luper-calia or February 14th.
Thus, February 14th became a day of unbridled sexual lust. The color “red” was sacred to that day be-cause of the blood and the “heart shape” that is popular to this day. The heart-shape was not a represen-tation of the human heart, which looks nothing like it. This shape represents the human female matrix or opening to the chamber of sacred copulation. No wonder the pagans commemorated their hero-hunter Nimrod, or Baal, by sending heart-shaped love tokens to one another on the evening of February 14 as a symbol of him!

When the Gnostic Catholic Church began to get a foothold in Rome around the 3rd century A.D., they became known as Valentinians. The Catholic Valentinians retained the sexual license of the festival in what they called “angels in a nuptial chamber,” which was also called the “sacrament of copulation.” This was said to be a reenactment of the marriage of “Sophia and the Redeemer.” As the participants of the February 14th ritual began, their sexual sacrament presided over and watched by the priests known as Valentinians, the following literary was spoken: “Let the seed of light descend into thy bridal chamber, receive the bridegroom… open thine arms to embrace him. Behold, grace has descended upon thee.”

As time went on, the Orthodox Church suppressed the Gnostic Catholics and manufactured “Saint Valentine,” whose day continues to be celebrated in these modern times. It should be without saying that followers of Messiah should avoid Valentine’s Day like a plague. 

In the eyes of our Creator, YaHuWaH, it is still “Lupercalia, the Day of the Wolf.” Men become wolves, as they carried on the satanic rituals of fornication, which means sexual intercourse without marriage. We have heard of the “wolf whistle,” and we all know that wolves do not whistle. It represents lustful men and women, who carry on Satan’s blasphemy to this very day in the rituals of paganism.

At this website, more insight is provided into the origins of Valentine’s Day:


Nimrod the Mighty Valentine
By Herman L. Hoeh


Christian Custom? -- Or Pagan Holiday?

Where did St. Valentine's Day come from?

You might suppose that school teachers and educators would know. But do they? How many of you were ever taught the real origin of Valentine’s Day? Were you ever told in school why you should observe the custom of exchanging Valentines?

The Silence of Educators

Teachers are all too often silent about the origin of the customs they are forced to teach in today’s schools! If they were to speak out, many would lose their jobs!

Isn’t it time we examined why we encourage our children to celebrate Saint Valentine’s Day, when it is never so much as mentioned in the Bible as a practice of the first Century followers of Messiah?

Today, candy-makers unload tons of heart-shaped red boxes for February 14th, while millions of the younger generation are annually exchanging Valentines. Florists consider February 14th (St. Valentine’s Day) as one of their best business days. And young lovers pair off (at least for a dance or two) at St. Valentine’s balls.

Why? Where did these customs originate? Where do we find any such practices in the Bible? How did we come to inherit these customs?

A Christian Custom?

Did you know that centuries before Messiah, the pagan Romans celebrated February 15th and the evening of February 14th as an idolatrous and sensuous festival in honor of “Lupercus, the hunter of wolves?”

The Romans called the festival the “Lupercalia.” The custom of exchanging Valentines and all the other traditions in honor of Lupercus (the deified hero-hunter of Rome) was also linked anciently with the pagan practice of teen-agers “going steady.” It usually led to fornication. Today, the custom of “going steady” is thought very modern, but it isn’t. It is merely a rebirth of an old custom handed down from the Roman festival of the Lupercalia, celebrated in the month of February, when names of young women were put into a box and drawn out by men as chance directed. That’s the admission of the “Encyclopedia Americana”, article, “St. Valentine’s Day.”

When Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire there was some talk in church circles of discarding this pagan free-for-all. But the Roman citizens wouldnt hear of it! So it was agreed that the holiday would continue as it was, except for the more grossly sensual observances.

It was not until the reign of Pope Gelasius that the holiday became a “Christian custom.” As far back as 496, Pope Gelasius changed Lupercalia on February 15th to St. Valentine’s Day on February 14th pg. 172 of “Customs and Holidays Around the World” by Lavinia Dobler.

But how did this pagan festival acquire the name of “St. Valentine’s Day?” And why is the little naked Cupid of the pagan Romans so often associated today with February 14th? And why do little children and young people still cut out hearts and send them on a day in honor of Lupercus the hunter of wolves? Why have we supposed these pagan customs in honor of a false god are Christian?

Who Was the Original “St. Valentine?”

Valentine was a common Roman name. Roman parents often gave the name to their children in honor of the famous man who was first called Valentine in antiquity. That famous man was Lupercus, the HUNTER. But who was Lupercus? And why should he have also borne the name Valentine among the heathen Romans?

The Greeks called Lupercus by the name of “Pan.” The Semites called Pan “Baal,” according to the “Classical Dictionaries.” Baal (mentioned so often in the Bible) was merely another name for Nimrod, “the mighty HUNTER” (Genesis 10:9). The hunter, Nimrod was the Lupercus (or wolf hunter) of the Romans. And St. Valentine’s Day was originally a day set aside by the pagans in his honor!

But why should Nimrod have been called “Valentine” by the Romans? And why should the celebration of this day have been anciently limited to the city of Rome before Pope Gelasius’ time? What part did the site of ancient Rome play in the life of Nimrod?

The word Valentine comes from another Latin word “Valentinus,” which is a proper name derived from the word “valens,” meaning “to be strong,” declares Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary. It means literally “strong, powerful, mighty.” Is there any connection with Nimrod? We read in the Bible that Nimrod was the “mighty hunter” (Genesis 10:9). It was a common proverb of ancient times that Nimrod was “the mighty hunter before YaHuWaH.” NIMROD WAS THEIR HERO -- THEIR STRONG MAN -- THEIR VALENTINE!

How plain that the original Valentine was Nimrod, the mighty hunter of wolves. Yet another of Nimrod’s names was “Sanctus” or “Santa,” meaning “Saint.” It was a common title of any hero-god. No wonder that the Roman Lupercalia is called “Saint Valentine’s Day!”

But why do we associate HEARTS on a day in honor of Nimrod -- the BAAL of the Phoenicians and Semites?

The surprising answer is that the pagan Romans acquired the symbol of the heart from the Babylonians. In the Babylonian tongue the word for “heart” was “bal” (see Young’s or Strong’s Concordance). The heart – “bal” -- was merely a symbol of Nimrod -- the “Baal” or Lord of the Babylonians!

Rome Tried to Redeem Valentine’s Day

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/st-valentine-beheaded

Saint Valentine depicted below as a boy bishop, was martyred on February 14th 278 A.D

Illustration: Eleanor Fortescue Brickdale in Old English Songs & Ballads--Mary Evans Picture Library

As you can see by this artist’s depiction of Saint Valentine, he is wearing the same “Dagon Fish hat” worn by the pagan priests of Nimrod (Ba’al) showing us that Satan is always trying to masquerade himself as an “angel of light.”  In this book entitled “Old English Songs & Ballads,” the later history of Valentine’s Day is recorded:

On February 14th around the year 278 A.D., Valentine, a priest in Rome in the days of Emperor Claudius II, was executed.

Under the rule of Claudius the Cruel, Rome was involved in many unpopular and bloody campaigns. The emperor had to maintain a strong army, but was having a difficult time getting soldiers to join his military leagues. Claudius believed that Roman men were unwilling to join the army because of their strong attachment to their wives and families.

To get rid of the problem, Claudius banned all marriages and engagements in Rome. Valentine, realizing the injustice of the decree, defied Claudius and continued to perform marriages for young lovers in secret.

When Valentine’s actions were discovered, Claudius ordered that he be put to death. Valentine was arrested and dragged before the Prefect of Rome, who condemned him to be beaten to death with clubs and to have his head cut off. The sentence was carried out on February 14th, on or about the year 270.

Legend also has it that while in jail, St. Valentine left a farewell note for the jailer’s daughter, who had become his friend, and signed it “From Your Valentine.”

For his great service, Valentine was named a saint after his death.

In truth, the exact origins and identity of St. Valentine are unclear. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, there are “At least three different Saint Valentines, all of them martyrs, are mentioned in the early martyrologies under the date of the 14th February.” One was a priest in Rome, the second one was a bishop of Interamna (now Terni, Italy) and the third St. Valentine was a martyr in the Roman province of Africa.

Legends vary on how the martyrs name became connected with romance. The date of his death may have become mingled with the Feast of Lupercalia, a pagan festival of love. On these occasions, the names of young women were placed in a box, from which they were drawn by the men as chance directed. In 496 AD, Pope Gelasius decided to put an end to the Feast of Lupercalia, and he declared that February 14th be celebrated as St Valentines Day.

Gradually, February 14th became a date for exchanging love messages, poems and simple gifts such as flowers.

Once again it is of “Roman Catholic” origin with pagan rites of sex and fertility attached to it.

Should We Honor Saints?

First of all, scripture defines a “saint” as one who is “set-apart” from the world and its pagan customs, and one who obeys the commandments of our Creator. The Roman Catholic Church defines a saint quite differently. 

The Roman Catholic Church has adopted a custom of “honoring saints” but are these people truly saints in the eyes of our Heavenly Father? Does scripture teach us to give honor to men such as “Saint Valentine?” What does scripture tell us about giving honor to human beings?

Yahuwchanon (John) 5:41 I receive not honour from men.

Yahuwchanon (John) 5:44 How can you believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that comes from Elohiym only?

The Roman Catholic Church has even created a day for honoring saints called “All-Saints Day” (aka Halloween). But no place are we commanded to set aside a day to honor any so-called “saints.” All of these pagan holidays are “traditions of men” designed to nullify the word of Elohiym in the life of the believer.

Traditions of Men

What did Yahuwshuwa tell us about man-made traditions?

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do you also transgress the commandment of Elohiym by your tradition?

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 15:6 Thus have you made the commandment of Elohiym of none effect by your tradition.

Marqos (Mark) 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well you reject the commandment of Elohiym, that you may keep your own tradition.

Marqos (Mark) 7:13 Making the word of Elohiym of none effect through your tradition…

In conclusion, we must ask ourselves, “Should a true follower of the Messiah be associated in any way with this celebration of evil roots? Should we be doing what the heathen have done for so many years and try to justify it as love?”

Romans 12:2 answers this very well: “And be not conformed to this world: but be you transformed by the renewing of your mind…”

You may have a hard time giving up this holiday. You may even try to rationalize: “Well we can turn this into a day to celebrate the love of Messiah, right?” Well this may sound logical but listen to what the Apostle Shauwl (Paul) wrote concerning man-made traditions:

Qolasiym (Colossians) 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Mashiyach (Messiah).

Finally, we are exhorted not to learn the ways of the heathen when it comes to observing the “signs of heavens” by use of astrology:

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 10:2 Thus says YHWH, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

It is about time that we examined these foolish customs of the pagans now falsely labeled by the Roman Church. It is time we quit this Roman and Babylonian foolishness -- this IDOLATRY -- and get back to the faith of our Messiah delivered once and for all time by the Hebrew Apostles.

Let’s stop teaching our children these pagan customs in memory of Baal the sun-god -- the original St. Valentine -- and teach them instead what the Bible really says!

Valentine’s Day is just another one of these “Feasts for the Beast” that are meant to condition the entire world into accepting the final “man of sin” in the last days. Although it is celebrated under the false pretense that it is all about LOVE, (just like Christmas), it is actually another pagan holiday giving honor to Satan through his visible image, Nimrod. Before you give out candy and cards this coming Valentine’s Day, consider that to do so you are paying homage to this creature in his many different aliases: Nimrod, Baal, Pan, Lupercus, Saturn, Santa (Saint), Satan!

How Does Puwriym Point to Messiah?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, February 2007

In the Book of Esther, we read about an evil plot against the children of Yahuwdah (Judah) while they were in exile in the Persian Empire.

The wicked  Haman hated the Jewish man named Mordecai because Mordecai refused to pay him homage and bow down to him. This caused Haman to become bitter towards all Yahuwdiy (Jews), and as a result he sought to destroy them all (Esther 3:5-6).

Haman is a picture of Satan, and Mordecai is a picture of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit inspired Yahuwshuwa our Messiah (whom many call Jesus) to be an intercessor for the House of Yahuwdah, just as Mordecai who was the cousin of Queen Esther, inspired her in her role as an intercessor for her people. Esther was from the tribe of BinYamiyn (Benjamin) but the tribe of Benjamin had assimilated into the House of Judah after the two kingdoms split in 1st Kings 12 around 930 B.C. The story of Queen Esther took place around 400 B.C. after the two kingdoms of Yahuwdah (Judah) & Yisra’el had been divided.

Mordechai Refusing to Bow to Haman is a picture of Messiah refusing to Bow to Satan

When Messiah was in the wilderness for 40 days and 40 nights, Satan wanted Yahuwshuwa to bow down to him:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 4:8-10: 

8 Again, the devil took him up into an exceeding high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 

9 And said unto him, All these things will I give you, if you will fall down and worship me

10 Then said Yahuwshuwa unto him, Get you hence, Satan: for it is written, You shall worship YHWH your Elohiym, and him only shall you serve.

Because Yahuwshuwa refused to bow to Satan, just as Mordecai refused to bow to Haman, Satan then determined to kill Yahuwshuwa, just as Haman sought to kill Mordecai.

And so Haman schemed to become the right hand man of King Ahasuerus (Esther 3:1), thereby positioning himself to convince King Ahasuerus to sign a decree stating that all the Yahuwdiy (Jews) should be killed on the 13th day of the 12th month of Adar.

The First Covenant Amended & Ratified Not Nullified 

YaHuWaH used Queen Esther to save the House of Yahuwdah (Judah, Jews). Her Hebrew name was Hadassah which means “myrtle tree” and this is a metaphor of the gospel. The root from where her name derives is “Chadash” which means “to renew, rebuild and repair.”

The term “Renewed Covenant” in Hebrew is called “Briyth Chadashah,” which literally means “Circumcision Renewed.” Esther’s Hebrew name means that YaHuWaH had “renewed” his covenant with Yisra’el, and he did not do away with the old one. The idea that our Creator enters into a covenant, so that later he can do away with that same covenant is simply a lie. This erroneous doctrine is what many call “Dispensationalism.” To believe that our Creator does away with any of his covenants is heresy. He is a “covenant-keeping” Elohiym, and he never breaks one single covenant that he makes. It was Yisra’el who broke the covenant with YaHuWaH, but he never broke it. He merely divorced her in Jeremiah 3:8 to signify that he was putting her away because of her uncleanness. But he promised in the book of Hosea and in Isaiah 54 that he would restore Yisra’el, clean her up, and receive her back unto himself. Hence the “Renewed Covenant” that he intended to make with Yisra’el was not meant to replace the old one, but to restore her back to the Covenant that he made with her in the first place before she broke it with her many false pagan deities.

In the same way that our Messiah was sent to “renew” the Covenant with Yisra’el, YaHuWaH sent Esther to “renew” the decree that was against the House of Yahuwdah (Judah, Jews) and to bring in an added decree whereby now they were able to defend themselves and overcome the enemy.

And so we see that Esther was a “type” of Messiah in her role that she interceded for her people, just as Yahuwshuwa interceded for us on the cross.

The First Covenant was against the children of Yisra’el (not because the covenant was flawed), but because they were unable in their sinful flesh to keep Towrah. And so YaHuWaH gave us a “Renewed Covenant” whereby we are given the power of the Holy Spirit to enable us to keep the Towrah (Mosaic Law). 

And so it is fitting that Queen Esther’s Hebrew name is Hadassah, because it comes from the root word “chadash” which means “renewed.” The first covenant or decree that the evil Haman devised against the Yahuwdiy (Jews) would certainly lead to death, just as the first Mosaic Covenant would doom us all to death without the blood atonement of Messiah, because in our flesh, no man is able to keep it.

And so in order to give us the power to overcome the sinful nature, a “Renewed Covenant” was given to us. Likewise, Esther was instrumental in bringing about a “Renewed Decree” that enabled the children of Yahuwdah (Judah, Jews) the power to defend themselves in the war between the Persians.

Esther risked her life as she fasted and prayed for 3 days and 3 nights, just as Yahuwshuwa our Messiah gave his life for us when he was  “3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the earth” (Matthew 12:40) before resurrecting from the dead to “new life.”

On the third day of her fast, (Esther 5:1) Esther asked for the life of her people before her husband, King Ahasuerus, just as Yahuwshuwa asked for the life of his people Yisra’el before his Heavenly Father on the 3rd day. 

Yahuwshuwa went into the lowest parts of the earth and preached the good news of the kingdom to all the saints who had died under the First Covenant who were in the Bosom of Abraham. He also “gave gifts unto men” which is the gift of salvation. (Ephesians 4:8-9, Luke 16).

On the third day after his crucifixion on Passover, he resurrected on a feast day called “First Fruits” (see Leviticus 23:17). He DID NOT resurrect on “EASTER,” (the Babylonian goddess of fertility) this is a lie of Satan! 

Yahuwshuwa acted as our High Priest in the temple, as he waved the “First Fruits” of the harvest of men’s souls on the third day, offering them before the Father in Heaven. 

Lots Were Cast for Messiah’s Garment & Lots Were Cast for the Best Time to Kill the Jews 

In the same way that our Messiah was an intercessor for his people, Esther also asked for the life of her people Yahuwdah (Judah) before her King, and he granted that the children of Yahuwdah (Judah, Jews) were allowed to fight against their enemies. As a result, they “crushed and brought to nothing” the wicked plans of Satan that was against them.

The word “Puwriym” in Hebrew comes from the root word “Puwr” which means “to crush, to bring to nought.” 

The word “Puwriym” means “lots” and we see here that the men who were under the authority of King Ahasuerus cast lots or “Puwr” to find out when it was a “lucky” time to destroy the children of Yahuwdah (Judah). They consulted the “Lots” as if consulting a fortune teller: 

Hadassah (Esther) 3:7 In the first month, that is, the month Nisan, in the twelfth year of king Ahasuerus, they cast Puwr, that is, the lot, before Haman from day to day, and from month to month, to the twelfth month, that is, the month Adar. 

Another parallel that we can see here is that the Roman Soldiers cast lots for the garment of Yahuwshuwa while he hung on the cross: 

Yahuwchanon (John) 19:24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which said, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.

And so the decree was given that the Persians were to attack the children of Yahuwdah (Judah) on a certain day:

Hadassah (Esther) 3:

13 And the letters were sent by posts into all the king’s provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to cause to perish, all Yahuwdiy (Jews), both young and old, little children and women, in one day, even upon the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, which is the month Adar, and to take the spoil of them for a prey. 

14 The copy of the writing for a commandment to be given in every province was published unto all people, that they should be ready against that day. 

15 The posts went out, being hastened by the king’s commandment, and the decree was given in Shushan the palace. And the king and Haman sat down to drink; but the city Shushan was perplexed.

Now there is something that I would like to point out here. Once the king signed a decree with his own signet ring, nobody could reverse that decree, not even the King himself.

This goes to show us that a covenant can never be reversed or broken. Once Yah made a covenant with the children of Yisra’el, he himself will not break it. And so the First Covenant, no matter how holy and just it was, it was “against us” because our sinful human nature is unable to live up to the perfect law of YaHuWaH. The curses that are written in Deuteronomy 28 for breaking the commandments of YaHuWaH were against us, but our Messiah blotted out the curses (not the law itself).

That is why a “Renewed Covenant” was given to us so that the Holy Law of Moses would be written in our hearts and minds, thereby giving us the power to keep the Towrah (Mosaic Law). Messiah did not blot out the Law of Moses, as many falsely believe and teach. But he blotted out the handwriting” of man-made ordinances (dogma, man-made laws, traditions of the Pharisees). These man-made decrees were “against us” because they keep us in bondage to human ordinances which prevent us from being obedient to the commandments of YaHuWaH. The sinful human nature is what inspired these “commandments and doctrines of men” but our Messiah blotted out, and nailed this sinful nature to the cross---not the Towrah (Mosaic Law)! 

Qolasiym (Colossians) 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross.

The Greek word here for “ordinances” is “dogmatizo” which means “a decree, doctrine of public decrees, of the Roman Senate, of rulers.”

But it can also mean: “the rules and requirements of the law of Moses; carrying a suggestion of severity and of threatened judgment.”

What was this “handwriting” that was “blotted out”?

In Numbers 5:29, we learn about something called the “Law of Jealousy” for when a wife has committed adultery on her husband and it is hidden from his eyes. The wife must drink bitter water that is mixed with dust from the floor of the temple. Then the priest is commanded to write the curses against her in a book and then blot out the curses with the bitter water.

Bemidbar (Numbers) 5:23 And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water:

The wife would then drink the cup of bitter water and if she was guilty of adultery, her thigh would rot and her belly would swell. But if she was not guilty, she would be free from any curse and then she would conceive.

In the same way that King Ahasuerus issued a man-made decree that was against the Yahuwdiy (the Jewish people), so our Messiah also blotted out the handwriting of man-made laws (dogma) which was against us. These “doctrines &commandments of men” were the laws invented by institutional religion that kept us from coming near to the temple of Elohiym so that we could hear the Torah, repent and be saved! It was because the House of Yisra’el became an adulterous, that these man-made laws were invented to keep her out of the temple. But YaHuWaH did not sanction these man-made law. He wanted the lost sheep to return back to him and back to his Torah (his Covenant). That is why our Messiah came to earth! He acted as the priest who blotted out the handwriting of curses that were written in the book of remembrance against Yisra’el for her harlotry.

The House of Yahuwdah (Judah) was taken captive into Persia because of their idolatry and adultery against YaHuWaH in the first place, and now the man-made decrees from the Persians were against them to destroy them. Esther interceded on behalf of her people and made an appeal to her husband who in turn added a clause to the decree to allow for the Yahuwdiy (Jews) to defend themselves against this evil decree. And afterward, a “New Decree” was written by Esther and Mordechai that the Yahuwdiy (Jews) were to celebrate their victory over this evil decree from year to year. Hence, Esther was used to “blot out” the old decrees invented by men (along with the curses), as she then brought in a new decree whereby their victory over Satan would forever be remembered as a monument of how YaHuWaH answered their prayers.

The law in stone tablets given to Moses, was holy, and just but never-the-less it was incompatible with our old sinful nature. Therefore, a new nature was given to us, whereby we are now able to keep the Mosaic Law (Towrah) by the power of the Holy Spirit.

Yahuwshuwa gave us a Renewed Covenant which is imparted to us by the Holy Spirit who writes the Law of Moses (Towrah) in our hearts and in our minds (Jeremiah 31:31-33, Hebrews 8:10, 10:16).

Haman Paid Money to Betray the House of Judah and Judas Paid Money to Betray the Messiah 

When the news came that the Jewish people were going to be destroyed on the 13th day of the 12th month of Adar, Queen Esther’s cousin Mordecai made a plea asking her to go on behalf of her people before her husband King Ahasuerus:

Hadassah (Esther) 4:

7 And Mordecai told him of all that had happened unto him, and of the sum of the money that Haman had promised to pay to the king’s treasuries for the Yahuwdiy (Jews), to destroy them. 
8 Also he gave him the copy of the writing of the decree that was given at Shushan to destroy them, to show it unto Esther, and to declare it unto her, and to charge her that she should go in unto the king, to make supplication unto him, and to make request before him for her people.

You will notice that Haman paid money into the King’s Treasury in exchange for having him sign this evil decree against the YaHuW’diy (Jews). The same thing happened when Judas was paid a sum of money to betray Yahuwshuwa to the High Priests and the Roman soldiers.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:3 Then Yahuwdah (Judah, Judas), which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders.

King Ahasuerus was not able to reverse this decree once he signed it with his own signet ring. Therefore, a “Renewed Decree” or had to be issued enabling the children of Yahuwdah (Judah, Jews) to defend themselves and fight. 

This goes to show us that YaHuWaH did not do away with the First Covenant as many Christians falsely teach and believe. The First Covenant has been “ratified” or “renewed.” An “addendum” was added to the First Covenant in the same way that King Ahasuerus added an “addendum” to the decree that he signed. The old decree was “against us” because it was a death sentence. But the new decree, did not cancel out the old decree. The new decree added a clause that stated that the YaHuW’diy (Jews) could fight for themselves and defend themselves. In the same way, YaHuWaH presented a “Renewed Covenant” which enables us to “fight” the good fight of faith against our enemy Satan who seeks to destroy us with sin.

And so we see that after the House of Yahuwdah (Judah), won the victory over their enemies, Queen Esther pronounced a feast called “Puwriym” which means “to crush.” The children of Yahuwdah (Judah) celebrated the fact that through their intercessor, Esther, they were able to “crush” the plans of Satan who had wickedly plotted against them.

We can see a picture of our Messiah in the story of Queen Esther as we celebrate the fact that through our Messiah, Yahuwshuwa, we as believers are granted the ability to “bruise the head of the serpent” (Genesis 3:15). Those of us who have faith in YaHuW’shuwa have the victory over all his wicked devices!

Messiah Forsaken by the Father in Heaven & Esther Forsaken by Ahasuerus

When Messiah hung on the tree, he felt as if the Father in Heaven had completely forsaken him. He even quoted a Messianic prophecy about himself from Psalms 22: 

Tehilliym (Psalm) 22:1 My Elohiym, my Elohiym, why have you forsaken me? why are you so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?

Of course the Heavenly Father had not really forsaken him but it merely felt that way while he hung there on the tree. Because he had to take upon his body the curse of sin and death, the Father had to hide his face from him, because YaHuWaH is too holy to be in the presence of sin. 

Likewise, Esther felt as if she had been forsaken by her husband Ahasuerus when he failed to call upon her for thirty days (Esther 4:11). The sentence for appearing before the king uninvited was death, and so the same thing is true with our Father in Heaven. We cannot approach his throne lightly with sin in our lives. If the High Priest in the Temple went into the Holy of Holies unworthily he would die on the spot!

Hadassah (Esther) 4:11 All the king’s servants, and the people of the king’s provinces, do know, that whosoever, whether man or women, shall come unto the king into the inner court, who is not called, there is one law of his to put him to death, except such to whom the king shall hold out the golden sceptre, that he may live: but I have not been called to come in unto the king these thirty days.

Both Esther and Yahuwshuwa Messiah felt as if they were forsaken for a moment but at the proper time, they both found grace in the eyes of YaHuWaH to approach the throne of the King to save their people! In this story, the wicked Haman built a gallows from a “tree” (symbolic of the cross) intending to hang Mordecai on it. But Haman’s plan soon backfired when his plot was discovered. King Ahasuerus asked Haman what should be done to show honor to a man whom the king had found favor with (Esther 6:6).

Mordechai Honored by Ahasuerus & Messiah Honored by his Heavenly Father                      

Haman suggested having the man wear the king’s robe and also having him ride the king’s horse around the city before all of the people. Haman thought that the king intended to honor him, but the king intended to honor Mordecai the Yahuwdiy (Jew) because Mordecai saved the life of the king when two of his chamberlains had plotted to kill King Ahasuerus. When Mordechai overheard their conversation, he relayed their plot to Queen Esther who then informed the king and prevented his assassination. Mordechai’s deed of saving the king had been recorded in the chronicles but had gone unnoticed until one night when the king could not sleep he requested to read the chronicles. When Mordechai’s good deed was brought to the king’s attention, he then determined to reward Mordechai. He asked Haman what should be done for such a man whom the king desired to honor. Haman then gave his answer:

Hadassah (Esther) 6:

7 And Haman answered the king, For the man whom the king delights to honour, 

Let the royal apparel be brought which the king uses to wear, and the horse that the king rides upon, and the crown royal which is set upon his head: 

9 And let this apparel and horse be delivered to the hand of one of the king’s most noble princes, that they may array the man withal whom the king delights to honour, and bring him on horseback through the street of the city, and proclaim before him, Thus shall it be done to the man whom the king delights to honour. 

Here is a picture of our Messiah when he rode through Jerusalem on a donkey’s colt 4 days before his crucifixion. The people “proclaimed him” just as Mordecai was proclaimed before the people that he was honored by the king:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 21:

4 All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, 

5 Tell you the daughter of Tziyown (Zion), Behold, your King comes unto you, meek, and sitting upon an donkey, and a colt the foal of a donkey. 

6 And the disciples went, and did as Yahuwshuwa commanded them, 

7 And brought the donkey, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon. 

8 And a very great multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut down branches from the trees, and strawed them in the way. 

9 And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the son of Dawiyd (David): Blessed is he that comes in the name of YHWH; Hosanna in the highest. 

And he will do it again at his second coming: 

Chazown (Revelation) 19:

11And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he does judge and make war. 

12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.

Esther Had a Hidden Name & Messiah Had a Hidden Name

Now there is something that I want to point out here concerning the name that “no man knew but he himself” (Revelation 19:12). Our Messiah’s name has been hidden for centuries as the Gentiles have given him a pagan name J’zeus which means “hail Zeus.” Queen Esther also had a hidden name. Her real name was Hadassah but her cousin Mordechai told her not to reveal to anyone that she was a Yahuwdiyah (Jewess) and he told her to go by the name of Esther. The name Esther comes from the pagan goddess of fertility named “Easter.” This goes to show us that our Messiah also was given a pagan name for a season, but later on in history, his true Hebrew name was destined to be revealed as seen in Zephaniah 3:9 & Hosea 2:16-17.

YaHuWaH knew that Esther would have to take on a pagan name in order to go “incognito” (undercover) to save her people. Messiah did the very same thing as he has been hidden under a Greco-Roman identity with a Greek name J’zeus. But now, as the latter days draw near, Messiah’s name and true identity is coming to light. People are beginning to call him by his real Hebrew name Yahuwshuwa (Joshua in ancient Hebrew), and they are beginning to see him as a Yahuwdiy (Jew)!

Haman & Ten Sons Hung on the Gallows & Messiah Hung on a Tree for Ten Tribes

The gallows that Haman intended to hang Mordecai on ended up being used to hang him and his ten sons. Once King Ahasuerus found out about Haman’s wicked plot, he ordered that the gallows which Haman had built for Mordechai would be used to hang him and his sons instead (Esther 9:10). In the same way, Satan thought he would destroy Messiah on the cross, but instead, Yahuwshuwa resurrected and Satan’s kingdom (the ten horns on the Beast) was defeated on that cross! Haman is a picture of the Antichrist, and his ten sons represent the “ten horns” on the beast in Revelation 13. These “ten horns” are ten nations or political powers that will seek to destroy the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) and the House of Yisra’el in these last days. Not only that, but in Matthew 15:24 we find out that our Messiah had come specifically for “the lost sheep of the House of Yisrael.” In 1st Kings 12 we read about how the twelve tribes of Yisra’el split up into two separate nations. The House of Judah (Jews) were then ruled under King Rehoboam and the House of Yisra’el (called Ephrayim) was ruled by King Jeroboam. Since that time, the “two houses of Yisrael(Isaiah 8:14) continue to be at odds with one another, even though in Ephesians 2:15 Paul stated that our Messiah came to “abolish in his flesh the enmity(hatred) between these two groups (Jews & Gentiles) to make of the two “one new man.Even though the work was accomplished on the cross by our Messiah, the outworking of this unification of the two houses of Yisrael has been going on since he resurrected in 30 A.D. The final fulfillment of this will happen in Ezekiel 37 in the last days when the two houses of Yisrael will become one family again (one bride, one stick, one house, one olive tree) when they are resurrected out of their graves! And so the very thing that Satan intended to use against our Messiah was actually used to destroy his own kingdom! The cross, like Haman’s gallows was intended by Satan to destroy the plans of our creator. He thought that he was going to destroy our Messiah and thus prevent the salvation of Yisra’el his covenant people. But instead the gallows and the cross were both used to destroy Satan and his kingdom!

The Scepter of Judah Given to Messiah & Esther Given the Scepter by the King 

When Queen Esther went before the King after three days and three nights of fasting, she pleaded with him for the life of her people the Yahuwdiy (Jews). As we can see, there is a prophetic fulfillment going on here of the “scepter” given to the House of Judah in Genesis 49:10 which was now being extended to Esther the Yahuwdiyah (Jewess) by King Ahasuerus:

Hadassah (Esther) 5:2 And it was so, when the king saw Esther the queen standing in the court, that she obtained favour in his sight: and the king held out to Esther the golden sceptre that was in his hand. So Esther drew near, and touched the top of the sceptre.

Hadassah (Esther) 8:4 Then the king held out the golden sceptre toward Esther. So Esther arose, and stood before the king.

You will notice that a very important prophecy is being fulfilled here! What prophecy am I referring to? Ya’aqob (Jacob), who was later given the new name “Yisra’el” by YaHuWaH himself, prophesied over his 4th son born to him by Leah. His name was Yahuwdah (Judah). Listen to what he tells the son named Yahuwdah (Judah), who would later on become a tribe of people known as “Yahuwdiy” (Jews):

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 49:

8 Yahuwdah (Judah), you are he whom your brethren shall praise: your hand shall be in the neck of your enemies; your father’s children shall bow down before you. 

9 Yahuwdah (Judah) is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, you are gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? 

10 The sceptre shall not depart from Yahuwdah (Judah), nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

What are we seeing here? We are seeing that Queen Esther is being given the “scepter” that belongs to the Tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah)! Her king and husband Ahasuerus is a picture of the heavenly Father handing her and the tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah), the “authority” or the “scepter” to make decrees! 

Yowb (Job) 22:28 You shall also decree thing, and it shall be established unto you: and the light shall shine upon your ways.

Yahuwdah (Judah) is a lawgiver and Esther the Yahuwdiyah (Jewess) and her cousin Mordechai were given the authority by YaHuWaH to make a decree that this feast called “Puwriym” should be remembered every year as a memorial for the House of Yahuwdah.

In the end, the king gave the house of the enemy to Esther, just as the Heavenly Father gave Satan’s Kingdom to Yahuwshuwa. The king gave his ring (symbolic of his power of attorney) to Mordecai as a symbol of the Father giving his authority to Yahuwshuwa.

Hadassah (Esther) 8:

1 On that day did the king Ahasuerus give the house of Haman the Yahuwdiy (Jew’s) enemy unto Esther the queen. And Mordecai came before the king; for Esther had told what he was unto her. 

2 And the king took off his ring, which he had taken from Haman, and gave it unto Mordecai. And Esther set Mordecai over the house of Haman.

Haman’s Estate Given to Mordechai & Satan’s Kingdom Given to Messiah 

In this story, King Ahasuerus represents the Heavenly Father, and Haman represents Satan. Mordecai represents the spirit of Messiah (the Holy Spirit). Esther represents the physical person of Yahuwshuwa Messiah himself as well as the “bride of Messiah” or the “body” of Messiah. The true remnant in the body of Messiah are being called out now like Esther to lay down their lives for the Yahuwdiy (Jewish) people. 

When King Ahasuerus took the ring away from Haman and gave it to Mordechai (representing his authority) this is a picture of the Father handing down his authority to the Son (Yahuwshuwa) who then took away the keys from Satan, (Revelation 1:18) and then he in turn handed down his authority to his followers the “keys to the kingdom.” 

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 16:19 And I will give unto you the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever you shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Luqas (Luke) 9:1 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.

When Yahuwshuwa went back to heaven after he resurrected, he gave his ministry over to the Holy Spirit:

Yahuwchanon (John) 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceeds from the Father, he shall testify of me

Yahuwchanon (John) 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

King Ahasuerus his gave authority to Esther just as the Father in Heaven gave his authority to Yahuwshuwa. In turn, Esther handed that authority to Mordecai, who is a “type” of the Holy Spirit. Likewise, we have Yahuwshuwa proclaiming here in the above verses that he will send us the Holy Spirit to continue his work. 

Luqas (Luke) 10:19 Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you.

The Scepter of Judah Given to Esther to Write Decrees 

And so to this day, the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) celebrates this time as decreed by two chosen vessels of YaHuWaH (Esther & Mordechai). If your heart is circumcised and you have the Holy Spirit in you, then you are considered to be joined to the House of Yahuwdah (Romans 2:28). Those who are born-again believers in Yahuwshuwa Messiah are now joined to him and his tribe called “Yahuwdah” (Judah).

Hadassah (Esther) 9:

15 For the Yahuwdiy (Jews) that were in Shushan gathered themselves together on the fourteenth day also of the month Adar, and slew three hundred men at Shushan; but on the prey they laid not their hand. 

16 But the other Yahuwdiy (Jews) that were in the king’s provinces gathered themselves together, and stood for their lives, and had rest from their enemies, and slew of their foes seventy and five thousand, but they laid not their hands on the prey, 

17 On the thirteenth day of the month Adar; and on the fourteenth day of the same rested they, and made it a day of feasting and gladness. 

18 But the Yahuwdiy (Jews) that were at Shushan assembled together on the thirteenth day thereof, and on the fourteenth thereof; and on the fifteenth day of the same they rested, and made it a day of feasting and gladness. 

19 Therefore the Yahuwdiy (Jews) of the villages, that dwelt in the unwalled towns, made the fourteenth day of the month Adar a day of gladness and feasting, and a good day, and of sending portions one to another. 

20 And Mordecai wrote these things, and sent letters unto all the Yahuwdiy (Jews) that were in all the provinces of the king Ahasuerus, both near and far

21 To establish this among them, that they should keep the fourteenth day of the month Adar, and the fifteenth day of the same, yearly, 

22 As the days wherein the Yahuwdiy (Jews) rested from their enemies, and the month which was turned unto them from sorrow to joy, and from mourning into a good day: that they should make them days of feasting and joy, and of sending portions one to another, and gifts to the poor. 

23 And the Yahuwdiy (Jews) undertook to do as they had begun, and as Mordecai had written unto them; 

24 Because Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Agagite, the enemy of all the Yahuwdiy (Jews), had devised against the Yahuwdiy (Jews) to destroy them, and had cast Pur, that is, the lot, to consume them, and to destroy them; 

25 But when Esther came before the king, he commanded by letters that his wicked device, which he devised against the Yahuwdiy (Jews), should return upon his own head, and that he and his sons should be hanged on the gallows. 

26 Wherefore they called these days Puwriym after the name of Puwr. Therefore for all the words of this letter, and of that which they had seen concerning this matter, and which had come unto them, 

27 The Yahuwdiy (Jews) ordained, and took upon them, and upon their seed, and upon all such as joined themselves unto them, so as it should not fail, that they would keep these two days according to their writing, and according to their appointed time every year; 

28 And that these days should be remembered and kept throughout every generation, every family, every province, and every city; and that these days of Puwriym should not fail from among the Yahuwdiy (Jews), nor the memorial of them perish from their seed. 

29 Then Esther the queen, the daughter of Abihail, and Mordecai the Yahuwdiy (Jew), wrote with all authority, to confirm this second letter of Puwriym. 

30 And he sent the letters unto all the Yahuwdiy (Jews), to the hundred twenty and seven provinces of the kingdom of Ahasuerus, with words of peace and truth, 

31 To confirm these days of Puwriym in their times appointed, according as Mordecai the Yahuwdiy (Jew) and Esther the queen had enjoined them, and as they had decreed for themselves and for their seed, the matters of the fastings and their cry. 

32 And the decree of Esther confirmed these matters of Puwriym; and it was written in the book.

The Sceptre of Yahuwdah (Judah) had been extended once again by the mighty hand of YaHuWaH through the earthly King Ahasuerus as he handed his authority to Esther and Mordechai.

This means that YaHuWaH gives his children the scepter to rule over their enemies!

Tehelliym (Psalm) 23:5 You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies: you anoint my head with oil; my cup runs over.

Should the Book of Esther Be in the Bible?

There are some people who have tried to suggest that the book of Esther should not be in the Bible because they say that the name of our Creator is not mentioned in there even once. But did you know that the name of our Creator the “I AM” (HaYah) is encoded in the book of Esther 19 times? Yes it is! 

The same name that he revealed to Mosheh at the burning bush in Exodus 3:14-15 is “I am that I am” or “I will be who I will be” or “He who causes to exist.” This name is listed in the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance as “HaYaH” which is # 1961, and it also means “to be, to exist, to breathe, to cause to exist.” That name HaYaH is seen 19 times in the book of Esther!

The Paleo Pictograph characters are seen below from right to left: Waw (Vav), Yod, Hey, Yod (the nail, the arm, the breath or spirit, the arm). Each of these pictographs paints a picture of our Messiah. The first letter is the “Waw” and it means “the nail or tent peg.” It shows us that our Messiah was nailed to the tree. The nail or tent peg also holds the tent together. It is a connector and it reveals that his blood covenant is what holds the house (or tent) of Yisra’el together. The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) said in Ephesians 2:15-16 that his sacrifice made the “two houses one new man” and that he has made us “one body by the cross.” The second letter is the “Yod” means “the arm” and it describes a metaphor of our Messiah who is called by Isaiah “the arm the arm of YHWH” (Isaiah 51:9, Isaiah 53:1, John 12:38). The third letter is the “Hey” and it means “the breath or spirit” of Elohiym. He breathed into Adam the breath of life and it is by his spirit that we have life. And the fourth letter is again, “the arm” of YaHuWaH (the Messiah):

ויהי

In the book of Esther, every time you see the phrase “and it came to pass” that phrase is #1961 “he who causes to be.” What this means is that HaYah (I AM) caused the Book of Esther to exist!

Esther’s name means “hidden” and it also means “star.” She is a picture of how the Messiah remains hidden until the appointed time and then he reveals himself as the bright & morning star! Esther went into the Persian Empire under a “hidden name” and so did our Messiah go into the Gentile nations under a “hidden name” in order to save his own people Yisra’el. In the book of Revelation, our Messiah called himself the “Alpha & Omega” which means “the first and last letter of the Greek Alphabet.” But in Hebrew he is called “the Alef & Taw” (the first and the last letter of the Hebrew Alphabet). 

In the book of Esther, the Paleo Hebrew Pictographs of the “Alef & Taw” are encoded 81 times!

The Alef & Taw is a picture of the “Red Heifer” being sacrificed on “Two Sticks” (the cross), and this symbol appears 81 times in the book of Esther! What do these letters mean? Below see from right to left the Waw, the Alef & the Taw. The Waw means “the nail”, the Alef means “the ox head or the red heifer” and the Taw means “the two sticks or cross.” What do these symbols represent? In our English Bibles, there are thousands of places in the TaNaKh (Old Testament) where this symbol appears but our English translators did not know what to do with it, so they left it out! In the Strong’s Hebrew Concordance, it is # 853 and it is the word “eyth” which simply means “sign of the definite direct object.” When you see this symbol in the scriptures it represents the Messiah! In Hosea 10:11 the House of Ephraim (the ten divorced tribes) are likened unto a “Red Heifer” and our Messiah fulfilled not only the Passover Lamb sacrifice for the “first born” but he also fulfilled the sacrifice of the “Red Heifer” for the cleansing of the altar, and this is the only sacrifice that is done outside of the camp (Numbers 19). See below, the symbol from right to left that means “the nail, the red heifer, and the cross” and it reveals that our Messiah died to restore the divorced tribes of Yisra’el back to the covenant!

ואת

The Father has revealed himself in the book of Esther as “HaYah” 19 times and the Messiah has revealed himself in the book of Esther 81 times!

In the 9th Chapter when Esther is giving the decree to remember “Puwriym” (which means to crush the plans of Satan), there are 12 Alef & Taw’s in that one Chapter for the 12 Tribes of Yisra’el!

Every time you see the phrase “and it came to pass” in the book of Esther, that is the Heavenly Father’s name! In other words “he who causes to be” wrote to book of Esther for his signature is all over it! 

See my other article entitled: “The Alef & Taw: the Red Heifer & the Two Sticks vs the Cross of Tammuz”


*Download ebook below. A suggested minimum donation for this ebook is $7.00. Make payment at the following link: 


Use the following email address to make the payment: DoublePortionInheritance@gmail.com

Jacob’s Time of Trouble & Daniel’s 70th Week

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2004  

The prophet YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) foretold of the restoration of the twelve tribes of Yisra’el in the last days. He described this time as “the end of punishment” for all twelve tribes for their idolatry. But he also described this as a time of restoration after Yisra’el had been chastised and scattered to the nations. Just as Ya’aqob (Jacob) himself had to go through his own time of trouble for his sins, there came a time when he “wrestled with a man all night long” and by the morning he had declared “I have seen Elohiym face to face and now my life is preserved” (Genesis 32:30).

Jacob was a slave in a foreigner’s house (his father-in-law Laban) and he had worked a total of fourteen years for his beloved wife Rachel and for Leah. He also agreed to work an additional 6 years for Laban’s cattle for a total of twenty years. By the end of those 20 years, he was ready to leave his father-in-law Laban and go to the place that YaHuWaH has promised to give him. We see in Genesis 31:3 that YaHuWaH commanded Jacob to go back to “the land of his fathers.”

And now the prophet Jeremiah is seeing that the House of Jacob (all twelve tribes) will be gathered back to their land again in the last days after they have been through their “time of trouble.”
        
         YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) 30:

1 The word that came to YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) from YHWH, saying,

2 Thus speaks YHWH Elohiym of Yisra’el, saying, Write you all the words that I have spoken unto you in a book.

3 For, lo, the days come, says YHWH, that I will bring again the captivity of my people Yisra’el and YaHuW’dah (Judah), says YHWH: and I will cause them to return to the land that I gave to their fathers, and they shall possess it.

4 And these are the words that YHWH spoke concerning Yisra’el and concerning YaHuW’dah (Judah).

5 For thus says YHWH; We have heard a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace.

6 Ask you now, and see whether a man does travail with child? wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?

7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Ya’aqob’s (Jacob’s)trouble, but he shall be saved out of it.

8 For it shall come to pass in that day, says YHWH of hosts, that I will break his yoke from off your neck, and will burst your bonds, and strangers shall no more serve themselves of him:

9 But they shall serve YHWH their Elohiym, and Dawiyd (David) their king, whom I will raise up unto them.

10 Therefore fear you not, O my servant Ya’aqob, (Jacob) says YHWH; neither be dismayed, O Yisra’el: for,lo, I will save you from afar, and your seed from the land of their captivity; and Ya’aqob shall return, and shall be in rest, and be quiet, and none shall make him afraid.

11 For I am with you, says YHWH, to save you: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered you, yet I will not make a full end of you: but I will correct you in measure, and will not leave you altogether unpunished.

Daniel’s 70th Week

This same period described by the prophet Jeremiah as “Jacobs time of trouble,” is also described in Daniel 12:1-2, where we are shown the same period that our Messiah spoke about in Matthew 24:21. The angel told Daniel that this “time of trouble” would be “such as never was since there was a nation.” This is very similar language to what YaHuWshuwa said in Matthew 24:21 when he said that this “great tribulation” would be “such as was not since the beginning of the world.” We see this same 3 ½ year event described in three different ways: Jacobs time of trouble, a time of trouble & great tribulation. We have been conditioned for a long time to believe that this is a 7- year period, but how can we be certain that it is only 3 ½ years? Where do we get the idea of a 7-year tribulation any way? It is taken from a mis-interpretation of Daniel 9:27 where many theologians have taught us to believe that this period called Daniel’s 70th Week is the same period known as “Jacobs time of trouble.” Well, they are partially correct in the fact that this is indeed a 7-year period, but it is actually divided into two separate periods of 3 ½ years and a 2,000 year gap! 

Back in the summer of 2004, I had become very perplexed over the identity of who the “he” is mentioned in Daniel 9:27. I had heard theologians over the years teach that this prophecy was speaking about a future “Antichrist” that would “confirm” some kind of “seven-year peace treaty” and thus would begin what is called “the great tribulation.” From this false premise, many have taught us all to believe that there is going to be an event in the last days called the “seven years of tribulation.” But as I began to search out the scriptures for this phrase “seven-year tribulation,” I discovered that it is no place in the entire Bible!

After much prayer and study over this one single verse, I came to the conclusion that there is no such thing as a “seven-year tribulation.” And once I realized that there is no scriptural support for a seven-year tribulation, that eliminated the erroneous belief in a “pre-tribulation rapture theory.” If there are only 3 ½ years left to go of Daniel’s 70th Week, this means that the idea of a “mid-tribulation” rapture theory also makes no sense.

In this study I aim to show that YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) the Messiah is the one who “confirms” the covenant in Daniel 9:27, and not some future “Antichrist” as many theologians have falsely taught. Theologians who build their pre-tribulation rapture theory on the idea that there are seven years of tribulation, have led many people to believe in a “dispensationalist” rendering of the end-times. This false doctrine goes something like this:

“The Church is separate from Yisrael, and thus the Church gets raptured at the beginning of a seven-year tribulation, leaving only the Jews and non-believers to suffer through the tribulation for seven years.”

Of course this belief goes against everything that our Messiah came to accomplish with regard to the “restoration of Yisra’el.” All Gentiles who join the faith of our Messiah are no longer considered “Gentiles” according to Ephesians 2:11-12, but they are considered “part of the commonwealth of Yisrael.” Hence there is no difference between Jew & Gentile in Messiah (Galatians 3:28), for both are called “the elect” according to the foreknowledge of the Father who are sprinkled with the blood and sanctified by the Spirit (1st Peter 1:1-2).

And so the question must be asked “where do theologians get the idea of a seven-year tribulation?” I had to ask myself this question back in 2004, and so I began to search out the scriptures for the answer, and to my surprise I found that all references to this period called “the great tribulation,” or what Jeremiah 30:7 calls “Jacob’s time of trouble” is only a period of “a time, times and a half times” (Daniel 12:7, Revelation 12:14).

In order to find out what this mysterious phrase means, we have to look up the Hebrew and the Greek words for “time.” In Daniel 12:6, Daniel asked the angel how long this “time of trouble” would last. The angel told Daniel that it would last for “a time, times and a half.” 

The Hebrew word used here for “time” is as follows in the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance:

#4150 mow`ed: properly, an appointment, i.e. a fixed time or season; specifically, a festival; conventionally a year; by implication, an assembly (as convened for a definite purpose); technically the congregation; by extension, the place of meeting; also a signal (as appointed beforehand):--appointed (sign, time), (place of, solemn) assembly, congregation, (set, solemn) feast, (appointed, due) season, solemn(-ity), synagogue, (set) time (appointed). 

As you can see the Hebrew word for “time” points to a feast or an appointed time.

But it can also mean “a year.”

And so going by this reasoning:

Time = 1 year
Times (plural) = 2 years
A half times = .05 years (six months)
Total = 3.5 years

Now let’s take a look at the Greek word for “time” in Revelation 12:14:

#2540. kairos kahee-ros’ of uncertain affinity; an occasion, i.e. set or proper time: always, opportunity, (convenient, due) season, (due, short, while) time, a while.

As you can see both the Hebrew and the Greek denote that this is for an appointed time or season---in other words during the Feasts of YaHuWaH!

The Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) uses this same terminology in 1st Thessalonians 5 when he refers to the “times and seasons” as being something that the set-apart ones are not to be ignorant of.

Further confirmation of this period of 3.5 years for the “time of trouble” is seen in Revelation 11:3 where “the two witnesses” are said to have a ministry that will last for “one thousand two hundred and sixty days” (1,260 days). On the biblical calendar of 360 days per year, that amounts to exactly 3.5 years!

1,260 days ÷ 30 days per month = 3.5

During this same period called “Jacob’s time of trouble” the Anti-Messiah will “speak blasphemies for forty two months” (Revelation 13:5).

42 X 30 days for each month = 1,260 days!

The Prophet Elijah Caused 3 ½ Years of “Trouble” for Yisra’el

The prophet EliYaHuW (Elijah) is the first one to cause “trouble” for Yisra’el when he prayed to YaHuWaH that they would not receive rain for 3 ½ years (1,260 days). Why did he pray this way? Yisra’el at that time was steeped in idolatry with Ba’al because of Queen Yeze’Baal (Jezebel) the foreign woman who married King Ahab.

Listen to what King Ahab accused him of:

1st Melakiym (Kings) 18:17And it came to pass, when Achab (Ahab) saw EliYaHuW (Elijah), that Achab (Ahab) said unto him, Are you he that troubles Yisra’el?

EliYaHuW responded back to King Achab:

1st Melakiym (Kings) 18:18 And he answered, I have not troubled Yisra’el; but you, and your father’s house, in that you have forsaken the commandments of YHWH, and you have followed Baalim.

This same period of 3.5 years was used when the prophet EliYaHuW (Elijah) prayed that Yisra’el would not receive rain as a sign of judgment:

Ya’aqob (James) 5:17 EliYaHuW (Elijah) was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months.

1st Melakiym (Kings) 17:1 And EliYaHuW (Elijah) the Tishbite, who was of the inhabitants of Gilead, said unto Achab, (Ahab) As YHWH Elohiym of Yisra’el lives, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, but according to my word.

1st Melakiym (Kings) 18:1 And it came to pass after many days, that the word of YHWH came to EliYaHuW (Elijah) in the third year, saying, Go, show yourself unto Achab (Ahab); and I will send rain upon the earth.

Multiple Fulfillments of 3 ½ Years of Tribulation: History Repeats Itself

The first fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy of an Anti-Messiah leader reigning for 3 ½ years was in 167 B.C. when Antiochus IV persecuted the Jews for 3 ½ years from 167 B.C. until 164 B.C. Daniel 11:21-31 accurately details the reign of Antiochus IV over the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) right up until the Maccabean revolt. During this 3 ½ year period, Antiochus desecrated the Temple of YaHuWaH and set up an abominable image of Zeus (Jupiter) in the Holy Place. He also enforced the sacrificing of pigs on the altar of sacrifice in the outer court, rendering the Temple unclean and unfit for worship to YaHuWaH. Daniel had seen in his vision that there would be 2,300 days until the sanctuary would be cleansed:

Daniyel (Daniel) 8:14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.

On December 25th 167 B.C., when Antiochus had set up an abominable image of the Greek god Zeus, in the Temple and sacrificed a pig on the altar, he then claimed that he had become “born-again” as a reincarnation of the pagan god Zeus, and thus claiming that his birthday was December 25th just like Nimrod and all of the other false Messiahs before him. Antiochus also claimed to be the physical manifestation of “God,” as he gave himself the title “Epiphanies” which means “God Manifest,” in Greek and it adds up to 666 in the Greek alpha-numeric system. This date of December 25th 167 B.C. began the 3 ½ year tribulation period for the YaHuW’diy (Jews) until the Maccabees revolted and cleansed the temple in 164 B.C.

If we count back 2,300 days from 164 B.C. (6.38 biblical years of 360 days), when the temple was cleansed and restored for worship to YaHuWaH, we come to the year when Antiochus Epiphanies began his persecution of the YaHuW’diy (Jews) in 171 B.C. However if the duration of time during which 2,300 daily sacrifices would ordinarily have been offered, (one at evening and one in the morning), as specified in Exodus 29:38-43, the actual time period involved is 1150 days, or slightly over three years. This, in fact, was the time of the Maccabean Tribulation, 167-164 B.C., at the end of which the sanctuary was “cleansed” by Judah Maccabees in his restoration of the evening and morning sacrifices (2nd Maccabees 10:1-5). It is from this event that the celebration of Chanukkah began and is also called the “Feast of Dedication” (John 10:22).  

The second fulfillment of this prophecy happened under the leadership of another Anti-Messiah leader named Nero Caesar who persecuted many the followers of Messiah. On December 31st in 67 A.D., when the Roman armies under General Cestius, “took away the daily sacrifices” in Jerusalem which were being offered up to the Roman pagan gods, they withdrew their troops and went back to Rome. This was the time when the YaHuW’diy (Jews) should have paid attention to the prophecies of Daniel and our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa and fled the city of Jerusalem. Because exactly 1,290 days later, (Daniel 12:11) the same Roman armies returned under General Titus and destroyed the Temple on July 31st 70 A.D. Within 45 days after the destruction of the temple, up until September 14th 70 A.D., the Jewish religious system had come to an end. Those Yisra’elites who were “accounted worthy to escape” during those 3 ½ years of “tribulation” as YaHuW’shuwa had warned in Luke 21:36 returned 45 days later to find the city destroyed but they were alive and well because they heeded the warning of Messiah to escape just as Daniel had prophesied in Daniel 12:12“Blessed is he that waits, and comes to the 1,335 days.”

From December 31st 67 A.D. until July 31st 70 A.D. was 1,290 days exactly, as Yah had given them ample warning through Daniel and YaHuW’shuwa to escape. Then from July 31st 70 A.D. when the Romans returned under Titus, another 45 days of total ruin and destruction came to Jerusalem as 225,000 Jews lost their lives in the war. And finally 76 months later or “2,300 days until the sanctuary shall be cleansed” (Daniel 8:14), on May 20th 73 A.D., when the Jewish government and all of the territories of Yisra’el were sold off. The stone built temple at Jerusalem, was then superseded by a “new living stone temple” as the Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) spoke of in Ephesians 2:19-22. He referred to the body of Messiah as the “holy temple” and the Apostle Kefa (Peter) called them “lively stones” (1st Peter 2:5).

This fulfilled the prophecy of Daniel 8:14 of the sanctuary being cleansed, because Yah had replaced the physical temple and animal sacrifices (which never did atone for sin in the first place), with the living temple of the believer, “cleansed” with the blood of the Lamb and “sanctified” by the Holy Spirit.

I believe these prophecies in Daniel have a literal application as well as a prophetic long-term application. In the first two fulfillments of these prophecies, they were “literal” days as in 1,260 days, 1,290 days, 1,335 days and 2,300 days. In the second fulfillment of these prophecies, the “days” are interpreted as “years” according to Ezekiel 4:6.

Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire in 334 B.C. bringing in the Greek Empire, and this began the beginning of the 2,300 years of Daniel’s prophecy in the 8th Chapter of the book of Daniel. When 2,300 “days” are rendered as years we can calculate exactly to the date from when the Grecian Empire took over Jerusalem until Yisra’el recaptured Jerusalem in the “Six Day War” in 1967. YaHuWaH had allowed them to be punished, but he then “cleansed the sanctuary” in Jerusalem from Heathen Rulers so that they could come back to their land to meet YaHuW’shuwa their Messiah at his second coming.

In the Babylonian Captivity of Yisra’el the word of YaHuWaH shows us that Yisra’el would be restored as a nation on May 14, 1948. Why is this date so significant? YaHuW’shuwa tells us in Luke 21:32 that this generation will not pass away before all these things are fulfilled. The generation that this scripture is referring to is the generation that was born when Yisra’el became a nation. This generation, born in 1948, will not pass away before the return of YaHuW’shuwa ha’Mashiyach.

The scriptures help to provides us with the date May 14, 1948. In Ezekiel 4:6 Yah instructed Ezekiel to lay on his side for 430 days, representing 430 years of iniquity upon Yisra’el. But He also promised that He will gather Yisra’el “out of all nations” and “bring them back into their land” (Ezekiel 36:24). 

True to this prophecy, the people were taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, in 606 B.C. (Daniel 1). The Babylonian Captivity lasted 70 years as prophesied in Jeremiah 25:11, ending in 536 B.C. (Ezra 1). At the conclusion of the Babylonian Captivity, 360 years remained of the 430 years prophesied by Ezekiel. But Yisra’el did not repent of their sins. Only 50,000 people returned at the end of the 70 years (Ezra 2:64-65). Most of Yisra’el chose not to return with Zerubbabel at that time. In Leviticus 26:18, Yah warned Yisra’el that if they continued in sin after their punishment, the punishment would be multiplied 7 times.

When the remaining 360 years is multiplied by 7, the punishment extends to 2,520 years. One half of 2,520 years is 1,260 years or “days.” Since Yah’s prophetic year is based upon a 360 day year (see Genesis 7:11, 7:24, 8:5; Revelation 12:6 and 12:14, as examples), 2,520 years of 360 days is 907,200 days. Based upon our solar calendar, this is 2,483 years, 9 months and 21 days. Adding this period to the date of the decree of King Cyrus discussed in Ezra 1, (457 B.C.) we come to the date of May 14, 1948, when Yisra’el was declared to be a nation once again. The exact same calculation can also apply to the captivity of Jerusalem. When the people were taken into captivity in 606 B.C., the city of Jerusalem was not then destroyed. Yisra’el’s captivity lasted 70 years which was completed in 536 B.C. However, 19 years into the Babylonian Captivity, in 587 B.C., Jerusalem was taken and the temple destroyed (2nd Kings 25). 70 years later, in 517 B.C., Daniel was given his vision of the “four beasts” or empires, (Daniel 8) and he was shown this period of 2,300 days, which was to begin with the Grecian Empire in 334 B.C. From the time of Daniel’s prophecy in 517 B.C. until Jerusalem was captured by Yisra’el once again on July 7, 1967 is exactly 2,520 biblical years or “days.” When we count backwards the converted solar years of 2,483 years, 9 months and 21 days to the date, of July 7, 1967 we come to the date of Daniel’s prophecy!

We can correlate the 19 year gap of Babylon taking Yisra’el captive in 606 B.C. until Jerusalem was taken in 587 B.C., and interestingly, if we add 19 years (19.27 converted into solar years), to May 14, 1948, we come to the exact date of June 7, 1967!

If all of these prophecies are literal and they still apply to present day Jerusalem and the modern State of Yisrael, why do so many people believe that these prophecies won’t be repeated again in the last days? We must realize that prophecy has many layers as we have a body, mind, spirit and emotions (soul). There are four aspects of our being and usually there are four layers of understanding scripture.

Once again in these last days the 3rd Jewish Temple will be rebuilt and I believe that this will mark the beginning of the prophetic time clock starting to “tick” again concerning the 490 years of Daniel 9:24-27. There have been 486.5 years already completed out of the 490 and there are only 3.5 years left of this prophecy. Once the Anti-Messiah will “take away the daily sacrifices” (Daniel 12:11) and he will set up the “abomination of desolation” in the holy place of the temple, there will once again be “great tribulation” as our Messiah foretold in Matthew 24:21.

This “final fulfillment” of 1,260 days or 3 ½ years during which the “man of sin” will sit in the temple of Elohiym is also confirmed by the Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) in 2nd Thessalonians 2:4.

Revelation 11:3 And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.

Meanwhile during this 1,260 day period of tribulation or “Jacob’s Trouble,” Yah will allow the “woman” (Yisra’el) to “escape” into the wilderness to be protected there under Yah’s hand:

Revelation 12:6 Then the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by Elohiym that they should feed her there one thousand two hundred and sixty days. 

In Yah’s prophetic time clock, he often uses “a day” for a “year”:

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 4:5-6 For I have laid upon you the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days,three hundred and ninety days: so shall you bear the iniquity of the house of Yisra’el. And when you hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of YaHuW’dah (Judah) forty days: I have appointed you each day for a year.

Yah was showing Yisra’el that for every Sabbath day that they had violated his covenant, he was going to punish them for one year.

If we use the formula of a day for a “year” from Ezekiel 4:6 we can arrive at a prophetic fulfillment of these “3 ½ years” or 1,260 days as being 1,260 years. From the year 538 A.D. when the Roman Catholic Church first officially became a nation and a church, until 1798 A.D, (when it ceased to be a state), was exactly 1,260 years! This prophecy of “a day for a year” in Ezekiel 4 was fulfilled on yet another level. Napoleon Bonaparte dethroned the papacy in 1798 and the papacy “suffered a deadly wound to the head.”

The Greek word for “anti” in scripture means “substitute” and the official title for each and every pope is “Substitute for Christ” or in Latin “Vicarious Filii Dei” (substitute for the son of God). Hence the title literally means “Antichrist!” Each and every pope wears a crown with this inscription and it adds up to 666 in the Latin alpha-numeric system! In Revelation 13:1 we are shown that the “beast has the name of blasphemy upon his heads...” This is none other than the Papacy who has the name of blasphemy “Substitute for the Son of God” or in Latin, “Vicarious Filii Dei” upon his heads!

Are you seeing a pattern yet? In each of the above scenarios, there is always a period of 1,260 literal days or years during which the false Messiah persecutes the people of Yah (tribulation) but in every case it ends with the evil leader being brought down and the righteous getting the victory. And so based on the patterns we have just seen, we can safely say that there is no precedence elsewhere in scripture for a “seven year” tribulation period. In Matthew 18:16, our Messiah told us that we need the witness of “two or three” in order to establish a matter. The same principle applies when trying to establish doctrine. We must have the “witness of two or three” elsewhere in scripture before we can build a doctrine out of one isolated verse. But we have no witnesses in scripture to support a seven year tribulation period at any time in history. But we have an overwhelming amount of evidence to support a tribulation of 1,260 days (3.5 years) from the past and pointing to the future.

In order to prove that Daniel 9:27 is foretelling about a future event of seven years of tribulation, we must find out who the subject is. We must find out who the identity of the “he” is in Daniel 9:27.

Now let’s look at the two verses below and tell me if you see a pattern:

Mark 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many. 

Daniyel (Daniel) 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. 

YaHuW’shuwa confirmed the one and only covenant made with Abraham during Passover week, and he confirmed it with “many” as he said the night before his crucifixion: 

“…this is the blood of the new covenant shed for many” (Mark 14:24).

In the midst of Passover week (Wednesday or the 4th day of the week) when YaHuW’shuwa was crucified, and also in the midst of Daniel’s 70th week (7 years), he caused the daily sacrifice and the oblation to “cease” to be recognized by the Father in Heaven, as well as the annual Yom Kippur sacrifices. The evening and morning oblation “failed” to be “acceptable” and the yearly sacrifice failed to be “acceptable” on Yom Kippur each year for 40 years following his crucifixion until YaHuW’shuwa made the Jewish Temple desolate. Why did he make it desolate? You will see the reason why in the prophecy that follows.

YaHuW’shuwa is the one who prophesied over Jerusalem and said “behold your house is left to you desolate,” and so it was his prophetic word which was decreed over Jerusalem that brought them to desolation.
MatthithYaHuW (Matthew) 23:

37 O Yerushalayim, Yerushalayim, you that kill the prophets, and stone them which are sent unto you, how often would I have gathered your children together, even as a hen gathers her chickens under her wings, and you would not!

38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. 

You will notice that the reason for their desolation is because they killed every single prophet that had been sent to them to include the ultimate betrayal of their own prophesied Messiah! It was exactly 40 years from YaHuW’shuwa’s death on the cross, until the Romans came with a flood and destroyed the city and the sanctuary (Daniel 9:26). It is our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa who will allow this desolation to continue right up until the CONSUMMATION. 

What happens on a wedding night?

The married couple “consummates their marriage covenant!” 

And so Jerusalem will continue to be desolate right up until the wedding night when YaHuW’shuwa consummates the marriage covenant with his bride!

What is determined against Jerusalem? “Desolation is determined!”

Desolation for Jerusalem has already been determined by YaHuW’shuwa and the prophets. The house of YaHuW’dah (Judah) crucified him and proclaimed “let his blood be on us.”

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. 

Luke 23:21 But they cried, saying, Crucify him, crucify him.

In the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance, the word for “cease” in Daniel 9:27 is as follows:

#7673 shabath shaw-bath’ a primitive root; to repose, i.e. desist from exertion; used in many implied relations (causative, figurative or specific):--(cause to, let, make to) cease, celebrate, cause (make) to fail, keep (sabbath), suffer to be lacking, leave, put away (down), (make to) rest, rid, still, take away.

The word “cease” in Daniel 9:27 is synonymous with “fail, suffer to be lacking, rest” and it can also imply something that is “figurative” so we can see that YaHuW’shuwa’s death on the cross was meant to sanctify the altar in the temple thereby making the “evening and morning oblations” acceptable before YaHuWaH. But you see because the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) and Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) did not recognize him as the Messiah, the daily sacrifices were no longer were “acceptable” to YaHuWaH. Hence, the evening and morning oblations “failed” in their purpose.

Daniel’s Seventy Weeks Explained

This prophecy begins in Daniel 9:24-27 with a 490 year period whereby the angel told Daniel that six things would happen:

1.) To finish the transgression.
2.) To make an end of sins.
3.) To make reconciliation for iniquity.
4.) To bring in everlasting righteousness.
5.) To seal up the vision and prophesy.
6.) To anoint the most holy.

The fulfillment of these six things is divided up into 4 time periods totaling 490 years.

490 years = 70 X 7

From these 490 years we see a period called:

62 weeks = 434 years
7 weeks = 49 years
1 week = 7 years divided in half by 3.5 years each by the phrase “in the midst of the week.”

Hence, there is a total of 4 separate and distinct periods for a total of 490 years. The fact that scripture treats these four periods as separate and distinct tells us that something takes place at each of these intervals.

From the time that the decree of King Cyrus was issued in 457 B.C. (Ezra 1:1-4, 2nd Chronicles 36:22-23) to allow the YaHuW’diy (Jews) to go back and rebuild their temple and city right up until the Messiah was revealed at his baptism or “unto Messiah the prince” was 483 years (Daniel 9:25).

62 weeks + 7 weeks = 69 weeks or 483 years.

In John 2:20, the Pharisees declared that it had taken 46 years to build the temple. But in reality it took 49 years total to build the temple because there was a 3-year gap in between where construction had ceased. That caused the temple construction to extend to 49 years and then from the time that Nehemiah built the walls that surrounded Jerusalem even “in troublous times” until “Messiah was cut off” was an additional 434 years (62 weeks). So there was a total of 483 years from “the going forth of the command to rebuild Jerusalem” until YaHuW’shuwa was revealed at his baptism as “the Messiah.”

If you take 483 years for the total amount of years beginning with 457 B.C. (when King Cyrus first issued this decree), right up until the angel told Daniel “unto Messiah the prince,” this takes us to when Messiah began his ministry in the fall of 27 A.D. It would take us to the year 26 A.D. if you do the math, but since we do not count the year “zero” and we skip to 1 A.D. following his birth in 3 B.C., it brings us to 27 A.D. when our Messiah was first revealed as the “prince” at the age of 30 years old (Luke 3:23).

The Hebrew term “Messiah the prince” in Daniel 9:25 is Mashiyach Nagiyd.”

The word “mashiyach” is seen below:

#4899 mashiyach maw-shee-akh from 4886; anointed; usually a consecrated person (as a king, priest, or saint); specifically, the Messiah:--anointed, Messiah.

The word for “prince” is seen below:

#5057 nagiyd naw-gheed’ from 5046; a commander (as occupying the front), civil, military or religious; generally (abstractly, plural), honorable themes:--captain, chief, excellent thing, (chief) governor, leader, noble, prince, (chief) ruler.

The root word for this word prince (nagid) comes from another word “nagad”:

#5046 nagad naw-gad’ a primitive root; properly, to front, i.e. stand boldly out opposite; by implication (causatively), to manifest; figuratively, to announce (always by word of mouth to one present); specifically, to expose, predict, explain, praise:--bewray, certainly, certify, declare(-ing), messenger, plainly, profess, rehearse, report, shew (forth), speak, surely, tell, utter.

As you can see the Hebrew word “prince” is a leader but it comes from another root word: to manifest, to announce, and to declare!

When was YaHuW’shuwa first manifested before our eyes or announced to be the Messiah? We have three gospel accounts that tell us when he was revealed as “the anointed one.” Immediately following his baptism in the Jordan River, the disciples “announced” that they had found the Messiah:

YaHuW’chanon (John) 1:

40 One of the two which heard YaHuW’chanon (John) speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Shimone Kefa (Simon Peter)’s brother.

41 He first finds his own brother Simon, and says unto him, We have found the Messiah, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.

We first see that he was baptized by John in the Jordan River, and then the Holy Spirit descended upon him as a dove. Then the Father’s voice spoke from heaven “this is my beloved son in whom am I well pleased” (Luke 3:22).

This was when he was first “anointed” or revealed as the Messiah! Then we have the disciples declaring “we have found the Messiah.” And then we have an explanation in Acts 10 showing that he was first anointed at his baptism:

Acts 10:

37 That word, I say, you know, which was published throughout all YaHuW’dah (Judaea), and began from Galilee, after the baptism which YaHuW’chanon (John) preached;

38 How Elohiym anointed YaHuW’shuwa of Nazareth with the Ruach ha’Kodesh (Holy Spirit) and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for Elohiym was with him.

And then 40 days after he emerged from the wilderness to fast and pray, he went into the temple to read the Isaiah 61 scroll on Yom Kippur. We know that this had to be Yom Kippur because the terminology “the acceptable year of YHWH” is used during the Day of Atonement. Listen to what he said:

Luke 4:

18 The Spirit of YHWH is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach the Besowrah (gospel) to the poor; he has sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

19 To preach the acceptable year of YHWH.

20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.

21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

What did he just declare? He just told us that he was the “anointed one” or the Mashiyach!

Now we can see that from the initial decree of King Cyrus allowing the Jews to go and rebuild Jerusalem (457 B.C.) until our Messiah was revealed at his baptism was 483 years!

49 years to build the temple + 434 years to build the city and the walls = 483 years which takes us to 27 A.D. in the fall at Messiah’s baptism, forty days before Yom Kippur.

This was at the beginning of his ministry!

This leaves only 7 years of Daniel’s Seventy Week prophecy:

490 years – 483 years = 7 years.

We know that YaHuW’shuwa’s ministry lasted 3.5 years and then he was “cut off.” This tells us that he was “cut off” during the middle of the last 7 years of this prophecy (after 3.5 years).

The Dual Nature of Messianic Prophecy Always Produces a Gap in History

*Examples of Historic Gaps in Biblical Prophecy

1.) The 2000 year gap of Joel confirmed by Keefa (Peter) on the day of Pentecost (Shabuoth).
    2.) The early and latter rain of the Holy Spirit.
    3.) The gap between the Feasts of Pentecost & and Trumpets.
    4.) The preaching of the Gospel of the Kingdom begins and ends
          with what is called “the fullness of the Gentiles.”
    5.) The Priests and the Ark preceded the people with a gap into the Promised Land.

Often times in prophecy, there is the immediate natural fulfillment, and later it’s parallel fulfillment concerning the spiritual. The dual nature of Messianic prophecy has caused the nation of Yisra’el to be blinded by the first appearance of Messiah who came as a “suffering servant.”

Few have seemingly pondered the question, “why did the Prophet Joel prophesy in four verses the beginning and end of the times of the Gentiles of which many call ‘the Church age’”?

Upon announcing the fulfillment of the 1st two verses of Joel’s prophecy on Pentecost (Shabuoth), Keefa (Peter) begins the first two verses as an explanation for the outpouring of the Spirit of Elohiym. The next two verses concluded with atmospheric judgments found in Revelation 6:12-17. When YaHuW’shuwa fulfilled the Feast of Shabuoth (Pentecost) by baptizing his disciples in fire, it marked the beginning of the “last days.”

At the end of this 2,000 year gap, at the last trump, and immediately after the atmospheric signs mentioned in Acts 2:18-19, YaHuW’shuwa gathers his elect (Matthew 24:28-31).

This 2,000 year gap between the prophetic fulfillment of the “Feast of Weeks” (Pentecost) & the “Feast of Trumpets” is when Messiah gathers his elect, and it marks the beginning of the end of this last “age” prior to the second coming of Messiah.  On the Feast of Trumpets when the elect are gathered will mark the end of Daniel’s 70th Week (Daniel 9:24-27).

Messiah was cut off after 486.5 years out of the 490 years of Daniel’s 70 Week prophecy. The prophecy begins with King Cyrus’s initial decree in 457 B.C. If you subtract 457 from 490, (for the length of the prophecy) and you don’t count the year “zero,” you end up at 27 A.D. when Messiah began his 3.5 year ministry at his baptism.

His baptism was his “legal moment of death” because in Romans 6:4 baptism is a picture of death. YaHuW’chanon (John) was the Levitical High Priest who symbolically “killed the first goat” for Yom Kippur.

The Holy Spirit then led YaHuW’shuwa into the wilderness for 40 days fulfilling the pattern of the 2nd twin goat, (the scapegoat). Messiah “took the sins away” by going into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. He overcame all temptation for sin in this act. He then emerged from the wilderness to read Isaiah 61 in the temple on Yom Kippur when he declared “the acceptable year of YHWH.” His final statement was “today this scripture is fulfilled in your ears.” But then something interesting happened.

Messiah did not finish the verse!

He read only half of this verse, and then he closed the scroll and said that he was fulfilling that verse at that time:

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 61:

1 The Spirit of YHWH Elohiym is upon me; because YHWH has anointed me to preach good tidings (Besowrah) unto the meek; he has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

2 To proclaim the acceptable year of YHWH, and the day of vengeance of our Elohiym; to comfort all that mourn;

Notice that he read up to the part that says “to proclaim the acceptable year of YHWH” and then he stops! Why?

The next part of this verse “and the day of vengeance of our Elohiym, to comfort all that mourn” will take place at his second coming on Yom Kippur after his seven-day marriage with his bride (typified in Leah). Atthe end of that week, he will also marry Rachel (the House of Judah). We see the same pattern in the account in Genesis when Jacob was first married to Leah but on that night he was told by Laban that he would be given Rachel after he “fulfilled the week” with Leah. This week is none other than the last week between the Feast of Trumpets & the Day of Atonement. During the ten days between these two feasts called “The Ten Days of Awe,” our Messiah will fulfill the pattern of Jacob marrying two brides (Leah & Rachel). Leah is symbolic of born-again Jews & Gentiles and Rachel represents the non-converted Jews who are sealed in the foreheads (Revelation 7, Ezekiel 9) but they do not accept him until he returns in Zechariah 12:10.

The Yom Kippur 40 Year Miracle

In the centuries following the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem (70 C.E.), the Jewish people began writing two versions of Jewish thought, religious history and commentary. One was written in Palestine and became known as the Jerusalem Talmud. The other was written in Babylon and was known as the Babylonian Talmud.

We read in the Jerusalem Talmud:

“Forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the western light went out, the crimson thread remained crimson, and the lot for YHWH always came up in the left hand. They would close the gates of the Temple by night and get up in the morning and find them wide open” (Jacob Neusner, The Yerushalmi, p.156-157). [the Temple was destroyed in 70 C.E.] 

A similar passage in the Babylonian Talmud states:

“Our rabbis taught: During the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple the lot [‘For the Lord’] did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson-colored strap become white; nor did the western most light shine; and the doors of the Hekel [Temple] would open by themselves” (Soncino version, Yoma 39b). 

What are these passages talking about? Since both Talmuds recount the same information, this indicates the knowledge of these events was accepted by the widespread Jewish community.

The Miracle of the “Lot” 

The first of these miracles concerns a random choosing of the “lot” which was cast on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur). The lot chosen determined which of two goats would be “for the YHWH” and which goat would be the “Azazel” or “scapegoat.” During the two hundred years before 30 C.E., when the High Priest picked one of two stones, again this selection was governed by chance, and each year the priest would select a black stone as often as a white stone. But for forty years in a row, beginning in 30 C.E., the High Priest always picked the black stone! The odds against this happening are astronomical (2 to the 40th power). In other words, the chances of this occurring are 1 in approximately 5, 479, 548, 800 or about 5.5 billion to one! By comparison, your chances of winning your local state or municipal-run cash Lottery would be much more favorable!

The lot for Azazel, the black stone, contrary to all the laws of chance, came up 40 times in a row from 30 to 70 AD! This was considered a dire event and signified something had fundamentally changed in this Yom Kippur ritual. This casting of lots is also accompanied by yet another miracle which is described next.

The priests would also take a red ribbon (symbolizing sin) and tie half around the horn of the scapegoat and tie the other half to the temple door. The scapegoat bore the sins of the nation of Yisra’el. If YaHuWaH forgave them of their sins, the red ribbon on the temple door would miraculously turn white. This was done in front of a large crowd to show them they had Elohiym’s favor:

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 1:18 “Come now, let us reason together,” says YHWH. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.”

Since 30 A.D., the ribbon stopped turning white as snow; this is also recorded in the Talmud:

Yoma 39b Our rabbis taught: During the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple the lot [‘For YHWH’] did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson-colored strap become white; nor did the western most light shine; and the doors of the Hekel [Temple] would open by themselves.”

There is only one possible explanation for this:

Because YaHuW’shuwa  ha’Mashiyach was the perfect sin sacrifice who died in 30 A.D!

Ibriym (Hebrews) 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Only His blood can truly atone for our sins and once He paid that price, animal sacrifice was worthless.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 10:4-6 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. Wherefore when he comes into the world, he says, Sacrifice and offering you would not, but a body have you prepared me: In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you have had no pleasure.

This was all done as a rehearsal for things to come, so Yisra’el would recognize the true Messiah when He came. 

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 1:11 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? says YHWH: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.

Another thing that is recorded in the Talmud is this historical mystery of the temple doors. The doors to the temple would swing open by themselves starting in 30 A.D. recorded in the Talmud:

Sota 6:3 Said Rabban Yohanan Ben Zakkai to the Temple, ‘O Temple, why do you frighten us? We know that you will end up destroyed. For it has been said, ‘Open your doors, O Lebanon, that the fire may devour your cedar.

Lastly, the most important Menorah Lamp that was to remain lit at all times kept going out on its own accord. The priests went to all measures to insure it would stay lit but much to their futile efforts, the menorah kept going out. YaHuW’shuwa died for our sins and just like the book of Hebrews tells us, the priesthood changed.

Messiah is now our High Priest and has given us access to the Father. It is also significant that the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D, exactly 40 years after YaHuW’shuwa’s death. YaHuWaH gave Yisra’el 40 years to repent of their sins and to accept YaHuW’shuwa as their Messiah. And when they did not, (in spite of all the signs he gave them), their probationary period ended in 70 A.D. and their temple and city was destroyed just as YaHuW’shuwa prophesied.

Earnest Martin states: 

“In fact, we are told in the Talmud that at dusk the lamps that were unlit in the daytime (the middle four lamps remained unlit, while the two eastern lamps normally stayed lit during the day) were to be re-lit from the flames of the western lamp (which was a lamp that was supposed to stay lit all the time it was like the ‘eternal’ flame that we see today in some national monuments)...”

“…This ‘western lamp’ was to be kept lit at all times. For that reason, the priests kept extra reservoirs of olive oil and other implements in ready supply to make sure that the ‘western lamp’ (under all circumstances) would stay lit. But what happened in the forty years from the very year Messiah said the physical Temple would be destroyed? Every night for forty years the western lamp went out, and this in spite of the priests each evening preparing in a special way the western lamp so that it would remain constantly burning all night!” (The Significance of the Year C.E. 30, Ernest Martin, Research Update, April 1994, p.4).

Had the Jewish Sanhedrin as a nation accepted his atonement, the “evening and morning oblations” would have then been done as an act of worship that would’ve been acceptable before YaHuWaH. They would’ve done these as a “memorial” of his death burial and resurrection and not as a substitute for sin. You see, the sin offering is different than the morning and evening sacrifices which are not performed for sin. They are performed as an act of worship. But YaHuWaH no longer accepted their act of worship in the temple because they rejected Messiah as the Passover Lamb.

YaHuW’shuwa therefore is the one who caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease” to be “acceptable” to YaHuWaH. YaHuW’shuwa’s sacrifice was not only that of the Passover Lamb, but he was also the sacrifice of the “Red Heifer”: 

Bemidbar (Numbers) 19:2 This is the ordinance of the law which YHWH has commanded, saying, Speak unto the children of Yisra’el, that they bring you a red heifer without spot, wherein is no blemish, and upon which never came yoke:

The sacrifice of the red heifer is for the cleansing of the temple, and it is the only sacrifice which is done “outside” of the camp of the city of Jerusalem and not inside of the temple. Ideally, the red heifer had to be 3.5 years old and we know that YaHuW’shuwa had a ministry that lasted for 3.5 years. How do we know that his ministry lasted 3.5 years? We know because Daniel’s 70th Week is a “seven-year” period and we are told that Messiah was “cut off” and “in the midst of the week” that he cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease” (Daniel 9:25-27).

The term “cut off” in Hebrew is the following word:

#3772 karath kaw-rath’ a primitive root; to cut (off, down or asunder); by imply-cation, to destroy or consume; specifically, to covenant (i.e. make an alliance or bargain, originally by cutting flesh and passing between the pieces):--be chewed, be con-(feder-)ate, covenant, cut (down, off), destroy, fail, feller, be freed, hew (down), make a league (covenant).

As you can see here the word for “cut off” also means “passing between the two pieces” to establish a covenant! When was the first time that this happened in scripture? In Genesis 15:17 we see Abraham entering into a Covenant with YaHuWaH and he “passed between the pieces.”

We are starting to get the picture now of what Daniel 9:24-27 is talking about! I believe we are seeing “the Red Heifer” for Leah and “the Twin Goats” on Yom Kippur for Rachel. The Passover Lamb sacrifice and the Yom Kippur sacrifices were fulfilled in that first 3.5 years of Messiah’s ministry.

Now many theologians assume that when Daniel 9:27 states “and he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease,” that this is talking about the Anti-Messiah.

But this prophecy is actually talking about both the true Messiah YaHuW’shuwa who spoke the prophetic word to cause Jerusalem to become desolate. But this phrase also points to the Anti-Messiah who will be used to implement the prophecy!

We find the same concept with the crucifixion. We read that Satan and his princes “crucified the Lord of glory” (2nd Corinthians 2:8). But we also read that it “pleased YHWH to bruise” his son (Isaiah 53:10). So who actually crucified the Messiah? Was it the Heavenly Father or was it Satan? It was both! It was the will of the Heavenly Father to crucify the Messiah, but he used Satan to bring it to pass! In the same way, Daniel 9:27 is telling us that the Messiah himself caused the sacrifices and oblations to cease, but he used Nero Caesar to bring it to pass! And he will allow it to happen again in the last days through the final “man of sin.”

You see, first we have the real Messiah who “caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease” when he spoke that prophetic word rendering Jerusalem desolate. But he caused Nero Caesar (an Anti-Messiah leader) to make that happen in 70 A.D.!

And then in the last days when this prophecy picks up where it left off (for the last 3.5 years) the Anti-Messiah does the same thing as he tries to mimic the true Messiah! So you see there is the true Messiah who caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease but he used the false Messiah to implement his prophetic word and he will do it again in the latter half of “Daniel’s 70th Week.”

In the last days when the final Anti-Messiah shows up in the Temple, he will cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease again! We see that this will happen in Daniel 12:11 with the false Messiah.

Messiah was “cut off” in the midst of the literal “week” (Passover week) as well as the last seven years spoken of by Daniel 9:26-27. Do you the story of Ya’aqob (Jacob)? Jacob loved only one woman---Rachel. But he was tricked into marrying Leah (her older sister). When he discovered that he had married Leah after the wedding night was over, he confronted Laban (his father in law) and asked him “why did you trick me?” 

And Laban replied: 

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 29:

27 Fulfil her week, and we will give you this also for the service which you shall serve with me yet seven other years.

28 And Ya’aqob (Jacob) did so, and fulfilled her weekand he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.

What we see here is a pattern of YaHuW’shuwa working for “one week” for his beloved Rachel (representing the House of Judah), but he did not get what he had worked for:

YaHuW’chanon (John) 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

YaHuW’shuwa came the first time for his beloved Rachel (the House of Judah) and the lost sheep who had been divorced and scattered from the House of Yisra’el. But they did not receive him.

That is when the gospel was extended to the Gentiles and then he was given in marriage first to the “Gentiles” who were then “grafted into the olive tree” with Yisra’el. These became known as “New Covenant Yisra’elites” and they are symbolic of Leah and her ten sons. What is interesting is that the name “Leah” means “cow” in Hebrew. But Rachel means “lamb” in Hebrew.

YaHuW’shuwa was the Passover Lamb for Rachel but he was also the Red Heifer for Leah!

The divorced wife (ten lost tribes known as gentiles) were not allowed to “come near” to the altar in the temple, but they had to remain “outside” and that is why YaHuW’shuwa died as the Red Heifer, “outside of the camp” in order to redeem the lost sheep of Yisra’el who were “afar off.” Ten out of twelve tribes had been divorced and sent away to the nations, but now because of his blood sacrifice, they were being brought “near” again (Ephesians 2:17).

The Witness of “Three” in Daniel’s 70 Week Prophecy

In 2nd Keefa (Peter) 3:8 we are told that “one day is like a thousand years to YHWH, and one thousand years is like one day.” We also find out that in Daniel 9:24-27 the Hebrew word being used here for “week” is “shabuwah” which means “sevened.” This means that any time period that is divisible by the number seven is a “shabuwah.” Thus we can apply the prophetic word here for “week” in Daniel 9:27 to mean more than just a literal seven-day calendar week. We can also apply it to mean any unit of measure that is divisible by “seven”such as “seven years.” 

Since Elohiym created the earth in six days, and he rested on the seventh day, we know that there will be 6,000 biblical years from creation before Messiah returns to set up his kingdom in the “Sabbath Millennium.” When we look at this 7,000 year “week” our Messiah, YaHuW’shuwa came to earth in human form during the “4thMillennium” (the middle of the week). This is one layer of understanding of this prophecy. We can also see that Messiah died “in the middle of the week” (Passover week on Wednesday). And he also died in the middle of “Daniel’s 70th Week” (in the middle of the last 7 years of this prophecy). Hence Messiah died “in the midst of the week, within the week, within the week.”

7,000 years = Messiah died in the 4th Millennium from creation (in the midst of the week of 7 Millennia).

7 years = Messiah died in the middle of a 7 year ministry of working for Rachel (like Jacob). His ministry was 3.5 years, and his “Two Witnesses” in Revelation 11 will pick up where he left off with a 3.5 year ministry (1,260 days). They will finish out the 7 year ministry of working for Rachel.

7 days = Messiah died in the middle of Passover Week on the 4th day of the week (Wednesday).

Hence the 7th Day Sabbath Points to our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa!

YaHuW’shuwa made the sacrifice and oblation “acceptable” to YaHuWaH. But since the House of Judah rejected his atonement, he could not “proclaim the acceptable year of YHWH” on Yom Kippur from the year of his crucifixion in 30 A.D., and moving forward up until 70 A.D.  They continued to perform the evening and morning sacrifices right up until 70 A.D. But YaHuWaH did not recognize their “vain oblations.” What does the word “vain” mean in Hebrew? It means “empty, worthless, false meaningless.”

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 1:13 Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.

Yah was already showing them that he would not accept their sacrifices of worship because they rejected his blood atonement. Isaiah prophesied about the day when Jerusalem would see her final destruction in the Roman Siege:

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 1:

7 Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fireyour land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.

8 And the daughter of Tziyown (Zion) is left as a cottage in a vineyard, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city.

11 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? says YHWH: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.

For 40 consecutive years between 30 A.D., and 70 A.D., the Jewish Talmud says that the stone “failed” or “ceased” to turn from black to white and the ribbon “failed” or “ceased” to turn from red to white on Yom Kippur. And so the sacrifices on Yom Kippur “failed” or ceased to be recognized as an acceptable sin offering, because they had to accept Messiah’s sacrifice in order for it to be acceptable.  How do we know this?

What is the “acceptable year of YHWH”? It is once a year on Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) when the scape goat is sent into the wilderness, that the children of Yisra’el find out if their names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life. If the sins of the nation were forgiven, Yah declared to them “the acceptable year of YHWH.” But if their sins as a nation were not forgiven, then they were not “acceptable” to YaHuWaH, and they had another year to get it right (Isaiah 61:2 & Luke 4:19).

YaHuW’shuwa declared this in the temple on Yom Kippur in 27 A.D., at the beginning of his ministry (after his 40 day fast in the wilderness).

See my other articles entitled:



It was at this time that he fulfilled the pattern of the scapegoat. As the sacrificial goat, his legal moment of death was his baptism. That is why YaHuW’chanon the Immerser (John the Baptist) declared that he was the “Lamb of Elohiym who takes away the sin of the world.” Now, if he took their sins away for that year, then why did he still judge them as a nation 40 years later in the Roman Siege?

Well first of all, we must realize that the atonement is only applied to those who repent and “accept” his blood atonement for their sins. On the whole as a nation, the Jewish Sanhedrin had a forty-year probationary period whereby they could accept him as the sacrificial lamb, but they refused as a nation to receive him as the Messiah. There were many Jewish believers (the remnant of the House of Judah) who did indeed believe on him as the Messiah, and they did receive atonement for their sins. But on the whole as a nation, the “establishment” of the Jewish religion and government did not.

We can show through scripture that YaHuW’shuwa fulfilled an intermediary fulfillment of the Day of Atonement or Yom Kippur by being baptized 40 days prior and then he was led by the Holy Spirit to be tested on our behalf. In other words, during the 40 days of repentance leading up to Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), YaHuW’shuwa was being tempted for our sakes so that he could act as our intercessor to help us overcome sin. Not that he needed to overcome sin, but he stood in the gap for us! His departure into the wilderness was a picture of “the old sinful man” dying and when he emerged from the wilderness that was a picture of “the new man” resurrecting and overcoming sin!

YaHuW’shuwa fasted and prayed “a day for each year” for Yisra’el’s rebellion, just like Ezekiel!

YaHuW’shuwa fasted for 40 days to fulfill the 40 years that Judah rejected him between 30 A.D. until 70 A.D. when he destroyed the Temple. Just like Ezekiel, he bore the iniquity for the house of YaHuW’dah (Judah) a day for each year.

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 4:

6 And when you have accomplished them, lie again on your right side, and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of YaHuW’dah (Judah) forty days: I have appointed you each day for a year.

7 Therefore you shall set your face toward the siege of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), and your arm shall be uncovered, and you shall prophesy against it.

8 And, behold, I will lay bands upon you, and you shall not turn you from one side to another, till you have ended the days of your siege. 

YaHuW’shuwa fasted one day for each year just like Ezekiel, and then he prophesied against Jerusalem that their generation would be destroyed 40 years later in the Roman Siege!

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 23:36-38 “O Yerushalayim...behold your house is left to you desolate.”

What did YaHuW’shuwa do when he returned out of the wilderness? He displayed the role of the scapegoat going to the wilderness, never to return. In other words, the sins of Yisra’el he bore himself “never to be remembered”! 

But he also displayed the role of the sacrificial lamb at his baptism because YaHuW’chanon (John) called him “the Lamb of Elohiym that takes away the sin of the world…”

And so YaHuW’shuwa fulfilled both the sacrificial lamb and the scapegoat during the 40 days of repentance leading up to Yom Kippur! 

YaHuW’shuwa is the one who would make their sacrifices of worship either “acceptable” or “not acceptable.” If their sins were forgiven as a nation, and their sins washed by the blood of the lamb, then Yah would have accepted their evening and morning oblations of worship. But because their sins remained for rejecting his sacrifice, hence their oblations and sacrifices were unacceptable to him!

Therefore it is not the Anti-Messiah who “confirms” the covenant, because the word here for “covenant” in Daniel 9:27 in Hebrew is:

#1285 briyth ber-eeth’ from #1262: in the sense of cutting.

It was YaHuW’shuwa who “confirmed the covenant with many” on the night before his crucifixion when he said “this is the blood of my covenant shed for MANY.”

Briyth is a word that means to “cut” or to circumcise. This is the same covenant that Elohiym made with Abraham and YaHuW’shuwa “confirmed” or sealed this same covenant with his own blood. In order to “confirm” a covenant there has to be one in place already. Further-more the King James Version says “the covenant” indicating that this was “the” one and only covenant. It was not just any old covenant. All other modern translations say “a covenant” implying that it was “any old covenant.” But no place elsewhere in scripture do we find that the Anti-Messiah “confirms” a covenant for one week. We must have the witness of “two or three” elsewhere in scripture to make a doctrine out of this idea of a “seven year tribulation.” And yet Theologians build a doctrine around this idea that the Anti-Messiah forms a seven-year peace treaty based solely on Daniel 9:27 without any corroboration from other scriptures. 

It is “the one & only covenant” that Elohiym made with Abraham which is “confirmed” for one week (Passover Week) by YaHuW’shuwa and also during the remainder of the entire seven years of “Jacob’s Trouble.” Jacob worked for Rachel for seven years, just as YaHuW’shuwa will work for his beloved for a total of “seven years.” But YaHuW’shuwa already fulfilled the first half of these seven years at his first coming.

But just before his return his two witnesses will fulfill the latter half of his 3.5 year ministry to “finish the week.” The “two witnesses” are not merely two individuals, but they are a corporate body of believers called the “man-child” (Revelation 12:5). In Revelation 11:4 they are described as “two olive trees and two candlesticks.” 

This is none other than “the two houses of Yisra’el” (Ephrayim & Judah) and “two candle-sticks” (Smyrna & Philadelphia). This corporate group of people called the “two witnesses” will then become “born” into incorruption as the “man-child.” YaHuW’shuwa is the first fulfillment of this as he will rule all nations with a rod of iron. But then his body of believers will follow the same pattern as he did. This corporate “man-child” will be “caught up unto Elohiym” and to his throne before returning on Yom Kippur for the “day of vengeance” (Revelation 19). This corporate man-child shall also “rule and reign with him for a thousand years” with a rod of iron (Revelation 20:4).

A rod of wood (stick) can be burned and is corruptible, but a rod of iron is incorruptible and indestructible. This means that the rod made of wood (the branches) were of human or corruptible seed, but when we put on incorruption (the rod) becomes made of iron (incorruptible) rather than a corruptible form.

This “corporate man-child” is none other than what the Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) talked about when he said that both Jewish & Gentile believers would come together as “one new man” (Ephesians 2:15-18). This corporate man-child called the “two witnesses” will carry the anointing of Mosheh & EliYaHuW (Moses & Elijah). This is what is known as the double portion anointing,” because they walk in the fullness of the Torah (Mosaic Law) and the Spirit (the spirit of Elijah). These two groups of people are the “two sticks” of Ephrayim & Judah coming together as one stick in the hand of YaHuWaH when Messiah returns (Ezekiel 37:16-17). 

When this corporate “body of Messiah” (the man-child) fulfills the latter half of “Daniel’s 70th Week” with a 3.5 year ministry that is when they will be “caught up” immediately after the tribulation with a great sound of a trumpet! (Matthew 24:19-31, Revelation 11:15).

Jacob-Yisra’el is a prophetic picture of the Messiah YaHuW’shuwa. The “man-child” (the corporate body of believers) represents the ones who will be born from the “woman” (Old Covenant Yisra’el). When this man-child (the two witnesses) complete the latter half of YaHuW’shuwa’s “seven years” of working for Rachel (symbolic of the two southern tribes of Judah) then Jacob’s Time of Trouble will be complete. At this point, YaHuW’shuwa will have already won Leah (the ten tribes of Yisra’el and their gentile companions from the nations) and then he will also be married to Rachel (Bethlehem-Judah) and together they will become “one stick” in  in the hand of YaHuWaH on Yom Kippur when Messiah returns in Revelation 19. You may be asking “how do I assimilate Rachel to Judah (Jews), when it was Leah who gave birth to Judah---not Rachel”? 

The answer to that is quite simple. First of all in Genesis 37:9, we find out that Joseph (a type of Messiah) had a dream that his eleven brothers, would all bow down to him and serve him. This is a prophetic picture of the end-times when Joseph’s House (ruled by his youngest son Ephrayim) will end up ruling over the entire House of Yisra’el (the twelve tribes). This is how Rachel ends up becoming Judah and Leah ends up becoming Ephrayim! The families switch places in order to become one house!

In 1st Kings 12 we read about the fact that the “Twelve Tribes of Yisra’el” split up and became two separate nations after King Solomon died. Two of these tribes remained in Jerusalem and the surrounding cities of Judah. These two tribes were Judah & Benjamin and they became known as the “Two Southern Tribes of Judah.”

The other ten of tribes were given a divorce decree by YaHuWaH (see Jeremiah 3:8) because of their idolatry. They were scattered to the surrounding nations and became known as “Gentiles.” They are to this day known as the “Ten Northern Tribes of Ephrayim.” Since Rachel had two children, she is a picture of the Two Southern Tribes of Judah. And since Leah had ten sons (including the sons she acquired by her maids), she symbolizes Ten Northern Tribes of Ephrayim.

Even though Leah was the mother of Judah, and Rachel was the mother of Joseph, the families end up in the last days “switching places” and they become so fully intermingled with one another, that they end up as “one stick” in the hand of YaHuWaH (Ezekiel 37:16-17). That is why Ya’aqob (Jacob) crossed his hands over in Genesis 48:18-19 when blessing Joseph’s two sons Ephrayim & Manasseh.

We can see this concept in a parable YaHuW’shuwa spoke to us:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 13:33 Another parable spoke he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.

What we see here is that the leaven is likened unto the Kingdom of Heaven which YaHuW’shuwa establishes in his Millennial Reign when he returns. The woman is a metaphor of Yisra’el, and she mixes “three measures of meal” (symbolic of Ephrayim, Judah & the nations) with the leaven (symbolic of Abraham’s seed) until all three people groups are leavened fully and saturated into the ball of dough (the world).

What does this mean? It means that Yah has allowed the ten northern tribes to scatter into all nations so that their “seed” would be like leaven (the promise of Messiah’s kingdom). And the “seed” of Abraham would then be sown into the nations until the entire world would be like a ball of dough fully mixed in with the seed of Abraham, and thereby produce “many nations.”

And so the two families end up trading places with each other until they become no more different from one another! In other words “neither Jew nor Gentile” (Galatians 3:28) as they will all become ONE HOUSE in Messiah!

Here we see a prophecy where Rachel is being likened unto Bethlehem-Judah:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 2:

16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) the prophet, saying,

18 In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not. 

As we can see from the above verse, the House Judah (Bethlehem) is seen here as a metaphor of Rachel. Why? It is because of what I just illustrated. Rachel ends up becoming known as the House of Judah and Leah ends up becoming the House of Ephrayim! They switch places! Rachel’s son Joseph ends up ruling over Leah’s sons through his son Ephrayim!

And so by understanding that the House of Judah is typified in Rachel, we can see that it was the true Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (not some Antichrist leader) who fulfills a “seven-year” ministry (3.5 years at his first coming) and then another 3.5 years through his two witnesses just before his second coming for a total of 7 years.

How Long Was Jacob’s Trouble?

We read in Genesis 28-31 that Jacob agreed to work for “seven years” for his beloved Rachel, but then he was tricked by his father-in-law Laban and he ended up with Leah instead on the wedding night. Laban then asked Jacob to “fulfill her week” (Leah’s) and he promised to let Jacob have Rachel at the end of the “week.” But Laban also asked Jacob to commit to seven more years of working for Rachel. Jacob agreed and so he got to marry both women in the same week but he also had to work for a total of 14 years for Rachel! He also agreed to work 6 years for Laban’s cattle for a total of 20 years. But in the theme of prophecy, when looking at the marriage supper of the lamb, we have to see Jacob as a prophetic “type”of our Messiah who will marry two brides in the same week between the Feast of Trumpets & the Day of Atonement. This period is called “The Ten Days of Awe.” In the final ten days leading up to Yom Kippur just before the Marriage Supper of the Lamb in Revelation 19, our Messiah will bring two groups of people together to form “one bride.” The first bride typified in Leah will be taken up to Mount Zion in Heaven for a 7-day wedding and she will return with the bridegroom on white horses on Yom Kippur.Then, the second bride typified in Rachel will be those who had to “suffer tribulation for ten days” (Revelation 2:10)during those ten days between the Feast of Trumpets & the Day of Atonement. Then on Yom Kippur (Atonement) both brides are made into “one bride” as the High Priest’s duty on Yom Kippur according to Leviticus 16 is to combine the blood of the heifer or bull (symbolic of Leah & Ephrayim) with the blood of the goat or lamb (symbolic of Rachel & Judah). And thus the blood of these two families will be combined to become one family. 

Now when we divide those 14 years into 4 fulfillments we get: 
14 ÷ 4 = 3.5 years each!

This means that we have the first fulfillment with the Maccabean Revolt for 3.5 years of “trouble.” Then we have Messiah’s 3.5 year ministry (more trouble). Then we have the third fulfillment with 3.5 years of “trouble” leading up the Roman Siege in 70 A.D. And finally we will have the fourth fulfillment of a “time of trouble” with the two witnesses in Revelation 11. 

Just as Jacob ended up with Leah instead of Rachel at the end of those seven years, the same thing will happen with our Messiah. After his seven-year ministry is completed through his two witnesses, Messiah returns, and he first gets married to a corporate bride typified in Leah as “born-again” believers (Jews & Gentiles). Leah was “buried” with her husband Jacob (Genesis 49:31) but Rachel was not. This symbolizes the fact that the born-again believers are “buried in baptism” with their Messiah! But the other group symbolized by Rachel will not “see” their Messiah until he returns in Zechariah 12:10.

In the same way that Jacob agreed to work for an additional seven years for Rachel, there will be “seven years” of burning weapons when Messiah returns (Ezekiel 39:9). And this will be likened unto the total of 14 years that Jacob worked for Rachel.

YaHuW’shuwa is the one who began to confirm this one and only covenant with all of Yisra’el until “in the midst of the week........ he was cut off” (Daniel 9:25).

But Messiah’s covenant continues to be confirmed when the third Jewish Temple is seen once again right up until the “Abomination of Desolation” is then set up.

When this happens, the prophetic time clock of Daniel’s Seventieth Week will once again begin to tick. And from this point on, the “two witnesses” will have a corporate ministry that duplicates YaHuW’shuwa Messiah’s ministry for 3.5 years (Revelation 11:4). Concurrently, the Anti-Messiah will have a false ministry of blasphemy for 42 months (Revelation 13:5).

In Revelation 11:14 the two witnesses will “prophesy for 1,260 days” just like the prophet EliYaHuW (Elijah) did.

But in Daniel 12:11, we see the angel telling Daniel that from the time that “the daily sacrifices are taken away” by the false Messiah and the “abomination of desolation is set up, it will be 1,290 days.” Why is there an additional 30 days mentioned here?

A Future Fulfillment of Chanukkah?

Did you ever wonder why the period called “the Great Tribulation” is 1,260 days in Revelation 11:3 but then in Daniel 12:11 it says “And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that makes desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days” (1,290 days). Why the 30-day discrepancy? Well the tribulation period of 1,260 days ends on Yom Kippur in Revelation 19 when our Messiah returns with his army to overthrow the Anti-Messiah. But then there will be another 30 days after that to destroy the Abomination of Desolation. When our Messiah returns there will be a war just like in the Maccabean Revolt where he will be like Judah Maccabees and his army. The armies that follow YaHuW’shuwa at his return are “clothed in fine linen fine and clean” and this is his bride in her new resurrected body! The bride will fight alongside with him to take back the temple of YaHuWaH and overthrow the false Messiah and his Abomination of Desolation!

If you add 75 days to 1,260 days (which culminates on Yom Kippur), it lands on the 25th day of the 9th month of Kislev on the Hebrew Calendar---in other words Chanukkah!

Listen to what the angel said in Daniel 12:12 “Blessed is he that waits, and comes to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days” (1,335 days).

The angel was telling Daniel “blessed is he who waits until Chanukkah when the Temple and the altar of YaHuWShuWA will be rebuilt and dedicated!” 

It will take 75 days to destroy the old temple where the Abomination of Desolation, was sitting and also to rebuild the new one where our Messiah will rule and reign for 1,000 years! This dedication will take place on Chanukkah because it is 75 days following Yom Kippur---in other words 1,335 days! 

Who Confirms the Covenant?

Why do so many theologians believe that the “he” in Daniel 9:27 is talking about the Anti-Messiah? They take this verse and they somehow extract the “prince” as being the Anti-Messiah who was General Titus ruled under Nero Caesar the Roman Prince:

Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

You will notice in the above verse that there are only two subjects in this verse. Who are they? They are “Messiah the prince” and “the people.” Often times people make the mistake of treating “the prince” who rules over the people as the subject. But this defies the rules of English grammar. The “prince” is just describing who “the people” belong to. “The people of the prince” would be describing “they” not “he.” Therefore, the “he” in Daniel 9:27 cannot be describing a group of people from the prince! The “he” in Daniel 9:27 can only be referring to the last “he” spoken of in Daniel 9:26 which is “Messiah!”

It is obvious that “the people” are the armies of General Titus, when Rome came to destroy Jerusalem in 70 A.D. In historical accounts from Josephus and others we are told that the Romans placed huge boulders at all of the gates of the city blocking it up and then they flooded the entire city. After a 3.5 year tribulation period and a war between Rome and Jerusalem, the final desolation had already been determined against Jerusalem out of the mouth of our Messiah himself.

So let us hear the conclusion of the matter:
      
1.) There is no other place in scripture describing a seven-year peace treaty or a covenant being confirmed by an Anti-Messiah and we cannot build a doctrine around one isolated verse of scripture that is vague.

2.) The is only “one covenant” spoken of all throughout scripture, which binds the other intermediate covenants together, and that is the one and only covenant Elohiym made with Abraham. It is this very same covenant which is being referred to as “the covenant” not just “a covenant.”

3.) The Hebrew word in Daniel 9:27 here for “covenant” is briyth which means “to cut or to circumcise” and we see this happening with the covenant Elohiym made with Abraham. This is not the same thing as a peace treaty on paper.

4.) English Grammar would necessitate that we apply the word “he” to the last subject spoken of which is Messiah in Daniel 9:26. The people are a “they” not a “he” and the “people of the prince” describes the people who come from the prince (Nero Caesar), therefore the subject is “the people.”

5.) It is YaHuW’shuwa who declared that Jerusalem would become “desolate” as he echoed the prophecies in the 1st Chapter of Isaiah. Therefore, the Anti-Messiah has no power to make Jerusalem desolate. The desolation comes because of Messiahs’s prophetic word and it is he who uses the false Messiah to make them desolate until his second coming when he “consummates” the marriage with his bride.

6.) YaHuW’shuwa said the night before his crucifixion that he was confirming his covenant “with many” and this is perfectly in line with Daniel 9:27 where it says “and he shall confirm the covenant with many. “

The King of Tyre, Nimrod of Babylon & Lucifer

$
0
0
By Maria Merola  

© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2004  
http://www.DoublePortionInheritance.com

In Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28, we see prophecies that seem to be referring to the King of Babylon (Nimrod) and the Prince of Tyre. But even though in these two prophecies, an earthly king is being described, we know from reading Daniel 10 that for every “ground prince” there is a ruling demon prince (a principality) or a fallen angel. Hence the fallen one spoken of in Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28 is indeed Satan who also possessed Nimrod and the Prince of Tyre. There is a very close similarity to Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28 that shows us that these prophecies are about Satan himself as well as the earthly vessels who were being used to carry out his evil plans. Let us examine these two prophecies in the Authorized King James Version. I have updated the archaic words and restored the sacred names in the KJV verses below: 

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 14:

13 For you have said in your heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of Elohiym: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

Yechezqel (Ezekiel )28: 

1 The word of YHWH came again unto me, saying, 

2 Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyrus, Thus says YHWH Elohiym; Because your heart is lifted up, and you have said, I am an ElohiymI sit in the seat of Elohiym, in the midst of the seas; yet you are a man, and not Elohiym, though you set your heart as the heart of Elohiym:

What we see here in Ezekiel 28 is that the Prince of Tyrus was seen in the Garden of Eden:

12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus says YHWH Elohiym; You seal up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 

13 You have been in Eden the garden of Elohiym; every precious stone was your covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of your tabrets and of your pipes was prepared in you in the day that you were created. 

14 You are the anointed cherub that covers; and I have set you so: you were upon the holy mountain of Elohiym you have walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 

15 You were perfect in your ways from the day that you were created, till iniquity was found in you.

And so we see that the Prince of Tyrus (possessed by Satan) was also the one who possessed the Prince of Babylon as well. That is why Ezekiel said that he was in the Garden of Eden! And so this prophecy in Isaiah 14 is about Satan as well as Nimrod whose body was being used as a “host” to carry out the evil schemes of the kingdom of darkness. Hence the name Lucifer is just a name that means “light bringer.” The Hebrew term “Heylel Ben Shachar” means “son of the morning” which indicates that he was just a “son” (a created being) and that the Messiah (the morning star) created him. The Greek Septuagint inaccurately translates this as “morning star” insinuating that it was YaHuW’shuwa who fell from heaven (the bright and morning star in Revelation 22:16. The Greek Septuagint translates this as if it said “Boker Kokab” (Morning Star) in Hebrew but it does not say this. Many people get confused over this verse and they begin to question the identity of our Messiah.

I have seen Orthodox Jews use the Septuagint to convert people away from our Messiah with this one verse from the Septuagint! That is why I use the Hebrew Masoretic Text. Constantine hired Eusebeus (a bishop of Caesarea) in the 3rd Century to make 50 Bibles for him in Latin Vulgate and instead of using the original Hebrew TaNaKh (Old Testament), he used the Greek Septuagint which was actually transcribed by Clement of Alexandria & Origen who were both Gnostics. They did not believe that YaHuW’shuwa is YaHuWaH in the flesh, so they removed the verses that they did not like from the Hebrew text when forming the Septuagint.

The Septuagint did not go into print until the 2nd Century A.D. (contrary to popular belief). The Vatican has propagated a lie (in order to defend the Catholic Bible’s legitimacy) and they make all scholars in their Jesuit propaganda believe that the Septuagint pre-dates our Messiah. But this is a lie. The Septuagint only goes back to 2nd Century Gnosticism. Here is evidence based on a letter from a man named Aristeas that shows that the historic events mentioned in this letter did not happen until the 2nd Century proving that the Septuagint is a Gnostic Conspiracy Hoax in order to discredit the deity of our Messiah:


And so the name Lucifer (although it was added to the text) is just another way of calling Satan a fallen star or a fallen angel. The Hebrew text does not use the Latin name Lucifer, but the word Heylel in Hebrew does mean the same thing as does Lucifer in Latin which is “light bringer.”

The Apostle Sha’ul said that Satan can transform himself as an “angel of light” (2nd Corinthians 11:14).The brightest star in our solar system is the sun which is why Malachi’s prophecy calls the Messiah “the sun of righteousness.” Satan wants to be the brightest star (the sun) or “the morning star” and so he has tricked people into sun-god worship. They worship the created object of the sun instead of the one who created the sun (Messiah). We know that Satan was like one of the stars before his fall because Messiah told us this:

Luke 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

In the final analysis, I believe that Lucifer or “light bringer” (Heylel) is just a generic name that means that Satan can transform himself as an “angel of light” but he is now a fallen angel. He has no light left in him. He is trying to portray himself as such but he is fallen. And his hosts such as Nimrod the King of Babylon and the Prince of Tyrus are human vessels through which he operated.

The 13th Apostle Assigned to the 13th Tribe

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, August 2011

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) has been one of the most misunderstood writers of the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) of all times. Even the Apostle Keefa (Peter) recognized this and prophesied against those who would twist Sha’uwl’s words out of context to their own destruction:

2nd Keefa (Peter) 3:

15 And account that the longsuffering of our Master is salvation; even as our beloved brother Sha’uwl (Paul) also according to the wisdom given unto him has written unto you;

16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understoodwhich they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

17 You therefore, beloved, seeing you know these things before, beware lest you also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

Here the Apostle Peter (Keefa) explains that those who reject the writings of Paul (Sha’uwl) are rejecting the scriptures! He said that when they twist Paul’s words they are doing the same thing with “the other scriptures!” Beloved there are people out there who are trying to tell us that the Epistles of Paul are not inspired and that they are not considered “scripture!” Peter’s words here prove them wrong! These very same people who want to discredit Paul as a legitimate Apostle try to use the fact that he was the “thirteenth apostle” as some type of proof that he could not have been sent by our Messiah. They cite Revelation 21:14-21 where we are shown that there are only going to be “twelve gates & twelve foundation stones” in the New Jerusalem for “the twelve tribes & the twelve apostles.” They think that they have found their proof that Paul is an illegitimate apostle because he was the “thirteenth apostle,” and there are only twelve tribes.

Ah, but lo and behold! We find out that there are actually 14 Tribes of Yisra’el! In Genesis 48-49, Ya’aqob (Jacob) whose name was changed to Yisra’el gave his blessing to all twelve of his sons. But his youngest son YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) was given the “double portion” of his father’s inheritance through his youngest son Ephrayim. Joseph had two sons in Egypt by a Gentile woman (symbolic of the marriage between Messiah & the Gentiles). The two sons from this union represent two groups of people in the last days. These two sons of Joseph are Ephrayim & Manasseh who were both given the name of Yisra’el, (like their grandfather) when he declared to them “let my name be named upon them” (Genesis 48:16). Now even though Manasseh was the older son of Joseph, Ya’aqob -Yisra’el switched his hands around and gave the blessing of the 13thtribe to Ephrayim (the younger) and the blessing of the 14th tribe to Manasseh (the older). Ya’aqob remembered what it was like to be the youngest of twins when he and his brother Esau were born only minutes apart. He remembered the fact that his mother Rebekah was given a prophesy at his birth:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 25:23 And YHWH said unto her, Two nations are in your womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from your bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger

And yet Ya’aqob-Yisra’el understood the same principle that our Messiah taught in Matthew 19:30 “But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first.” 

Hence, he made the youngest (Ephrayim) “the first born” (Jeremiah 31:9).

Now it is a curious thing that the tribe of Ephrayim and Dan are not mentioned among the 12 tribes of Yisra’el in Revelation 7. One can only speculate as to why this might be the case. I believe it is because in 1stKings 12, King Jeroboam set up golden calves at Dan & Mount Ephrayim and he invented pagan holidays in the eighth month of the year against the commandments of YaHuWaH. Because Dan & Ephrayim became the place of idolatry, I believe that their names were blotted out which is why they are not seen in Revelation 7. However, they are not dead! Like the prodigal son, they will rise again when they “die” to the old sinful nature! But when they resurrect from the dead, they will be given “a new name” (Revelation 2:17, 3:12) and they will be grafted into the tribe of their bridegroom which is Judah! The Apostle Sha’uwl even explained in Romans 2:26-29 that those who have their hearts circumcised are considered “YaHuW’diy” or Jews. This is how Ephrayim & Judah will become one stick in the hand of YaHuWaH (Ezekiel 37:16-18) at the resurrection!

In Ezekiel 47:22-23, we learn that the “stranger” is merged into whatever tribe of Yisra’el that they choose to sojourn with. In the case of a “born-again” believer in Messiah, we sojourn with YaHuWShuWA who is from the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah). And thus Ephrayim is merged into YaHuW’dah (Judah) as per Ezekiel 37:16-19. A bride takes on the name of her husband, and that is why the name of Ephrayim is not mentioned among the tribes of Yisra’el in Revelation 7. It is because when Ephrayim becomes married to the Messiah, he becomes “one stick” with YaHuW’dah (Judah) according to Ezekiel 37:16-19. The House of Ephrayim will take on the name of their husband’s tribe----YaHuW’dah (Judah)! Ephrayim will then go into the gate of YaHuW’dah (Judah) in the New Yerushalayim because when he resurrects along with his older brother Judah, they shall no longer be two, but they shall become “one new man” (Jew & Gentile) according to Ephesians 2:15.  

Now we can see the Apostle Sha’uwl as being a prophetic “type” of the tribe of Ephrayim. It is no “small coincidence” that the name “Sha’uwl” (Paul) in Hebrew means “small.” It is because Ephrayim was the “youngest” (the smallest) and yet he became “the greatest.” Likewise the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) called himself “the least of the apostles” (1stCorinthians 15:9), and yet he later on became the “greatest” or the “chiefest” of the Apostles just like Ephrayim who became the greatest of all tribes! (2nd Corinthians 11:5 & 12:11). The Apostle Sha’uwl was called to preach to the Gentiles which are the “lost sheep” of the House of Yisra’el. Like Ephrayim who thought he was an Egyptian, he did not realize that he was an Yisra’elite until his grandfather Jacob-Yisrael declared over him “let my name be upon you.” Likewise, the Apostle Sha’uwl is called to bring “Ephrayim” back home like the prodigal son to see his true identity with Yisra’el! What is even more amazing is that we have already seen that Ephrayim is the 13thtribe of Yisra’el and guess how many books of the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) Sha’uwl wrote? He wrote 13 books of the New Testament for the 13 tribes of Yisra’el!

BinYamiyn:  “Son of My Right Hand”

In keeping with the theme of the “youngest” we can also see why the Apostle Sha’uwl  (Paul) was from the tribe of Benjamin. When Joseph was about to be restored to his eleven brothers in Bereshiyth (Genesis) 43, the youngest son of Jacob (Benjamin) was left at home. YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) inquired about his little brother and wanted to know where he was. He sent his ten brothers back home and said to them:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 43:3 “…You shall not see my faceexcept your brother be with you.”

This language is very familiar because YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) is a prophetic type of Messiah here and his brothers represent the other “ten lost tribes of Yisra’el” who do not as of yet recognize YaHuWShuWA as their Messiah. In Luke 13:35, our Messiah prophesied to the inhabitants of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) “….You shall not see me, until the time come when you shall say, Blessed is he that comes in the name of YHWH.”

We can see a parallel here where Joseph told his brothers “you shall not see me until Benjamin comes back with you.” And then our Messiah said “you shall not see me until you recognize me as the one who comes in the name of YaHuWaH.”

In other words, Benjamin is the key to bringing back the other tribes to Messiah! The fact that his name means “small” means that the least among us shall be the greatest!

This is why the Apostle Sha’uwl , whose name means “small” is from the tribe of Benjamin (Romans 11:1), because he is the one “assigned” to bring the other lost tribes back to the Messiah! In this story it was Joseph himself (symbolic of Messiah) who sent his brothers away requesting that they bring “BinYamiyn” (Benjamin) back with them. The name Benjamin means “the son of the right hand.” And who is seated at the “right hand” of the Father in Heaven? Who is prophetically called “the Arm of YaHuWaH” (the arm of the Lord) in Isaiah 51:9 & Isaiah 53:1? It is YaHuWShuWA Messiah who is the “right hand” of YaHuWaH and the tribe of Benjamin is his son!

In other words the one who was chosen to bring back the other ten tribes to meet their Messiah was Benjamin whose name signifies that he is the son of the Messiah (typified in Joseph) who is “seated at the right hand of the Father.” This is a prophecy about the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul)! The Apostle Sha’uwl is the one who was chosen to bring the besowrah (gospel) to the “Gentiles” and he is the one who was assigned to bring back the “ten tribes” to meet their Messiah in the last days!

The smallest of “seeds” of the sons of Yisra’el-Ya’aqob was the youngest son of them all and his name is “Ephrayim” whose name actually means “double fruit” for he would later on in history become like the mustard seed, which becomes the largest and most fruitful of them all! Our Messiah even told us that the “smallest” of all seeds on the earth is the mustard seed, yet, when it is all grown up, it is the largest of plants! (Mark 4:31-32).

But a seed must go into the ground and “die” in order to become fruitful! Our Messiah told a parable relating the mustard seed to the Kingdom of Heaven:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 13:

31 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:

32 Which indeed is the least of all seedsbut when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.

YaHuW’chanon (John) 12:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abides alone: but if it die, it brings forth much fruit.

Here we see that Ephrayim is the smallest of the “seeds” of the sons of Abraham. He was the youngest and yet in the end of days, he will become “a multitude of nations” too numerous to count! (Genesis 48:19, Revelation 7:9)

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) is likened unto the House of Ephrayim because his name means “small” and he called himself “the least of the apostles.” The Apostle Sha’uwl is likened unto that little boy who donated his lunch to the multitudes:

YaHuW’chanon (John) 6:

8 One of his disciples, Andrew, Shimone Keefa (Simon Peter)’s brother, said unto him,

9 There is a lad here, which has five barley loaves, and two small fishes: but what are they among so many?

10 And YaHuWShuWA said, Make the men sit down. Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand.

11 And YaHuWShuWA took the loaves; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down; and likewise of the fishes as much as they would.

12 When they were filled, he said unto his disciples, Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.

13 Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves.

What are we seeing here? We see that the “five barley loaves” symbolizes the Towrah because there are five books in the “Mosaic Law” (Towrah). Then we see that there are two fishes which represent the “two houses of Yisra’el” that have been split apart since King Solomon died in 1st Kings 12. These two houses of Yisra’el (Ephrayim & Judah) are represented by the two fishes because in Jeremiah 16:16 we see a prophecy about how in the last days, YaHuWaH would send “fishers” to fish these divorced tribes out of the Gentile nations where he had sent them. Then in Matthew 4:19, YaHuWShuWA was calling his disciples to become “fishers of men” because he knew the prophecy of Jeremiah. Hence the “two fishes” represent “both houses of Yisra’el” (Isaiah 8:14). The little boy “fed the multitudes” and yet there was so much food left over that there were “twelve baskets full” left over representing the “twelve tribes of Yisra’el!”

This story is a picture of the smallest and the least among us. That little boy who gave his small lunch away is like Ephrayim (the youngest) and like the Apostle Sha’uwl  who called himself the least apostle in 1st Corinthians 15:9. And also like that mustard seed (the smallest of seeds), that becomes the largest and most fruitful of trees once it “falls to the ground and dies.” And thus we learn a very important principle here that our Messiah taught:

Marqos (Mark) 10:44 And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.

Ephrayim is like the prodigal son in Luke 15:24, who was thought to be dead, but when he comes back home to the Father and his Towrah (commandments) he is given the blood atonement (fatted calf) and he is “resurrected” into a new creature. In Ezekiel 37:1-13, he will “come out of his graves” and his dead bones will be revived! His name was blotted out in Revelation 7, but he will come back to life again in Revelation 7 & 14 as “the multitude of nations.” But the reason why his name is never mentioned again is because Ephrayim must go through a metamorphosis much like a caterpillar that goes into a cocoon and “dies” to his old nature. But when he emerges (resurrects) into a new creature, he no longer has the same name. His name becomes YaHuW’dah (Judah):

2nd Qorintiym (Corinthians) 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Messiah, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new

In Revelation 2:17 & 3:12, we are told that the overcomers will receive a new name. When Ephrayim gets married to the “Lion of the Tribe of Judah” (YaHuW’dah), he will then be given a new name and he will rule and reign with Messiah for “one thousand years” with a rod of iron! 

In the New Yerushalayim the tribe of Ephraiym will go through the YaHuW’dah (Judah) gate because he will become “one stick” with the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) through our Messiah! And so this is how the thirteenth tribe is able to be grafted into the twelve tribes!

Hence the Apostle Sha’uwl is the thirteenth Apostle who was assigned to bring the thirteenth tribe of Ephrayim back home and he wrote thirteen books of the New Testament. In other words, he has been sent to the “Ten Lost Tribes of Yisra’el” who think that they are Gentiles. When Ephrayim is joined back to the House of of YaHuW’dah (Judah) into one stick, one olive tree, then he will no longer be the 13th tribe for he will be assimilated into the 12 Tribes of Yisra’el in the New Yerushalayim!

Discrepancies in Sha’uwl’s Account in the Book of Acts Explained

There are some people who have attempted to discredit the Apostle Sha’uwl by using these verses in the book of Acts. At first glance, it would appear that Sha’uwl’s story is being told several different ways and thus makes him appear not credible. But let us examine these verses below that are in question:

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts) 9:3-7: The men who were with Sha’uwl heard a voice but saw no man.

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts) 22:6-11: In verse 9 those men with Sha’uwl saw the light but they did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me.

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts) 26:12–18: In verse 13 they heard the voice, but in verse 14 we had fallen to the ground.

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts)9:3-7

3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:

4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecute you me?

5 And he said, Who are you, Master? And the Master said, I am YaHuWShuWA whom you persecute: it is hard for you to kick against the pricks.

6 And he trembling and astonished said, Master, what will you have me to do? And the Master said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told you what you must do.

7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts)22:

6 And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come near unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me.

7 And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecute you me?

8 And I answered, Who are you, Master? And he said unto me, I am YaHuWShuWA of Nazareth, whom you persecute.

9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spoke to me.

*Note: this is not a contradiction from Acts 9:7 for even though the men heard a voice, it does not mean that they heard what was being said. It is possible to hear a voice and not be able to discern what that voice is actually saying. In Acts 9:7 it says that “they saw no man” but it does not say that they did not see a light. Here in Acts 22:9 it says that “they saw a light” but not a man. They heard a voice in Acts 9:7 but that does not mean that they heard what was being said to Sha’uwl. The Greek translation for the word “voice” in the Strong’s Concordance is as follows:

# 5456 phōnē:  fo-nay; a sound, a tone, of inanimate things, as musical instruments, a voice, the sound of uttered words, speech, of a language, tongue.

This word is much more ambiguous than a person’s voice. This Greek word “phone” means a noise of some kind but not limited to a human voice.

We see the same phenomenon taking place when the Apostle YaHuW’chanon (John) heard the voice of YaHuWaH in heaven. Let’s see what that voice sounded like:

Chazown (Revelation) 1:10 I was in the Spirit on YHWH’s day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,

Chazown (Revelation) 4:1 After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up here, and I will show you things which must be hereafter.

Below the prophecy against Mystery Babylon is being described and it says that the “voice” of musical instruments” will no longer be heard in her:

Chazown (Revelation) 18:22 And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in you; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in you; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in you;

Why does it not say in the above verse the “sound” of musical instruments will no longer be heard? Why does it use the word “voice” instead of sound?

We can see that John heard the “voice” (sounds, musical tones).

Hence, the men who were with Sha’uwl  “heard tones” or sounds, but that does not mean that they heard “a voice talking” or that they heard intelligible words being spoken!

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts)22:

10 And I said, What shall I do, MASTER? And the Master said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told you of all things which are appointed for you to do.

11 And when I could not see for the glory of that light, being led by the hand of them that were with me, I came into Damascus.

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts)26:

12 Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests,

13 At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.

14 And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto meand saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecute you me? it is hard for you to kick against the pricks.

*Note: Here only Sha’uwl can hear the voice in the Hebrew Tongue! It does not say that the other man can speak in Hebrew does it? They heard a “voice” (phone, tones, sounds) like musical instruments from heaven, but that does not mean that they understood the conversation that Sha’uwl  was having with the Messiah does it? NO! Here it says that Paul saw a light (not a man) and it says that he “heard the voice speaking to him.” The other men heard a “phone” (the Greek word for musical tones) but it does not mean that they heard the voice speak to them intelligibly!

Ma’asheh Shlichiym (Acts)26:

15 And I said, Who are you, Master? And he said, I am YaHuWShuWA whom you persecute.

16 But rise, and stand upon your feet: for I have appeared unto you for this purpose, to make you a minister and a witness both of these things which you have seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto you;

17 Delivering you from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send you,

18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto Elohiym, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me

In the final analysis, we can see that the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) has been one of the most fruitful of all gospel writers. To eliminate his writings from the scriptures is to eliminate a major portion of Bible Prophecy! If you have been assaulted by “Anti-Paul” zealots, this explanation should get you back on the path of truth.


Does the Name Jesus Add up to 666?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, February 2012  


There is a false teaching going around right now that is trying to purport that the name “Jesus” adds up to 666 in the Greek Alphabet and that the name “Jesus” is the “Mark of the Beast.” I will show you below that this is simply not the case and those who are purporting this are using false Alpha-numerics and a false pronunciation of “key-sus” or “cheese-sus”(which sounds nothing like Jesus) in order to try and make their theory work.


I do believe that the name Jesus has it’s origins in the pagan Greek god named Zeus, as research has proven that the Greeks took the first Hebrew Letter in our Heavenly Father’s name (Yad) and they placed that in front of the name Zeus for Y’Zeus. Later on this name began to be spelled as Ieosus. But regardless of this fact, we can see a prophetic pattern with the patriarch Yahuwceph (Joseph) who was given a “hidden name” by the Pharoah as Zaphnath-paaneah which means “Savior” in Egyptian. Joseph was a proph-etic “type” of Messiah and he saved the Egyptians from famine as well as his Yisra’elite brothers. Also, we can see the same prophetic pattern with Esther whose name comes from “Easter” the pagan goddess of fertility, but YaHuWaH allowed her to go into the Persian Empire, under a “hidden name” to save her people. But once the mighty exploits were done for YaHuWaH and his people, then Esther revealed that her true name is “Hadassah.”

We see the same pattern with Daniel being given a Babylonian name Belteshazzar while in exile. This pattern is evident over and over again in scripture. Likewise our Messiah was given a “hidden name” as Jesus and he saved the Gentiles under that name until the fullness of the Gentiles is accom-plished (Romans 11:25). But now that we are in the last days, his real Hebrew name is being revealed as Yahuwshuwa!

I believe that we are going to see a prophetic pattern of what took place in the Maccabean Revolt in the last days. In 164 B.C. Antiochus Epiphanies set up an Image of Zeus on December 25th in the Jewish Temple and forced the covenant people of YaHuWaH to worship this image under penalty of death. I believe that the same thing will happen again!  I believe that the false Messiah will set up an image or a “clone of Jesus” in the 3rd Jewish Temple and cause people to worship that image!

However, I do believe that many people have been saved just as I was back in 1981 calling on the name of “Jesus” because the Holy Spirit “interprets the groaning our hearts” according to Romans 8:26-27.

When people don’t know the true name of the Messiah, the Father knows who they are talking about because the Holy Spirit interprets the name Jesus as Yahuwshuwa before the throne! Now the day is going to come when people are going to have to choose to worship either the “false image of Jesus” in the 3rd Jewish Temple (a clone from the Shroud of Turin) or the true Messiah Yahuwshuwa! And when that day comes, there will no longer be any mystery as to the true name of our Messiah. People will no longer be able to get away with calling him “Jesus” because at that point the Roman Papacy will standardize the name Jesus as “their Mark” and they will attach that name to the “Image of the Beast.” But for now, I believe that YaHuWaH is showing mercy on those who have called him by the name Jesus before they knew better!

Now Let Us Take a Look at the Chart Below for the Greek Alphabet

Now, let me show you why the name Jesus does not add up to 666. See the above chart or go to this website for the chart for the Greek Alphabet below:


In the prophecy about the Mark of the Beast in Revelation 13:18, the number 666 is # 5516 in the Greek Strong’s Concordance as follows: 

#5516. chi xi stigma khee xee stig’-ma the 22nd, 14th and an obsolete letter (4742 as a cross) of the Greek alphabet (intermediate between the 5th and 6th), used as numbers; denoting respectively 600, 60 and 6; 666 as a numeral:--six hundred threescore and six. 

Chazown (Revelation) 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that has understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six (666).

Below is the break-down taken from a certain person who claims that the name Jesus adds up to 666:

600 = chi (“chee” as in cheetah)

60 = xi (pronounced “zi”)

6= sigma (an “S” sound)

chi + zi + sigma = chizis.

Jesus (pronounced “chizis”) is the mark of the Beast.

Now the first thing that you will notice is that this person who is purporting that the Greek letter Chi sounds like “chee” as in “cheetah” is wrong!

The pronunciation key tells us that these three Greek letters are pronounced as khee xee stig’-ma. The Greek letter Chi sounds like “key” not “chee” as in “cheese!” I would have no problem what-so-ever believing that the name Jesus adds up to 666 if it were only true! I have no attachment to the name Jesus, and I gave up using the name Jesus a long time ago. I only use it sometimes when trying to teach people the true name. However, this is a dishonest rendering of the wisdom to count the number of the Beast, and let me tell you why. The people that are presenting this false mathematical equation are using the wrong letter to try and build their case! There are actually two different letters in the Greek Alphabet that sound very similar! They are “stigma” and “sigma.”

The “Mark of the Beast” in Revelation 13:18 is NOT Chi Xi Sigma but it is Chi Xi Stigma!

Now, let us add up the letters to the formula that is being used to try and prove that the name Jesus adds up to 666:

The Greek Letter Chi = 600 
The Greek Letter Xi = 60
The Greek Letter Sigma = 200

Grand Total = 860

The word for 666 in the Greek Strong’s Concordance is NOT Chi Xi Sigma!

It is Chi Xi STIGMA! 

Below you will see the numeric value of Chi Xi Stigma: χξϚ 

The Greek Letter Chi = 600 

The Greek Letter Xi = 60

The Greek Letter Stigma = 6

Grand Total = 666

The Greek Word Stigma is no longer a letter in the Greek Alphabet! 

The Word “stigma” means to stick or to prick!

So then what is the “stigma”? It is an obsolete letter of the Greek Alphabet that is no longer in use, but it did not make the “S” sound! It made the “ST” sound and it is the equivalent of the Hebrew letter “Waw” or the modern “Vav” which is the 6th Letter in the Hebrew Alphabet: 

Obsolete letters


Digamma or wau (Ϝ) was the continuation of Phoenician waw, denoting the sound /w/. It stood in the sixth position in the alphabet, after Ε. It dropped out of use because the sound /w/ became mute during the archaic and classical era. It remained in use as a numeric sign denoting the number six. In this function, its shape in uncial and cursive writing changed to “ϛ” until in Medieval Greek handwriting it was conflated with an accidentally similar ligature sign for “στ.” The symbol “ϛ” both in its function as a numeral continuing that of digamma and in its function as a ligature, is today called stigma. 

The letter “stigma” used to be the 6th letter in the Greek Alphabet equivalent to the Hebrew letter “waw” and it had the numerical value of 6. But the Greek Letter called “sigma” is the 18th letter in the Greek Alphabet equivalent to the Hebrew “Sin” and it has the numerical value of 200---not six! 

Hence Chi Xi Stigma would sound like this: Key-zee-s not as this person is trying to purport as Cheese-us. And besides, the way that the modern word for Jesus is pronounced in English is Geezus, not Cheese-us and not Key-zee-s! They don’t sound alike at all. And so trying to make a case that the name Jesus adds up to 666 is completely false and not only that, but the pronunciation of these three letters as Key-zee-s does not sound like Cheese-us or Geezus! The people trying to peddle this lie are using the wrong letter in the Greek Alphabet, and the wrong pronunciation key and also they are not even adding up the numeric value of the Greek letters to arrive at the number 666! 

The three Greek letters that they are using to spell this word chizis (Chi Xi Sigma) adds up to 860---not 666! 

So while I agree that the name “Jesus” is pagan, and it comes from Y’Zeus, it does not add up to 666 and hence it does not fit the criteria for the Mark of the Beast! Now let us add up the letters to the Greek word for Jesus: 

IhsouV (Ieosus or Jesus)

Iota = 10

Eta = 8

Sigma = 200

Omicron = 70

Upsilon = 400

Sigma = 200

Total = 888

Now there are several different ways to calculate the names of people in Gematria. At this website you can calculate a lot of terms that add up to 666 and a lot of terms that add up to 888 or 444.

In English Gematria, you would assign A = 6, B = 12, C = 18, D = 24, E = 30 and so on. When you do English Gematria, you arrive at the very same numeric value for the name Jesus, Yshua, & Messiah. They all add up to 444!


The word Jesus = 444

The word Yshua = 444

The word Messiah = 444

The Total:

Jesus Messiah = 888

Yshua Messiah = 888

But the Greek word Christos = 666!

Why? Because the Greeks called all of their false pagan Messiah’s Christos! So we should not use the title Christos for the true Hebrew Messiah! What is the bottom line? The bottom line is that we are entering into a prophetic season where we are being called out of Mystery Babylon the Great the Mother of all Harlots! And that means that YaHuWaH our Creator is removing the false names of Baal and the false pagan deities from our lips! And that includes the name Jesus, God, and Lord!

Hoshea 2:

16 And it shall be at that day, saith YHWH,that you shall call me Ishi (husband); and shall call me no more Baali (Baal or Lord).

17 For I will take away the names of Baalim(Lords) out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.

In the Strong’s Concordance the word “Baal” means Lord!

#1168 Baal: A Phoenician Deity; Lord; Husband, Master

If you were saved using the name Jesus like I was back in 1981, then it is time to “go on unto perfection” (Hebrews 6:1) and begin to call upon him by his true name of Salvation! That name is YaHuWShuWA (Joshua in Ancient Hebrew).

Prophecy is being fulfilled right now as YaHuWaH is restoring his Covenant people to a pure language which is called “Edenic” or Ancient Hebrew. Why is he restoring us to a pure language in these last days? So that we may all call upon his NAME YaHuWaH with one consent!

Tzphanyahuw (Zephaniah) 3:9 For then will I turn to the people a pure language, that they may all call upon the name of YHWH, to serve him with one consent

See my other blogs by clicking on the hyper-links below. These blogs go deeper into this subject of the Mark of the Beast and the name Jesus versus the true name of our Messiah Yahuwshuwa:






Does Towrah Command Us to Wear Head Coverings?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2007  

Often times people ask me whether or not it is a commandment for women or men to wear head coverings. This subject comes up quite frequently and so I have had to prepare this teaching so that I do not have to repeat myself every time it comes up.

First of all I would like to say that there is nothing in the Mosaic Law (Torah) that commands a woman to cover her head. This idea that a woman must wear a head covering is spreading within the Hebraic Root’s Community and people are acting like it’s in the Torah but it’s not!

Where are they getting this idea from? Well they are using only one verse from 1st Corinthians 11:5-8 to try and make this into a doctrine.

One thing I have learned from YaHuWaH our Father is that we cannot build a doctrine from one verse of scripture and we certainly cannot use one verse from the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) in order to come up with a new doctrine. When following the rules of proper Hermeneutics, we must find the witness of “two or three” elsewhere in scripture. Our Messiah told us in Matthew 18:16 that “out of the mouth of two or three everything may be established.”

I once used to believe that Sha’ul’s letter to the Corinthians in 1st Corinthians 11 was speaking about a “literal head covering” for women. But back in 2007, I listened to an excellent teaching by Michael Rood entitled “Who Is Your Unauthorized Covering?” and that is when I realized that Sha’ul (Paul) could not have been speaking of a literal head-covering.

You can view Michael Rood’s teaching about this on youtube at the following links:




Michael Rood begins by explaining that we cannot use one verse of 1st Corinthians 11 in order to ascertain what the Apostle Sha’ul was talking about. He says that we must go back to the beginning of the book of 1st Corinthians and read the entire book in order to get the proper context. Michael Rood stated (if I may paraphrase): “…what person in their right mind receives a ten-page letter in the mail and then skips over to page five and goes down to the middle of the page and starts reading and then assumes that he knows what the letter is all about?”

Michael Rood is right! I followed his line of reasoning and realized that when we read from the beginning in 1st Corinthians Chapter 1, the problem that Sha’ul (Paul) was addressing was authority. There were people who were already beginning to set up denominational heads over themselves saying: “I am of Paul, I am of Apollos, I am of Cephas.” Let’s read it in context:

1st Corinthians 1:

12 Now this I say, that every one of you says, I am of Sha’ul (Paul); and I of Apollos; and I of Kefa (Cephas); and I of Mashiyach (Messiah).

13 Is Mashiyach (Messiah) divided? was Shaul (Paul) crucified for you? or were you baptized in the name of Shaul (Paul)?

And so Michael Rood explains that the entire book of 1st Corinthians is about people putting human leaders over themselves instead of Messiah as their “head or covering.” Now once you understand this, you can go to 1st Corinthians 11 and understand the context of what Sha’ul (Paul) was talking about. Below you will see that the Apostle Sha’ul is explaining a chain of command as follows:

1st Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Mashiyach (Messiah); and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Mashiyach (Messiah) is Elohyim.

And so the chain of command is like this:

1.) YaHuWaH Elohiym (the Heavenly Father)
2.) YaHuWShuWA ha’MaShiYacH (Messiah)
3.) The Woman’s Husband or Father
4.) The Wife or Daughter

The “head” being spoken of here is not our literal skull! It is the person who is in authority over us! Now in the very next verse, Shaul tells us that if a man prays or prophesies with his head covered that he is dishonoring his head? How do you dishonor your own head? This should give you a hint that he is not referring to your own skull. You can dishonor another person however. And so this gives more understanding to this next verse:
1st Corinthians 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonours his head.

*Note: The first thing you will notice is that the Lewites (Levites) in the temple wore head coverings! Why then is Sha’ul (Paul) telling us that a man dishonors his head if he prays or prophesies with his head covered? Let’s see what the Torah says about a man praying or prophesying with his head covered:

Shemoth (Exodus) 28:3 And you shall speak unto all that are wise hearted, whom I have filled with the spirit of wisdom, that they may make Aaron’s garments to consecrate himthat he may minister unto me in the priest’s office.

Shemoth (Exodus) 28:4 And these are the garments which they shall make; a breastplate, and an ephod, and a robe, and a broidered coat, a mitre (turban), and a girdle: and they shall make holy garments for Aaron your brother, and his sons, that he may minister unto me in the priest’s office.

What is the Hebrew word for “mitre”?

It is #4701 in the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance: Mitsnepheth: turban of the High Priest. 

Shemoth (Exodus) 29:6 And you shall put the mitre (turban) upon his head, and put the holy crown upon the mitre (turban).

Shemoth (Exodus) 39:27 And they made coats of fine linen of woven work for Aaron, and for his sons,

Shemoth (Exodus) 39:28 And a mitre (turban) of fine linen, and goodly bonnets of fine linen, and linen breeches of fine twined linen,

ZecharYaHuW (Zechariah) 3:5 And I said, Let them set a fair mitre (turban) upon His head. So they set a fair mitre (turban) upon his head, and clothed him with garments. And the angel of YHWH stood by.

Aha! So now we understand that Shaul (Paul) was not speaking against men wearing head coverings when they pray or prophesy! He was speaking about being “under one’s head” or the person in authority which is Messiah! He is the “head” of the body!

Colossians 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the Assembly: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

The Greek word used for “head” as describing our Messiah in Colossians 1:18 is As follows:

#2776. kephale kef-al-ay’ from the primary kapto (in the sense of seizing); the head (as the part most readily taken hold of), literally or figuratively:--head.

As you can see, this word for “head” in Greek can mean literally a person’s skull or figuratively as the person who is in authority over you as your “head.”

The same Greek word kephale is being used in Ephesians 5:23 where Paul is describing the headship of a husband over the wife being like that of Messiah over his Assembly: 

Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head (kephale) of the wife, even as Mashiyach (Messiah) is the head (kephale) of the Assembly: and he is the saviour of the body.

The Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) uses this same Greek word kephale in 1st Corinthians 11:3-10

1st Corinthians 11:

3 But I would have you know, that the head (kephale) of every man is Mashiyach (Messiah); and the head (kephale) of the woman is the man; and the head (kephale) of Mashiyach (Messiah) is Elohyim.

5 But every woman that prays or prophesies with her head (kephale) uncovered dishonours her head (kephale): for that is even all one as if she were shaven.

6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head,(kephale) forasmuch as he is the image and glory of Elohiym: but the woman is the glory of the man.

8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.

9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head (kephale) because of the angels.

And so that is why Sha’ul (Paul) says that a woman’s “head” (her authority) must be covered. She must be under her covering (her husband or father) and he must also be under his covering or else that chain of command is broken and that is how Satan is able to attack the family!

What does he mean when he says “a woman ought to have power on her head because of the angels?” Does a piece of cloth have power over angels? No! 

When Sha’ul says “a woman ought to have power on her head” he is referring to being under the proper chain of command so that the fallen angels can’t have access to her! Do you honestly think that a piece of cloth has supernatural power to protect you from fallen angels? That sounds absurd doesn’t it? 

I have heard people argue that when the Nephilim (fallen angels) in Genesis 6:4 saw women and their beautiful hair, that they lusted after them and desired them. The argument that I hear is that women should wear a head covering to prevent these fallen angels and even men from lusting after them. But that argument falls apart when you realize that if a fallen angel wants to wait until a woman takes a shower, and she has to wash her hair, then she is uncovered and that fallen angel will then have access to her! That argument just does not hold water. Also, if a man has a lust problem he will lust over a woman even when she is covered. I have gone jogging in the dead of winter with a hooded sweatshirt on and sweat pants, and a face mask to protect my face from the cold and I have had men drive by and make lustful remarks. Lustful men will be lustful no matter how much a woman is covered! Now I am not suggesting that women should dress however they want without regard to how it may make men stumble. Certainly I believe that women should dress modestly and cover up parts of their body that might cause a man to think lustful thoughts. But some people want to define what modesty looks like and they are not always basing that on what is truly modest in the eyes of YaHuWaH. Often times they are trying to draw more attention to themselves to make themselves “appear more holy” than others. Modesty should be defined by scripture and by the leading of the Holy Spirit and not some man-made code of conduct that others set for themselves and then they try to force that on others as if it is commanded in the Torah.

Now let us examine the context of these verses:

1st Corinthians 11:

8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.

9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head (kephale) because of the angels.

*Note: Notice that he is not talking about veils or hats here. He is talking about the wife being made for the husband in marriage, is he not?

That is why he says this in the following verse:

“For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head (kephale) because of the angels.”

The fallen angels have access to the family when people are not under their proper chain of command and there is not order in the family. A piece of cloth cannot protect us from fallen angels. How silly for people to think that huh?

That is why YaHuWaH gave the woman HAIR for her covering:

1st Corinthians 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

Her hair is GIVEN TO HER BY YAHUWAH! Her hair is already her covering to symbolize that she is under her husband and her Messiah!

Now, I don’t know about you, but I would rather choose the covering that YaHuWaH has “given me” which is my hair than a covering made by a human being!

Now I will admit that when I pray, I like to wear a prayer shawl or a “tallit” to remind me that I am under the covering of YaHuW’shuwa my Messiah! But I will not be put underneath “The Doctrine of the Nicolaitanes” which is something that our Messiah hates:

Revelation 2:15 So have you also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate.

The word Nikolaites in Greek is: #3531 and it means: “destruction of the people” and it also means “to conquer or dominate the people.”

This simply means that there are sects out there that want to “force” their beliefs on you and they do not allow you the freedom to be led by the Ruach ha’Kodesh (Holy Spirit) for yourself.

But what did our Messiah tell us?

1st YaHuW’chanon (John) 2:27 But the anointing which you have received of him abides in you, and you need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teaches youof all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it has taught you, you shall abide in him. 

Now if a woman wants to wear a head covering to remind her of the fact that she is under her husband’s authority and the authority of her Messiah, I see nothing wrong with wearing a head-covering as a reminder. However this is not a commandment in the Torah and people need to stop forcing their beliefs on others and making them feel “less spiritual” for not wearing a head-covering. By turning this “head-covering” issue into a Torah commandment is just wrong and sinful on the part of the people who are doing this. We are commanded not to “add to the word, nor diminish from it”:

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 4:2 You shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish ought from it, that you may keep the commandments of YHWH your Elohiym which I command you. 

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: you shall not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Mishle (Proverbs) 30:6 Add you not unto his words, lest he reprove you, and you be found a liar.

Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that hears the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, Elohiym shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

Revelation 22:19And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, Elohiym shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

It is a very serious matter to add commandments that are not in the Scriptures! You can have curses added to you and worse yet you can have your name removed from the book of life for removing things from the scriptures! 

If we use the same logic that men are not allowed to wear a head covering while praying or prophesying then we have to conclude that it is also a sin for a woman to pray or prophesy with her head covered. However, since I just established that Sha’ul could not have been speaking about a man’s literal head in 1st Corinthians 11:7, and that Lewites (Levites) wore head coverings while ministering to YaHuWaH in the temple, then it also stands to reason that Sha’ul was not speaking of the literal head or skull of a woman either.

I wear a prayer shawl when I pray to remind myself that I am under the covering of YaHuWaH Elohiym. But sometimes it begins to slip off of my head and after several hours of wearing it, I get hot and sweaty underneath it and I have to take it off, because it distracts me from focusing my attention on YaHuWaH in prayer and hearing his voice.

If a woman wants to cover her head during prayer or prophesying, or even 100% of the time, then she is allowed to do so, but it is wrong for people to put somebody under this man-made law and treat them as if they are breaking Torah if they choose not to do so. Likewise, if a man wants to wear a prayer shawl or a tallit, he too is allowed to do so. But nobody should be forcing either male or female to wear head coverings full time or at any time for that matter.

Commandment or Culture?

I have heard the arguments of some people who insist that because there are references to the woman wearing a head-covering in scripture that this constitutes a commandment.

Bemidbar (Numbers) 5:18 And the priest shall set the woman before YHWH, and uncover the woman’s head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causes the curse:

Now it is unclear throughout the entire context of scripture whether or not this was customary for a woman to cover her head specifically for this “Law of Jealousy” or if this was just a cultural thing for a woman to wear a head covering 100% of the time or just when she went into the temple. But either way, such logic defies the scriptures themselves. For if we were to suppose a circumstance found in scripture constitutes a commandment of YaHuWaH, then we are violating Torah for we are commanded not to “add nor diminish” from his word. Whether or not women wore head coverings in those days as the “norm” because it was their culture or if it was for this specific “Law of Jealousy” remains unclear. Historically we know that both men and women wore head coverings almost 100% of the time. But does this mean it was a commandment?

A Royal Priesthood

1st Kefa (Peter) 2:9 But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that you should show forth the praises of him who has called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

As a royal priesthood after the order of Melchizedek, both male and female are now in eternity called to be “priests” and ministers. Are we always on duty? We should be! If we are his royal priests, then we should always be ready to minister to him and to others. Does this mean that we should always wear head coverings like the Lewites did? That choice is up to you. There is no physical temple standing right now in Yerushalayim and our bodies are a temple for YaHuWaH. Are we supposed to take all of the commandments that pertain to the Lewites (Levites) and apply them to the eternal priesthood of Melchizedek? Well we can within reason, but if we do so, then we would have to do that on every point. That would mean that we have to wear the Ephod 100% of the time as a breastplate. I personally own a miniature Ephod that I wear as a medallion around my neck but does this mean that if I don’t wear it sometimes that I am sinning? How far do we take this?

Within the confines of the marriage relationship the wife is to be subject to her husband. But outside of the confines of marriage, there is no difference between male and female roles in the body of Messiah, for we are all one:

Galatians 3:28 There is neither YaHuW’diy(Jew) nor Greekthere is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Mashiyach YaHuW’shuwa.

This means that both male and female are seated in heavenly places as his royal priesthood:

Ephesians 2:6 And has raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Mashiyach YaHuW’shuwa.

As ministers of righteousness and ministers of reconciliation, let us stop seeking to be righteous by the external things that we do and let our righteousness be from above. I see people trying to appear holy and righteous by the external things that they do like wearing head coverings, blowing shofars, wearing Tzit-zit (which indeed is a commandment), and appearing to be “holy” outwardly but meanwhile they treat the brethren shamefully!

Our Messiah had a rebuke for those who made themselves appear righteous by the external things that they do but inwardly they were full of sin:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 23:

25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

26 You blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

28 Even so you also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

The bottom-line: If you are wearing a head covering because that is how the Ruach ha’Kodesh (Holy Spirit) is leading you, then by all means do so! But if you are wearing a full time head covering in order to fit into your peer group or to appear more righteous or to appear more like a Hebrew, then you are doing so for all of the wrong reasons!

I see a lot of people within the Hebraic Root’s Community trying to find their “identity” in external things and trying to make themselves “appear” more Hebrew by what they wear and what they do. These things are fine to do, but you must make sure that your identity is founded in one thing alone---that you are a child of the King Messiah YaHuW’shuwa!

If you are washed in the blood of the lamb and you have been sanctified by the Holy Spirit (1st Peter 1:1-2), then you are called “the elect” after the foreknowledge of the Father and not by what you do or wear, but by your faith alone in the finished work of the sacrifice of Messiah! If you wear head-coverings as an outward sign of who you are in Messiah and you are not seeking to make yourself “appear more holy than others” then fine!

But if your righteousness is defined by these external things and you make others feel less spiritual because they do not share your convictions, then chances are, your motives are all wrong. When a person’s conscience has been cleansed, they do not seek to make themselves “appear righteous” by doing external things. If you already know who you are in Messiah, then you do not need to “cover up” a guilty conscience by doing external things. Now there is a difference between doing external things because you are already righteous by faith, and you find yourself wanting to do those things out of your love for Messiah; versus someone who has not repented of sin (that is still deeply embedded in their hearts) and yet they go around forcing others to conform to their wardrobe choices as a means to making themselves feel better. If you are seeking to sooth a guilty conscience by forcing others to wear what you wear and dress the way that you dress, then you are in sin.

Anything that you seek to use to make yourself “appear righteous” is nothing but filthy rags!

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

Does YaHuWaH Allow Remarriage After Divorce?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2008   

*Disclaimer: 

The entire point of this article is not to say that YaHuWaH condones divorce for any reason. The entire point of this study is for all of those (including myself) who have been divorced wrongfully and against their will by a cheating spouse. 

If you are a victim of being divorced by a cheating spouse, and you have been made to feel that you can never remarry, just because of some mistranslated words taken out of context in Matthew 5 & Matthew 19, then this article is for you! This article is by no means condoning divorce for any reason. This study is merely to show that the innocent party who did not want the divorce is allowed to remarry! 

Ever since I can remember, I have heard people in the Christian Churches quote Malachi 2:16 and they would often say “God hates divorce.”  This phrase was often used as if to say those who were divorced (even if they were the innocent party that did not want the divorce) were somehow in sin for having been divorced by their spouse. While it is true that YaHuWaH hates it when a family is torn apart and a Marriage Covenant is broken, it is not true that divorce is always a sin in every case. We read about Joseph (the earthly father of our Messiah) and he was a righteous man intending to divorce his betrothed (wife to be) Mary (Miriyam):

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 1: 

18 Now the birth of Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach (Messiah) was on this wise: When as his mother Miryam (Mary) was espoused to Yahuwceph (Joseph), before they came together, she was found with child of the Ruwach ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit). 

19 Then Yahuwceph (Joseph) her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily. 

20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of YHWH appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Yahuwceph (Joseph), you son of Dawiyd (David), fear not to take unto you Miryam (Mary) your wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Ruwach ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit). 

Joseph was a just man and yet he was planning to put away Mary (Miryam) privately because he did not want to cause her shame or to have her stoned to death. If Mary (Miryam) had committed adultery, then Joseph would have had a just cause to divorce her. But as he was visited by the Angel of YaHuWaH, he soon found out that she was not an adulteress, but she had conceived by the power of the Ruwach ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit). This goes to show that divorcing a woman who had committed adultery was not a sin according to Deuteronomy 24. 

Ever since I was a child raised in the Catholic Church, I was always taught that if one was divorced that he or she could never again re-marry or else they would be committing adultery. This false conclusion stems from the modern Bible translators wrong interpretation of the Hebrew & Greek words for “divorce” and “putting away” in Matthew 5, Matthew 19 & Malachi 2:16. Few people realize that these are two completely different words with different meanings in both Hebrew & Greek. The King James Version, the Hebrew Masoretic Text, and the Greek Textus Receptus interprets these words correctly, whereas all modern translations do not translate these words properly from Hebrew to English, thus leaving the reader to come to a false conclusion.

When I was born again in 1981, I was confronted by those in the Pentecostal Holiness” Churches that placed condemnation on me because I married a divorced man. But my former husband at the time had an ex-wife who had already remarried another man, so there was no hope for him to reconcile with her and I made sure of this before I married him. People in the Pentecostal Holiness Churches often cited verses that our Messiah quoted in the gospels to prove to me that I was an adulteress by being married to a divorced man.

But what I did not know back then that I do know now, is that there are two different words in Hebrew for “divorce” and “put away.”

In the Strong’s Hebrew Concordance we see what these two different words are:

# 7971. shalach shaw-lakh’ a primitive root; to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications):-- any wise, appoint, bring (on the way), cast awaycast out, conduct, earnestly, forsake, give (up), grow long, lay, leave, let depart (down, go, loose), push away, put away, forth, in, out, reach forth, send away, send forth, out), set, shoot (forth, out), sow, spread, stretch forth (out).

# 3748. kriythuwth ker-ee-thooth’ from 3772; a cutting of the matrimonial bond, i.e. divorce:--divorcement).

We see above that the word “shalach” means to simply send away without a certificate of divorce. This means that some men were sending their wives out of their homes or separating from them without giving them a legal divorce certificate. YaHuWaH hated this because these women were left hanging in limbo and could not remarry.

We also see another word in the Hebrew Scriptures “kriythuwth” which means to “cut the matrimonial bond” or to “divorce.”

Now, with that foundation laid, let’s see what the King James Version says in Malachi 2:16:

Malakiy (Malachi) 2:16: For YHWH, the Elohiym of Yisra’el, says that he hates putting away (shalach): for one covers violence with his garment, says YHWH of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that you deal not treacherously. 

Now let’s compare this verse in Malachi 2:16 in some of the modern translations:

New King James Version: 

16 “For the LORD God of Israel says That He hates divorce, For it covers one’s garment with violence,” Says the LORD of hosts. 

New International Version: 

16 “The man who hates and divorces his wife,” says the LORD, the God of Israel, “does violence to the one he should protect,” says the LORD Almighty. 

New American Standard Version: 

16 “For I hate divorce,” says the LORD, the God of Israel, “and him who covers his garment with wrong,” says the LORD of hosts. “So take heed to your spirit, that you do not deal treacherously.” 

Now let’s take a look at the Oldest Hebrew Translation: 

Malachi 2:16
כי שׂנא שׁלח#7971 אמר יהוה  אלהי  ישׂראל  וכסה חמס  על  לבושׁו  אמר  יהוה צבאות  ונשׁמרתם  ברוחכם  ולא  תבגדו׃  

You will notice that the word “shalach” (put away) is used here #7971. It mentions nothing about “Elohiym hating divorce!” It simply says that he hates “shalach” (putting away).

This means that YaHuWaH hates it when a man separates from his wife and marries another woman without legally divorcing the first wife. This is not to say that YaHuWaH is okay with men cheating on their wives. This of course is a sin. But if the man is going to commit adultery and marry another woman, the very least he could do is to give his first wife a certificate of divorce and this would allow her to remarry. So “Does YaHuWaH really hate divorce in all cases?” NO!

What YaHuWaH hates is the fact that husbands were separating from their wives without having a just cause, and to top it all off they were not even making it legal by giving them a certificate of divorce which would enable them to get remarried. This is what YaHuWaH hates!

YaHuWaH does not ALWAYS HATE DIVORCE WHEN IT IS FOR A JUST CAUSE: 

How can we be sure that YaHuWaH does not hate divorce in all cases? We find out that YaHuWaH himself is divorced from Yisra’el:

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Yisra’el committed adultery I had put her away (shalach), and given her a bill of divorce (kriythuwth); yet her treacherous sister Yahuwdah (Judah) feared not, but went and played the harlot also. 

Notice that he did two things:

1.) Put her away 

2.) Wrote her a bill of divorce 

He did not merely “put her away” but he made it legal and wrote her a divorce decree!

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 24: 

1 When a man has taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he has found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement (kriythuwth), and give it in her hand, and send her out (shalach)of his house. 

2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. 

Notice that a man who wants to divorce his wife may only do so for “some uncleanness” in her. What does this mean? It means that she has either committed adultery or he thought she was a virgin and then on the wedding night he found out that this was not the case. It can also mean that she is an idol worshiper and she worships pagan gods.

We find out that in the book of Ezra Chapter 10:3-19, the men were commanded to divorce their wives who refused to put away their idols.

Another reason why divorce is out of someone’s control is when the innocent party (the believer) has an unbelieving spouse who wants to leave the marriage:

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 7:15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but Elohiym has called us to peace. 

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) is telling us that if an unbelieving spouse wants to depart, then let him go. He goes on to say that we are “not under bondage” to the marriage in this case.

Now that we know that there is a difference between being “put away” and being legally divorced, it changes how we will read what our Messiah said in the gospels, so long as we read it in the King James Version or some other version that uses the correct Greek words:

# 630. apoluo ap-ol-oo’-o from 575 and 3089; to free fully, i.e. (literally) relieve, release, dismiss (reflexively, depart), or (figuratively) let die, pardon or (specially) divorce:--(let) depart, dismiss, forgive, let go, loose, put away, send away, release, set at liberty.

# 647. apostasion ap-os-tas’-ee-on neuter of a (presumed) adjective from a derivative of 868; properly, something separative, i.e. (specially) divorce:--writing of divorcement.

# 3080. lusis loo’-sis from 3089; a loosening, i.e. (specially), divorce:--to be loosed.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5: 

31 It has been said, Whosoever shall put away (shalach, apoluo) his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:

32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causes her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced (shalach, apoluo) commits adultery.

As you can see the word “put away”was translated correctly in verse 31 as it is #630 in the Greek Strong’s Concordance. But in verse 32, however the English translators used the wrong word for “divorced.” The word should be “put away,” which is #630 apoluo.  

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 19: 

3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away (shalach, apoluo) his wife for every cause? 

4 And he answered and said unto them, Have you not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 

5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they two shall be one flesh? 

6 Wherefore they are no more two, but one flesh. What therefore Elohiym has joined together, let not man put asunder. 

7 They say unto him, Why did Mosheh then command to give a writing of divorcement (kriythuwth, apostasion)and to put her away (shalach, apoluo)?

8 He said unto them, Mosheh because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away (shalach, apoluo) your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away (shalach, apoluo) his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, commits adultery: and whoso marries her which is put away (shalach, apoluo) does commit adultery. 

Now here is where most people get confused. As you can see from the above verses, the thing that causes one to commit adultery is to marry someone who is “put away” or separated but not divorced!  The Greek words being used are “apoluo” in every single case which simply means to be separated but not legally divorced!

But there is one place where the King James translators did mistranslate the word “put away” and instead they inserted the word “divorce” where it does not belong:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5:31 It has been said, Whosoever shall put away (#630 apoluo) his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement (#647 apostasion): 

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 5:32 But I say unto you, that whosoever shall put away (#630 apoluo) his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causes her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced (#630 apoluo) commits adultery. 

Did you get that? In Matthew 5:32 the wrong word was used for divorced! They translated it correctly in Matthew 5:31 using the word apostasion #647 for divorcement. But then in verse 32, they used the word divorced, but it should be “put away” because right next to it in the Strong’s Concordance and the Blue Letter Bible, it shows that the original Greek word is not #647 for “apostasion” (divorced) but the word should say “put away” because the number used right next to it is # 630 which is the Greek word “apoluo.” 

This means that our Messiah said that whoever marries a person who is still legally married but separated from their spouse is committing adultery! He was not saying that if a person marries a divorced person that they are committining adultery necessarily! If the person leaves their spouse in order to marry someone else then they are committing adultery. But if the innocent party has had their spouse leave them and divorce them, then they are free to remarry because they are the innocent party who did not cause the divorce!

All of the other modern translations have caused divorced people for years to be under unnecessary condemnation for being wrongfully divorced by a spouse. But the King James Version gets it right in every place by using the correct word “put away” (apoluo) except for in this one place in Matthew 5:32 where they mistranslated the word “apoluo” as divorced! 

Now let me comment on the above verses in Matthew 5 & 19. First of all, “No, it is not okay to put away a wife for any reason.”

Messiah knew that the only reason why a man could “put away” his wife is for the cause of fornication or adultery. But he was still required to write her a certificate of divorce in such cases. You see men were just abandoning their wives without having a just cause, and they were lusting after another woman. Because these men did not have a just cause to divorce their wives, instead of giving them a divorce certificate, they would simply abandon their wives without a certificate and then they would marry another woman without being loosed from the first wife. Not only did they not have a just cause for divorcing their wives (which was the first sin) but they also were putting away their wives without writing them a certificate of divorce, and this left the woman unable to re-marry.

And so she was left in limbo still being legally married to the first husband and unable to re-marry.

Now the Pharisees asked “is it lawful for a man to PUT AWAY his wife for every cause”?

The first thing that we will note is that in Deuteronomy 24, the only just cause for a man divorcing his wife is that he found some “uncleanness” in her (either fornication or idolatry). But the Pharisees knowing this already were trying to trick Messiah to see if he would agree with Mosheh (Moses) or not.  

You will notice that in verse 9, a man is guilty of adultery if he marries a woman who is “put away” (separated but not legally divorced). If a husband merely “puts away” his wife without a legal divorce and then remarries another woman, he is also committing adultery. This is also another proof that YaHuWaH never condoned polygamy but he merely tolerated it.  

In verse 9 it also says that the man who marries a woman who is “put away” (separated but not legally divorced) he also commits adultery.

In Debariym (Deuteronomy) 24, however, if a man marries a woman who is legally divorced, he does not commit adultery. It is only when he marries a woman who has not been legally divorced by her husband that he is then committing adultery!

Also notice that the only reason why YaHuWaH allows a man to put away his wife is for the cause of fornication. This means that he thought she was a virgin before the wedding night, but then on the night of the wedding he then finds out that she is not. He would have a just cause to divorce her under those circumstances. However, if he loved her anyway, he would kill a lamb and put the blood of that lamb on the bed-sheet and show it to the wedding guests outside to cover her sin!

Now let’s take a look at Mark’s account:

Marqos (Mark) 10: 

2 And the Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it lawful for a man to put away (shalach, apoluo) his wife? tempting him. 

3 And he answered and said unto them, What did Mosheh command you? 

4 And they said, Mosheh suffered to write a bill of divorcement (kriythuwth, apostasion)and to put her away (shalach, apoluo). 

5 And Yahuwshuwa answered and said unto them, For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept. 

6 But from the beginning of the creation Elohiym made them male and female. 

7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 

8 And they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh. 

9 What therefore Elohiym has joined together, let not man put asunder. 

10 And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same matter. 

11 And he said unto them, Whosoever shall put away (shalach, apoluo) his wife, and marry another, commits adultery against her. 

12 And if a woman shall put away (shalach, apoluo) her husband, and be married to another, she commits adultery. 

Notice that if a “woman shall put away her husband” (meaning that she merely separates but she has not been legally divorced by him), that she is also committing adultery if she marries another man. In verse 11, Yahuwshuwa Messiah says that if a man shall “put away his wife and marries another woman, he is committing adultery against his first wife.”

This once again is proof that polygamy is wrong. The first wife is being sinned against when a man takes another wife while he is still legally married to her.

Luqas (Luke) 16:18 Whosoever puts away (shalach, apoluo) his wife, and marries another, commits adultery: and whosoever marries her that is put away (shalach, apoluo) from her husband commits adultery. 

When the Jews came out of Babylonian Captivity, many of the men had married heathen wives and they were commanded to divorce these heathen wives and to return back to Towrah.

Ezrah 9: 

1 Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Yisra’el, and the priests, and the Lewites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites. 

For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers has been chief in this trespass. 

3 And when I heard this thing, I rent my garment and my mantle, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down astonied. 

4 Then were assembled unto me every one that trembled at the words of the Elohiym of Yisra’el, because of the transgression of those that had been carried away; and I sat astonied until the evening sacrifice. 

5 And at the evening sacrifice I arose up from my heaviness; and having rent my garment and my mantle, I fell upon my knees, and spread out my hands unto YHWH my Elohiym. 

Here in the above verses we have Ezra renting his clothes and plucking out his beard as he mourns and weeps in repentance on behalf of the sins of the House of Judah for marrying heathens who worship idols. Then he went into prayer and fasting to seek after YaHuWaH to know how to handle the situation:

Ezrah 9: 

12 Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth forever: that you may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children forever. 

13 And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that you our Elohiym have punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and have given us such deliverance as this; 

14 Should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations? would not you be angry with us till you had consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor escaping? 

15 O YHWH Elohiym of Yisra’el, you are righteous: for we remain yet escaped, as it is this day: behold, we are before you in our trespasses: for we cannot stand before you because of this. 

In the next verses we read that all the remnant of the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) wept and repented for marrying heathens and idol worshipersAfter there was repentance, they entered into Covenant with YaHuWaH to divorce their heathen wives: 

Ezrah 10: 

1 Now when Ezrah had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and casting himself down before the house of Elohiym, there assembled unto him out of Yisra’el a very great congregation of men and women and children: for the people wept very sore. 

2 And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our Elohiym, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now there is hope in Yisra’el concerning this thing. 

3 Now therefore let us make a covenant with our Elohiym to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our Elohiym; and let it be done according to the law. 

In conclusion, we know that YaHuWaH really does not want any married couple to be divorced, but in some cases, he actually commands us to divorce a spouse who is a heathen that worships idols. Now if the unbelieving spouse wants to remain married to the believing spouse, the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) says that we should pray for that unbelieving spouse. But what if that unbelieving spouse is a witch or a Satanist? There are extenuating circumstances where a wife may have to flee with her children to get away from a dangerous spouse. And if a man is married to a woman who is practicing witchcraft or has idols in the home, then he may divorce her according to Deuteronomy 24 for this is considered “uncleanness.”

There is a fine line between an unbelieving spouse who needs prayer and wants to remain in the marriage and an all-out heathen who is worshiping idols and inviting demons into the home thereby bringing everyone under a curse. It is one of those things that should be determined on a “case-by-case” basis with much prayer and counseling and also by the leading of the Ruwach ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit).

However, if that unbelieving spouse does not want to dwell with the believing spouse, then we are not under bondage in such cases (see 1st Corinthians 7). Ultimately we should all take the approach like the prophet Hosea and pray for a wayward spouse. But if the wayward spouse refuses to return to YaHuWaH or to repent from adultery or idol worship, then we are free to divorce and re-marry according to the scriptures.

My Own Personal Testimony 

I had a husband who cheated on me for years. He used drugs, beat me and verbally abused me, but I never left him. He also dabbled in Satanism and recorded worship music offered up to Satan in the recording studio. My children were terrified when they heard this music. Yet I remained with him and prayed for him for many years. Then finally he left and moved in with another woman after 10 years of marriage.  Even during this one year separation when he was living with the other woman, I continued to pray for him and for the other woman.

Finally after a one year separation, he told me that he wanted to be married to the other woman, and so I let him depart” as the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) said to do in 1st Corinthians 7. My ex-husband wanted the divorce and so I signed the divorce papers and gave him his freedom. This was not my choice, but I could not force him to stay and I know that YaHuWaH was delivering me from a very abusive situation.

I would’ve taken him back and forgiven him if he had repented, but YaHuWaH released me from that terrible marriage. There were people that told me that I could never remarry because I was divorced but this is not what Deuteronomy 24 says. It says that when a man writes his wife a certificate of divorce, she may go and become another man’s wife!

At the time I did not know that the terms “divorce” and putting away” are totally different words in Hebrew and Greek. And so I was one of the countless people who have been put under condemnation for being divorced even though it was out of my control.    

If a woman is married to a man who abuses drugs or alcohol and he beats her, she should remove herself physically from danger by separating but she should not file for a divorce. She should continue to pray for him from a distance.

The Apostle Sha’uwl said this:

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 7: 

10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but YHWH, Let not the wife depart from her husband: 

11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife. 

As you can see Sha’uwl is telling the woman not to depart from her husband, but “IF SHE DOES” let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband.

This tells us that there could be extenuating circumstances whereby she has to physically leave, because she is in danger, but if she does this, she is to remain unmarried or if the husband is rehabilitated and quits drinking and beating her, repents, gets demons cast out of him, etc. she may return and be reconciled to him. I don’t believe that YaHuWaH wants a woman to remain married to a man who is a pedophile and sodomizes her and the children. Or a man who is a homosexual who goes out and sleeps with men thereby infecting her with aides. These are the types of reasons why the woman may separate from her husband but she cannot write him a certificate of divorce or initiate the divorce. Only the husband may do that.

But the bottom-line is that if the husband writes his wife a divorce certificate, she is free to remarry. Our Messiah Yahuwshuwa was not contradicting Deuteronomy 24 when he said that a man or a woman “commits adultery” for marrying a person who has been “put away.” For the word “put away” does not mean the same thing as divorce! A person who is “put away” is merely separated but there is no legally binding document that proves that they are divorced! In order for a person to be allowed to remarry according to the scriptures, the man must write the woman a divorce certificate and then she may remarry!

Hence, our Messiah was not telling us that a man or a woman who is divorced may never remarry! 


The Queen of Heaven: Why Does The Church Celebrate Easter?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September, 2002
http://www.DoublePortionInheritance.com
For too long many of us have been lied to about the resurrection of the true Yahuwdiyth (Jewish) Messiah named Yahuwshuwa. Just ask any person on the street “When did Jesus die on the cross, and when was Jesus raised from the dead?” The answer will inevitably be “He died on Good Friday and he rose again on Easter Sunday.”
You see, organized religion has fed us lies in order to sell their political agenda and their merchandise. But the prophet Jeremiah was shown these last days that we are now living in. Listen to what he says:
Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 16:19 O YHWH, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto you from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.
What exactly are these lies that we have inherited?
It all began at the Tower of Babel about 2,275 years before the birth of Messiah. An evil religion and empire was started by one of the most evil men in history. His name was Nimrod and he was the great grandson of Noah. But he was very rebellious against YaHuWaH Elohiym, and he was finally caught and slain for his crimes. Scripture calls him “the mighty hunter” but this was not in a positive connotation. Nimrod actually hunted for humans and used them for sacrifices to the pagan sun-god Moloch.
Nimrod’s name is only mentioned four times in the entire Bible, (Genesis 10:8 &9, 1st Chronicles 1:10, Micah 5:6). But more details are given in the book of Yashar (Jasher) about Nimrod’s life and his mother Semiramis. The book of Yashar (Jasher) is spoken about in scripture in Joshua 10:13 & 2nd Samuel 1:18.
In the book of Yashar (Jasher) we read that Nimrod was counseled by the priests of Baal to marry his own mother as an act of incest in order to acquire what is called “the third eye” or the “all-seeing eye of Lucifer.” Today people call it “psychic power” or “extra-sensory perception” but it is demonic power to “see” things in the spiritual realms. The Bible calls this “a spirit of divination” (Ezekiel 13:6-7) which is a  counterfeit to the true gifts of the Holy Spirit given to those who are in covenant relationship with the Messiah Yahuwshuwa and who obey his commandments (1st Corinthians 12:1-11).
And so Nimrod married his mother Semiramis in order to acquire this special power from the fallen angels, and together they started a “one world religion and government” called “The Babylonian Empire.” Nimrod built a tower that would reach towards heaven because he wanted to consult the fallen angels through the use of astrology. When YaHuWaH saw that Nimrod’s kingdom was becoming powerful and that the people were all in “one accord” under a false satanic empire, he caused the continents to be divided in the earth by large bodies of water, and he caused the people’s languages to become confused, and thus the people of Babylon scattered to different parts of the world (Genesis 10:32 & 11:7). See my other article entitled “Nimrod, the Papacy & Pangea”
The continents of the earth at one time were all connected as one large land-mass, but in Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:32 we read that Yah divided the nations of the earth. This is what is known as “Pangaea” in modern Science. Nimrod’s religion then migrated to all of the continents of the world, but since the languages had been confused by YaHuWaH, the names of the characters were changed. Thus Nimrod had various names in different cultures and his mother Semiramis also had various names in different cultures as well. Nimrod’s mother and wife, Semiramis became universally known as “The Queen of Heaven” and this pagan goddess has been worshiped all over the world since that time.
Whose Resurrection Are You Celebrating?
The nation of Yisra’el was guilty of worshiping this very same “Queen of Heaven,” the goddess of the moon and sky, and our Heavenly Father sent the prophet Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) to give warning to them. Listen to the attitudes of the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) as they presumptuously thought that they could burn incense to this goddess while still maintaining their covenant relationship with YaHuWaH:
Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 44:17-18 “But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goes forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the QUEEN OF HEAVEN, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Yahuwdah (Judah), and in the streets of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem): for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. But since we left off to burn incense to the QUEEN OF HEAVEN, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, we have wanted all things, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine.”
Has anything changed today in the Christian Church? Most Christians think that the ancient Yisraelites were somehow much more idolatrous than people are today in Christianity. But the truth is, the very same sins committed by the nation of Yisra’el which caused them to go into captivity with their enemies, are the very same sins that are being committed today within Christianity! Our Messiah was not sacrificed on a tree so that we can continue in these pagan lies. He was sacrificed to redeem backsliding Yisra’el from her pagan ways and that includes those in the Christian Churches today!

Pictured here is Isis “Queen of Heaven” holding her baby son Horus. The Roman Emperor Constantine renamed this image “Mary & Baby Jesus” in the 3rd Century, but this image is none other than the original Queen of Heaven named Semiramis and she is holding her baby son Tammuz. When Nimrod and Semiramis’s religion migrated to other parts of the world, she took on different names. Another one of her aliases is “Easter.” This is the true identity of EASTER and her son Nimrod who was later supposedly reincarnated as Tammuz (Ezekiel 8:14). Mythology teaches that she spends six months each year in the underworld, but on Easter Sunday (named after the sun-god) she resurrects in the “East” because the sun rises in the East, and the pagans worship the sun.

Her name started out as Semiramis, but then it was changed in other cultures. She is known as Isis, Diana, Astarte, Ishtar, Aphrodite, Venus, Easter and the false deified version of the “Catholic Mary.” Her baby son Nimrod (later reincarnated as Tammuz) also had other names in various cultures because this Babylonian religion migrated around the world. He is known as Horus, Apollo, Sol, Krishna, Hercules, Mithra, and many others.

This image of Isis Queen of Heaven with baby Horus the sun-god is the true identity of the Catholic “Mary & baby Jesus” that is worshipped by Catholics through icons and graven images.

You will also notice the two horns on her head are for the “horned god” Lucifer and the circle symbolizes the sun. This image violates the second commandment in Shemoth (Exodus)20:4 which says “you shall not make unto you any graven image.”


We’ve all seen this image on Christmas cards and Catholic imagery, but this image is none other than the pagan goddess Semiramis, Easter, Isis, and her son & husband Nimrod, Tammuz, Horus, Osirus etc.
In order to understand how Satan slipped in his false religion into modern-day Christendom, we must first understand the origin of Satan’s first religion from ancient Babylon. Nimrod was one of Noah’s great grandsons who was known as a “mighty hunter” of men’s souls. Nimrod married his mother Semiramis. ----The Two Babylons by Alexander Hyslop.

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:8-10 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before YHWH: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before YHWH. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel.

Together, Semiramis and her son/husband, Nimrod started this occult religion of sacrificing babies to Moloch, aka Satan or the false pagan sun-god. Nimrod means “tyrant,” as he led the Babylonians to pay tribute to the skies (the sun, moon, stars, planets) with the sacrifices of their children. The Tower of Babel which was built for this purpose, echoed in other cultures such as the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas. Obelisks were phallic or male fertility symbols interpreted as sun rays (precursors of steeples).

This religion was making them rich as the people had to pay money to come into the temple to sacrifice their babies at the Winter Solstice (December 
21st-25th) and also at “Easter Sunrise Services,” at the Spring or Vernal Equinox (March 21st-25th). This sounds just like today’s abortion clinics, doesn’t it?
Every year on March 25th& December 25th, there would be wild drunken parties and orgies where virgins were impregnated by pagan priests. Since there are 9 months to a pregnancy, and there are also 9 months between March 25th and December 25th, the pagan priests of Ba’al would impregnate these virgins on Easter Sunday, and then by December 25th when these infants were newly born, they would then offer up these newborn babies on the altar to “Moloch” on December 25th. A few months later on Easter “Sun-day” they would offer up more infants to the goddess named “Easter,” and then they would dye eggs in the blood of these sacrificed infants!!!
Pictured here are “blood red eggs” which is the only color that the Greek Orthodox Church uses to color their eggs!

When one of Noah’s sons, Shem heard what Nimrod was doing, he sent out a bounty hunt to have Nimrod killed. However, the book of Yashar (Jasher) records that it was Esau (the twin brother of Jacob) who actually killed Nimrod. After Nimrod was killed, Semiramis was worried that she would lose “church members.” Semiramis did not want to lose this big money-making religion, and so she had to think of a way to keep the people hooked into her system. And so she concocted an idea which would keep the legend of Nimrod alive, thereby keeping the big money-making religion alive as well. She then consulted with the pagan priests and astrologers who told her that the sun “dies” on December 21st but then it begins to come back to life again on the eve of December 24th.

In paganism this is what is known as the “Winter Solstice,” which falls on December 21st ----when the earth is the furthest away from the sun. On December 24th, the earth begins to rotate back around the sun and comes closer to the sun. But the pagans did not know this in earlier times before science and telescopes were invented. These pagans in Babylon thought that the sun died on December 21st and it resurrected on the eve of December 24th thereby causing it to be 
“reborn” on December 25th !
Using astrology as her guide, Semiramis became pregnant on March 25th (exactly 9 months before December 25th), and then she concocted a legend for the Babylonian people telling them that on December 21st, Nimrod dies each year. She then told them that on December 25th Nimrod is “born-again” as the “sun-god” or “Ba’al.” Hence, on December 25th the “sun-god” is celebrated around the world under many different names. Semiramis told the Babylonians that she had become the goddess of the moon and the sky and that her son/husband, Nimrod was being “reincarnated” in her womb as “Ba’al” the sun-god on December 25th. She told the Babylonians that Nimrod impregnated her with the “rays of the sun” supernaturally.
Her new son was named Tammuz according to Ezekiel 8:14 or generically he was called “Ba’al” (which means Lord or husband). Each year on Tammuz’s birthday on December 25th, the pagans were ordered by Semiramis to go into the groves (forests) and placed a gift on a tree to honor Nimrod who was “cut down” like a tree (Isaiah 14:12-19). They were also ordered to cut down a tree, take it into their homes and decorate it with silver and gold balls to symbolize Nimrod’s testicles (Jeremiah 10:3-4).
Trees and branches became symbols of Nimrod because Nimrod was “cut down” just like a tree. Hence, a tree stump became a place of honoring him, as the scriptures speak of the pagans going into the “groves” or the forest and worshiping their false gods “under every green tree.” In Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 10:2-4 YaHuWaH says:
“Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; (astrology was idolized) for the heathen are dismayed at them…For the customs of the people are vain: for one cuts a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers that it move not.”

In the King James Version the word “groves” is used many times, but in Hebrew the word is as follows:
Strong’s H842 – ‘asherah
אֲשֵׁרָה

Asherah: groves (for idol worship); a Babylonian (Astarte)-Canaanite goddess (of fortune and happiness), the supposed consort of Baal, her images; the goddess, goddesses; her images; sacred trees or poles set up near an altar.

Christmas trees are really Asherah Poles or sacred trees for honoring “Ba’al” and the ornaments represent Nimrod’s testicles!
Babylonian history records that Nimrod was cut into pieces and his body parts were sent to different provinces of Babylon to warn the people not to sacrifice babies to Moloch. His only body part that was never found was his penis, and so his mother/wife, Semiramis, decided to memorialize it by erecting a giant image of Nimrod’s penis which today is called the obelisk.
The obelisk is a powerful witchcraft “talisman” and those within the occult know that the devil and his fallen angels use these as “points of contact.” You will note that there is one in Washington D.C. called “The Washington Monument” and there is also one in front of St. Peter’s Square in front of the Vatican. Occultists have strategic reasons for placing these on church buildings as “steeples” in order to cast spells on the people within these churches.
This is the olbelisk that sits in front of the Vatican in Saint Peter’s Square. Our Creator YaHuWaH hates these images and he commands us to break them down and destroy them! The following scripture references are commandments to break down these images called “groves” or “Asherah Poles.” YaHuWaH does not want to be reminded of the fact that Yisra’el worshiped Nimrod and his supposed reincarnated son Tammuz (Baal) and his mother/wife Semiramis (Easter). The following scriptures command us to destroy these images (steeples, Christmas trees, obelisks): Exodus 23:24, Exodus 34:13, Deuteronomy 7:5, Deuteronomy 12:3, Jeremiah 43:13, Hosea 10:2.

The obelisk is shown jutting up into the sky which is supposed to represent Nimrod having intercourse with the goddess of the sky & moon, his mother/wife, Semiramis. YaHuWaH gave many warnings against these “groves” where the heathens would cut the tops of these trees off and then shape them into obelisks or phallic symbols. They would then go and have orgies there and exchange gifts under 
“every green tree” (Deuteronomy 12:12, 1st Kings 14:23, 2nd Kings 17:10, 2nd Chronicles 28:4, Jeremiah 2:20, 3:13, 3:6, Isaiah 57:5).
Pictured is a statue of Semiramis holding her baby son Nimrod or his alleged reincarnation, Tammuz. This statue has been seen around the world in many different cultures under different names, but the same demon spirits are behind these statues regardless of the names given to them.
Forty Days of Weeping for Tammuz: Lent & Ash Wednesday
When Tammuz was forty years old, as he was hunting in the woods, he was killed by a wild boar (a pig). He took after his father Nimrod because he was also a “mighty hunter.” After Tammuz died, his mother Semiramis began a custom in Babylon called “Forty Days of Weeping for Tammuz” where people were commanded to fast and pray for Tammuz in the underworld. They exchanged one day of pleasure in this life for each year of Tammuz’s life. Today in the Roman Catholic Church this has been renamed “Lent.” These forty days of fasting eventually would be incorporated into Roman Catholic worship, whereby the people are commanded to fast leading up to Easter. To this day, Catholics begin these forty days on what is called “Ash Wednesday.” As it was done in ancient Babylon, so it is also done today, where the pagan priests of Baal would take ashes and place a “mark” on the foreheads of the people with a cross as he would recite a declaration about how we were “created from ashes and to ashes we shall return.” 

When I was a child at the age of 6 years old in the Catholic School, this custom did not sit well with me. Scripture tells us that if we belong to Messiah that we shall never see death. The Apostle Shauwl (Paul) explained to us in 1st Corinthians 15:50-54 that the elect shall exchange a mortal body for immortality. When I was a child in the Catholic School, we were told that when we celebrated Lent, that we were commemorating the time when our Messiah fasted and prayed in the wilderness for “forty days and forty nights.” That is what we were made to believe that Lent was all about. The nuns made a chart on the wall as each child called out what he was giving up for forty days. Some children gave up candy or a favorite television show during those forty days. But the truth of the matter is, our Messiah fasted and prayed during the “Forty Days of Repentance” leading up to Yowm Kippur. The Jewish people have a tradition of fasting and repenting for forty days leading up to Yowm Kippur to commemorate the forty days when Moses was on Mount Sinai receiving the second set of commandments. And this is when our Messiah fasted and prayed in the wilderness.
Here, we see YaHuWaH condemning this practice called “weeping for Tammuz” which today is called Lent in the Catholic Church:

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 8:13-14 “Turn you yet again, and you shall see greater abominations that they do. Then he brought me to the door of the gate of YHWH’s house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. Then said he unto me, Have you seen this, O son of man?”
Today in many cultures people make “Easter Bread” or “hot crossed buns” as an offering to the Queen of Heaven. Do people realize that they are inadvertently offering up cakes to the Queen of Heaven? 

Yirmeyahuw (Jeremiah) 7:18-19 “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough,to make cakes to thequeen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger. Do they provoke me to anger? says YHWH: do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces? Therefore thus says YHWH Elohiym; Behold, my anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place.”
Pictured here is an artist’s 
depiction of the false deified version of the Catholic Mary with nail prints in her hands! Roman Catholic doctrine claims that she participated in the crucifixion and resurrected just like Yahuwshuwa (Jesus)! This is why they call her the Queen of Heaven, just like the pagan goddess in Jeremiah 44. This is also why they pray to her, and this is why today Christians celebrate “Easter” in honor of her resurrection! Beloved, if you thought that Easter was about the resurrection of the true Messiah named Yahuwshuwa, think again! 

The “Good Friday & Sunday Resurrection Myth”

The reason why the Vatican has gone to a lot of trouble to convince everyone that our Messiah resurrected on “Sun-day” morning is because they want to assimilate him to the pagan god of the “Sun.” Satan needed to find a way to convince the true followers of Messiah to worship him (Satan) unawares, and so he has set aside a special day that represents “Nimrod,” the god of the sun from the Tower of Babel. Nimrod was the first historical false Messiah who ruled his false One World Government and Religion about 2,275 years before the birth of the true Messiah, Yahuwshuwa. He was the first historical Anti-Messiah whose name in Chaldean adds up to 666.
But the true and genuine Messiah, Yahuwshuwa came to earth in human form during the “4th Millennium” (the middle of creation week) and he died “in the midst of the week” (Passover week on the 4th day of the week or Wednesday), and also in the “middle” of the 7,000 years since creation in the 4th Millennium. And he also died in the middle of “Daniel’s 70th Week” (in the middle of the 7-year ministry where he worked for Rachel.) Hence, Messiah died “in the midst of the week, within the week, within the week.”

7,000 years = Messiah died in the 4th Millennium from creation (in the midst of the week of 7 millennia).

7 years = Messiah died in the middle of a 7-year ministry of working for Rachel (like Jacob). His ministry was 3.5 years, and his “Two Witnesses” in Revelation 11 will pick up where he left off with a 3.5 year ministry (1,260 days). They will finish out the 7-year ministry of working for Rachel (symbolic of the House of Judah).

7 days = Messiah died in the middle of Passover Week on the 4th day of the week (Wednesday). 

Our Messiah Yahuwshuwa will return in the 7th Millennium from creation for his bride and this is called “The Sabbath Millennium.” In 2nd Peter 3:8 we told that “one day is like a thousand years with YHWH and a thousand years is as one day.”

Hence, the 7th Day Sabbath points to our Messiah Yahuwshuwa!
The first day of the week called “Sun-day” does not point to our Messiah, because Sunday is not “The Lord’s Day” as many have falsely been taught to believe in the Church.
Semiramis, (the wife and mother of Nimrod) who was also called Venus in Rome, has a day of the week named after her. That day in Italian or Latin is “Venerdi” for Venus. This word “Venerdi” is where we get the word “venerate” which means “to worship.”In the 3rd Century, Constantine renamed the statue of Venus “The Virgin Mary.” Hence, “Friday” is meant to signify her participation with the crucifixion of our Messiah! 

Mary Declared the Co-Redeemer of Salvation

Catholic Catechism Pg. 252 #969

“Taken up into heaven she (Mary) did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation…”

Catholic Catechism Pg. 125 #494

“Being obedient she (Mary) became the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race.”

Catholic Catechism Pg. 125 #494

“She (Mary) is inseparably linked with the saving work of her Son.”

In his general audience address of April 9, 1997, Pope John Paul II said: 

Mary …co-operated during the event itself of the crucifixion and in the role of mother; thus her co-operation embraces the whole of Christ’s saving workShe alone was associated in this way with the redemptive sacrifice of that merited the salvation of all mankind. In union with Christ and submission to Him, she collaborated in obtaining the grace of salvation for all humanity…In God’s plan, Mary is the ‘woman’ (Genesis 3:15), the New Eveunited to New Adam in restoring humanity to it’s original dignity. Her cooperation with her Son continues for all time in the universal motherhood which she enjoys in the order of grace. Trusting in this maternal cooperation, let us turn to Mary, imploring her help in all of our needs” (Vatican Information Service).

The reason why this idea of Mary being the “New Eve” is so blasphemous is because in the original religion of Babylon, Semiramis married her own son, Nimrod and today, Roman Catholicism falsely teaches that “Mary is the Holy Spirit” thus making her the wife of our Messiah!

While it is true that Yahuwshuwa (Jesus) is called “the last Adam” (1stCorinthians 15:45) since he redeemed us from the curse of sin, YaHuWaH calls Yisra’el his “wife” (Jeremiah 3:15). Catholic’s giving Mary the title “second Eve” implies that “Mary and Jesus are united in marriage” just as Adam and Eve and just like Semiramis & Nimrod!

Catholic doctrine even admits to this blasphemy by falsely teaching that “the Holy Spirit is her spouse.”

In 1985, in Guayaquil, Equador, Pope John Paul II gave this speech: 

…at Calvary she united herself with the sacrifice of her son that led to the foundation of the church; her maternal heart shared to the very depths of the will of Christ ‘to gather into one all the dispersed children of God’. Having suffered for the Church, Mary deserved to become the Mother of all the disciples of her Son, the Mother of their unity…Infact Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix did not cease with the glorification of her Son”(Inside the Vatican, July 1997, p.23).

In the mid 1960’s Vatican Council II gave Mary the titles of Co-Redeemer, Mediator, Advocate (Vatican II Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, chap.8 II, 56, pp.380-383).

#969 ... “Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation .... Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix.”

Dogmatic Constitution on The Church, Lumen Gentium, promulgated by Pope Paul VI, Nov. 21, 1964, section #6 Source: Catechism of the Catholic Church, published by Ligouri Publications, English translation copyright 1994 by the United States Catholic Conference, Inc.--Libreria Editrice Vaticana, bearing the Imprimi Potest of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, page 252. Source: Pope Pius XI, Encyclical Letter

AD CATHOLICI SACERDOTII (On the Catholic Priesthood), promulgated on 20 December 1935.

“Mary has been elevated in Roman Catholic teaching to a Mediatrix of Salvation, interposing her between Christ and mankind.”

But scripture clearly tells us that there is only “one mediator” between YaHuWaH and mankind:

1stTimotiyos (Timothy) 2:5For there is one Elohiym, and one mediator between Elohiym and men, the man Mashiyach (Messiah) Yahuwshuwa.

1st Yahuwchanon (John) 2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that you sin notAnd if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach the righteous.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 8:6But now has (Yahuwshuwa) obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 9:15And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Tehilliym (Psalm) 54:4 Behold, Elohiymis my helper: YHWH is with them that uphold my soul.

Ibriym (Hebrews) 13:6 So that we may boldly say, YHWH is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.

As you can see, the word of YaHuWaH declares that Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashiyach alone is our mediator, helper, and advocate!

Now certainly, we can understand that as his mother, she would’ve suffered and would have been grief-stricken over watching her son be tortured to death. But never-the-less, the idea of calling her a “co-mediator” is idolatry, and blasphemy. This treats her as a “goddess” worthy of worship instead the mortal human being that she was. 

And now we can understand how the Roman Catholic Church has conferred the pagan goddess Easter’s title onto Mary (Miryam) the mother of our Messiah, Yahuwshuwa. Today they call her, “Mary Queen of Heaven,” just like the pagan deity that YaHuWaH condemned in Jeremiah 7 & 44! Wow! What an affront to the mother of our Messiah—the real Miryam!
Of course, we know that this is not the REAL Miryam described in the scriptures. The Roman Catholic Church not only presents to us a false Messiah or “Another Yahuwshuwa, but they also present Another Miryam!” 

Semiramis, (Nimrod’s mother), became known in other cultures as “Magna Mater,” the “Great Mother,” and she was worshiped as Mother Earth. The Sun “mated” with the Earth each spring, and the “Rites of Spring” symbolized by the “May Pole” and “Easter” came 9 moons (months) before December 25th on the “birth” of the winter Sun. Her Assyrian name is Ishtar which is where we derive the name “Easter.” In the illustration above, you can see the reason why people buy lilies during Easter and women don corsages of lilies and orchids to church on Easter Sunday. It is because the lily is a symbol for the goddess named Easter.  
Easter, the goddess of the dawn is the universal goddess of fertility throughout history since the Tower of Babel. She began as Nimrod’s wife Semiramis, and then after YaHuWaH scattered the nations and confused their languages at the Tower of Babel (Genesis 10-11), her image with her baby son Tammuz migrated to other nations under different names.

The Romans called her Astarte but later she was called Venus, and the Phoenicians called her Asherah. The Hebrews called her Astoroth, the consort of Ba’al. Her emblem is the flower of the lily. She is the “goddess of the dawn,” and her statue stands on a bridge in France. The French made a colossus of this image, and it now stands in New York Harbor, facing “East,” referring to the name Ishtar or Easter.

Why is she facing the East?

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 8:16And he brought me into the inner court of YHWH’s house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of YHWH, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of YHWH, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.

As you might have already figured it out, this image is none other than the Statue of Liberty! The French Illuminati donated this statue to America in order to bring the spirit of Jezebel’s influence upon our nation!

The torch that she carries is the “light of Lucifer” the same “light” of Freemasonry. Why is she called “Lady Liberty?”
It is because she teaches the servants of YaHuWaH to commit fornication with the kings of the earth (Revelation 2:20-23, Revelation 18:3). She teaches a false “LIBERTY” which says “we have freedom from keeping the Mosaic Law.” But this so-called liberty is what the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) called “THE MYSTERY OF LAWLESSNESS” in 2nd Thessalonians 2:7. We are not free from keeping the commandments of Elohiym. But we are free from “the law of sin and death” (the sinful nature), so that we are able through the power of the Holy Spirit to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah) or the commandments.
The Pagan History of the Christian Church

Beginning with an occult system from ancient Babylon, Nimrod and his mother/wife Semiramis started a religion that would spread throughout the entire world, and it would take on different names for each culture. As time passed, all over the world on December 25th, the sun was worshiped by these various names: Tammuz, Horus, Osiris, Sol, Ba’al, Mithra etc. The chart to the right shows all of the various names under which Nimrod (the pagan sun-god) was worshiped. It was a time for orgies, sacrificing babies, drunkenness, gluttony and merriment. In Rome this holiday was called “Saturnalia” for the god “Saturn” which is another name for Satan or Nimrod. And then at the Spring or Vernal Equinox the goddess of the moon and sky was also worshiped on March 25th (Easter) as infants were sacrificed in her honor. She also had different names in every culture as seen by the chart below.
In the year 96 A.D., the Apostle Yahuwchanon (John) had been exiled to the Island called Patmos, under orders from Nero Caesar. The Roman Empire was in power over the entire world at this time and Rome’s pagan religion was a form of Ba’al worship carried over from ancient Babylon and Egypt. Nero, thought that he was divine, “like god,” and he was jealous of the worship that people were giving to the Messiah Yahuwshuwa. He thought that their  worship rightfully belonged to him, and so he ordered that those who refused to bow to him as “god” would be killed. Nero was one of the historical Anti-Messiah (Antichrist) leaders whose name also adds up to 666 in Roman alpha-numerics. Under his reign, many followers of Yahuwshuwa Messiah were slaughtered.
Nero would conduct rallies in the Coliseums where he would allow these followers of Messiah to be fed to hungry lions for entertainment. But this only convicted the spectators as they were moved by the Holy Spirit when they saw these believers who were willing to lay down their lives for their Messiah, Yahuwshuwa. As a result of these persecutions, many pagans were being converted to faith in Messiah. Satan’s plan to stop the true faith of Messiah wasn’t working so he attempted to bring the true faith of Messiah to an end by forming a close counterfeit that resulted in many false conversions. Satan had thus devised a diabolical plan in which he used this ancient religion from Babylon (which originated with Semiramis and Nimrod), and he gave it a new “image” to make it look like “Christianity.” It all began with Constantine, the son of a Roman Emperor.

After his father died, Constantine felt that he was the rightful heir to his father’s throne, but Maxentius was also in line to take the throne as the next Emperor of Rome. And so in 312 A.D., on October 28th at the Stone Milvian Bridge at the Tiber River, Constantine’s enemy, Maxentius and his army stood between Constantine and the throne. As Constantine and his troops were greatly outnumbered, tradition says that Constantine saw a vision of a “cross” in the sky as he heard the words “in this sign conquer.” This is an amazing discovery in light of what it says in Revelation 6:2, where we see the Anti-Messiah (Antichrist) riding a white horse as he goes forth conquering:

Chazown (Revelation) 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.

The “bowed crucifix” is an allusion to Nimrod’s bow and is meant to point to the rider on the white horse in Revelation 6:2. The same words that Constantine heard “in this sign conquer” are the same words of Revelation 6:2. This rider goes forth conquering the world through pagan religion and much blood shed for the souls of men.

The “bow” is symbolic of Nimrod who was a mighty hunter and so the “bow” is used to symbolize the Anti-Messiah as well. Constantine was also one of the many historical Anti-Messiahs because he mingled the once true faith of the Hebrew Apostles (called Nazarenes) with paganism, and thus he began a new “Greco-Roman” paganized version of the faith of Messiah. As a result of this “vision” he claimed to have been converted to “Christianity.” However, the “cross” which Constantine saw in the sky was actually an Egyptian “Ankh,” which is a detestable idol to YaHuWaH. This Egyptian “Ankh” came from the recycled ancient Babylonian religion of Nimrod & Semiramis. The capital “T” stands for Tammuz and the upside down egg on top symbolizes the goddess of fertility.

Here is an illustration of the Egyptian Ankh which Constantine saw in the sky.

See my other article entitled: “The Alef & Taw: the Red Heifer & the Two Sticks”where I explain the difference between the cross of our Messiah versus the pagan counterfeit cross.

Constantine was a “Gnostic” who did not believe in the deity of our Messiah. He secretly worshiped the pagan sun deity named Mithra, and he thought that the true Messiah of Yisra’el named Yahuw
shuwa was just one of many reincarnations of the same sun-god from Babylon. This is why he had no problem replacing all of the set-apart Feast Days of YaHuWaH outlined in Leviticus 23 with the same pagan days kept in honor of Nimrod, and the sun deities. Instead of destroying the heathen temples and idols as YaHuWaH commands us to do, Constantine simply recycled the pagan statues, naming them after “Christian” saints. The statue of the mythological god Neptune for instance was renamed “Saint Peter” the statue of Venus was renamed “The Virgin Mary” and the statue of Sol (Mithra) was renamed “Jesus Christ.”----“Constantine” by Ramsey Mac Mullen, published by Dial Press, Crosscurrents in World History Series, New York, 1969, Pg. 72

After this infamous vision of the pagan cross, Constantine sprinkled his troops in baptism, requiring no repentance for sin, no conversion, no faith in Yahuwshuwa as the Messiah or his finished work on the Taw (cross). These brutish men instantly became “Christians” according to Constantine. He then made infant baptism (which is completely unbiblical) mandatory for Roman citizenship which precluded people from ever having a genuine conversion to faith in Messiah. They concluded that all they needed was to be sprinkled as an infant with water, and they were automatically “Christians.” Under the guise of Christianity, Constantine and his troops then conquered the city of Rome and took over the Roman government in 312 A.D. In 313 A.D., Constantine then issued “a decree of tolerance” known as “Edict of Milan” giving total religious freedom to Christians.

This seemed like a major victory for Christians, since they would no longer have to be tortured for their faith in Messiah. Yet Satan was using this political move to start a new religion called Roman Catholicism. The word Catholic means “universal” in Greek and this means that Satan has always intended for this religion to take over the world, and become a “One World Church.” From its very foundations, world domination was the motivation behind Roman Catholicism. In June of 2000, the New World Order established a “One World Church” naming the Roman Catholic Church the “Mother” of this new religion and Pope John Paul II was elected as the “leader” of the “United Religions.” See my other article entitled: 
“The Abomination of Desolation Getting Closer!” And also my other article entitled: “Who is that Woman Jezebel & Who is the Beast?

In 325 A.D. Constantine set up “The Council of Nicaea” and he became “Summus Pontifex” (the official title of a Pope).----Religious Encyclopedia, Schaff-Herzog, published by Baker Book House, 1967; The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop, and Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, by Chiniquy.

Constantine’s Creed

At the first Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D., the Roman Emperor Constantine formed the first “Ecumenical Council” of the Catholic Church. At this council it was decided that the celebration of the “Jewish Passover” would be replaced with the resurrection of this pagan goddess of fertility known as Easter. Here is what this creed declared:

“I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms, unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews, and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspirations, purifications, sanctifications, and propitiations, and fasts and new moons, and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants, and observances and synagogues---absolutely everything Jewish, every Law, rite and custom and if afterwards I shall wish to deny and return to Jewish superstition, or shall be found eating with Jews, or feasting with them, or secretly conversing and condemning the Christian religion instead of openly confuting them and condemning their vain faith, then let the trembling of Cain and the leprosy of Gehazi cleave to me, as well as the legal punishments to which I acknowledge myself liable….

…And may I be an anathema in the world to come, and may my soul be set down with Satan and the devils. (Stcfano Assemani, Acta Sanctorium Martyrum Orientalium at Occidentalium, Vol. 1, Rome 1748, page 105).

Furthermore, any follower of the “Jewish Messiah” named Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashiyach who wished to join this “holy community” was compelled to adopt a different set of rules and customs.

Subsequently special creeds were drafted, to which the Christian would have to swear such as:

“I accept all customs, rites, legalism, and feasts of the Romans, sacrifices. Prayers, purifications with water, sanctifications by Pontificus Maxmus (high priests of Rome), propitiations, and feasts, and the New Sabbath “Sol dei” (day of the Sun), all new chants and observances, and all the foods and drinks of the Romans (Pork and all unclean foods).

In other words, I absolutely accept everything Roman, every new law, rite and custom, of Rome, and the New Roman Religion.”

Additionally, in approximately 365 A.D, the Imperial Church of ROME, Aka Catholic Council of Laodicea wrote, in one of their canons:

Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day.

Rather, honoring the Lord’s Day (Ba’al’s Day) which is “Sun-day” for Sol Invictus (the invincible sun). But if any shall be found to be Judaizers, let them be anathema (against) Christ.”

Medieval Sourcebook: Constantine I: On the Keeping of Easter


ON THE KEEPING OF EASTER.

From the Letter of the Emperor to all those not present at the Council.---Found in Eusebius, Vita Const., Lib. iii., 18-20.

“...When the question relative to the sacred festival of Easter arose, it was universally thought that it would be convenient that all should keep the feast on one day; for what could be more beautiful and more desirable, than to see this festival, through which we receive the hope of immortality, celebrated by all with one accord, and in the same manner? It was declared to be particularly unworthy for this, the holiest of all festivals, to follow the custom [the calculation] of the Jews, who had soiled their hands with the most fearful of crimes, and whose minds were blinded. In rejecting their custom, we may transmit to our descendants the legitimate mode of celebrating Easter, which we have observed from the time of the Saviour’s Passion to the present day[according to the day of the week]. We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews, for the Saviour has shown us another way; our worship follows a more legitimate and more convenient course (the order of the days of the week); and consequently, in unanimously adopting this mode, we desire, dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews, for it is truly shameful for us to hear them boast that without their direction we could not keep this feast. How can they be in the right, they who, after the death of the Saviour, have no longer been led by reason but by wild violence, as their delusion may urge them? They do not possess the truth in this Easter question; for, in their blindness and repugnance to all improvements, they frequently celebrate two Passovers in the same year. We could not imitate those who are openly in error. How, then, could we follow these Jews, who are most certainly blinded by error? For to celebrate the Passover twice in one year is totally inadmissible. But even if this were not so, it would still be your duty not to tarnish your soul by communications with such wicked people [the Jews]. Besides, consider well, that in such an important matter, and on a subject of such great solemnity, there ought not to be any division. Our Saviour has left us only one festal day of our redemption, that is to say, of his holy passion, and he desired[to establish] only one Catholic Church. Think, then, how unseemly it is, that on the same day some should be fasting whilst others are seated at a banquet; and that after Easter, some should be rejoicing at feasts, whilst others are still observing a strict fast. For this reason, a Divine Providence wills that this custom should be rectified and regulated in a uniform way; and everyone, I hope, will agree upon this point. As, on the one hand, it is our duty not to have anything in common with the murderers of our Lord; and as, on the other, the custom now followed by the Churches of the West, of the South, and of the North, and by some of those of the East, is the most acceptable, it has appeared good to all; and I have been guarantee for your consent, that you would accept it with joy, as it is followed at Rome, in Africa, in all Italy, Egypt, Spain, Gaul, Britain, Libya, in all Achaia, and in the dioceses of Asia, of Pontus, and Cilicia. You should consider not only that the number of churches in these provinces make a majority, but also that it is right to demand what our reason approves, and that we should have nothing in common with the Jews. To sum up in few words: By the unanimous judgment of all, it has been decided that the most holy festival of Easter should be everywhere celebrated on one and the same day...
In approximately 365 AD, the Council of Laodicea wrote, in one of their canons:
Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day. Rather, honoring the Lord’s Day. But if any shall be found to be Judaizers, let them be anathema (against) from Christ.”
In 164 B.C. Antiochus Epiphanies, a Greek-Syrian dictator set up an image of Zeus on December 25th in the 2nd Jewish Temple and he forced the followers of YaHuWaH to eat unclean animals, and to break the commandments of YaHuWaH. He also forced the Yahuwdiy (Jews) to bow to this image of Zeus and to worship on pagan holidays instead of on the feasts that were set apart by YaHuWaH in Leviticus 23. This was the very same “Abomination of Desolation” spoken of in the 11th chapter of Daniel. This prophecy was repeated again later on in Rome when Constantine set up images of pagan deities in the Christian Churches and he committed the very same abominations as Antiochus did. This prophecy will be repeated once again in the last days with the final “man of sin.” Antiochus Epiphanies was also one of the many historical Anti-Messiahs (Antichrists) whose name Epiphanies” adds up to 666 in the Greek alpha-numberic system.
These were the new laws that Antiochus set up:
You shall profane the Sabbath.
You shall change the set times (festivals) and laws.
You shall set up idols.
You shall eat unclean animals.
You shall not circumcise.
You shall forget Towrah.
The persecutions began in 167 B.C. in the days of Antiochus, but 3.5 years later, the temple was taken back and rededicated in 164 B.C. This became known as “The Feast of Dedication(Chanukkah) which our Messiah observed in John 10:22. 

These laws created by an Antichrist leader named Antiochus are the very same things that Constantine would later repeat and this is what the entire Christian world are living by today!
Most of the Christian world is following men like Antiochus Ephiphanies and Constantine of Rome in their practices and they don’t even realize it! Both of these men were Antichrists of history who killed the true servants of Yah and forced them to disobey the commandments!

But what did our Messiah tell us about worshiping YaHuWaH Elohiym the same way as do the Jews or the Yahuwdiy?

Yahuwchanon (John) 4:22You worship you know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Yahuwdiy (Jews).

Now did he mean that we should all join a local Jewish Synagogue and follow the Jews who do not accept Yahuwshuwa as their Messiah? Of course not! He made a distinction between the Yahuwdiy (Jews) who follow the Mosaic Law (Towrah) just as he did and those Jews who are of the “Synagogue of Satan” for they don’t follow the Mosiac Law at all. They instead follow the “traditions of men” (the Talmudic Law) or the Oral Traditions which often-times are against the Mosaic Law.
Listen to what our Messiah had to say about those who would call themselves Jews, but they are disobedient to the commandments:

Chazown (Revelation) 2:9 I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Yahuwdiy (Jews), and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Chazown (Revelation) 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Yahuwdiy (Jews), and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.

Who is he talking about in these verses above? He is referring to those who have departed from keeping the Towrah (Mosiac Law) and they instead have replaced the commandments of YaHuWaH with their own traditions.
In the days when our Messiah was sacrificed for us, the High Priest named Caiaphas was not a legitimate High Priest from the Levites, but he was an Edomite pretending to be a Jew in order to sway the true Yahuwdiy (Jews) from their creator and his commandments. Caiaphas was actually appointed by Rome, and King Herod was not a legitimate King of Judah, but he was a Phoenician--the same city where Queen Jezebel came from. These were not legitimate Jews who were ruling Jerusalem in the days when our Messiah walked the earth. Listen to what he said to these false Jews in his day:

Marqos (Mark) 7:9And he said unto them, Full well you reject the commandment of Elohiym, that you may keep your own tradition.

A true Yahuwdiy (Jew) will teach obedience to the commandments or the Towrah of Mosheh. But a false Jew does exactly what the Roman Catholic Church does by replacing the commandments of YaHuWaH with the TRADITIONS OF MEN!
Listen to the prophecy that Ya’aqob (Jacob) spoke over his son named Yahuwdah (Judah):

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 49:
8 Yahuwdah (Judah), you are he whom your brethren shall praise: your hand shall be in the neck of your enemies; your father’s children shall bow down before you.

9 Yahuwdah (Judah) is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, you are gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?

10 The sceptre shall not depart from Yahuwdah (Judah), nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

As you can see from the above prophecy, the House of Judah (the true Jews) are charged with gathering the people in the last days to the Messiah. The Hebrew word “Shiloh” means “he whose it is” or “that which belongs to him.” This word is an allusion to the Messianic Kingdom when our Messiah returns. This means that the true Jews will be those who belong to the Messiah, and they will gather the lost sheep of the House of Yisrael to the Messiah.

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) explained the importance of the role of the Yahuwdiy (Jews):

Romiym (Romans) 3:

1 What advantage then has the Yahuwdiy (Jew)? or what profit is there of circumcision?

2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of Elohiym (God).

And then finally we have an end-time prophecy where we read that Ten Gentiles from the nations will grab the “kanaph” (four corners of the garment) of him who is a Yahuwdiy (Jew) and they will follow him:

Zekaryahuw (Zechariah) 8:23 Thus says YHWH of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt (kanaph) of him that is a Yahuwdiy (Jew), saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that Elohiym is with you.
What is a “kanaph?”The Hebrew word for “skirt” in Zechariah 8:23 above is this word #3671 which is “kanaph” and it means “a wing or corner of the garment.” The children of Yisrael are commanded to wear fringes or “Tzitzit” on the four corners of their garments to remind them to obey the Towrah (see Numbers 15:38 & Deuteronomy 22:12).

But who is a real Yahuwdiy (Jew) according to scripture?

Romiym (Romans) 2:

25 For circumcision verily profits, if you keep the Towrah (law): but if you be a breaker of the Towrah (law), your circumcision is made uncircumcision.

26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keeps the righteousness of the Towrah (law), shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfills the Towrah (law), judge you, who by the letter and circumcision does transgress the Towrah (law)?

28 For he is not a Yahuwdiy (Jew), which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

29 But he is a Yahuwdiy (Jew), which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of Elohiym.

The Apostle Sha’uwl made a distinction here between a real Jew and a false Jew. In the end it is not going to be about DNA or “endless genealogies.” 

Those who will be counted as Yahuwdiy or Jews by our Creator are those who “keep the commandments and have the testimony of Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach” (Revelation 12:17).

Those who sojourn with the Lion of Yahuwdah (Judah), have joined his tribe and they are become Yahuwdiy (Jews) according to Ezekiel 47:22. Any stranger who wanted to “sojourn with an Yisra’elite tribe,” would then be grafted into that tribe and he would be counted as “one born among” that tribe. And so becoming a Jew is not about joining a man-made religion with extra man-made rules and regulations. Becoming a Jew is all about following the Jewish Messiah and obeying his Towrah!

Therefore, Constantine’s Creed taught to the Christian Churches is proven to be a fraud! 

The true faith of our Messiah is to receive forgiveness of our sins through his blood (justification) and to receive the indwelling of the Ruwach haQodesh (Holy Spirit) who then teaches us to obey the very same commandments that he did (sanctification)!

Anyone who teaches you something different is preaching a false Besowrah (Gospel) and a false Messiah! Easter Sunday is NOT the resurrection of the true Messiah of Yisra’el. Easter is the name of the pagan goddess of fertility from Babylon and we are commanded to “Come out of Mystery Babylon the Great the Mother of Harlots” (Revelation 18:4).


*Download ebook below. A suggested minimum donation for this ebook is $7.00. Make payment at the following link: http://www.paypal.com
Use the following email address to make the payment: 


Then download the ebook:

What Constitutes a Legitimate Biblical Marriage Covenant?

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, December 2011


I see a trend lately that is going on within the Hebraic Root’s Com-munity that is very alarming. Because of one passage of scripture where Rebekah and Isaac went into the tent, in Genesis 24:67, some people assume that there was no wedding ceremony that took place in front of witnesses, and this is their justification for living in forni-cation. This false conclusion is leading people to believe that they can just “shack up” suddenly they are instantly married. And thus, these same people erroneously call this a “biblical marriage.” But beloved, if a man and a woman have sexual union without a wed-ding ceremony, this is nothing more than fornication unless the biblical pattern is followed. Let us read this passage that is being used to justify fornication or pre-marital sex:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 24:67 And Yitzchaq (Isaac) brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Ribqah (Rebekah), and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Yitzchaq (Isaac) Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.

Just because the scriptures do not give the details of the wedding ceremony between Isaac and Rebekah, people often-times assume that all they did was have sexual union and they were instantly married. But in order for a covenant to be valid in the eyes of YaHuWaH, there has to be the biblical pattern of “three witnesses” which are shown to us in scripture. We have already been given the pattern from the Towrah (Mosaic Law) showing us what constitutes a valid marriage covenant. These three witnesses point to the marriage covenant between Messiah and his bride, and they are what makes a marriage covenant legitimate in the eyes of our Heavenly Father, YaHuWaH. 

In this study, I aim to show that there is much more to a marriage covenant than simply having sexual union. To assume that all one has to do in order to enter into a “biblical marriage” is to “consummate” (have sexual union) is to negate the deep spiritual meaning behind the original wedding between YaHuWaH and his bride Yisrael on Mount Sinai. 

Webster’s Dictionary defines the word “FORNICATION:”

Fornication: noun: voluntary sexual intercourse between two unmarried persons or two persons not married to each other.

As you can see, pre-marital sex is “fornication,” which is not the same thing as adultery. Adultery means to have sexual union with another while you are already committed in marriage. In other words, it is cheating on your spouse. But fornication means to have sex outside of the bonds of marriage. So how do we know what makes a legitimate marriage covenant in the eyes of our Creator? We are going to see patterns in scripture for a legitimate covenant being made with three witnesses: Spirit, Water & Blood.

This illustration below shows Fire (the Spirit) the Menorah (the lamp of the Word) and the Lion (the blood sacrifice of Messiah).

In 1st Yahuwchanon (John) 5:7-8 it says: 

“For there are three that bear record in heaven: The Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are ONE. And there are three that bear witness in the earth: the Spirit, the Water and the Blood, and these three agree in one.”

When YaHuWaH “spoke” the marriage vows to Yisra’el “by his voice, breath or Spirit” at Mount Sinai that was the witness of the “Spirit” (Exodus 19:18-20). YaHuWaH himself descended onto Mount Sinai in the form of fire, and this happened on the Feast of Shabuwoth (Pentecost). This was the same feast wherein Messiah himself poured out his Ruwach (Spirit) on the set-apart ones in the second chapter of Acts in the form of “tongues of fire.” Mosheh commanded the people to wash their clothes with water and to sanctify themselves for the wedding ceremony on Mount Sinai (Exodus 19:10-14). 

Mosheh then went up to Mount Sinai to commune for forty days with YaHuWaH to receive the “written marriage covenant” on stone tablets. The Hebrew word for “written” is “kathab,” and that is why in a traditional Hebrew wedding, the bride and the groom sign a “ketuwbah,” which is a written marriage agreement.

The written marriage agreement represents the witness of the “water” (the word) because the word of YaHuWaH is likened unto “Living Water” and our Messiah is the “WORD” who became flesh (John 1:1). He is the bridegroom who sanctifies his bride “by the washing of water by the word” (Ephesians 5:26). After the covenant was presented to the nation of Yisrael, Mosheh also sprinkled them with the blood of sacrificed animals to signify that the covenant was being sealed in heaven. 

When a bridegroom and a bride consummate their marriage, this is the same thing as the witness of the “blood,” because ideally, both the bride and the bridegroom should be virgins on their wedding night if this is their first marriage. 

When the bride and the bridegroom “consummate” after they have taken vows in front of witnesses, the witness of the “blood” seen in 1st Yahuwchanon (John) 5:8 is what this typifies. The witness of the “blood” correlates the Father, because in Zechariah 12:10 YaHuWaH says: “they will look upon ME whom they have pierced and they will mourn for HIM as one mourns for his only son.” This tells us that it was the Fathers blood that was in Messiahs veins! This is the same thing as when the sacrificial system was set up in the Tabernacle and when our Messiah offered up his blood for us (the Father’s blood was in his veins). The marriage is only valid when these three witnesses are present: 

#1.) The Holy Spirit (taking vows orally) before witnesses. 
#2.) The signing of a “written marriage agreement” called a ketuwbah in Hebrew (symbolic of the written Towrah). 
#3.) And finally there must be a “consummation.” In other words, the shedding of blood is symbolized by the sacrifice of the Lamb. 

It is not a valid marriage covenant unless these three things are present:

1.) Vows (the Spirit or Fire)
2.) Written Towrah or Ketuwbah (the Water of the Word)
3.) Sacrifice or Consummation (the Blood).

If a man married a woman and he thought she was a virgin, but he found out on the wedding night that she was not a virgin, he could legally divorce her according to Towrah (see Deuteronomy 24). But if he still loved her any way, he could kill a lamb and then smear the blood of the lamb on the bed sheet and bring that out to the wedding guests to display it before the crowd!

That is exactly what our Messiah Yahuwshuwa did for his backsliding whoring bride Yisra’el! He covered her sin with his blood making her a pure virgin again! Now if a woman is no longer a virgin because she is a widow or divorced unlawfully by her husband, then she can apply the blood of Messiah to their union as “the blood of the lamb.” This will be the third witness needed to make the marriage legitimate!

In a legitimate Hebrew Wedding, the man who escorts the bride to the bridegroom and gives her away is “Mosheh” (Moses) who represents the Towrah (Mosaic Law):

Galatiym (Galatians) 3:24 Wherefore the Towrah (law) was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Mashiyach (Messiah), that we might be justified by faith.

But once the bride has been handed over to the bridegroom, then the the bridegroom takes over from there, and it is he who teaches the bride to be obedient to the marriage covenant. He does this by demonstrating his sacrificial love for her. He not only gives her a written marriage agreement with the instructions on it, but he demonstrates to her what the marriage covenant looks with his actions:

Ephsiym (Ephesians) 5:

25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Mashiyach (Messiah) also loved the qahal (assembly), and gave himself for it;

26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,

27 That he might present it to himself a glorious qahal (assembly), not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be qodesh (holy) and without blemish.

28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loves his wife loves himself.

Once the bride sees that her husband is self-sacrificing, she has no problem submitting to him:

Ephsiym (Ephesians) 5:

22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto YHWH.

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Mashiyach (Messiah) is the head of the qahal (assembly): and he is the saviour of the body.

24 Therefore as the qahal (assembly) is subject unto Mashiyach (Messiah), so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Shemoth (Exodus) 32:

32 Yet now, if you will forgive their sin--; and if not, blot me, I pray you, out of your book which you have written.

33And YHWH said unto Mosheh (Moses), Whosoever has sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book.

What is also interesting is thatthe name Mosheh means “to draw out from the water,” and so it is fitting that he represents “the washing of water by the word” (Ephesians 5:26)as the Towrah (the word) is what washes the bride and makes her ready to meet the bridegroom. This is also the reason why Mosheh was used by YaHuWaH to give to Yisrael “water out of a rock” (Numbers 20:10) at Meribah. The WORD came to them in the form of LIVING WATER symbolic of our Messiah who is that Rock! (1st Corinthians 10:4). 

And then there is the “best man” who is called “the friend of the bridegroom.” He is typified in the prophet  Eliyahuw (Elijah) who is symbolic of the “fire” of the Holy Spirit. Eliyahuw was “taken up” into a chariot of fire which pre-figures the bride being “caught up” to meet the bridegroom in the air in 1st Thessalonians 4:17. The “friend of the bride-groom” in a Hebrew Wedding stands outside the door while the bride and the bridegroom go into the bridal chamber called a “chuppah” in Hebrew(see Psalms 19:5 & Joel 2:16). 

While the bride and groom are in the chuppah, the friend of the bridegroom is supposed to stand guard to make sure that nobody disturbs them. During the consum-mation of the marriage, the friend of the bridegroom is supposed to “listen for the voice of the bridegroom” to hear him “consummate” the marriage! When the “friend of the bridegroom” hears the voice of the bridegroom consummate with his bride, he then notifies the wedding guests outside who are waiting to celebrate and they all shout for joy! This is when the bridegrooms friend has his own joy fulfilled:

Yahuwchanon (John) 3:29 He that has the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which stands and hears him, rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.

Yahuwchanon (John) the Immerser (Baptizer) came in the “Spirit of Eliyahuw” (Elijah) and he is the one being called “friend of the bridegroom” because he came as a representative of the prophet Eliyahuw or Elijah. 
Luqas (Luke) 1:17 And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Eliyahuw (Elijah), to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for YHWH.

Back in 2007 when I was in a time of intense prayer and fasting, the Spirit of YaHuWaH came to me and said “Maria, the double portion anointing is that of Mosheh & Eliyahuw,” and as he said this I had a vision of Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach (Messiah) at the Mount of Transfiguration with Mosheh &  Eliyahuw (Moses & Elijah). I suddenly realized that our Messiah Yahuwshuwa operated in both types of “anointing” in his life which are Law (Moses) and Prophets (Elijah). In other words, the two witnesses in Revelation 11:4 are typified in these two witnesses that are symbolized in an Ancient Hebrew Wedding. Most Christians believe that the indwelling of the Holy Spirit has now replaced the need for the Mosaic Law in our lives. But after this vision, I suddenly realized that both they go “hand-in-hand.”

We are told many times in scripture that a covenant or a matter is established by the “witness of two or three.” (Deuteronomy 17:6, 19:15, Joshua 7:3,  2nd Kings 9:32, Isaiah 17:6, Amos 4:8, Matthew 18:16, 18:20, John 2:6, 1st Corin-thians 14:27, 14:29, 2nd Corinthians 13:1, 1st Timothy 5:19, 1st John 5:7-8, Hebrews 10:28). 

And so in order for a marriage covenant to be truly “biblical” we must have “two or three witnesses:”

1.) Mosheh (the written Towrah) = the ketuwbah or the written marriage contract signed by both the bride and the groom.

2.) Eliyahuw (the spirit of the prophets or the fulfillment) = the oral vows exchanged between bride & groom and this happened at Mount Sinai and also on the day of Shabuwoth (Pentecost) when YaHuWaH orally gave his Towrah to his bride (Exodus 19 & Acts 2).

3.) Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach (the blood) = the atonement of the Messiah is the consummation.

And so we see a pattern in scripture wherever Covenant is established we ALWAYS HAVE THREE WITNESSES:

1.) The Father (the blood)
2.) The Word (the water)
3.) The Holy Spirit (the spirit)

Moses represents the “Water of the Word” (the Towrah) because his name in Hebrew “Mosheh” means “to be drawn from the water.”

Eliyahuw means “YaHuWaH is my El” and this is the fulfillment for when we are baptized in water, we declare that YaHuWaH is our Mighty One!

Yahuwshuwa the Mashiyach represents the Father (for the Father & the Son are one) and his blood makes atonement which “consummates” the marriage!

Hence we need all three elements to form a legitimate marriage covenant:

Father = blood
Word = water
Holy Spirit = spirit

In an earthly marriage we also need these three witnesses:

Written Ketuwbah (written marriage contract) = water of the word
Oral Vows = spirit
Consummation = blood

And these three elements (ketuwbah, vows and consum-mation) must be witnessed not only by three heavenly witnesses (Father, Son & Holy Spirit) but also by three earthly witnesses (Mosheh, Eliyahuw, Yahuwshuwa).

This means that the bride and groom first “sign the ketuwbah” just like Miryam (Mary) and Yahuwceph (Joseph) which means that they are legally “engaged” (espoused) once they do this. Then the next step is to take vows in front of two or three witnesses. And then once they do that, they may “consummate” (have intercourse).

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 1:

18 Now the birth of Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach was on this wise: When as his mother Miryam (Mary) was espoused to Yahuwceph (Joseph), before they came together, she was found with child of the Ruwach ha’Qodesh (Holy Spirit).

19 Then Yahuwceph (Joseph) her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privately (privily).

Now what you will notice in the above verse is that Miryam and Yahuwceph were engaged to be married (espoused) and they had not “come together” (consummated) yet because they had not had the wedding ceremony where they exchanged vows in front of two or three witnesses!

Then, Yahuwceph was going to put her away privately because he thought that she had committed adultery on him. Why would he think this if they had already been sleeping together? If he thought that the baby was not his, that proves that they had not consummated (had sexual union) yet! They were engaged (espoused) but not legally married yet!

Another thing which proves that sexual union alone does not constitute a legitimate marriage, is in the account where our Messiah was speaking to the Samaritan woman at the well. Listen to what he says to her in this account:

Yahuwchanon (John) 4:

16 Yahuwshuwa said unto her, Go, call your husband, and come hither.

17 The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Yahuwshuwa said unto her, You have well said, I have no husband:

18 For you have had five husbands; and he whom you now have is not your husband: in that you said truly.

As you can see, if this woman had five husbands previously, and now she was living with this man in sin, why didnt her sexual union with him qualify that as a marriage? Why did our Messiah recognize the other five marriages that she had been in, but he did not recognize the relationship that she was currently in as a legitimate marriage? It is because sexual union alone does not constitute a legitimate marriage! 

The other two elements must be present first before the consummation, which are the oral vows in front of witnesses and also the written agreement signed between the bride and the groom in front of witnesses. The two witnesses are typified in Mosheh  (Moses) and Eliyahuw (Elijah) The pattern has already been set forth for us in the scriptures.

What is the Law of Niddah?

$
0
0
Maria Merola אריאל
 © Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, October 22, 2009

Often times I encounter people who are looking for loopholes to not obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah). These very same people think that have found their “legal loophole” when they try to divert the attention away from the obvious commandments in scripture to a vague misunderstanding about the laws surrounding a woman’s uncleanness (menstrual cycle).  

These very same people, in their attempt to debunk the validity of the Towrah for the New Covenant believer are constantly trying to bring up literal interpretations of scripture in order to somehow “prove” that nobody is able to obey the instructions of our Heavenly Father. They assume that he placed all of those laws in the Towrah (the five books of Moses) as some kind of “test” to show us that none of us can obey it, and so therefore we should throw out the entire first five books of Mosheh (Moses) and simply relegate the entire thing to “antiquity.”

To those who would try to teach that men are not allowed to even “touch” a woman by giving her a hug or holding her hand during her menstrual cycle, let’s see what the Towrah actually says:

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:19 And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever touches her shall be unclean until the evening.

Now, what we are about to learn from the above verse, is that the phrase whoever touches her” in the Hebrew translation is implying that anyone who actually touches the blood or touches her in a sexual way, shall be unclean until evening. This commandment is not prohibiting anyone from touching her in the literal sense. If this were the case, she could not change her baby’s diapers while on her menstrual period, she could not breast-feed her baby, iron her husband’s clothes, cook food, wash dishes etc. Basically, she would have to sit in a box for a week and do absolutely nothing for seven days! This would be the equivalent to what they call “solitary confinement” within the prison system. Why would YaHuWaH, our Creator create a woman in this way, only to punish her for seven days out of every month, whereby she would not be allowed to come near anyone or touch anyone? This makes no sense at all, unless we study these verses out in context, so stay with me on this. Let us continue:

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:21 And whosoever touches her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

In the above verses, the word for “touch” does not mean that a woman cannot receive a hug or a kiss when she is on her menstrual cycle. It means that she may not be “touched” in a sexual way, or have sexual intercourse with her husband during those seven days of her uncleanness  It also means that one may not touch the blood itself if it has spilled onto the bed or the surface where she sat. But how can we be sure of this? Well, let us take a look at the Hebrew word here for “touch:”

# 5060 naga` naw-gah’ a primitive root; properly, to touch, i.e. lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphemism, to lie with a woman); by implication, to reach (figuratively, to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.):–beat, (be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join, near plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch.

You will notice from the definition of this word for touch,that this is an ambiguous word, and it has multiple meanings. One of the definitions says “near plague,” and so means that one is not supposed to touch the plague itself, or the blood. It does not mean that we cannot touch the woman.

You will also notice that this means “a euphemism” for“to lie with a woman.

How does the dictionary define a“euphemism?” It means the following: the substitution of a mild, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh or blunt; the expression so substituted:“To pass away” is a euphemism for “to die.” An inoffensive phrase substituted for one considered offensive or hurtful, especially one concerned with religion, sex, death or excreta. Examples of euphemisms are “sleep with” for “have sexual intercourse with.” Other examples are:“departed” instead of“dead” or “relieve oneself” instead of“urinate.”

And so it is with the “laws of uncleanness” (niddah) that the prohibition for “touching” her is being used as a euphemism which means not to have sexual intercourse with her or actually touch the blood.

What does this word “niddah” mean?

Strong’s #H5079 – niddahנִדָּה

Impurity, filthiness, menstruous, set apart; impurity; of ceremonial impurity; of menstruation; impure thing; of idolatry, immorality.

This word for “uncleanness” is used in Ezekiel 36:17 referring to the uncleanness of the House of Yisra’el:

Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 36:

16 Moreover the word of YHWH came unto me, saying,

17 Son of man, when the house of Yisra’el dwelt in their own land, they defiled it by their own way and by their doings: their way was before me as the uncleanness of a removed woman.

18 Wherefore I poured my fury upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for their idols wherewith they had polluted it:

19 And I scattered them among the heathen, and they were dispersed through the countries: according to their way and according to their doings I judged them.

You see, the word “niddah” is specifically used to describe the uncleanness that comes from innocent blood being shed and idolatry. But the word used for “unclean” inLeviticus 15 for the woman’s menstrual cycle is the following word:

Strong’s #H2930 tame’טָמֵא

To be unclean, become unclean, become impure; to be or become unclean sexually, religiously, ceremonially, to defile oneself, be defiled; sexually, by idolatry, ceremonially, to be regarded as unclean, to defile sexually, religiously, ceremonially, to pronounce unclean, declare unclean (ceremonially).

Let’s take a look at another scripture that uses this word for “touch” in the same context:

Mishle (Proverbs) 6:29 So he that goes in to his neighbour’s wife; whosoever touches (naga) her shall not be innocent.

Once again, this Hebrew word for “touch” is referring to sexual intercourse. This is not a prohibition against accidentally bumping into a woman in a grocery store!

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) uses the word “touch” in the same way here in his letter to the Corinthians.

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 7:

1 Now concerning the things whereof you wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.

2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

Given the context of what Sha’uwl (Paul) is addressing in 1st Corinthians 7, we know that he is not talking about a father giving his teenage daughter a hug. He is talking about “touching” a woman in a sexual way or having intercourse before marriage.

Hence, when a woman is on her menstrual cycle she is able to hug her husband and children, but her husband may not have intercourse with her during this time.

Furthermore, you will notice that if her husband did accidentally “touch” her during her uncleanness (meaning that he touched the blood), he would be considered “unclean” ceremonially for Temple service. This means that he could not come before YaHuWaH in prayer as he had touched “death” because her egg (which was supposed to be fertilized into a human life) had died. Therefore, YaHuWaH cannot have death in his presence as he is the author of life. If a man accidentally “touches” his wife in a sexual way during her menstrual cycle, he has to wait seven days before he can approach YaHuWaH in prayer in the Temple. It is not a sin punishable by death.

Now there is a clear distinction between “touching” the surface whereupon the woman on her menstrual period sat versus touching the actual blood itself.

YaHuWaH was prohibiting anyone from actually touching the issue of blood. Otherwise, you may never sit on a bus or a train or an airplane for you would never know if a woman who had been on her period had sat there before you did!

Think about this logically. YaHuWaH obviously meant not to touch the blood. Let’s read it again with the proper understanding:

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:21 And whosoever touches her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

*Note: this means that whoever touches her bed, if the blood had spilled onto the bed, and they accidentally touched the blood itself, then they are unclean. If she is protected, and there is no issue of blood contaminating anyone, then the bed is not unclean. The bed only becomes unclean if the blood had spilled onto the bed.

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:22 And whosoever touches anything that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

*Note: if you take this literally, then you would never be allowed to buy a new car, because a woman on her period may have test driven the car. If you sat in that driver seat later on, you would have to go home and wash your clothes every day, because you would never know if a woman on her period had sat in that passenger seat thereby making that seat forever and perpetually unclean. Now think about how ridiculous that sounds!

This would also mean that you could not buy a sofa at the furniture store without having to wash your clothes every time you sat on that sofa! Do you see how tedious this would be? It is obvious that YaHuWaH was forbidding us from actually touching the blood itself, not the woman. Today there are protective things for women to wear during her menstrual cycle. But back then in biblical times, they did not have such protection, and blood would get on everything. They had to make rags to wear and they were not very absorbent. Now let us examine the following verse to see what “it” means:

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:23 And if it be on her bed, or on anything whereon she sits, when he touches it, he shall be unclean until the evening.

You will notice in the verse above, that it says “if it be on her bed.” If what be on her bed?

Blood!

If a woman wears tampons or sanitary pads and there is no blood on the bed or the sofa, or the bus, train, car seat, then you are not unclean if you happen to sit in the same seat whereupon she also sat. It is only if “it” (meaning the blood) is on her bed (chair, car seat etc.) and you touch that object where the blood is exposed, then you are unclean until evening. But if a man lies with his wife while she is on her period, then he is unclean for seven days, and he may not approach the “Holy Place” in the sanctuary for seven days. He would bathe literally (mikvah) or baptize himself in water, and also he shall “wash his garments” where upon the blood had been exposed.

If a man does lie with his wife during her uncleanness, then he should repent and go and sin no more. He may experience seven days where he will not be able to sense the presence of the Holy Spirit when he prays. He may then be in a sense under a “cloud” until those seven days are finished, and then he could experience “breakthrough” in the spirit.

What About a Man’s Uncleanness?

The same principle applies when a man spills his semen. If a man spills his seed, he is unclean ceremonially until evening. You will also notice in verse 17, that whereupon the semen is touching the skin or garment, that garment is unclean just as it is with the blood of the woman:

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 15:

16 And if any man’s seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the evening.

17 And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the evening.

18 The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the evening.

This does not mean that if the man sits on a chair after he has spilled his semen, that the chair becomes unclean. It means that the object upon which the semen is spilled becomes unclean until it is washed off. The same thing holds true with the object upon which the woman’s blood is spilled. The object upon which the semen or blood comes into contact shall be unclean until it is washed off and there is a waiting period until evening.

The same Hebrew word is used for a man’s uncleanness in Hebrew which is Strong’s #H2930 tame’טָמֵא

To be unclean, become unclean, become impure; to be or become unclean sexually, religiously, ceremonially, to defile oneself, be defiled; sexually, by idolatry, ceremonially, to be regarded as unclean, to defile sexually, religiously, ceremonially, to pronounce unclean, declare unclean (ceremonially).

If the man is also unclean if he spills his semen, why is it that men treat the woman’s uncleanness as if it is somehow worse?

Double Standards of the Rabbis?

If the rabbinic standards were true for not being allowed to touch a woman during her menstrual cycle, then men would also not be allowed to touch anyone for the rest of the day if he had spilled his seed that morning. This means he could not conduct regular business all day long at work and shake hands with other men, or touch the same hammer or pen that someone had touched.

In the final analysis, we can see that the laws for “niddah” are greatly misunderstood and often-times abused within Judaism. And they seem to be completely ignored within Christianity and used out of context as an excuse to negate the Towrah (Mosaic Law) entirely in the life of the Renewed Covenant believer. The laws of uncleanness as we can see, are not exclusive to women. The deceptive nature of HaWaH (Eve) in the Garden of Eden was nailed to the tree when our Messiah was sacrificed for us. The woman is no longer under the curse brought on by HaWaH (Eve), and thus the female gender is redeemed equally from all sin and uncleanness. 

Galatians 3:28“…..there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Mashiyach Yahuwshuwa.

Two Conditions of the Human Heart Seen in Ephrayim & Judah

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
 © Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, August, 2009
There seems to be a growing trend of misunderstanding surrounding what many today call “The Two House Theology.” This misunderstanding stems from the fact that there are some people who are erroneously teaching that all “born-again” Christians are literally the DNA descendants of the House of Ephrayim. But, beloved that is not what the Two House doctrine is about at all. In reality, we learn from scripture that it does not matter whether someone is physically born with Yisra’elite DNA in them or not. YaHuWaH himself explained in Ezekiel 47:22 that if any stranger wants to “sojourn” or dwell among any of the Tribes of Yisra’el, that stranger is then counted as “one born among them” and that stranger becomes part ofthat particular tribe. And so if we are “dwelling” or abiding in the Messiah who is from the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) we are counted as “one born into the House of Judah.”
In Ezekiel 37:16 we read an end-time prophecy about two groups of people coming together and becoming “one” in the last days at the resurrection. The first group is called “the stick of Judah” which is actually “the tree of Judah” because the word “stick” in Hebrew is ets which means “tree.” And then we read about “the tree of Joseph” that is in the hand of Ephrayim. But both of these groups have Gentile “companions”who join them and they are also grafted into the House so that they are every bit as much a part of the House of Yisra’el as the natural DNA children. Also in Galatians 3:28 the Apostle Sha’uwl states that “if we belong to Messiah, we are Abraham’s Seed and heirs to the promise.”
You see it is not necessary to be physically born into the literal DNA children of Yisra’el, for we literally become Abraham’s seed when we are “born-again” by the blood of Messiah who then makes us related to Abraham! The word “seed” in Greek is “sperma” in Galatians 3:28 which means that we literally become “Abraham’s descendants” through YaHuW’shuwa Mashiyach!
The word of YaHuWaH came to Ezekiel and said:
Yechezqel (Ezekiel) 37:

16 Moreover, you son of man, take you one stick, and write upon it, For YaHuW’dah (Judah), and for the children of Yisra’el his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For YaHuW’ceph (Joseph), the stick of Ephrayim and for all the house of Yisra’el his companions:

17 And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in your hand.

In this prophecy, we see two groups of people who were once united as one nation—one family under King Dawiyd (David), but then they were torn into two separate nations when idolatry and greed (the law of sin and death) made them “two” and no longer “one” (see 1st Kings 12). In the story of the prodigal son in Luke 15, our MaShiYacH (Messiah) told this story as a metaphor of the “Two Houses of Yisra’el” but not only was this an illustration of the “Two Houses of Yisra’el,” this was also a personal message to each of us as individuals. This parable has a corporate application for two nations (Ephrayim & Judah) and it also has a personal application whereby we can learn a principle of what it takes to become “the first born” in the eyes of YaHuWaH. Our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa was using this parable to illustrate a “kingdom principle” that will be the very attitude that we must all adopt if we are ever going to see “the restoration of Yisra’el.” What is this principle? It is a basic human principle that applies to both Houses of Yisra’el. Simply put, YaHuWaH“gives grace to the humble” but he“resists the proud” (James 4:6, 1st Peter 5:5).

In this parable of the prodigal son, when he humbled himself, the Father gave him “grace” (favor and free gifts). But the older son who displayed pride and dependence upon his own righteousness, was not given anything “extra” for his works of obedience. His reward was not doubled as it was with the younger son who returned and repented. Let us now revisit the story of “The Prodigal Son” as told by the MaShiYacH himself, YaHuWShuWA.

Luke 15:

11 And he said, A certain man had two sons:

12 And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falls to me. And he divided unto them his living.

13 And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.

*Explanation:So far we can see many similarities between this story and the story of YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) in Bereshiyth (Genesis) 30. Joseph received a portion of his Father Ya’aqob (Jacob)’s inheritance when his father gave him a “coat of many colors.” The coat of many colors symbolizes the various colors of the flags of the nations. It also symbolizes “covenant” because in Genesis 9:13, YaHuWaH set the rainbow in the sky as a sign to Noah and the inhabitants of the earth, of his “seven covenants” which are all “everlasting covenants.” These covenants are as follows:

1.) Adamic
2.) Noahite
3.) Abrahamic
4.) Mosaic
5.) Davidic
6.) Messiah’s Renewed Covenant
7.) The Everlasting Covenant.

Because there are “seven colors” in a rainbow, YaHuWaH was showing us that all seven of his covenants are really one and the same covenant! Also, at one time all nations of the earth were connected as one continent. But in Genesis 10:32 YaHuWaH divided the nations of the earth:

Bereshiyth (Genesis) 10:

25 And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.

32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.

After YaHuWaH divided the nations of the earth, how many continents did he divide the earth into? SEVEN CONTINENTS FOR SEVEN COVENANTS!

That is what the rainbow symbolizes and that is what YaHuW’ceph’s coat of many colors represents! Joseph’s coat symbolizes all of the nations of the earth coming into covenant with our Creator in the last days! Interestingly, YaHuW’ceph (Joseph)’s very name means “YaHuWaH will increase” but his son’s name Ephrayim means “double fruit.” You see YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) will become doubly fruitful through his son Ephrayim who was prophesied over by his grandfather Yisra’el (Jacob) that he would become “a multitude of nations.”

Not only did Joseph have favor with his earthly father Jacob (evidenced by the coat of many colors), but Joseph also had favor with his Heavenly Father. Because of the great favor he had, however, Joseph boasted about his prophetic dreams and it made his brothers angry. That is when they took revenge on him and they sent him to a far-away country and they sold him into Egyptian slavery. Later on when Joseph was falsely accused by Potiphar’s wife and thrown into jail, it is very similar to this story of the prodigal son who was in the pig-pen feeding the pigs. In both stories they were at their lowest point. But then Pharaoh had a dream in which Joseph received the interpretation and that is when he was promoted to the “second in command” to Pharaoh himself. Joseph saw in Pharaoh’s dream that there would be a famine in Egypt and in this story of the prodigal son, there also was a famine in the land. Now let’s continue with the story of the prodigal son:

Luke 15:

14 And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want.

15 And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.

16 And he would fain (desired) have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.

17 And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father’s have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!

18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before you,

19 And am no more worthy to be called your son: make me as one of your hired servants.

20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.

21 And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in your sight, and am no more worthy to be called your son.

*Explanation: In this account, we are seeing a prophetic picture of Two Houses of Yisra’el: Judah & Joseph. Judah later on in history became known as the “Two Southern Tribes” of Yisra’el, and Joseph became the “Ten Northern Tribes” of Yisra’el. What is interesting is that this story is reversing some of the events that happened to Joseph and making those same events happen to Judah. For example, even though Joseph is the one who was sent away by his brothers and he was the youngest (like the prodigal) in the story of Joseph, instead of him going back home to his father Jacob’s house, the other brothers (symbolic of the older brother Judah) go to Egypt to buy grain. What we are learning in this story is that in the end times, the same thing that happened to Joseph (typified in the prodigal son) ends up happening to Judah (typified in Joseph’s ten brothers). You see even though Judah is the one who is called the Two Southern Tribes, in the end, Judah’s circumstances match what also happened to the Ten Lost Tribes of Ephrayim. This happened because Judah was puffed up and thought he was more righteous, like the older brother in this story of the prodigal. Because of this, the Heavenly Father in the last days ends up allowing Judah to go through the same thing as Joseph or the prodigal son! He allows Judah to experience the same exile, shame and humbling experiences. In this story, instead of Joseph (symbolic of the prodigal) coming back home and repenting, this time it is Judah (symbolic of the ten brothers) who end up coming back to Joseph to repent! Even more interesting is that in the story of the prodigal the father “fell on the son’s neck and kissed him.” But in the story of Joseph, in Genesis 45:14, Joseph fell on his brother Benjamin’s neck and wept, and then in Genesis 46:19, Joseph fell on his father Jacob’s neck and wept. What we are seeing here is that in the end times, these two stories and these two houses (Joseph & Judah) are reversed because there is a process of restoration going on! And so the story of the prodigal son continues to unfold right up until the end as we can see many parallels in Luke 15:

22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:

23 And bring hither (here) the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:

24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.

*Explanation: What we see here is that Jacob had givenJoseph a “coat of many colors” because he favored him above all of his brothers. As I mentioned earlier, the coat of many colors symbolizes the nations. In Genesis 37:31, Joseph’s brothers after selling him into Egyptian slavery, took his coat and dipped it in the blood of a kid (a goat). What does this symbolize? The Yom Kippur sacrificial goat! You see Joseph is a symbol of the Messiah and his coat of many colors being dipped in the blood of the goat represents the fact that our Messiah has “sprinkled many nations” (Isaiah 52:15) with his own blood and he became the “atonement” (covering) for them!

The Hebrew word “Kippur” (atonement) comes from a root word “Kaphar” which means “covering, coat.” Now in the story of the prodigal son, here we see that the father is giving his son a “robe” (a coat or covering) and he is killing a “fatted calf” instead of a goat. Why? It is because the House of Ephrayim is symbolized by the Red Heifer or a Bullock (Jeremiah 31:18, Hosea 4:16, 10:11, Numbers 19:2) and the House of Judah is symbolized by the goat (Genesis 38:20-28, Zechariah 10:3). In Leviticus 16, the instructions are given for the High Priest every year on Yom Kippur. The priest is instructed to kill first a “bullock” (a heifer) to cleanse and sanctify himself. And then he is to kill the goat and sprinkle the blood of the goat on the mercy seat. But then he is instructed to “mix the blood of the bullock with the blood of the goat” (Leviticus 16:19) and then he is commanded to sprinkle the altar “seven times” for the entire House of Yisra’el! Could it be that these “seven times” that the priest sprinkles the blood is for the “seven continents of the world” as well as the “seven covenants” and the “seven colors of the rainbow”? Did I already mention that our Messiah has sprinkled many nations with his blood?

YeshaYaHuW (Isaiah) 52:

14 As many were astonished at you; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men:

15 So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.

In the last days when Messiah returns, he will make “both Houses of Yisra’el” one house again on Yom Kippur when returns! The mixing of the blood of the bullock (heifer) and the blood of the goat symbolizes that both families (Judah & Ephrayim) will then become one family, one bride, one stick in the hand of YaHuWaH! You see Leah is the mother of Judah and she had ten sons (including the ones she had by her concubines). Rachel is the mother of Joseph and she had two sons. The Two Southern Tribes of Judah in the last days however are symbolized by Rachel (the goat and the lamb) and the Ten Northern Tribes of Ephrayim are symbolized by Leah (the heifer, the bullock, the cow). Why is this? It is because in the last days, the families “switch places” and we see that the first born is becoming like the last born and the last is becoming like the first! This is why Ya’aqob (Jacob-Yisra’el) “switched” his hands over when giving the blessing to the youngest son Ephrayim and YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) was displeased at his father for this. Why did Ya’aqob switch his hands over and give the blessing of the older to the younger? He was illustrating a “kingdom principle” that in order for there to be restoration in the house, there has to be an “equalization” that takes place. That means that the one who was humbled becomes exalted and the one who was exalted is now being humbled!

Rachel’s name in Hebrew means “lamb” and Leah’s name in Hebrew means “weary” but it also means “cow.” In the last days, the two families (Leah’s & Rachel’s sons) or Ephrayim & Judah end up switching places!
You see at first Joseph was the one who was humbled (like the prodigal son) as he was sent away to the nations, and then he was later restored and exalted by Pharaoh. And when he was exalted, then he helped bring his brothers back to restoration as well (symbolic of older brother Judah). You see Joseph typifies the Messiah at his first and second coming! He first typifies him as “the suffering servant” when he was humbled and beaten unjustly by his brothers. But then when he is later on exalted as King, he typifies the Messiah at his second coming for then he will restore his brothers!

Acts 3:21Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which Elohiym has spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.

Joseph symbolizes “Double Portion Restoration!” Joseph was the first to receive a “double portion” of all that his father Jacob had (Genesis 48:22). At Messiah’s first coming, he typified Joseph in his “humble servant” state. But at his second coming, YaHuW’shuwa will also typify Joseph as the “double portion” inheritor when he is exalted as the king of the earth! He will inherit both Houses of Yisra’el when he brings both houses together again. Now let’s continue to examine the prophetic typology we see in Joseph & Judah from this parable of the prodigal son:

Luke 15:

25 Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh (near) to the house, he heard musick and dancing.

26 And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant.

27 And he said unto him, Your brother is come; and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he has received him safe and sound.

28 And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.

29 And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve you, neither transgressed I at any time your commandment: and yet you never gave me a kid (goat), that I might make merry with my friends:

30 But as soon as this your son was come, which has devoured your living with harlots, you have killed for him the fatted calf.

*Explanation: We see here the older son (symbolic of Judah) proud of his own efforts and obedience and he is begrudging his younger brother of receiving a second inheritance. It seems unfair that the younger brother first received his inheritance (salvation) and then he squandered it on wild and lawless living.

This reminds us of the Christian Church today who have received an inheritance (salvation by grace through faith) but many of them think that grace is a license to go on sinning and that they are no longer under obligation to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah). This is exactly the picture of the prodigal son! Now, in these last days, the prodigal son is coming back home with a humble heart with repentance before his father, and he is willing to be just a “servant” in his father’s house (a hired hand).

But instead what does his father do? He gives him another inheritance! Jacob also gave to Joseph “one portion above his brethren” (Genesis 48:22) and now the prodigal son (typified in Joseph) is also receiving another portion when he is restored to his father! This did not seem fair to the older brother. He did not think that his brother should get another portion after wasting the first portion!

The prodigal son was given a “robe” which is symbolic of the blood atonement or covering but also of provision. It symbolizes the white wedding garment of righteousness. But he is also given a “ring” which is symbolic of the authority of the father’s name (a signet or signature ring). He also received shoes on his feet (his feet shod with the gospel of peace). So you see the younger son who was “the last” or “the least” ended up becoming as “the first born” when he repented and received blood atonement! He was “born-again” (resurrected from the dead) and then he received “a double portion inheritance!” It is for this reason that YaHuWaH called Ephrayim “my first born” in Jeremiah 31:9. Now we have the father telling the older brother (symbolic of Judah) that he should rejoice that his younger brother Ephrayim is coming back to Towrah obedience! But lo and behold, what do we see happening in these last days? Many Jews are getting angry at the fact that so many Christians are coming out of their pagan ways to embrace Towrah. They say things like “these Gentiles are trying to act like one of us, but they don’t deserve salvation….they are nothing more than heathens unworthy of the Father’s favor…” Let’s see the parallel in this parable:

Luke 15:

31 And he said unto him, Son, you are ever with me, and all that I have is yours.

32 It was meet (necessary) that we should make merry, and be glad: for this your brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.

Now we see a picture of the Heavenly Father telling the House of Judah “son you are ever with me, and all that I have is yours.” This is symbolic of the first born sons who came into the kingdom ahead of the younger sons. We see often times that those who have been walking in the faith of Messiah for many years begin to grow dependent upon their own righteousness and they forget that at one time they too were like the younger son who was newly repentant and excited about his new found faith. Those of us who are more mature in the faith find it easy to make fun of the “newbies” thinking ourselves to be better than they are. But you see the Father delights in the “newbies” and he wants us to rejoice over them with him!

On so a corporate level, the Ten divorced or scattered Northern Tribes of Yisra’el represent Ephrayim (the younger son in the story of the prodigal). And this group typified in Ephrayim-Joseph will follow YaHuW’dah (Judah) as prophesied in Zechariah 8:23.

ZekarYaHuW (Zechariah) 8:23 Thus says YHWH of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt (kanaph) of him that is a YaHuW’diy (Jew), saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that Elohiym is with you.

The Hebrew word for “skirt” is“kanaph” and it means: wing, extremity, edge, winged, border, corner of the garment. In Malachi 4:2, another prophecy about the Messiah is told as one who comes with “healing in his wings”:

Malakiy (Malachi) 4:2 “But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings…”

On the four corners of these prayer shawls we are commanded to place on them “fringes” to remind us that we are to obey the commandments (Deuteronomy 22:12, Numbers 15:38). These “fringes” are called tziytzith” in Hebrew. The Hebrew word for “wings” here in Malachi 4:2 is once again # 3671 which is “kanaph and this is the same word used in Zechariah 8:23 for skirt!

We are shown that these “ten men” (figurative of Ephrayim) will grab ahold of one YaHuW’diy (Jew) or the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) into obedience to Towrah.

Now this “one Jew” is YaHuW’shuwa himself who is from the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah). But this prophecy also represents all of those who are “in YaHuW’shuwa” who follow the Lamb wherever he goes and they are keeping his commandments. All of those who have already been following this “one Jew” for many years are now called YaHuW’diy (Jews). The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) illustrated that those who obey the Towrah are considered Jews. Here in Romans 2, Sha’uwl is rebuking the older brother Judah:

Romans 2:

23 You that make your boast of the Towrah (law), through breaking the law dishonour You Elohiym?

24 For the name of Elohiym is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.

25 For circumcision verily profits, if You keep the Towrah (law): but if You be a breaker of the Towrah (law), your circumcision is made uncircumcision.

26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the Towrah (law), shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the Towrah (law), judge you, who by the letter and circumcision does transgress the Towrah (law)?

28 For he is not a YaHuW’diy (Jew), which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

29 But he is a YaHuW’diy (Jew), which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of Elohiym.

What we see here is an “attitude” of superiority displayed by the Jews in Paul’s day who thought that they were more righteous in their obedience to the Mosaic Law (Towrah). He was telling them that even though they prided themselves in their obedience, they were not as obedient inwardly as they pretended to be outwardly! Paul was telling these Jews in his day that even if the Gentiles begin to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah) their uncircumcision would be looked upon by the Father in Heaven as circumcision!

So you see Sha’uwl (Paul) was equating being a YaHuW’diy (a Jew) to one who obeys Towrah! He told these Jews of his day that in the end the Heavenly Father YaHuWaH will count the obedient ones as YaHuW’diy (Jews)! What does this word “Jew” really mean? In the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance we see the meaning:

#3064. Yhuwdiy yeh-hoo-dee’ patronymically from 3063; a Jehudite (i.e. Judaite or Jew), or descendant of Jehudah(Judah):--Jew.

#3063. Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first,and of its territory:--Judah.

#3061. Yhuwd yeh-hood’ (Aramaic) contracted from a form corresponding to 3063; properly, Judah, hence, Judaea:--Jewry, Judah, Judea.

Here we see that the name for the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) comes from the same letters in our Creator’s name YaHuWaH but with one extra letter added which is the “dalet” or the 4th letter in the Hebrew Alphabet which means “the door.” Our Messiah is “the door” that the sheep go through in order to come to the Father (John 10:7). YaHuW’shuwa Messiah is from the Tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) and he came to us in the 4th Millennium. He also died on the 4th day of the week (Wednesday), and Judah was the 4th son born to Leah & Jacob! The 4th letter is the door! Now we know why YaHuW’shuwa said this to the Samaritan woman:

YaHuW’chanon (John) 4:22You worship you know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the YaHuW’diy (Jews).

What did he mean? Was he talking about man-made religion? Was he talking about Judaism? No! He was talking about a tribe of people who “follow the lamb where ever he goes!” (Revelation 14:4). You see all those who follow the Lamb who is also the Lion of the Tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah) will enter through the door to the Father and they have their Father’s name in their foreheads which is YaHuWaH!

You see, in this story of the prodigal son, we see two types of people. On an individual basis, there are those who think that they are YaHuW’diy (Jews) from the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah), but they are following a man-made religion and traditions. They are not following the Messiah YaHuW’shuwa. There are those who call themselves “Jews” (simply because they follow Judaism) but if they continue to reject the Messiah’s blood atonement, in the end, they will end up taking the “Mark of the Beast” and they will not be counted as “Jews.” In Ezekiel 5:2 the prophecy states that “one third” of the inhabitants of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) will be saved but the other “two thirds” will perish.

In Revelation 2:9 & Revelation 3:9 our Messiah described those who would call themselves “Jews” but they are not, but they are of the “Synagogue of Satan.” They may be keeping Towrah outwardly or externally but if they do not have their hearts circumcised by the Holy Spirit and they are not cleansed by the blood of the Lamb, then they have rejected the “Living Towrah” which is Messiah himself. In 1st Kings 12, the Ten Northern Tribes of Yisra’el became known as “Gentiles” when they forsook the covenant and they began to worship other deities with pagan holidays under King Jeroboam. But many of them returned back to the covenant when they accepted the blood of Messiah as atonement for their sins and they are cleansed now from their idolatry. But you see those within Christianity who are still keeping pagan holidays and they are not keeping the Sabbaths and Feasts (a sign of the covenant) are still not obeying Towrah even though they profess to accept the blood of the Lamb for their sins.

If these Christians continue in paganism, they are inadvertently “trampling underfoot the grace of Elohiym” and they are crucifying to themselves the “Son of Elohiym” afresh (Hebrews 10:26-30). Both Houses of Yisra’el are rejecting the Blood of the Lamb in some form. The House of Ephrayim (symbolic of Christianity) is doing it inadvertently when they reject the written Towrah for they return back to the very sins that they were supposedly cleansed from. But the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) is rejecting the blood of the Lamb by their rejection of Messiah himself (the Living Towrah). Within both camps (Ephrayim & Judah) there is a partial rejection of the Messiah. Either they are rejecting his written Towrah or they are rejecting his “person” (his Spirit).

YaHuW’shuwa himself commanded us to worship the Father “in Spirit and in Truth” (John 4:24). The House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) claim to follow the Towrah (the book of Truth) but often times they obey the traditions of men (Talmud) more than they do the Towrah. Christianity claims to follow the “person” of Messiah himself (his Holy Spirit), but they reject his instructions (his Towrah). And so you have those who reject the Towrah (the book of Truth) and those who reject the Holy Spirit (the Messiah himself). But we need both the Holy Spirit & the Living Towrah!

Dual Covenant Theology

There is currently a false teaching going on today propagated by what is called “the Noahide Laws” within Judaism. The Vatican and other televangelists like John Hagee have also embraced this false doctrine. This theology states that “Jews do not need Jesus to be saved.” They claim that the Jews are already saved by keeping the Towrah and hence they do not need blood atonement. They also claim that Christians do need blood atonement for their sins and so because “they believe in Jesus” they do not need to obey the Mosaic Law (Towrah), for they can be saved by the blood of the lamb without obedience to Towrah. Those who promote “Dual Covenant Theology” claim that only the Ten Northern Tribes (returning Gentiles) need blood atonement seen in the story of the prodigal son. But the reality is, after the Roman Siege in 70 A.D. the House of Judah also became estranged and divorced (sent away) to the nations as well!

The prophet YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) was shown in chapter 24 that the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) would be carried away captive by the King of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar. But even after a remnant from the House of Judah returned back to the land of Jerusalem, many of them were taken captive by “Mystery Babylon Religion” (Rome)into Europe in 70 A.D., where the Roman Catholic Church influenced them once again into Babylonian ways. Listen to what the House of Judah said concerning Messiah:

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 27:25-29“…..Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children…. And when they had platted a crown of thorns, they put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand: and they bowed the knee before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the YaHuW’diy (Jews)!”

So you see the House of Judah (symbolized by the older son) also received his blood upon them which is a prophetic picture of the future when they will finally “look upon the one whom they pierced” (Zechariah 12:10).

Even though corporately speaking, it was Ephrayim (the ten lost tribes) who left the covenant (the sabbaths and feasts), the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) must also follow the same pattern of admitting that they are like the prodigal son because they too have fallen just like Ephrayim. In the story of the prodigal son, the older son can typify both the House of Ephrayim on one level but it can also typify the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) on another level.  

You see the Two Houses of Yisra’el have switched places over time. First it was Judah who was born to the older sister Leah (who also married Jacob first). But then, even though Joseph was born last to the younger sister who was married last (Rachel), Joseph received from his father Jacob “first born” status through his youngest son Ephrayim. And Joseph also received “an extra portion above his brothers” (the double portion).

But later on in history, in Jeremiah 3:8 and in 1st Kings 12, Ephrayim was sent away to the nations for his harlotry with idols. In Hosea 4:17 we read:

Ephrayim is joined to idols: let him alone.”

When Messiah came the first time during his earthly ministry, he came for “the lost sheep of the House of Yisra’el,” (Matthew 15:24). In other words, he came for the Ten Northern Tribes of Ephrayim who were estranged from the covenant. At that time Judah, (the older brother) was still in covenant and YaHuWaH had not divorced them yet. The rebuke that Messiah had for the House of Judah is that they were supposed to be helping the lost sheep come back to the covenant but they were like the older brother in the story of the prodigal son. They did not feel that the Heavenly Father should allow the other ten tribes to come back home since they had squandered their inheritance.

In Romans 7 & Colossians 2 The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) made a distinction between “the Law of Divorce” seen in Deuteronomy 24 (which the ten divorced tribes of Yisra’el were under) versus “the Law of the Spirit of Life” which is the Mosaic Law now transferred from stone tablets into “fleshy tables of the heart” (2nd Corinthians 3:3). The New Covenant is actually a “renewed marriage contract” (with the same Mosaic Law in it) only now it is sealed in Messiah’s blood and ratified by the deposit of the Holy Spirit!

After Messiah died on the tree outside of the camp as the Red Heifer (Numbers 19), he gave Ephrayim freedom from the Law of Divorce which kept him away and out of covenant!

You see according to Deuteronomy 24, once a man divorced his wife, and wrote her a certificate of divorce, she was free to remarry. But she could never go back to her first husband. Ten out of Twelve Tribes of Yisra’el were divorced with a handwriting of ordinances (the Law of Divorce) seen in Jeremiah 3:8. Then they went to the nations and remarried their Baalim (Ba’als and false deities). And then because of that handwriting contained in ordinances, the Jewish Rabbis invented man-made ordinances (which was against us) that would keep the divorced tribes (Gentiles) out of the Temple called “the middle wall of partition.” (Ephesians 2:14)

If any Gentile went beyond that wall they would be stoned to death! The Gentiles were then prevented from hearing the Law & Prophets preached and they could not receive blood atonement for their sins thereby allowing them to come back into covenant!

YaHuW’shuwa Messiah came to set Ephrayim free from the Law of Divorce and the “doctrines and commandments of men” which were the Rabbinic Laws that kept them separated from Judah (the Jews).  These man-made ordinances (dogma) prevented the Gentiles from coming to the temple where they could hear the Towrah, repent and be saved. But you see in Romans 7, the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) explained that once a woman’s husband was dead, she was free from “the law of her husband” (in other words the law in Deuteronomy 24 that said she could never return to him).

YaHuW’shuwa Messiah therefore died in order to free the divorced tribes of Yisra’el from their divorce! They were NOT made free from the Mosaic Law! You see the Mosaic Law (Towrah) is their written marriage contract! Why would he set them free from their marriage covenant with him?  
In the book of Ruth we read about a Moabite woman named Ruth who converted and left her pagan idols in Moab behind. She followed her mother-in-law Naomi back to “Bethlehem-Judah” and she made a confession---a declaration with her mouth:

Ruth 1:16And Ruth said, Intreat me not to leave you, or to return from following after you: for wherever you go, I will go; and where you lodge, I will lodge: your people shall be my people, and your Elohiym my Elohiym:

In the Towrah, the Yisra’elites were commanded not to marry from the Moabites, And yet Ruth “converted” and she joined the House of Judah! She did not join a religion called “Judaism” nor did she have any “Jewish” blood in her veins, and yet she went back to the land of “Judah” with Naomi which means that she “sojourned” with a YaHuW’diy (Jew)! She became a Jew when she traveled, sojourned with a Jew! It was only after Ruth converted or “crossed over” that she was able to marry Boaz from the tribe of YaHuW’dah (Judah)! Boaz is a prophetic “type” of Messiah and Ruth is a “prophetic type” of the Gentiles who convert in the last days! In Revelation 14:4 there is a group of people called “the 144 thousand” who are the bride and they “follow the lamb wherever he goes.” This bride follows the Messiah from the Tribe of Judah! She joins his tribe just like Ruth!

What happened to Ruth is also the same thing that is now happening on a much larger scale as we see that “ten men from the Gentile nations are grabbing the corners of the garment” or the tziytzith” of a YaHuW’diy (Jew) as seen in Zechariah 8:23. This is a prophetic picture of the younger son typified in “Ten Tribe Ephrayim” grabbing onto the commandments of the older son from YaHuW’dah (Judah)!

Often times in prophecy we can see multiple layers and fulfillments. In Matthew 13:25-30 our Messiah told a parable about “wheat & tares” symbolizing those have been converted into YaHuW’diy (Jews) ready to marry the bridegroom and those who are not converted. The tares look very much like the wheat and it is very difficult to tell them apart. We can see that there are those who thought they were wheat (true Jews)butthey have to come to terms with the fact that they are tares before they can be “reborn” and transformed into wheat.

The house of YaHuW’dah (Judah) is embodied in YaHuW’shuwa himself, not in a religion called Judaism. I am not saying that those within Rabbinic Judaism are not truly Jews. That is for the Heavenly Father to decide. I do not know who has the DNA of the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) but the Father in Heaven does, so it is not my place to make a determination as to who are the true Jews and who are not. But if those who say that they are Jews, never embrace the blood covenant of the Messiah YaHuW’shuwa, they won’t come into their inheritance.

It is only by his blood that the House of Ephrayim will become one with the house of YaHuW’dah (Judah)! There is no other way! He said “I am the way, the truth and the life, NO MAN (even Jews) can come to Father, but by me” YaHuW’chanon (John) 14:6.

His blood is what accounts us all as “righteous” in the end. Only through YaHuW’shuwa’s blood are we going to be counted as “YaHuW’dah” (Judah).

Why does the bride have to join the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) in order to marry the Messiah? As I illustrated earlier, the name YaHuWDaH (Judah) is the very same name as our Heavenly Father YaHuWaH with one extra letter added to it called “the dalet” which means “the door.” The dalet is the equivalent of the English letter “D” and it is the 4th letter in the Hebrew Alphabet. YaHuW’shuwa said that he is “the door” that the sheep must enter in through in order to come to the Father. Hence, to have the name of the tribe of YaHuW’dah means that you have the Father’s name plus the Messiah’s name (the door) or the dalet! In order to have the Father’s name written in your forehead, you must first acknowledge the son:

1st YaHuW’chanon (John) 2:23Whosoever denies the Son, the same has not the Father: he that acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

Revelation 14:1-4 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Tziyown (Zion), and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads….These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins….These are they which follow the Lamb wherever he goes. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto Elohiym and to the Lamb.

*Note:This group of 144 thousand are said to have “his Father’s name.” Beloved, “he” is none other than Ephrayim! He is the one who is the multitude of nations in the last days called “the one new man” (Ephesians 2:15). But he is not being called Ephrayim any longer! He has a new name now because he has become “one stick” with the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) according to Ezekiel 37:16. And now he has the name of YaHuWaH which is his Father’s name, but he also has the name of the Son (the door, the dalet) and so he is now part of the tribe of YaHuWDaH!

In Ezekiel 47:22 any “stranger” who had been estranged from the covenant could “sojourn” with an Yisra’elite tribe and he would then become as “one born among” that tribe. This means that any Gentile who comes back into covenant and he “sojourns” or “abides with” the Messiah from the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) becomes a YaHuW’diy (Jew)!

The House of Ephrayim represents more than just the physical descendants of YaHuW’ceph (Joseph). Ephrayim is a metaphor of every human being who admits his fallen state and comes back to the Father repenting and when he does, he receives blood atonement.

Like the prodigal son who received the fatted calf when he came back home, this is the same condition of every person who admits he is a sinner.

Every human being must admit their sinful nature before they can achieve the status of “first born.” This must happen in the life of every person whether they are a “Jew” (YaHuW’diy) or a Gentile. We must first “descend” (be humbled) just as YaHuW’shuwa descended (before ascending back to the Father). The Hebrew word for Jordan River is “Yarden” and it means “descender.” When our Messiah was immersed (baptized) in the Yarden (Jordan) he “descended” as a symbol of death to the old man (Romans 6:4). But when he came up out of the water, that is a symbol of his resurrection and “ascension” back to the Father in Heaven.

Ya’aqob (Jacob)’s name means “supplanter” and he also descended into deception when he supplanted his brother Esau’s inheritance. But when he repented for deceiving his Father Yitzchaq (Isaac), then he was “transformed” into one who “prevails” and he became Yisra’el.

Once we are humbled and broken over our fallen nature, we can come back up to the first born status as Ephrayim did!

In the end, Ephrayim (on a corporate level) will join the stick of YaHuW’dah (Judah) and they shall become ONE in Messiah, ONE HOUSE under YaHuW’dah (Judah), embodied in YaHuW’shuwa himself.

There is no difference in the Father’s eyes with regard to the sinful heart of man.

YirmeYaHuW (Jeremiah) 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

YaHuWaH desires to see both houses of Yisra’el (Jew & Gentile) come together as ONE NEW MAN (Ephesians 2:12-15). YaHuW’shuwa has abolished in his flesh the “enmity” of the sinful human nature which keeps YaHuW’dah (Judah) & Ephrayim divided to this day.

The Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) declared in Galatians 3:28 there is neither YaHuW’diy (Jew) nor Gentile (Greek) for we are ONE in YaHuW’shuwa Messiah.”

Ephrayim represents every human being (Jew or Gentile) who has departed from Towrah (the Father’s instructions) and he must repent and come back into his identity with the Father again. But YaHuW’dah (Judah) represents every human being (Jew or Gentile) who becomes “born-again,” and he recognizes his inheritance, but then he begins to depend on his own human efforts instead of the blood atonement of Messiah. And because of his dependence on his own human efforts, he forgets that the source of his salvation comes from the Father and not by his own merit. When this happens, Judah represents every human being who must be humbled and realize that at any moment he too is able to fall just like Ephrayim.

This principle is seen over and over again in scripture, because pride goes before a fall. When we think we are better than others because of our own self-righteousness, then we are shown to be just as “fallen” as the prodigal son.

We see this principle illustrated by YaHuW’shuwa in this parable about the Publican & the Pharisee:

Luke 18:

9 And he spoke this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others:

10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.

11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, Elohiym, I thank you, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.

12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.

13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote (beat) upon his breast, saying, Elohiym be merciful to me a sinner.

14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalts himself shall be abased; and he that humbles himself shall be exalted.


In the illustration above, the Pharisee trusted in his own righteousness by Towrah obedience. But the Publican admitted his fallen state and his prayer was accepted. This is the principle seen with Ephrayim & YaHuW’dah (Judah). Ephrayim is like the Publican (tax collector) who received mercy when he repented. But YaHuW’dah (Judah) represents the Pharisee who trusted in his own righteousness and he soon forgets that he too was born with a sinful nature.

Every human being must see his fallen state before he can come back up to the status of the “firstborn.”
 
The first becomes the last and the last becomes the first.

MattithYaHuW (Matthew) 20:16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Mark 9:35 And he sat down, and called the twelve, and said unto them, If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all.

Mark 10:31 But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.

And it is this very principle that causes Ephrayim to receive the status of “firstborn.” Ephrayim did nothing to earn his first-born status. He was helpless to receive this title. The Father simply “chose” Ephrayim because he has mercy on whom he will have mercy (Romans 9:15-18).

Over and over again we see this principle of the first becoming the last, and the last becoming the first. This is a “kingdom” principle. The first born son often becomes the last, and the last son becomes the first. We see it with King Dawiyd (David) who was the youngest and he was chosen as King. We see it with YaHuW’ceph (Joseph) who was the youngest and outcast who later became a King as well. We see it also with Ya’aqob (Jacob) & Esau, Manasseh & Ephrayim etc.

Regardless of whether you were born with Yisra’elite DNA, or if you were born as a Gentile, every human being must become as the “least” before he can come back up to status of the “firstborn.” In other words, we must be born-again!

YaHuW’chanon (John) 3:

3 YaHuW’shuwa answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of Elohiym.

4 Nicodemus says unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?

5 YaHuW’shuwa answered, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of Elohiym.

6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7 Marvel not that I said unto you, You must be born again.

A seed must first fall to the ground and die before it can begin to produce fruit. A caterpillar must go into the cocoon and “die to the old nature” before he can be “born-anew” as a butterfly!

In the story of the prodigal son, on a corporate level, the older brother is YaHuW’dah (Judah) and the younger brother is Ephrayim at the time of Messiah’s first coming. But in these last days, the tables are turning!

Back when Messiah was here, the House of Judah was behaving as if they were superior like the older brother. They were not willing to welcome back the lost sinners symbolized by the younger brother. But today I see born-again Christians acting superior because they think that they are better than Judah now that they have obtained salvation.

Many Christians are now behaving like the older brother because they have received the “born-again” experience of being filled with the Holy Spirit while many Jews have not accepted the blood atonement of Messiah yet, so now the House of Judah are more like the younger lost brother.

On an individual level, in the Kingdom of heaven, we have to die if we want to gain eternal life. We have to go low if we want to come up higher. We have to humble ourselves before we are exalted. We have to become the least before we can become great in the Kingdom. We have to admit our fallen state before we can repent and become a “new creature.”

In the end, we see that there truly is no difference in the Father’s eyes between YaHuW’diy (Jews) and Ephrayim (former Gentiles). Both houses of Yisra’el have been estranged from the Father because of the sinful fallen nature. But both houses must accept the status of the “least” before they can come back up to the status of the firstborn!

Messiah Ate the Passover the Night Before He Died!

$
0
0
By Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, April, 2012

For the past 2,000 years, there has been an age-old controversy within the community of believers, whereby some have surmised that our Messiah did not actually “eat” a Passover meal with his disciples. They say that he merely ate the “Last Supper” and they rationalize that this could not have been a true Passover meal because they assume that the Passover Lambs had not been slaughtered yet the night before he died. 

But did you know that there is no such thing in the scriptures as a “Last Supper?” Many have wondered how our Messiah could have eaten the Passover the night before he died and yet, he also became the Passover the following evening.

Well, there is a very simple explanation for this. You see, the Towrah says that Passover is on the 14th“at evening” but in Hebrew it is “ben ha’ereb” which means “between the two evenings.”

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:18In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at evening.

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 23:5In the fourteenth day of the first month at evening is YHWH’s Passover. 

Bemidbar (Numbers) 9:3In the fourteenth day of this month, at evening, you shall keep it in his appointed season: according to all the rites of it, and according to all the ceremonies thereof, shall you keep it. 

As you can see by the verses above, in English, it would appear to some that this would be at the tail-end of the 14th of Abib (three hours before the 15th of Abib).

But let us take a look at the following verse as it reads in Hebrew:

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:6 And you shall keep it [the lamb] up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Yisra’el shall kill it in the evening.

The phrase above“in the evening” in Hebrew reads“ben ha’ereb” which literally means“between the two evenings.” Also note, that they were to keep the lamb “up until” the fourteenth day of Abib. This means that the moment that the sun went down on the thirteenth of Abib, they were to kill it between the two evenings on the fourteenth day of Abib.

The word “in” is #996ben:between, in the midst of. The word evening” is #6153 – ereb: evening, night, sunset, dusk. But this word ereb” comes from another root word:

#6150 `arab aw-rab’ a primitive root; from #6148; through the idea of covering with a texture; to grow dusky at sundown:--be darkened, (toward) evening.

#6148 `arab aw-rab' a primitive root; to braid, i.e. intermix; technically, to traffic (as if by barter); also or give to be security (as a kind of exchange):--engage, (inter-)meddle (with), mingle(self), mortgage, occupy, give pledges, be(-come, put in) surety, undertake.

As you can see, this word for “eveningcomes from the root words that mean “to mingle, intermix.” When the light mixes with the darkness then it becomes “dusk,” and that is precisely what the word “evening” means. Hence, between “two evenings” means that there would be two periods of dusk within a 24-hour period on the 14th day of the 1st Hebrew month of Abib. The commandment to kill the Passover Lamb between “two evenings” would then imply that anytime within that 24-hour period, a lamb could be slaughtered.

Some scholars believe that this phrase “between the evenings” is referring to a Hebrew Idiom that describes the period from “twelve noon until sundown” as the last six hours of the day, and this is what they believe that this phrase means. But we already have the precedence in scripture which illustrates that Passover is the same thing as Yowm Kippur which is “from evening to evening:”

Wayyiqra (Leviticus) 23:

27 Also on the tenth day of this seventh month there shall be a day of atonement (Yowm Kippur): it shall be an holy convocation unto you; and you shall afflict your souls, and offer an offering made by fire unto YHWH.

28 And you shall do no work in that same day: for it is a day of atonement (Yowm Kippur), to make an atonement for you before YHWH your Elohiym.

29 For whatsoever soul it be that shall not be afflicted in that same day, he shall be cut off from among his people.

30 And whatsoever soul it be that does any work in that same day, the same soul will I destroy from among his people.

31 You shall do no manner of work: it shall be a statute forever throughout your generations in all your dwellings.

32 It shall be unto you a Sabbath of rest, and you shall afflict your souls: in the ninth day of the month at eveningfrom evening unto evening, shall you celebrate your Sabbath.

Did you see this? Yowm Kippur runs its course from “evening to evening” and Passover is the same. It runs its course “from evening to evening” or “between the two evenings.” 

Let us now examine the graphic here from the Brown’s Driver-Briggs Lexicon. You will notice that the Phari-sees, Samaritans, and the Karaites had differing opinions as to when the “evening” would be rendered. 

I believe that YaHuWaH purposely designed it that way so that our Messiah would fulfill the Towrah by “eating the Passover” with the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) the night before he was betrayed by them. And then the following evening (before the 15th of Abib), he also became the Passover for those outside of the covenant. When he ate it the night before, the House of Judah was still in covenant with YaHuWaH. 

But the following evening, the House of Judah would then have betrayed him at that point. He was then escorted outside of the city limits of Jerusalem to the place of execution for those who were outside of the covenant (The House of Ephrayim). You see, in Numbers 19, it says that whenever the altar in the Temple became defiled, a spotless red heifer had to be escorted outside of the city of Jerusalem where he would be killed and his body would be consumed. His ashes would then be used to cleanse the altar to sanctify and cleanse it from all defilement. Our Messiah not only fulfilled the Passover Lamb for both Houses of Yisrael, but he also became the Red Heifer sacrifice because they defiled his altar when they shed innocent blood! This is the reason why there had to be two evenings for slaughtering lambs, for both Houses of Yisrael! 

After doing much research into this, I discovered that in the days when our Messiah was sacrificed on the tree, the House of Judah did a personal Passover for each individual family at the beginning of the 14th of Abib, and then the next evening before the 15th, they did one for the community at the Temple. This only makes sense, since the House of Judah had not left the covenant yet when he ate it with them. Judas had not betrayed him yet and the House of Judah had not shouted “crucify him” yet. 

The main reason why this has become an issue for me, is because there are some people who use this controversy to try and discredit the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) scriptures. These same people argue that “there are mistakes” in the Briyth Chadashah. While it is true that there are minor translation errors in the New Testament, the assertion that the translators purposely inserted the idea of Messiah “eating the Passover” in three gospels is absurd. Once people begin to attack the Briyth Chadashah (NT), that leads to a very slippery slope. Before you know it, people begin to deny the validity of the New Testament scriptures entirely and that also leads to them denying Yahuwshuwa as their Messiah!

Another disturbing conclusion that this often leads to is the denial that our Messiah had to fulfill the Towrah 100% in order to be the perfect, sinless lamb. You see, if he had not eaten the Passover Lamb on the four-teenth day of Abib (as commanded) then he would have been in violation of the commandment, and that would have rendered his sacrifice as defiled! But the same people who argue that he did not eat the Passover with his disciples, also assume that he ate “leavened bread” which goes against the Towrah commandment to eat “unleavened bread” with the Passover Lamb and bitter herbs (Exodus 12:8).

There has never been a doubt in my mind that our Messiah ate the true Passover meal, but there has been so much argument about this recently, that I decided to do a study on the matter in hopes that I might bring unity back to the body of Messiah, and thereby show weightier evidence that our Messiah not only obeyed the Towrah by “eating the Passover” but he was also the Passover Lamb that year!

You see, our Creator, YaHuWaH has already placed in the Towrah the parameters whereby our Messiah would not be in conflict with the Towrah in doing both (eating the Passover and becoming the Passover).

In this study we find out that our Messiah did not violate Towrah (as some have suggested) for he was able to actually eat the Passover and thereby be “perfect” the next day when he actually became the Passover Lamb!

Why is this issue so important? Because the very insinuation that he did not eat the Passover in the year that he died casts a shadow of doubt that he was the genuine Messiah of Yisra’el. In order for him to be “perfect” he had to eat the Passover. He could not be the perfect sacrifice unless he himself obeyed Towrah by eating the Passover. Another serious issue that is raised in this argument, is the validity of the Briyth Chadashah (Renewed Covenant) writings. Those who argue that our Messiah did not eat the Passover insist that there are major errors in the New Testament scriptures and therefore, they cannot be trusted. Beloved, once we begin down that road, then one begins to doubt if the New Testament scriptures are even telling us the truth concerning our Messiah’s death, burial and resurrection! 

Any minor translation errors in the New Testament scriptures are very easy to detect by simply looking up the original words in Greek and/or Aramaic and also looking up the meaning of these words in the Strongs Concordance or a Lexicon. Also, the King James Version helps us out by showing when certain words were not in the text by the use of italics. All we have to do is look for words in italics in the King James Version and we can easily find out if there are translation problems. Consequently, there are not blatant or major trans-lation errors in the “Textus Receptus” or the “Received Text”which is the “New Testament” manuscripts preserved in Antioch Syria. King James sent fifty Hebrew Scribes to find these in the 1600’s and this is what they used to trans-late the Briyth Chadshah (Renewed Covenant). Those who purport that Messiah did not eat the Passover meal are using corrupted Bible translations such as the “Vaticanus Codex” from the Vatican vaults. 

The Gnostics in Alexandria Egypt, who did not believe in Messiah’s deity, removed many verses from the original manuscripts in the 2nd Century, and thus they created a corrupted text which was later used by Constantine for the Latin Vulgate Bible of Roman Catholicism. Therefore, when trying to solve this issue, the only manuscripts that I would trust are the Textus Receptus (used by the King James translators) and the Aramic Peshitta. To understand the hidden agenda of the Gnostics to alter the scriptures, see my other article entitled “King James Version versus Modern Translations.”

Now there is actually real evidence that Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashi-yach ate the REAL Passover Lamb with Unleavened Bread. This was not merely a Last Supper” or a precursor to the real Passover. There is not one place in the entire Bible where the term Last Supper” is ever once used! This was by no means his last meal with his disciples, for only days later he would resurrect and meet with them on the Road to Emmaus and that day eat fish and honeycomb with them (Luke 24:24-42).

Here is conclusive evidence that Messiah ate the REAL Passover. Our study begins with the gospel account of Mark where our Messiah’s own words will be highlighted in bright red and embol-dened. Words that are italicized in the King James Version (because they were not originally in the text) are placed in brackets.


Marqos (Mark) 14:12 And the first [day] of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover, his disciples said unto him, Where will you that we go and prepare that you may eat the passover?
                 
Marqos (Mark) 14:13 And he sends forth two of his disciples, and says unto them, Go you into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: follow him.

Marqos (Mark) 14:14 And wheresoever he shall go in, say you to the goodman of the house, The Master says, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples?

Marqos (Mark) 14:15 And he will show you a large upper room furnished and prepared: there make ready for us.

Marqos (Mark) 14:16 And his disciples went forth, and came into the city, and found as he had said unto them: and they made ready the passover.

Marqos (Mark) 14:17 And in the evening he came with the twelve.

Marqos (Mark) 14:18 And as they sat and did eat, Yahuwshuwa said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eats with me shall betray me.

*Note: Verse 16 says they made ready the Passover! Verse 18 says that they ate! Messiah himself said “one of you which eats with me,” indicating that he was eating! What did they eat? They ate what they had prepared in verse 16! And what was it that they had prepared? The Passover! That means that they actually killed a lamb, roasted it and ate it on the night of the 14th of Abib with UNLEAVENED BREAD, (not leav-ened bread). Some people argue that the Passover meal that he ate only consisted of bread and wine and there was no lamb involved. But what exactly does the word Passover mean? If our Messiah actually ate the Passover with his disciples, how does one eat a Passover? Let’s see what the Greek Strong’s Concordance shows us for this word Passover: 

#3957. pascha πάσχα; pronunciation: pä’-skhä; of Aramaic origin of פֶּסַח (H6453); the paschal sacrifice which was accustomed to be offered for the people’s deliverance of old from Egypt; the paschal lamb, i.e. the lamb the Yisraelites were accustomed to slay and eat on the fourteenth day of the month of Nisan (the first month of their year) in memory of the day on which their fathers, preparing to depart from Egypt, were bidden by Elohiym to slay and eat a lamb, and to sprinkle their door posts with its blood, that the destroying angel, seeing the blood, might pass over their dwellings; Messiah crucified is likened to the slain paschal lamb; the paschal supper; the paschal feast, the feast of the Passover, extending from the 14th to the 20th day of the month Nisan.

What Does the Aramaic Peshitta Say?

There is ample historical evidence that the New Testament scriptures were first written down in Aramaic before being translated into Greek. Andrew Gabriel Roth published the Aramaic English New Testament, and I show below what the Besowrah (Gospels) say regarding our Messiah eating the Passover. The Aramaic translation for the word Passover is “Paskha:”

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:17 (AENT): Now on the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the disciples drew near to Y’shua and said to him “Where do you want us to prepare for you to eat the Paskha?”

Mattithyahuw (Mark) 14:12 (AENT): And in the first day of the Unleavened Bread in which the Yehudeans slay the Paskha, his disciples were saying to him “Where do you desire for us to go and prepare the Paskha to eat?”

Luqas (Luke) 22:8 (AENT): And Y’shua sent Keefa and Yochanan and said to them “Go. Prepare the Paskha for us that we may eat.”
How do we know that Messiah actually ate unleavened bread? We are going to uncover this puzzle by first removing the additional words that were not in the original text of the New Testament. The verse below has italicized words highlighted in red and placed in brackets to indicate that these words were added by the English translators:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:17 Now the first [day] of [the feast of] unleavened bread the disciples came to Yahuwshuwa, saying unto him, Where will you that we prepare for you to eat the passover?

Now, you will notice that if this was the “first of unleavened bread,” and he had not died yet, this means that it was the beginning of the fourteenth of Abib (just after sundown on the thirteenth of Abib) and they were already calling this the “first of unleavened bread.” 

The Greek word used here for “unleavened” is seen as follows:

#106: azymos ζυμος; pronunciation ä’-zü-mos: unfermented, free from leaven or yeastof the unleavened loaves used in the paschal feast of the Jews; metaphor free from faults or the “leaven of iniquity.”

You see, he was telling them to prepare unleavened bread to be eaten with the lamb according to the Towrah commandment! Now some people would rationalize that when he broke the bread with his disciples and ate it, that this was “leavened bread” but let’s look at the word used in Mark 14:22:

Marqos (Mark) 14:22 And as they did eat, Yahuwshuwa took bread, and blessed, and broke it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.

What is the Greek word used here for bread?

#740: artos ρτος; pronunciation: ä’r-tos: food composed of flour mixed with water and baked; the Israelites made it in the form of an oblong or round cake, as thick as one’s thumb, and as large as a plate or platter hence it was not to be cut but broken; loaves were consecrated to the Lord; of the bread used at the love-feasts and at the Lord’s Table; food of any kind.

There is nothing here that indicates that this was leavened bread! Nothing! This Greek word artos is a generic word used for any kind of bread whether leavened or unleavened.

But we already know it was unleavened bread because he already commanded them to make ready the Passover on the first of unleavened bread. And so if you put these two Greek words together: artos & asymos you get the term “unleavened bread!” 

The word azymos simply means “unleavened” and it does not include the word “bread” with it. It can mean anything that is unleavened or unfermented-- even wine. And so the word artos is just the Greek word for bread just like our English word for bread in general. If I use the word “bread” in a sentence in English, everyone knows I mean bread with leaven in it (yeast). But now if I tell you that I am keeping the Passover, and I tell you that I ate bread, you are going to know that what I ate was no ordinary bread. You are going to know that I ate unleavened bread!

But most importantly, if he was using “leavened bread” as a metaphor for his body, that means that he would have been a sinner! You see, leaven is a picture of “sin” and therefore, his sacrifice had to be represented by a sinless, spotless lamb, and bread with no leaven!

Now, another very important factor to take into consideration is that the word “day” and the words “the feast of” are in italics in Matthew 26:17:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:17 Now the first [day]of [the feast of] unleavened bread the disciples came to Yahuwshuwa, saying unto him, Where will you that we prepare for you to eat the passover?

This means that these words were not in the original text! Therefore the verse should read like this:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:17 Now the first of unleavened bread the disciples came to Yahuwshuwa, saying unto him, Where will you that we prepare for you to eat the Passover?

You see, the fact that this was not “the feast of” unleavened bread but merely the first of the “days of unleavened bread” is extremely important! The Towrah tells us to begin eating unleavened bread on the fourteenth day of the month of Abib (Exodus 12:18). And so that is why Matthew 26:17 is telling us that this was the “first” of these days of unleavened bread. It would not commence the actual “feast” of unleavened bread until the following night on the fifteenth of Abib. The English translators took the liberty of adding these words into the text of Matthew 26:17, but because they had no gauge for keeping the Feasts of YaHuWaH, they confused the readers making it appear that this was actually the fifteenth day of the month of Abib, but it was only the fourteenth day of the month of Abib, and Towrah tells us to begin eating unleavened bread on the first of those days of unleavened bread. Some people argue that the phrase “first of unleavened bread” in Matthew 26:17 should say “the day before unleavened bread” but this is not necessarily true. Let’s see the word for “first” in Greek as follows:

Strong’s #G4413: prōtos πρτος: first in time or place; in any succession of things or persons; first in rank; influence, honour; chief; principal; first, at the first; foremost (in time, place, order or importance):--before, beginning, best, chiefest, first (of all), former.

As you can see, the primary application of the word “protos” most often means “first” and only in rare cases could it mean “before.” But the dead giveaway that Matthew 26:17 says “first” and not “before” in this instance is evidenced by the fact that later on in the chapter, Messiah was telling his disciples to go and “prepare the Passover” and that he was going to “eat the Passover” with them!

If this was BEFORE Passover, how then could he eat the Passover before Passover? This makes no sense!

The entire context of chapter 26 of Matthew tells us that this was “the first” of the days of unleavened bread which included the day of preparation called “Passover.” Now even if the word “protos is indeed being translated as “before,” unleavened bread in Mark 26:17, it does not change a thing! As a matter of fact it helps our case even more, for the fact still remains that this was the beginning of the fourteenth of Abib (just as the thirteenth of Abib had ended) and the disciples had just asked our Mashiyach (Messiah) Yahuw-shuwa this question (if I may paraphrase): “Where do you want us to go and prepare the Passover for you so that you may eat it?” Now this was the perfect opportunity for him to reply back to his disciples with a response that goes something like this:

“Hey guys, sorry, but I won’t be able to keep the Passover with you tomorrow night because I am going to be hanging on a tree this time tomorrow.”

But no! He did not say this to them!

Instead, what did he say to them?

Luqas (Luke) 22:8 And he sent Keefa (Peter) and Yahuwchanon (John), saying, Go and prepare us the passover, that we may eat.

Do you see what he said? Was he lying? Why would he say to them “go and prepare US the Passover that WE may EAT?”

Was he playing games with them? Was he only pretending that he was going to eat the Passover with them and then at the last minute he was going to break the news to them and say this to them: “look guys I cannot eat the Passover with you this year?”

In the King James Version, italicized words denote that the words were not there originally. In Matthew 26:17, this was not the daytime, neither was it the 15th of Abib (the Feast of Unleavened Bread). This was the “first of the days of unleavened bread.” The Yisra’elites had a custom of calling all eight days (inclusive) between the 14th and the 21st of Abib “the days of unleavened bread” even though on the 15th of Abib commences “The Feast of Unleavened Bread.” But here in Matthew 26:17, this was the beginning of those “days” of unleavened bread. Even though the actual “feast” of unleavened bread does not begin until the 15th of Abib, there is actually a commandment in the Towrah to begin eating unleavened bread on the 14th of Abib:

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:18 In the first [month], on the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at evening.

Okay, so we begin eating unleavened bread on the 14th day of the month of Abib! Even though the 15th of Abib is called “The FEAST of Unleavened Bread,” we begin eating unleavened bread between the two evenings on the 14th!

Why does the 15th commence the “Feast” of Unleavened Bread? It is because on the first night of the 14th of Abib, lamb is to be eaten with the unleavened bread, but there will be a total of “seven days” that we eat unleavened bread following that first night on the 14th!

Okay, so let’s count how many days we eat the unleavened bread:

Day # 1 the 14th
Day # 2 the 15th
Day # 3 the 16th
Day # 4 the 17th
Day # 5 the 18th
Day # 6 the 19th
Day # 7 the 20th
Day # 8 the 21st

So you see, we begin eating unleavened bread on the 14thof Abib, but we also have an additional “seven days” where we eat no leaven and we eat unleavened bread beginning on the 15th of Abib which is called “The Feast of Unleavened Bread.” By the 21st of Abib, at sundown, that is when we cease to eat unleavened bread.

Therefore, if our Messiah ate the unleavened bread on the first night of the fourteenth of Abib (just after the sun went down on the 13th of Abib), this means that he also ate the Passover Lamb with it! The night before he was crucified, began the fourteenth of Abib, and he was not violating Towrah as some people suppose. So long as he and his disciples killed the lamb “at evening” or in Hebrew beyn ha’ereb which means “between the two evenings,” they were still within the parameters of keeping the Passover according to Towrah. Some people seem to think that the lambs were only slaughtered on the evening of the 14th just before the date was about to change to the 15th of Abib. But beloved, there were thousands of people making pilgrimage at this time in 30 C.E. to have their lambs killed in the Temple. It would be absurd to think that thousands of lambs could be slaughtered within a just few hours between 12 noon & 3:00 p.m. 

Did Messiah & His Disciples Leave the House? 


Those who purport that Messiah did not eat the Passover Lamb the night before he died, will often use this passage in Exodus 12:22 to make the point that Yahuwshuwa and his disciples left the upper room that night to go to the Garden of Gethsemane to pray. So let us examine this passage to get some understanding of how this Towrah commandment applied back in 1st Century Jerusalem:  

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:22 And you shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning.

As you can see, the Yisraelites were commanded not to go out at the door of his house until morning. But why? It is because they were living in a heathen nation, where the covering of the blood of the lamb did not cover those who were not in covenant with YaHuWaH.

But in 1st Century Jerusalem, the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) and the surrounding cities were “in the house”or in other words, they were “in covenant,” so all of their homes were “under the blood” because they were all keeping Passover!

And so on the night when our Messiah ate the Passover with his disciples, who was the first one to “leave the house” or the covenant? Judas! He betrayed him, and so the death angel took him because of his disobedience! Yahuwdah (Judas) was a picture of the disobedient Egyptians who also perished because they were “not under the blood” or in other words “outside of the house.” When Yahuwdah (Judas) betrayed his Messsiah, he left the House of Judah where the blood covering was! 

Therefore, when Yahuwshuwa and his disciples went to pray in the Garden of Gethsemane, they were still “in the house” because they were under the blood covering of the House of Yahuwdah (Judah).

The next morning of the 14th of Abib (after Yisra’el ate the Passover) in Exodus 12,  Moses & Aaron went to negotiate their departure with Pharaoh. By that point, they were allowed to leave their homes. Likewise the next morning, Yahuwshuwa was summoned by Caiaphas  Herod and Pontius Pilate and then he and his disciples “left the house” when he was escorted “outside of Jerusalem” to the place of execution for all of those who had “left the covenant” the following day when they shouted “Crucify him!”

Communion or Passover?

Those who argue that Messiah did not actually eat a Passover Meal with his disciples are making it appear that the Apostle Sha’uwl (Paul) was instituting a brand new ordinance of which the Roman Catholic Church has branded as “Holy Communion.” 

In the King James Version we read:

1st Corinthians 10:16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

But what does this word “communion” mean in Greek?

Strong’s #G2842 – koinōnia: fellowship, association, community, communion, joint participation, intercourse. 

As you can see, the word communion” is not some type of ordinance or ritual, for it simply means to have fellowshipwith Messiah. And this is what we should experience when we keep Passover. We can therefore, read this verse as follows:

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 10:16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the fellowship of the blood of Mashiyach? The bread which we break, is it not the fellowship of the body of Mashiyach?

But how can we be certain that Sha’uwl (Paul) is talking about Passover in this verse? We can easily tell, because he is using the term “cup of blessing” which is the third out of four cups used in a traditional Jewish Passover Meal!

If this was a brand new ordinance called “communion”why then does Paul use Passover terminology?

We know that what is referred to as “The Lord’s Supper” in 1st Corinthians 11 is the very same thing as Passover, by the fact that Messiah said “as often as you do this, do this in remembrance of me.”

Also important to note, is that whenever you see the term “Lord” in the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) and the Greek translation is “Kurios,” it means that the original word should be YaHuWaH---not Lord! Therefore, the term “The Lord’s Supper” is actually “YaHuWaH’s Supper.” In Exodus 12:11, it is called “YaHuWaH’s Passover!”

But how often did they do this? They did this once per year on Passover----not every Sunday morning in church!

Was this a brand new ordinance that he was adding to the Towrah? And what about Deuteronomy 12:32 where we are commanded not to “add to nor diminish from” the commandments? Was Yahuwshuwa our Messiah “adding” something new to the Towrah? Of course he was not! 

Since the great Exodus in the days of Mosheh (Moses), the nation of Yisra’el had already been doing this as a “day of remembrance,” and that is why Yahuwshuwa said “as often as you do this, do this in remembrance of me.” It was because they were already doing this as an annual remembrance:

Shemoth Exodus 13:3 And Mosheh (Moses) said unto the people, Remember this day, in which you came out from Mitzrayim (Egypt), out of the house of bondage; for by strength of hand YHWH brought you out from this place: there shall no leavened bread be eaten.

So now we know what our Messiah was commanding us to do in remembrance of him!

Those who say that our Messiah did not eat the Passover, are therefore in agreement with the Roman Catholic Church by treating this as a separate ordinance called “Holy Communion” of which nothing was ever instituted in the Torwah to be kept forever! Therefore, when Paul was talking about “YaHuWaH’s Supper” (the Lord’s Supper), it was the very same thing as Passover! You will notice that Paul was rebuking the Corinthians because they were not properly discerning that their fellowship together should be based on the covenant that was first instituted at the original Passover in Exodus 12. Listen to what he says:

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:20 When you come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat YHWH’s supper.

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:23 For I have received of YHWH that which also I delivered unto you, that YHWH Yahuwshuwa the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:24 And when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

*Note: Now it should be obvious here that if our Messiah is using “bread” to symbolize his body, and leaven is a metaphor for sin, then why would he use leavened bread to symbolize his sinless body?! Those who say that he ate leavened bread the night before his sacrifice are therefore insinuating that he was not the sinless lamb!

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the Renewed Testament in my blood: this do you, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.

*Note: notice that it says that Messiah had supped with, which means  that he ate!

1st Qorintiym (Corinthians) 11:26 For as often as you eat this bread, and drink this cup, you do show YHWH’s death till he come.

To understand the difference between the biblical Passover Supper versus the Catholic Communion, see my blog entitled “What is the Catholic Mass?”

Terminology Confusion

One of the biggest reasons why people struggle to understand whether or not our Messiah actually “ate” the Passover meal is because of “terminology” confusion. In order to understand the terms that are used inter-changeably, we must understand that the Towrah commands that we not eat leaven for a total of eight days commencing on the 14th of Abib and ending on the 21st of Abib:

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:18 In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at evening.

Now the first thing you will notice is that we begin eating unleavened bread on the 14th of Abib “at evening” but as I mentioned earlier, the phrase literally means “between the two evenings” as seen in Exodus 12:6 where the phrase “in the evening” is literally translated “between the two evenings.” This means that we actually begin Passover on the first evening of the 14th just as the 13th of Abib has ended. So the commandment to eat unleavened bread for “seven days” means “in addition to” that first day when we are commanded to slaughter a lamb on the 14th.

These days begin with the 14th of Abib and end on the 21st of Abib (inclusive) for a total of eight days. Now, there are times when you will see the phrase “feast of unleavened bread” and this pertains specifically to the 15th of Abib and onward for the remaining seven days of the feast. You will also see times in the Briyth Chadashah (New Testament) where the phrase “days of unleavened bread” appears, and this is referring to the entire “eight days” between the 14th - 21st inclusive.

You will also see the phrase “feast of the passover” which is referring specifically to the remaining seven days of the “feast” of unleavened bread following “the day of preparation” (also called Passover). You see on the 14th of Abib (Passover) it is called “the day of preparation,” when we are instructed to clean out the leaven (yeast) from our homes. And so following the 14th of Abib (preparation day), begins the actual “Feast” of Passover aka Unleavened Bread for seven more days. But if we actually begin eating unleavened bread on the 14thof Abib, we have a total of eight days.

That first day on the 14th of Abib, is a preparation day. Sometimes all eight days are being spoken of inclusively and at other times only the seven days of the actual feast (following the preparation day) is being spoken of. Some people want to cancel out what the other three gospels say about our Messiah eating the Passover Lamb with only one verse from John 13:1. They rationalize that the other gospels contain mistakes and cannot be trusted. But they reason that the book of John is the only one that is correct. We can see from John 13:1, that the phrase “feast of the passover” is specifically referring to the “seven days” remaining of the “feast of unleavened bread” and this was still on the 14th of Abib (the preparation day) when our Messiah ate the supper with his disciples. 

By combining the information from all four gospels, we can ascertain that this supper was the Passover meal on the 14th of Abib prior to the actual “Feast” of Unleavened Bread (also called the Feast of Passover). Now there is something that I want to point out that totally debunks the theory that Matthew 26:17 is a mistrans-lation with the word “first.” As I already pointed out earlier, the word “protos” in Greek most often means “first” and rarely means “before.”

But now we have the book of John recording that this was “before” the Feast of Passover, and so we should look up the word to see if the word is “protos”which would add more weight to their false argument that Matthew 26:17 mistranslates the word “before” as “first.” 

But when we look up the word for “before” in John 13:1, we find out that it is not the word “protos!” The word for “before” is #4253 in the Greek Concordance which is the word “pro” rather than “protos.” This proves that there is a distinction between protos and pro! 

The word“protos” actually means “first” while “pro” means “before.” Those who want to disqualify Matthew 26:17 as being a mistranslation are now proven wrong. 

If Matthew 26:17 should say “before” instead of “first,” then the Greek word should be pro not protos! In John 13:1, (the verse below), this is not in conflict with the other gospels. This was “before” the Feast of Unleavened Bread (interchangeably called the Feast of Passover). This was on the fourteenth of Abib and it was before the actual feast and they had just finished eating the Passover Supper together:

Yahuwchanon (John) 13:1-2 Now before the feast of the passover, when Yahuwshuwa knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end. And supper being ended, the devil having now put into the heart of Yahuwdah (Judas) Iscariot, Shimone’s (Simon’s) son, to betray him.

What are we observing here from all four gospels? We are seeing that the terms feast of unleavened bread and feast of passover are used interchangeably to mean the seven additional days commencing on the fifteenth of Abib. But when we see the phrase “days of unleavened bread” this is inclusive of all eight days, to include the day of preparation which commences the fourteenth day of Abib.

Below is a link that explains why there were two nights of slaughtering lambs for Passover.

Two Passovers? http://www.cogwriter.com/passover_on_the_fourteenth_or_fifteenth.htm

The gospels appear to say that the Messiah ate a Passover meal with the twelve on the evening beginning Nisan 14, and John appears to say Jews were having their Passover meal one day later. There are different theories to explain this.

The Sadducees and Pharisees disagreed on the day of Passover. The Sadducees (the more conservative group) believed the Feasts of Passover and Unleavened Bread were separate feast days. They held Passover on the fourteenth as Elohiym decreed in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. Those of the majority opinion, including the Pharisees, held Passover on the fifteenth…Thousands of people would come to Jerusalem to have their lambs ritually slain in the Temple. If they only had one day in which to prepare for the Passover, it would have been extremely difficult to have slaughtered all the lambs brought in to be sacrificed. Therefore, they worked on two different time scales. The northern part of the country went with the old way of dating (starting from morning and going to the following morning). The southern part of the country followed the official dating method (from evening to evening). Thus, there were two times when lambs were being killed in the Temple for sacrifice----Sampson R & Pierce L. A Family Guide to the Biblical Holidays. Heart of Wisdom Publishing June 2001, p. 112.

As you can see from the above historical account, the lambs were slaughtered the evening before our Messiah was sacrificed on the tree, and they were slaughtered again the following evening! There were two evenings of slaughtering lambs!  

All Yisra’el began to “unleaven” their homes on the 14th of Abib called “the day of preparation.” And so any time within those 24 hours (beginning at the first sunset when the date changed from the 13th to the 14th of Abib) until the following night just before the date changed at sunset to the 15th of Abib, Yisra’el was able to kill the Passover any time during those 24 hours. So long as the lamb was slaughtered “at evening” or between the two evenings, they were still within the parameters of obeying the Towrah.

In Exodus 12:16 we read: “And you shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Yisra’el shall kill it in the evening.”

In Hebrew the word “it” is #996 beyn which means “between,” hence the scripture in Hebrew should say:

“And you shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Yisra’el shall kill between the evenings.”

According to Gesenius’ Lexicon the phrase should say: “between the two evenings.”

This means that there were actually two evenings in which they could slaughter lambs!

Two Evenings for Two Houses of Yisra’el

The Passover (Pesach) was purposely designed by our Creator YaHuWaH to be “between the two evenings.” In Shemoth (Exodus) 12:6, we read that the Passover Lamb is to be killed “in the evening” of the 14th of Abib. But in Hebrew, as I just illustrated, it says “beyn ha’ereb” which means “between the two evenings,” for the Two Houses of Yisra’el! You see, our Messiah ate the Passover on the 1st evening of the 14th of Abib with the House of Yahuwdah (Judah), for they had not left the covenant yet until the next day when they shouted “Crucify him! Let his blood be upon us!” That is why the disciple Yahuwdah (Judas) was present at the Passover with our Messiah. It is because he had not betrayed him yet. In 2nd Chronicles 29:21, the lambs and goats are sacrificed for the House of Judah, while the bullocks (heifers) are for the nations (the lost tribes of Ephrayim). 

On the following evening of the 14th of Abib, Messiah also became the Red Heifer for Ephrayim. In Hosea 10:11, Ephrayim is likened unto a “heifer.” The Red Heifer is the only sacrifice done outside of Jerusalem’s city walls (Numbers 19). He had to go outside of the camp for Ephrayim to cleanse the altar. The Red Heifer sanctified the altar so that the next evening when they killed the second batch of lambs, the altar would be cleansed! You see, the House of Judah had betrayed their Messiah by the second evening, therefore, their Temple sacrifice would have been invalid unless he had also become the Red Heifer outside of the camp! That is why two evenings were needed for killing lambs for two flocks (Ephrayim & Judah). Messiah told us that he had two flocks:

Yahuwchanon (John) 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

In Genesis 41:52, Joseph’s youngest son Ephrayim was born to him in Egypt. He was told by his grandfather Ya’aqob (Jacob) that he would become a “multitude of nations” (Gentiles) in Genesis 48:19. When these Ephrayimites (Gentiles) accept the blood covenant of YaHuWaH, they are then grafted into the same olive tree with Yisra’el, and they are no longer called “Gentiles.” Ya’aqob-Yisra’el renamed his grandsons (Ephrayim & Manasseh) when he said “let my name be named upon them” (Genesis 48:16). 

Likewise, when Yisra’el left Egypt that night, many Egyptians left with them and they became “as one born among” the Yisra’elites! It now becomes obvious why there are two nights for slaughtering lambs for Passover. The first night was for the “firstborn” of Yisra’el (Judah) and the second night is for the “firstborn” of the Egyptians symbolizing Ephrayim! You see, at the first Passover, two different sacrifices took place. The lambs were killed for Judah and then the firstborn of the Egyptians were killed for those Egyptians (Ephrayimites) who would join Yisrael! 

This is also evident in the fact that the first Hebrew month called Abib is marked by the constellation of the Ram. Abraham offered up his firstborn son Yitzchaq (Isaac), and then a Ram was seen with his horns caught in the thickets (Genesis 22:13). The Ramsymbolizes the firstborn sons of Judah. But in the second month, King Hezekiah instituted a “second Passover” for the lost tribes of Ephrayim & Manasseh as he invited them to return to the covenant (2nd Chronicles 30). The constellation that is seen in the 2nd Hebrew month is the Bull for Ephrayim! 

*Note: we are commanded not to use the constellations for fortune-telling and divination according to Deuteronomy 18:10-11. The constellations are to be used only for determining the times and the seasons according to Genesis 1:14-16. 


Messiah became both sacrifices! He was the Lamb on the first evening of Passover and then he was the Red Heifer on the second evening of Passover within the same 24-hour period of the 14th of Abib! Another clue is seen in 2nd Chronicles 29:17 where we find out that the priests came to cleanse the Temple in Jerusalem to make the sanctuary fit for Passover. But they began on the 1st of Abib to cleanse the Temple and they were not finished until the 16th of Abib. Why were they not ready to do Passover on the 14th of Abib? Because the 14th& 15th of Abib is for the cleansing of Ephrayim & Judah! That is why they had to wait until the 2nd month and do Passover on the 14th day of the 2nd Month!

In the year that our Messiah was sacrificed for us on the tree, thousands of people were making pilgrimage that year to Jerusalem. It would have been impossible to slaughter all of those lambs in just one evening. That is why there were two different evenings for slaughtering lambs on the 14th of Abib.

To see my study of when a “day” actually begins (not a calendar date), see my other article entitled “The Sabbath Resurrection: I Will Raise Him Up at the Last Day.”

And when is evening? Evening is a Hebrew word called “ereb” and it can mean anytime from noon until sunset. When did Messiah die on the tree? It was at 3:00 p.m. (the 9th hour of the day) and so this was “evening” according to the Towrah command to kill the lamb at evening. When Messiah hung on the tree, what time did it become dark? It was between the hours of 12 noon and 3:00 p.m. that it grew dark indicating that this was “evening” in order to fulfill the Towrah commandment to kill the lamb in the evening:

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:8 And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roast with fire, and unleavened bread; and with bitter herbs they shall eat it.  

This means that anytime between those two evenings from sunset to sunset on the fourteenth of Abib, they could kill the lamb. You see, noon is called “post meridian” or p.m. because it is the last 6 hours of the 24-hour cycle.

Where & When Does Towrah Command That We Kill the Passover?

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 16:2 You shall therefore sacrifice the passover unto YHWH your Elohiym, of the flock and the herd, in the place which YHWH shall choose to place his name there.

Debariym (Deuteronomy) 16:6 But at the place which YHWH your Elohiym shall choose to place his name in, there you shall sacrifice the passover at eveningat the going down of the sun, at the season that you came forth out of Mitzrayim (Egypt).

And Where Has YaHuWaH Chosen To Place His Name?

1st Melekiym (Kings) 11:36 And unto his son will I give one tribe, that Dawiyd (David) my servant may have a light alway before me in Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), the city which I have chosen me to put my name there.

2nd Melekiym (Kings) 21:4 And he built altars in the house of YHWH, of which YHWH said, In Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) will I put my name.

2nd Melekiym (Kings) 21:7 And he set a graven image of the grove that he had made in the house, of which YHWH said to Dawiyd (David), and to Shelomo (Solomon) his son, In this house, and in Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), which I have chosen out of all tribes of Yisra’el, will I put my name for ever:

2nd Melekiym (Kings) 23:27 And YHWH said, I will remove Yahuwdah (Judah) also out of my sight, as I have removed Yisra’el, and will cast off this city Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.

2nd Dibre ha Yamiym (Chronicles) 6:6 But I have chosen Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), that my name might be there; and have chosen Dawiyd (David) to be over my people Yisra’el.

2nd Dibre ha Yamiym (Chronicles) 33:4 Also he built altars in the house of YHWH, whereof YHWH had said, In Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) shall my name be forever.

2nd Dibre ha Yamiym (Chronicles) 33:7 And he set a carved image, the idol which he had made, in the house of Elohiym, of which Elohiym had said to Dawiyd (David) and to Shelomo (Solomon) his son, In this house, and in Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), which I have chosen before all the tribes of Yisra’el, will I put my name for ever:

You see, in the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) and in Yerushalayim has YaHuWaH chosen to place his name forever! Even the name YaHuWDaH has the Father’s name in it with the letter“dalet” (equivalent to our letter d) added into it! The “dalet” is the 4th letter in the Hebrew Alphabet which means “the door” and Messiah is “the door” to the Father (John 10:7-9). He is the Lion of Yahuwdah (Revelation 5:5) and he is the door to the Father. And so in the cities of Judah and Jerusalem is where YaHuWaH has placed his name!

This means that the lamb could be slaughtered anywhere within the city of Yerushalayim. It did not have to be in the Temple! 

There is no denying that the gospels seem to depict two consecutive Passovers. However, our Messiah did not actually keep two different Passovers. Both times he was keeping one and the very same Passover. You see, in prophecy, you always have the “the type & shadow” seen in the TaNaKh (Old Testament), and then you have Messiah becoming “the anti-type” which means the fulfillment of the “type.” 

The Passover that he ate and the Passover that he became were actually one and the same because they both happened on the same day. The night before he died, he displayed the “type & shadow” of the Renewed Covenant. But then on the very same day (the fourteenth of Abib), he fulfilled the “type & shadow!” 

Those who claim that Yahuwshuwa and his disciples did not observe the Passover in the Last Supper not only deny scripture, but they implicitly make Yahuwshuwa a Towrah-breaker. Below we see the calendar year of when our Messiah died on the tree. What we see is that on the third day of the week (what we call Tuesday) at sundown, the calendar date changed from the 13th of Abib to the fourteenth of Abib (Nisan). Earlier that day, while it was still the thirteenth, the disciples prepared the guest chamber where they would later on that night kill, roast and eat the Passover. 

That evening, they killed and ate the Passover Lamb along with unleavened bread. The next day on the fourth day of the week (what we call Wednesday) it was still the fourteenth of the month, but the date changed to the fifteenth at sundown going into Thursday. On that Wednesday afternoon at 3:00 p.m. our Messiah was crucified and it was still on the fourteenth of the month. He fulfilled both “the type & the anti-type” of the very same Passover in one 24-hour period!

To see a chart that I put together detailing the events of the first Passover in Exodus and correlating it to Messiah’s fulfillment of Passover, click on this link: “Comparison Between First Passover & Messiah’s Passover.”  

This calendar illustration above shows what the year looked like when our Messiah was crucified. It was the year 30 C.E. according to the historic record of the Talmud as described in the “Forty Year Yowm Kippur Miracle.” But because of changes that Pope Gregory made in 1582 to the Julian calendar, the year 30 C.E. is today rendered as 31 C.E. To read more about the timing of when our Messiah died and resurrected, see my other article entitled “How Does Good Friday Discredit Our Messiah? Can You Count to Three?”  

Prophetic Parallels Between the Type & Anti-type Passovers

Now I want to address a timing issue that a lot of people have with the 14th of Abib/Nisan (which is when Passover begins) and the 15th of Abib which is when the Feast of Unleavened Bread begins. For some reason, people get these two days mixed up. They think that the lamb was to be killed “at the end” of the 14th of Abib, three hours before the date was about to change to the 15th of Abib.

In order to solve this timing issue, we have to look at the original night of Passover in the Exodus of Yisra’el. When we see what took place on the night when our Messiah “ate the Passover” with his disciples, and we compare that to the first Passover when Yisra’el ate the Passover before leaving Egypt, we can clearly see that the night our Messiah ate the Passover meal with his disciples parallels prophetically to the night that the angel “took the firstborn” of the Egyptians. The first thing you will note is that the lambs were to be kept up until” the 14th day of the month before being killed:

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:6 And you shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Yisra’el shall kill it in the evening.

As you can see from the King James Version of the Bible, we are commanded to kill the Passover Lamb on the 14th of Abib “in the evening.” As I illustrated earlier, the Hebrew translation says “beyn ha’ereb” which means “between the two evenings.” Hence, the commandment is actually telling us to kill the lamb “between the evenings” on the 14th day of the month. This means that either one of these “evenings” on the 14th of Abib was valid for killing the lamb.

*Note: they had to keep the Lamb UP UNTIL the 14th of the month. That means from the time that the calendar date changed from the 13th to the 14th of Abib at sundown is when Passover started. That is when they killed the lamb. This is when Messiah and his disciples also killed the lamb that they ate the night before he died.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:7 And they shall take of the blood, and strike it on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:8  And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roast with fire, and unleavened bread; and with bitter herbs they shall eat it.

*Note: this night of the 14th parallels to the same night when Yahuwshuwa said this:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

On the same anniversary date of when ancient Yisra’el had placed the blood on their doorposts, Yahuwshuwa illustrated that this “cup of salvation” (the 3rd cup) of the Passover Meal symbolizes the betrothal between the husband and the bride. Also, when Yisra’el struck the door posts with the blood, this parallels to when Yahuwshuwa foretold that the prophecy of Zechariah 13:7 was getting ready to come to pass that same night:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:31 Then said Yahuwshuwa unto them, All you shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.

And so the striking of the blood on the two doorposts was for the “Two Houses of Yisra’el” and this was the same night that death took the Egyptian’s firstborn. Also on this same night when Yahuwshuwa was about to be betrayed, a messenger of death was sent to take Yahuwshuwa (the firstborn from among the dead) and he also symbolized the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) who was the firstborn (the older son in the story of the prodigal). In other words, he was the shepherd that YaHuWaH himself would allow to be “smitten” for the sins of the firstborn sons (Judah)! And below, we can see where the gospel account matches the very same verbiage by the use of the word “smote:”

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:

67 Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,

68 Saying, Prophesy unto us, you Mashiyach (Messiah), Who is he that smote you?

Similarly, in Exodus 12:29, we read that the firstborn of the Egyptians were “smitten” as it says “And it came to pass, that at midnight YHWH smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the first-born of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.” 

The night that Yahuwshuwa prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, he sweat drops of blood (Luke 22:44). This parallels to when Yisra’el struck the doorposts with the blood. 

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 26:23 And he answered and said, He that dips his hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me.

When Yahuwdah (Judas) dipped his hand in the dish with Yahuwshuwa, to betray him, that was the same thing as Exodus 12:7 where it says “take the blood and strike it on the two sides of the posts.” This was for the “Two Houses of Yisra’el.” This is also more proof that Yahuwshuwa actually ate the Passover meal. For it he had not eaten it, why then did he dip his hand in the dish with Yahuwdah (Judas)? And furthermore, we can see by the scripture below, that our Messiah did actually “eat” the unleavened bread with them:

Yahuwchanon (John) 13:18 I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eats bread with me has lifted up his heel against me.

The Tribe of Yahuwdah (Judah) as a nation rejected the blood of the lamb and now the person named after this tribe, Yahuwdah (Judas) was going to betray him by “dipping” his hand in the dish as a symbol of “dipping” the hyssop into the blood and striking the door posts (Exodus 12:22). Yahuwdah (Judas) was symbolic of the firstborn (the Tribe of Judah) and he was going to betray the “firstborn” lamb (Messiah) so that he could be killed in their place as their scapegoat!

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:11 And thus shall you eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and you shall eat it in haste: it is YHWH’s Passover.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:12  For I will pass through the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt) this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt), both man and beast; and against all the gods of Mitzrayim (Egypt) I will execute judgment: I am YHWH.

*Note: When judgment from YaHuWaH came over Egypt and smote all the “firstborn” in the land, that parallels to the shepherd being smitten on that same anniversary night on the fourteenth of Abib (Passover). Yahuwdah (Judas) realized that he had betrayed innocent blood and so he hung himself. But before he hung himself he said these words:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:4 Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood.

The place where he hung himself is therefore called “the field of blood.”

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:8 Wherefore that field was called, The field of blood, unto this day.

Yahuwdah (Judas) represents the older son (the firstborn) in the story of the prodigal son which is the House of Yahuwdah (Judah). The firstborn of the Two Houses of Yisra’el was being judged that night because as a nation they killed their Messiah and the person named after this tribe (Yahuwdah or Judas) was being used to illustrate this judgment that was going to come to them forty years later in the Roman Siege. But Messiah also took “the cup of wrath” (the 2nd cup) for them as a nation to those from the House of Judah who would repent and later-on accept his sacrifice.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:13 And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where you are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt).

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and you shall keep it a feast to YHWH throughout your generations; you shall keep it a feast by an ordinance forever.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:15 Seven days shall you eat unleavened bread; even the first day you shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eats leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Yisra’el.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:16  And in the first day there shall be an holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be an holy convocation to you; no manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, that only may be done of you.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:17 And you shall observe the feast of unleavened bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your armies out of the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt): therefore shall you observe this day in your generations by an ordinance forever.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:18 In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at evening.

*Note: this all happened on the night of the 14th of Abib!!!

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:29  And it came to pass, that at midnight YHWH smote all the firstborn in the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt), from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:30  And Pharaoh rose up in the night, he, and all his servants, and all the Mitzrayites (Egyptians); and there was a great cry in Mitzrayim (Egypt); for there was not a house where there was not one dead.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:31 And he called for Mosheh (Moses) and Aharown (Aaron) by night, and said, Rise up, and get you forth from among my people, both you and the children of Yisra’el; and go, serve YHWH, as you have said.

*Note: When Pharaoh sent the firstborn sons (Yisra’el) out of Egypt that night, it was because YaHuWaH smote their firstborn in exchange for his firstborn son (Yisra’el), and that parallels to when Pontius Pilate said this:

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:17 Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will you that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Yahuwshuwa which is called Mashiyach (Messiah)?

And so Messiah represented “the firstborn” sons of Egypt who died in place of the “firstborn sons” of Yisra’el. The innocent children of the firstborn of Egypt had to die in order to release the firstborn of Yisra’el. Messiah was now the innocent lamb taking the place for the guilty. The word “scapegoat” means “the innocent party who takes the place of the guilty party.” The name Barabbas is actually Bar Abba which means “son of the Father” in Aramaic. He was now being released to symbolize that all of Yisra’el was being released from their debt of sin and Messiah was taking their place!

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:32 Also take your flocks and your herds, as you have said, and be gone; and bless me also.

Above we see in Exodus 12:32 Pharaoh commanding Mosheh & Aharown (Moses & Aaron) to take the people out of Egypt. This was after midnight on the 14th of Abib, but they did not actually depart from Egypt until the 15th of Abib:

Bemidbar (Numbers) 33:3 And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Yisra’el went out with an high hand in the sight of all the Egyptians.

On the night that our Messiah was arrested and brought before Caiaphas, Herod, and then Pilate, we can see this as a parallel of the night when Pharaoh sent for Moses & Aaron asking them to take the children of Yisra’el and leave Egypt. In this story, Pilate washed his hands of “innocent blood” as he recognized that Messiah was the innocent scapegoat for the House of Yahuwdah (Judah) for they were shouting “let his blood be upon us” (Matthew 27:25). Pharaoh also recognized that the blood of the innocent lambs had protected Yisra’el that night but the firstborn sons of Egypt were not protected by the blood of the lamb. Now Pilate was about to release the guilty party (Barabbas) who was symbolic of the nation of Yisra’el and he was about to execute the Messiah in his place. Likewise, Pharaoah was about to release the children of Yisra’el from Egypt recognizing that the blood of the innocent Egyptian children as well as the blood of the lambs saved the Yisra’elites.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:

24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see you to it.

25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

26 Then released he Bar Abba (Barabbas) unto them: and when he had scourged Yahuwshuwa , he delivered him to be crucified.

As we can see from the commandment in Exodus 12:10 below, the lamb was to be completely eaten until there was nothing left of him. Our Messiah was completely stripped of his clothes and beaten until there was nothing left of his visible image. Isaiah prophesied that “his visage (appearance) would be marred more than any man (Isaiah 52:14). After Mashiyach and his disciples ate the Passover Lamb, then he himself illustrated that he was to become that lamb that they had just eaten. By the morning of the fourteenth of Abib, he had been arrested and beaten to a pulp until he was barely recognizable. By that evening, after he was taken down from the cross, his body was completely emaciated and his spirit was gone from him. In other words, there was nothing remaining of him, for he was taken down from the cross and placed into a brand new tomb donated by Joseph of Arimathea (Matthew 27:60). This fulfilled the Towrah instructions of Numbers 19:9 where the ashes of the red heifer are to be gathered into a “clean place.

Shemoth (Exodus) 12:10  And you shall let nothing of it remain until the morning; and that which remains of it until the morning you shall burn with fire.

Mattithyahuw (Matthew) 27:

28 And they stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe.

29 And when they had platted a crown of thorns, they put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand: and they bowed the knee before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the Yahuwdiy (Jews)!

30 And they spit upon him, and took the reed, and smote him on the head.

31 And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him.

The Crucifixion, the Parting of the Temple Veil & the Parting of the Red Sea

The moment that our Messiah “gave up his spirit” to the Father (Luke 23:46), that is when the veil in the Temple was parted (torn in two) according to Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38 & Luke 23:45. This parallels to when the Red Sea had “parted” and as a result, Pharaoh and his armies were destroyed (Exodus 15:4). This was after a “three days journey” from the time that Yisra’el ate the Passover Lamb that they left Egypt on the 15th of Abib (Exodus 8:27). 

This also parallels to “three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” from the time that our Messiah’s spirit “departed” from this world to go into the “lowest parts of the earth” to redeem those who were in “Abrahams Bosom” (Matthew 12:40; Luke 16:22; Ephesians 4:9). Messiah was also buried after his sacrifice on the tree just before the 15th of Abib.

The Egyptians also buried their firstborn on the 15th of Abib (Numbers 33:4). Messiah’s burial as the firstborn son and the burial of the Egyptian’s firstborn both symbolize that the leaven of sin was destroyed and buried! 

Our Messiah’s crucifixion as the Passover Lamb perfectly parallels to the Egyptians being destroyed in the Red Sea. He also ate the Passover Lamb with unleavened bread with his disciples on the same anniversary night that Yisra’el first ate their Passover Lamb with unleavened bread. Pharaoh arose in the middle of the night on that very first Passover when the firstborn of the Egyptians were taken by the death angel, and that is when he called for Moses to depart  in haste taking the entire nation with him, and this was still on the 14thof Abib. This was at the very same time on the future Passover that Yahuwshuwa was arrested and brought to trial. The next morning he also “departed” from Jerusalem to the place of execution, in the same way that ancient Yisra’el “departed” from Egypt the next morning (Exodus 12:29-51). As you can see by the illustration above, he was nailed on “two trees” for the Two Houses of Yisra’el, which also correlates to the “two side-posts” of the door that Yisra’el was told to strike with the blood. The upper post on the door that Yisra’el was also told to strike with blood symbolizes Messiah who is the “head” of the body or the bride. Above the cross where he was nailed, the “header” read “King of the Yahuwdiy“ (Jews). 

What is also very interesting is that the Ancient Paleo Hebrew letter “Taw” looks exactly like a cross, while the Modern Hebrew letter “Taw” looks exactly like a door frame! 

To understand why our Messiah had to be nailed to two trees (forming a cross) and not merely a stake or a pole, see my other article entitled: “The Alef & Taw: the Red Heifer & the Two Sticks.”

In order for a covenant to be valid, it has to contain three elements: The Spirit, the Water & the Blood.

1st Yahuwchanon (John) 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

When Yisra’el left Egypt on the 14th of Abib (the morning after they ate the Passover), they were led by a pillar of fire by night and a cloud by day, symbolic of the Holy Spirit (Exodus 13:21-22; 14:19 & 24). Our Messiah was in the heart of the earth “three days and three nights” (Matthew 12:40) before he resurrected on First Fruits on the 17th of Abib. This parallels to Yisra’el traveling for “three days” (Numbers 33:3-8) until they arrived at the Red Sea. The Red Sea is a picture of “victory over death” just as our Messiah “swallowed up death in victory” (1st Corinthians 15:54-55), when he rose again on First Fruits!

When they came to the Red Sea, that represented water immer-sion (baptism). Yisra’el “crossed over” from death to life, from bondage to freedom but the Egyptians were destroyed in the Red Sea. That is what happened when our Messiah was nailed to the tree! Our Messiah destroyed the power of sin on the tree in the same way that YaHuWaH destroyed the Egyptians in the Red Sea! The Holy Spirit guided them in the form of the cloud and pillar of fire and then the blood of the Egyptians paid for their freedom when they drowned in the water. There were three elements present at this event: Spirit, Water & Blood!

After our Messiah died, he gave up his “spirit” and then the Roman Solider put a spear into his side and out came blood and water (John 19:34). There were three elements present at this event: Spirit, Water, & Blood! 

When our Messiah gave up his spirit and died on the tree, at that precise moment the veil in the Temple parted just like the Red Sea was parted! The Temple veil that separated mankind from the Holy of Holies was torn in half (Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:35, Luke 23:45). This granted the royal priesthood after the order of Melchizedek access to the Father in Heaven so that we can come “boldly before the throne of grace” (Hebrews 4:6).

Now there is something interesting that I want to share about the term “Red Sea” in Hebrew. The word for “Red” is seen in the Hebrew Concordance as follows:

#5486. cuwph: soof a primitive root; to snatch away, i.e. terminateconsumehave an end, perish, be utterly.

#5487. cuwph: soof (Aramaic) corresponding to 5486; to come to an end:-- consumefulfill.

#5490. cowph sofe from 5486; a termination:--conclusionend, hinder participle.

#5489. Cuwph soof for 5488 (by ellipsis of 3220); the Reed (Sea):--Red Sea.

Now, let’s take a look at the word for “Sea” in Hebrew:

#3220 yam yawm from an unused root meaning to roara sea (as breaking in noisy surf) or large body of water; specifically (with the article), the Mediterranean Sea; sometimes a large river, or an artificial basin; locally, the west, or (rarely) the south:--sea.

What we see here is that the Red Sea is symbolic of the sacrifice of Messiah. It contains two of the elements of covenant (blood and water). The word for “Red” in Hebrew is literally “Reeds” and it means to terminate, to consume, to fulfill, to bring to an end! It also means “to snatch away” and this correlates to when our Messiah comes to snatch away his bride at his second coming. It is also not a coincidence that the English translators used the word “Red Sea” for “Sea of Reeds” because red is the color of blood. Interestingly in Matthew 27:29-30 it says that the Roman Soldiers used a“Reed”to beat our Messiah with!

Mashiyach brought an end to sin for all of mankind on the same anniversary date of when YaHuWaH brought an end to Egyptian bondage and slavery for the Yisra’elites. And when did this take place? It all took place during those “three days” between the 14th of Abib (Passover) and the evening of the 17th of Abib, (which then became the 18th of Abib) which was the “First Fruits” Resurrection!

The Official Engagement

In the story of the prodigal son in Luke 15, when the son returned home, he repen-ted for his sins and he was given blood atonement with a “fatted calf.” Why not a lamb? It is because the Lamb symbolizes the House of Judah (the firstborn son) and the Red Heifer symbolizes the House of Ephraiym (the younger son). You see, our Messiah ate the Passover Lamb on the first evening of Passover, (with Judah), but on the next evening of Passover he was also the Red Heifer to cleanse Ephrayim! The Red Heifer is the only sacrifice that is done outside of the city of Jerusalem (see Numbers 19). When the younger son in the story of the prodigal received blood atonement for his sins, he received a ring on his finger and a garment. This is symbolic of the engagement ring and the wedding garment!

Beloved, what this means is that our Messiah had to eat the Passover Meal the night before he died in order to become engaged to his future bride! In an ancient Hebrew Wedding custom, the couple seal their engage-ment over a meal and a cup of wine. The groom then goes away until the future wedding day so that he may build a house for his bride on his father’s estate. He then says to his betrothed:

“In my Father’s house are many mansions ....I go to prepare a place for you...I will come again and receive you to myself; that where I am there you may be also” (John 14:2-3).

To the nation of Yisra’el, his backsliding, whoring wife whom he divorced in Jeremiah 3:8, he promised to bring her back to himself in a betrothal (an engagement). Listen to what he says: Hoshea 2:19-20:

“And I will betroth you unto me forever; yes, I will betroth you unto me in righteousness, and in judgment, and in lovingkindnessand in mercies… I will even betroth you unto me in faithfulnessand you shall know YHWH.” 
You see, our Messiah had to typify both the Passover Lamb & the Red Heifer in order to bring both houses back together again! That is why he ate the Passover Lamb with the bread and the wine for the betrothal, and then he sealed the betro-thal the following evening when he was sacrificed as both the Passover Lamb and the Red Heifer. If Messiah did not eat the Passover, then he did not partake of an official engagement ceremony with his future bride! 

In an ancient Hebrew Wedding tradition, the bridegroom would take his bride into the chamber (called a chuppah in Hebrew) and they would consummate their marriage. The “friend of the bridegroom” would stand outside the door and listen for the voice of the bridegroom.” Once he heard the bridegroom consum-mate with his bride, then his joy would be complete. This was precisely the role of Yahuwchanon (John) the Immerser (Baptist) who is called “the friend of the bridegroom” (John 3:29). Now if the bride is found to not be a virgin, legally according to Towrah, the bridegroom could divorce her (Deuteronomy 24). But if he decided that he loved her any way, he would kill a lamb and then he would place the blood of that lamb on the bed sheet, and he would then bring it outside to the wedding guests to display the blood to the crowd. The guests would then think that the blood belonged to the bride. This is how the bridegroom covered the sins of his beloved bride Yisra’el who had played the harlot. Now he was cleansing her with the blood of the lamb and renewing his covenant with her!

I often hear people use the argument that our Messiah could not have eaten the Passover Lamb because they reason that he only “desired” to eat it but he was unable to eat it. They use Luke 22:15 out of context to try and suggest that he merely desired to eat it but was unable to do so. This makes it appear like a “failed attempt” on the part of Messiah, or a plan gone awry. But what I find incredulous is that these same people ignore what the rest of what the chapter says! It is extremely important to believe that our Messiah “ate” that Passover Meal with his disciples the night before he died, for if he had not, then none of us can be engaged to be married to him! Let’s read what he did now in context.

Luqas (Luke) 22:8 And he (Messiah) sent Keefa (Peter) and Yahuwchanon (John), saying, Go and prepare us the passover, that WE may eat.

*Note: Messiah sent Peter and John to prepare the Passover that “WE” may eat (including himself). Notice what he says next after Peter and John asked him “where do you want us to prepare the Passover?”

Luqas (Luke) 22:

9 And they said unto him, Where will you that we prepare?

10 And he (Messiah) said unto them, Behold, when you are entered into the city, there shall a man meet you, bearing a pitcher of water; follow him into the house where he enters in.

11 And you shall say unto the goodman of the house, The Master says unto you, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples?

12 And he shall show you a large upper room furnished: there make ready.

13 And they went, and found as he had said unto them: and they made ready the passover.

14 And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him.

15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer:

*Note: When Messiah said “I have desired to eat THIS Passover,” notice that he used the word “THIS” which indicates that THIS PASSOVER was already on the table in front of him and he was eating it! If he was not eating it he would have said: “I have desired to eat THE Passover.” He had desired to eat of this meal with them all along because he knew that it symbolized the engagement or betrothal with his bride, and now he was getting to eat it! If he had not eaten it, then none of us would be under the Renewed Covenant and none of us would be engaged to be married to him for the future “marriage supper of the lamb” according to Revelation 19:7!

Some people take the next verses to mean that because our Messiah said that this was the last time that he was having this Passover Meal with them until the Millennium, that he was not partaking of the meal with them at all. But let’s see what he says:

Luqas (Luke) 22:16 For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of Elohiym.

*Note: the word “ANYMORE” indicates that he will not eat “anymore” after this night the Passover with his disciples until he eats it again in the New Kingdom! What does this word mean in Greek?

#3765. ouketi ook-et’-ee, also (separately) ouk eti ook et’-ee from 3756 and 2089; not yet, no longer:--after that (not), (not) any more, henceforth (hereafter) not, no longer (more), not as yet (now), now no more (not), yet (not).

In the English Aramaic New Testament (AENT), it literally says “I will not eat from now on.”

This indicates that “from this day moving forward,” he would no longer eat of the Passover until he returns and he will then eat it again in his kingdom. Those who purport that he did not eat the Passover suggest that he was telling them that he was not eating the Passover at this time. But he was merely saying “after this, I will no longer eat the Passover with you until I return.”  The fact that Messiah implicitly says in John 13:18 that he was “eating the bread with Judas” is enough proof, that he was eating this Passover Meal of which he had earlier in the day asked them to prepare!

Luqas (Luke) 22:17 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:

Luqas (Luke) 22:18 For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of Elohiym shall come.

Luqas (Luke) 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.

In order to understand what he meant, we must take a look at the four cups that are used in a traditional Passover Meal and what they symbolize. In a traditional Messianic Passover Seder, the 4th cup is called “The Cup of Praise” (in Hebrew, Hallel).

Yahuwshuwa didn’t REJECT the cup in question. He SHARED “the cup after the meal” -- the 3rd cup, “The Cup of Salvation” -- and he revealed that which had been concealed previously: that it was symbolic of his blood sealing the future Renewed Covenant. In sharing it, he was showing that the Renewed Covenant is the actual marriage betrothal from Mount Horeb----not the one that they broke at Mount Sinai. The Covenant at Mount Sinai “genders to bondage” (Galatians 4:24) because the hearts of the people were still unrenewed. YaHuWaH had to divorce Yisra’el at Mount Sinai because of their harlotry with the golden calf, which is why Mosheh broke those first set of stone tablets. But when Mosheh came back down a second time with the 2nd set of tablets, that was a picture of the Renewed Marriage Covenant! And it was accompanied by the blood sacrifices in the Tabernacle at Mount Horeb not at Mount Sinai! 

The word “Sinai” means “Babylonian moon-god, because this is where Yisra’el violated the marriage covenant with the molten calf. But the word “Horeb” means “to kill and destroy!” Mount Sinai symbolizes their bondage to idolatry with the golden calf. But Mount Horeb symbolizes the sacrifice of Messiah on the tree! That is where sin was destroyed! That is the second covenant that genders to freedom (Galatians 4:26)!

In a Hebrew Wedding, the bride and groom share a glass of wine and that seals their covenant.

Yahuwshuwa didn’t drink the FOURTH cup -- The Cup of Praise -- saying he wouldn’t drink of this wine until his Kingdom is established on earth.

During the course of the Seder, the four cups of wine that are served to the people present at the Seder are used in the following manner, and are described below. 

1.) The Cup of Sanctification (Luke 22:17; 1st Corinthians 10:16,1st Peter 1:2, 2nd Thessalonians 2:13). This cup is called the Cup of Sanctification, or the Kiddush. 

2.) The Cup of Wrath (Luke 22:42-44). This cup is not to be drank of, but is poured out on the table as the plagues of Egypt are recited. Yahuwshuwa drank of this cup for us in the Garden of Gethsemane and when he died on the tree (Revelation 14:10, 16:19).

3.) The Cup of Blessing (1st Corinthians 10:16) & The Cup of Salvation, (Psalms 116:13) or Redemption. This cup is filled to overflowing, symbolizing an overflowing salvation.

4.) The Cup of the Kingdom (Matthew 26:28-29, Mark 14:25, Luke 22:18).

Yahuwshuwa ha’Mashiyach spoke of eating and drinking in the Messianic Kingdom with his disciples because this is the final cup that the bride and the groom on their wedding day! That is the only cup that he did not drink of, because it is reserved for the wedding day!

Historical Evidence of the First Century Followers of Messiah Regarding Passover

At this website, exhaustive historical evidence can be found in the writings of what some call “the early Church fathers…”


When did the first century followers of Messiah observe Passover?

In the days of the first and second centuries, the followers of Messiah recorded the following account:

Samuel Bacchiocchi, in his scholarly book From Sabbath to Sunday, A Historical Investigation of the Rise of Sunday Observance in Early Christianity, wrote: 

“Moreover we know from the Quartodeciman’s sources (i.e. those who kept Passover on Nisan 14 ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH RECKONING), which apparently represent a DIRECT CONTINUATION OF THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH, that the PASCHAL FEAST WAS INDEED OBSERVED BY CHRISTIANS….It’s celebration ... occurred ... as well stated by J. Jeremias, ‘at the SAME TIME AS THE JEWISH PASSOVER, that is, on the NIGHT OF THE 14TH OF NISAN. . .” (Page 161). 

Bacchiocchi writes, in plain language, later on in his monumental classic work: 

. . . Epiphanius (ca.  A.D. 315-403) suggests that UNTIL A.D. 135, Christians  EVERYWHERE observed Passover ON THE JEWISH DATEnamely, ON NISAN 14irrespective of the day of the week” (ibid.). 

When does the Panarion of Epiphanius actually state that the Passover was kept? Well, on the 14th:

The Quartodecimans contentiously keep Passover on the one day, once per year… They keep the Passover on whichever day the fourteenth of the month falls...Messiah had to be slain on the fourteenth of the month in accordance with the law (Epiphanius, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide). Section IV, Verses 1,3;1,6;2,6. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp. 23-25).

APOLLINARIS BISHOP OF HIERAPOLIS

Polycarp was martyred shortly after his visit to Rome in A.D. 156. The view that Messiah was crucified on the fifteenth of Abib was attacked and refuted by Claudius Apollinaris Bishop of Hierapolis A.D. 160-180. He was known by Polycarp and was influenced by Polycarp’s example and his teachings. Apollinaris was also a contemporary of Melito and Polycrates…..But it is interesting to note that even in Apollinaris’ time some falsely argued that the Passover should be on the 15th

Yet, Apollinaris stood for the observance on the 14th. Melito, Poly-crates, Polycarp, Apollinaris are considered to be Quartodecimans (one who held that the date of Passover must remain the 14th of Nisan).

Rome was the church that was against Quartodeciman practices. And in a letter rebutting Rome, Polycrates states that in his region, the Apostles John and Philip kept the Passover the same time he did as they and he would not deviate from the Bible.

The Catholic historian Eusebius tells of the problem of the date:

A QUESTION of no small importance arose at that time. For the parishes of all Asia, as from an older tradition, held that the fourteenth day of the moon, on which day the Jews were commanded to sacrifice the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Saviour’s passover...But it was not the custom of the churches in the rest of the world...But the bishops of Asia, led by Polycrates, decided to hold to the old custom handed down to them. He himself, in a letter which he addressed to Victor and the church of Rome, set forth in the following words the tradition which had come down to him (Eusebius. Church History. Book V, Chapters 23,25).

Notice that Eusebius states that it was those led by Polycrates who held that they needed to heed an older tradition (than the Roman one), one that observed Messiah’s Passover on the fourteenth!

This matter, which began when Polycarp first tried to get Rome to switch from a Sunday Passover to the biblical Passover on the 14th is known as the “Quartodeciman Controversy.” Notice that the Apostles and their successors in Asia Minor all kept the same original date--which according to Eusebius was the fourteenth.

The 14th is also when people put out the leaven, and that the Jews still do according to their writings:  “On the evening of the fourteenth we check for leaven by the light of a candle” (Pesachim 1:1). Hence, Polycrates’ exact day, according to his own words and Jewish practices would have been the evening of the 14th!

If true Christians kept the Passover on the fifteenth, they would have been called Quintodecimans.” In-stead, all the arguments about it refer to them as “Quartodecimans.” Plus, Eusebius would have stated that they observed the 15th instead of the 14th. Instead he clearly wrote that those holding Quartodeciman practices observed Passover on the 14th, as did Polycrates and Apollinaris….Furthermore, though he held heretical views, Clement of Alexandria in the mid-second century at least understood that Messiahs’ Passover commenced right after the 13th day of Abib at sunset and the start of the 14th

Calendar Discrepancies

In conclusion, this controversial issue of whether or not our Messiah actually ate the Passover is easily solved by under-standing the importance of the Hebrew calendar for the festivals and the authority of the Sanhedrin in those days. The Sadducees and the Pharisees were the two main sects of Judaism in those days and neither of them could ever agree on what dates to keep these feasts. We see the same controversies going on today. We have those who sight the new crescent moon and follow that rendering of time-keeping. And we have those who follow the dark moon or the “conjunction moon.” And so there was a need often-times to celebrate these feasts twice to accommodate various situations.

During the time of Mashiyach (Messiah) in the year 30 C.E., the Hebrew calendar was determined by calculations of the sun, the moon and the stars (Genesis 1:14-16). Observations of a new crescent moon were by at least two eyewitnesses (marking the beginning of the month). The testimony of at least two witnesses always took priority over calculations. After the witnesses were cross-examined by the court and found sound, the court would send out messengers and light fires on mountaintops to inform the people that a new month had begun.

The Sanhedrin’s authority included postponing the beginning of Abib/Nisan (adding an extra month, Adar II) and thus postponing Passover if the barley was not yet ripe, the winter rains had not stopped (causing impassible roads and bridges thus inhibiting all to come to Jerusalem to keep the Passover), inadequate lambs available, or any other reason that would make it difficult to keep the Passover.

Sometimes the testimony of the witnesses was uncertain. If the calculations and observations were close but not off by more than one day, the court would be on the safe side and declare two consecutive new moons and thus a second day for celebrating the Feasts of YaHuWaH. 

Sometimes, due to bad weather, the messengers and signals would not reach all the Yisra’elites, especially outside of Jerusalem. Thus the Sanhedrin, to avoid confusion and uncertainty, would institute a second day for celebrating the festivals.

In the year of our Messiah’s crucifixion, we see Elohiym’s wise providential hand working. More than likely, one of these two above scenarios took place causing the Sanhedrin to declare two consecutive days to celeb-rate the Passover (at the very least we can be sure that for some reason the Sanhedrin did declare two days to kill the Passover). Hence, Mashiyach and the disciples could keep the Passover, instituting Passover’s Supper and on the very same calendar date (the fourteenth of Abib) he also became the Passover the next evening at 3:00 p.m.

YaHuWaH purposely designed Passover to be celebrated beyn ha’ereb which means “between the two evenings” so that our Messiah could actually do both, which is to “eat the Passover” on the first evening of the fourteenth and then he could also “become the Passover” at the last evening of the fourteenth of Abib, thus redeeming both Judah & Ephrayim!



*Download ebook below. A suggested minimum donation for this ebook is $7.00. Make payment at the following link: http://www.paypal.com
Use the following email address to make the payment: 


Then download the ebook:

http://doubleportioninheritance.com/files/Messiah_Ate_the_ Passover_the_Night_ Before_He_Died.pdf




*Download the Renewed Covenant Passover Haggadah below in ebook form. A suggested minimum donation for this ebook is $7.00. Make payment at the following link: http://www.paypal.com

Use the following email address to make the payment: 


Then download the ebook:

Viewing all 108 articles
Browse latest View live